Loading…

Is the Accuracy of Prior Preterm Birth History Biased by Delivery Characteristics?

To assess the sensitivity of birth certificates to preterm birth history and determine whether omissions are randomly or systemically biased. Subjects who experienced a preterm birth followed by a subsequent pregnancy were identified in a regional database. The variable “previous preterm birth” was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Maternal and child health journal 2012-08, Vol.16 (6), p.1241-1246
Main Authors: Hackney, David N., Durie, Danielle E., Dozier, Ann M., Suter, Barbara J., Glantz, J. Christopher
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c639t-5ec2218d37dedfd49b1b1dc68456a68bbf11e0955784bfce0745eaaa2724610a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c639t-5ec2218d37dedfd49b1b1dc68456a68bbf11e0955784bfce0745eaaa2724610a3
container_end_page 1246
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1241
container_title Maternal and child health journal
container_volume 16
creator Hackney, David N.
Durie, Danielle E.
Dozier, Ann M.
Suter, Barbara J.
Glantz, J. Christopher
description To assess the sensitivity of birth certificates to preterm birth history and determine whether omissions are randomly or systemically biased. Subjects who experienced a preterm birth followed by a subsequent pregnancy were identified in a regional database. The variable “previous preterm birth” was abstracted from birth certificates of the subsequent pregnancy. Clinical characteristics were compared between subjects who were correctly versus incorrectly coded. 713 subjects were identified, of whom 65.5% were correctly coded in their subsequent pregnancy. Compared to correctly coded patients, patients who were not correctly identified tended to have late and non-recurrent preterm births or deliveries that were secondary to maternal or fetal indications. A recurrence of preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy was also associated with correct coding. The overall sensitivity of birth certificates to preterm birth history is suboptimal. Omissions are not random, and are associated with obstetrical characteristics from both the current and prior deliveries. As a consequence, resulting associations may be flawed.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10995-011-0882-x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5062744</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A349721531</galeid><sourcerecordid>A349721531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c639t-5ec2218d37dedfd49b1b1dc68456a68bbf11e0955784bfce0745eaaa2724610a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-AG9kQBBvpuZkJl83yrp-tFBQRK9DJnNmJ2Vm0iYzpfvvzbq17soKEsjn874kJ2-WPQdyCoSINxGIUqwgAAWRkha3D7JjYKIsOKfyYZoTRQshBTvKnsR4SUhSkepxdkRBVRKUPM6-ncd86jBfWDsHY9e5b_OvwfmQepwwDPl7F6YuP3Nx8mGdViZik9fr_AP27gbT1rIzSZnYhDgb3z3NHrWmj_jsbjzJfnz6-H15Vlx8-Xy-XFwUlpdqKhhaSkE2pWiwaZtK1VBDY7msGDdc1nULgEQxJmRVtxaJqBgaY6igFQdiypPs7db3aq4HbCyOUzC9vgpuMGGtvXF6_2R0nV75G80Ip6KqksHrO4Pgr2eMkx5ctNj3ZkQ_Rw2klEwREOV_oJRzqaSAhL78C730cxhTJX5RAoSg5R9qZXrUbmx9uqLdmOpFWSlBgZUbr-IAtcIR03v8iK1L23v86QE-tQYHZw8KXu0IOjT91EXfz5PzY9wHYQva4GMM2N7XGYjehFFvw6hTGPUmjPo2aV7sftC94nf6EkC3QExH4wrDbqn-5foTcGrnWQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1026717723</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is the Accuracy of Prior Preterm Birth History Biased by Delivery Characteristics?</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Hackney, David N. ; Durie, Danielle E. ; Dozier, Ann M. ; Suter, Barbara J. ; Glantz, J. Christopher</creator><creatorcontrib>Hackney, David N. ; Durie, Danielle E. ; Dozier, Ann M. ; Suter, Barbara J. ; Glantz, J. Christopher</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the sensitivity of birth certificates to preterm birth history and determine whether omissions are randomly or systemically biased. Subjects who experienced a preterm birth followed by a subsequent pregnancy were identified in a regional database. The variable “previous preterm birth” was abstracted from birth certificates of the subsequent pregnancy. Clinical characteristics were compared between subjects who were correctly versus incorrectly coded. 713 subjects were identified, of whom 65.5% were correctly coded in their subsequent pregnancy. Compared to correctly coded patients, patients who were not correctly identified tended to have late and non-recurrent preterm births or deliveries that were secondary to maternal or fetal indications. A recurrence of preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy was also associated with correct coding. The overall sensitivity of birth certificates to preterm birth history is suboptimal. Omissions are not random, and are associated with obstetrical characteristics from both the current and prior deliveries. As a consequence, resulting associations may be flawed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-7875</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6628</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10995-011-0882-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21948198</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Adult ; Bias ; Birth Certificates ; Childrens health ; Delivery, Obstetric - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Gestational Age ; Gynecology ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infants (Premature) ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Maternal and Child Health ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; New York - epidemiology ; Pediatrics ; Population Economics ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology ; Premature birth ; Premature Birth - epidemiology ; Preventive medicine ; Public Health ; Recurrence ; Registries ; Reproducibility of Results ; Reproductive History ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Sociology ; Variables ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Maternal and child health journal, 2012-08, Vol.16 (6), p.1241-1246</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c639t-5ec2218d37dedfd49b1b1dc68456a68bbf11e0955784bfce0745eaaa2724610a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c639t-5ec2218d37dedfd49b1b1dc68456a68bbf11e0955784bfce0745eaaa2724610a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21948198$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hackney, David N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durie, Danielle E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dozier, Ann M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suter, Barbara J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glantz, J. Christopher</creatorcontrib><title>Is the Accuracy of Prior Preterm Birth History Biased by Delivery Characteristics?