Loading…
Is the Accuracy of Prior Preterm Birth History Biased by Delivery Characteristics?
To assess the sensitivity of birth certificates to preterm birth history and determine whether omissions are randomly or systemically biased. Subjects who experienced a preterm birth followed by a subsequent pregnancy were identified in a regional database. The variable “previous preterm birth” was...
Saved in:
Published in: | Maternal and child health journal 2012-08, Vol.16 (6), p.1241-1246 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c639t-5ec2218d37dedfd49b1b1dc68456a68bbf11e0955784bfce0745eaaa2724610a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c639t-5ec2218d37dedfd49b1b1dc68456a68bbf11e0955784bfce0745eaaa2724610a3 |
container_end_page | 1246 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1241 |
container_title | Maternal and child health journal |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Hackney, David N. Durie, Danielle E. Dozier, Ann M. Suter, Barbara J. Glantz, J. Christopher |
description | To assess the sensitivity of birth certificates to preterm birth history and determine whether omissions are randomly or systemically biased. Subjects who experienced a preterm birth followed by a subsequent pregnancy were identified in a regional database. The variable “previous preterm birth” was abstracted from birth certificates of the subsequent pregnancy. Clinical characteristics were compared between subjects who were correctly versus incorrectly coded. 713 subjects were identified, of whom 65.5% were correctly coded in their subsequent pregnancy. Compared to correctly coded patients, patients who were not correctly identified tended to have late and non-recurrent preterm births or deliveries that were secondary to maternal or fetal indications. A recurrence of preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy was also associated with correct coding. The overall sensitivity of birth certificates to preterm birth history is suboptimal. Omissions are not random, and are associated with obstetrical characteristics from both the current and prior deliveries. As a consequence, resulting associations may be flawed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10995-011-0882-x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5062744</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A349721531</galeid><sourcerecordid>A349721531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c639t-5ec2218d37dedfd49b1b1dc68456a68bbf11e0955784bfce0745eaaa2724610a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-AG9kQBBvpuZkJl83yrp-tFBQRK9DJnNmJ2Vm0iYzpfvvzbq17soKEsjn874kJ2-WPQdyCoSINxGIUqwgAAWRkha3D7JjYKIsOKfyYZoTRQshBTvKnsR4SUhSkepxdkRBVRKUPM6-ncd86jBfWDsHY9e5b_OvwfmQepwwDPl7F6YuP3Nx8mGdViZik9fr_AP27gbT1rIzSZnYhDgb3z3NHrWmj_jsbjzJfnz6-H15Vlx8-Xy-XFwUlpdqKhhaSkE2pWiwaZtK1VBDY7msGDdc1nULgEQxJmRVtxaJqBgaY6igFQdiypPs7db3aq4HbCyOUzC9vgpuMGGtvXF6_2R0nV75G80Ip6KqksHrO4Pgr2eMkx5ctNj3ZkQ_Rw2klEwREOV_oJRzqaSAhL78C730cxhTJX5RAoSg5R9qZXrUbmx9uqLdmOpFWSlBgZUbr-IAtcIR03v8iK1L23v86QE-tQYHZw8KXu0IOjT91EXfz5PzY9wHYQva4GMM2N7XGYjehFFvw6hTGPUmjPo2aV7sftC94nf6EkC3QExH4wrDbqn-5foTcGrnWQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1026717723</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is the Accuracy of Prior Preterm Birth History Biased by Delivery Characteristics?</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Hackney, David N. ; Durie, Danielle E. ; Dozier, Ann M. ; Suter, Barbara J. ; Glantz, J. Christopher</creator><creatorcontrib>Hackney, David N. ; Durie, Danielle E. ; Dozier, Ann M. ; Suter, Barbara J. ; Glantz, J. Christopher</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the sensitivity of birth certificates to preterm birth history and determine whether omissions are randomly or systemically biased. Subjects who experienced a preterm birth followed by a subsequent pregnancy were identified in a regional database. The variable “previous preterm birth” was abstracted from birth certificates of the subsequent pregnancy. Clinical characteristics were compared between subjects who were correctly versus incorrectly coded. 713 subjects were identified, of whom 65.5% were correctly coded in their subsequent pregnancy. Compared to correctly coded patients, patients who were not correctly identified tended to have late and non-recurrent preterm births or deliveries that were secondary to maternal or fetal indications. A recurrence of preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy was also associated with correct coding. The overall sensitivity of birth certificates to preterm birth history is suboptimal. Omissions are not random, and are associated with obstetrical characteristics from both the current and prior deliveries. As a consequence, resulting associations may be flawed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-7875</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6628</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10995-011-0882-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21948198</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Adult ; Bias ; Birth Certificates ; Childrens health ; Delivery, Obstetric - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Gestational Age ; Gynecology ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infants (Premature) ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Maternal and Child Health ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; New York - epidemiology ; Pediatrics ; Population Economics ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology ; Premature birth ; Premature Birth - epidemiology ; Preventive medicine ; Public Health ; Recurrence ; Registries ; Reproducibility of Results ; Reproductive History ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Sociology ; Variables ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Maternal and child health journal, 2012-08, Vol.16 (6), p.1241-1246</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c639t-5ec2218d37dedfd49b1b1dc68456a68bbf11e0955784bfce0745eaaa2724610a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c639t-5ec2218d37dedfd49b1b1dc68456a68bbf11e0955784bfce0745eaaa2724610a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21948198$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hackney, David N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durie, Danielle E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dozier, Ann M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suter, Barbara J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glantz, J. Christopher</creatorcontrib><title>Is the Accuracy of Prior Preterm Birth History Biased by Delivery Characteristics?</title><title>Maternal and child health journal</title><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><description>To assess the sensitivity of birth certificates to preterm birth history and determine whether omissions are randomly or systemically biased. Subjects who experienced a preterm birth followed by a subsequent pregnancy were identified in a regional database. The variable “previous preterm birth” was abstracted from birth certificates of the subsequent pregnancy. Clinical characteristics were compared between subjects who were correctly versus incorrectly coded. 713 subjects were identified, of whom 65.5% were correctly coded in their subsequent pregnancy. Compared to correctly coded patients, patients who were not correctly identified tended to have late and non-recurrent preterm births or deliveries that were secondary to maternal or fetal indications. A recurrence of preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy was also associated with correct coding. The overall sensitivity of birth certificates to preterm birth history is suboptimal. Omissions are not random, and are associated with obstetrical characteristics from both the current and prior deliveries. As a consequence, resulting associations may be flawed.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Birth Certificates</subject><subject>Childrens health</subject><subject>Delivery, Obstetric - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infants (Premature)</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maternal and Child Health</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>New York - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Population Economics</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology</subject><subject>Premature birth</subject><subject>Premature Birth - epidemiology</subject><subject>Preventive medicine</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Reproductive History</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1092-7875</issn><issn>1573-6628</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-AG9kQBBvpuZkJl83yrp-tFBQRK9DJnNmJ2Vm0iYzpfvvzbq17soKEsjn874kJ2-WPQdyCoSINxGIUqwgAAWRkha3D7JjYKIsOKfyYZoTRQshBTvKnsR4SUhSkepxdkRBVRKUPM6-ncd86jBfWDsHY9e5b_OvwfmQepwwDPl7F6YuP3Nx8mGdViZik9fr_AP27gbT1rIzSZnYhDgb3z3NHrWmj_jsbjzJfnz6-H15Vlx8-Xy-XFwUlpdqKhhaSkE2pWiwaZtK1VBDY7msGDdc1nULgEQxJmRVtxaJqBgaY6igFQdiypPs7db3aq4HbCyOUzC9vgpuMGGtvXF6_2R0nV75G80Ip6KqksHrO4Pgr2eMkx5ctNj3ZkQ_Rw2klEwREOV_oJRzqaSAhL78C730cxhTJX5RAoSg5R9qZXrUbmx9uqLdmOpFWSlBgZUbr-IAtcIR03v8iK1L23v86QE-tQYHZw8KXu0IOjT91EXfz5PzY9wHYQva4GMM2N7XGYjehFFvw6hTGPUmjPo2aV7sftC94nf6EkC3QExH4wrDbqn-5foTcGrnWQ</recordid><startdate>20120801</startdate><enddate>20120801</enddate><creator>Hackney, David N.</creator><creator>Durie, Danielle E.</creator><creator>Dozier, Ann M.</creator><creator>Suter, Barbara J.</creator><creator>Glantz, J. Christopher</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120801</creationdate><title>Is the Accuracy of Prior Preterm Birth History Biased by Delivery Characteristics?</title><author>Hackney, David N. ; Durie, Danielle E. ; Dozier, Ann M. ; Suter, Barbara J. ; Glantz, J. Christopher</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c639t-5ec2218d37dedfd49b1b1dc68456a68bbf11e0955784bfce0745eaaa2724610a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Birth Certificates</topic><topic>Childrens health</topic><topic>Delivery, Obstetric - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infants (Premature)</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maternal and Child Health</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>New York - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Population Economics</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology</topic><topic>Premature birth</topic><topic>Premature Birth - epidemiology</topic><topic>Preventive medicine</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Reproductive History</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hackney, David N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durie, Danielle E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dozier, Ann M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suter, Barbara J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glantz, J. Christopher</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health & Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Maternal and child health journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hackney, David N.</au><au>Durie, Danielle E.</au><au>Dozier, Ann M.</au><au>Suter, Barbara J.</au><au>Glantz, J. Christopher</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is the Accuracy of Prior Preterm Birth History Biased by Delivery Characteristics?</atitle><jtitle>Maternal and child health journal</jtitle><stitle>Matern Child Health J</stitle><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><date>2012-08-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1241</spage><epage>1246</epage><pages>1241-1246</pages><issn>1092-7875</issn><eissn>1573-6628</eissn><abstract>To assess the sensitivity of birth certificates to preterm birth history and determine whether omissions are randomly or systemically biased. Subjects who experienced a preterm birth followed by a subsequent pregnancy were identified in a regional database. The variable “previous preterm birth” was abstracted from birth certificates of the subsequent pregnancy. Clinical characteristics were compared between subjects who were correctly versus incorrectly coded. 713 subjects were identified, of whom 65.5% were correctly coded in their subsequent pregnancy. Compared to correctly coded patients, patients who were not correctly identified tended to have late and non-recurrent preterm births or deliveries that were secondary to maternal or fetal indications. A recurrence of preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy was also associated with correct coding. The overall sensitivity of birth certificates to preterm birth history is suboptimal. Omissions are not random, and are associated with obstetrical characteristics from both the current and prior deliveries. As a consequence, resulting associations may be flawed.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>21948198</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10995-011-0882-x</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1092-7875 |
ispartof | Maternal and child health journal, 2012-08, Vol.16 (6), p.1241-1246 |
issn | 1092-7875 1573-6628 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5062744 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Accuracy Adult Bias Birth Certificates Childrens health Delivery, Obstetric - statistics & numerical data Female Gestational Age Gynecology Hospitals Humans Infant, Newborn Infants (Premature) Logistic Models Male Maternal and Child Health Medicine Medicine & Public Health New York - epidemiology Pediatrics Population Economics Pregnancy Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology Premature birth Premature Birth - epidemiology Preventive medicine Public Health Recurrence Registries Reproducibility of Results Reproductive History Socioeconomic Factors Sociology Variables Young Adult |
title | Is the Accuracy of Prior Preterm Birth History Biased by Delivery Characteristics? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T07%3A13%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20the%20Accuracy%20of%20Prior%20Preterm%20Birth%20History%20Biased%20by%20Delivery%20Characteristics?&rft.jtitle=Maternal%20and%20child%20health%20journal&rft.au=Hackney,%20David%20N.&rft.date=2012-08-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1241&rft.epage=1246&rft.pages=1241-1246&rft.issn=1092-7875&rft.eissn=1573-6628&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10995-011-0882-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA349721531%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c639t-5ec2218d37dedfd49b1b1dc68456a68bbf11e0955784bfce0745eaaa2724610a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1026717723&rft_id=info:pmid/21948198&rft_galeid=A349721531&rfr_iscdi=true |