</title><title>Maternal and child health journal</title><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><description>To assess the sensitivity of birth certificates to preterm birth history and determine whether omissions are randomly or systemically biased. Subjects who experienced a preterm birth followed by a subsequent pregnancy were identified in a regional database. The variable “previous preterm birth” was abstracted from birth certificates of the subsequent pregnancy. Clinical characteristics were compared between subjects who were correctly versus incorrectly coded. 713 subjects were identified, of whom 65.5% were correctly coded in their subsequent pregnancy. Compared to correctly coded patients, patients who were not correctly identified tended to have late and non-recurrent preterm births or deliveries that were secondary to maternal or fetal indications. A recurrence of preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy was also associated with correct coding. The overall sensitivity of birth certificates to preterm birth history is suboptimal. Omissions are not random, and are associated with obstetrical characteristics from both the current and prior deliveries. As a consequence, resulting associations may be flawed.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Birth Certificates</subject><subject>Childrens health</subject><subject>Delivery, Obstetric - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infants (Premature)</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maternal and Child Health</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>New York - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Population Economics</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology</subject><subject>Premature birth</subject><subject>Premature Birth - epidemiology</subject><subject>Preventive medicine</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Reproductive History</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1092-7875</issn><issn>1573-6628</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-AG9kQBBvpuZkJl83yrp-tFBQRK9DJnNmJ2Vm0iYzpfvvzbq17soKEsjn874kJ2-WPQdyCoSINxGIUqwgAAWRkha3D7JjYKIsOKfyYZoTRQshBTvKnsR4SUhSkepxdkRBVRKUPM6-ncd86jBfWDsHY9e5b_OvwfmQepwwDPl7F6YuP3Nx8mGdViZik9fr_AP27gbT1rIzSZnYhDgb3z3NHrWmj_jsbjzJfnz6-H15Vlx8-Xy-XFwUlpdqKhhaSkE2pWiwaZtK1VBDY7msGDdc1nULgEQxJmRVtxaJqBgaY6igFQdiypPs7db3aq4HbCyOUzC9vgpuMGGtvXF6_2R0nV75G80Ip6KqksHrO4Pgr2eMkx5ctNj3ZkQ_Rw2klEwREOV_oJRzqaSAhL78C730cxhTJX5RAoSg5R9qZXrUbmx9uqLdmOpFWSlBgZUbr-IAtcIR03v8iK1L23v86QE-tQYHZw8KXu0IOjT91EXfz5PzY9wHYQva4GMM2N7XGYjehFFvw6hTGPUmjPo2aV7sftC94nf6EkC3QExH4wrDbqn-5foTcGrnWQ</recordid><startdate>20120801</startdate><enddate>20120801</enddate><creator>Hackney, David N.</creator><creator>Durie, Danielle E.</creator><creator>Dozier, Ann M.</creator><creator>Suter, Barbara J.</creator><creator>Glantz, J. Christopher</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120801</creationdate><title>Is the Accuracy of Prior Preterm Birth History Biased by Delivery Characteristics?</title><author>Hackney, David N. ; Durie, Danielle E. ; Dozier, Ann M. ; Suter, Barbara J. ; Glantz, J. Christopher</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c639t-5ec2218d37dedfd49b1b1dc68456a68bbf11e0955784bfce0745eaaa2724610a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Birth Certificates</topic><topic>Childrens health</topic><topic>Delivery, Obstetric - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infants (Premature)</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maternal and Child Health</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>New York - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Population Economics</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology</topic><topic>Premature birth</topic><topic>Premature Birth - epidemiology</topic><topic>Preventive medicine</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Reproductive History</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hackney, David N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durie, Danielle E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dozier, Ann M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suter, Barbara J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glantz, J. Christopher</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health &amp; Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Maternal and child health journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hackney, David N.</au><au>Durie, Danielle E.</au><au>Dozier, Ann M.</au><au>Suter, Barbara J.</au><au>Glantz, J. Christopher</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is the Accuracy of Prior Preterm Birth History Biased by Delivery Characteristics?</atitle><jtitle>Maternal and child health journal</jtitle><stitle>Matern Child Health J</stitle><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><date>2012-08-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1241</spage><epage>1246</epage><pages>1241-1246</pages><issn>1092-7875</issn><eissn>1573-6628</eissn><abstract>To assess the sensitivity of birth certificates to preterm birth history and determine whether omissions are randomly or systemically biased. Subjects who experienced a preterm birth followed by a subsequent pregnancy were identified in a regional database. The variable “previous preterm birth” was abstracted from birth certificates of the subsequent pregnancy. Clinical characteristics were compared between subjects who were correctly versus incorrectly coded. 713 subjects were identified, of whom 65.5% were correctly coded in their subsequent pregnancy. Compared to correctly coded patients, patients who were not correctly identified tended to have late and non-recurrent preterm births or deliveries that were secondary to maternal or fetal indications. A recurrence of preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy was also associated with correct coding. The overall sensitivity of birth certificates to preterm birth history is suboptimal. Omissions are not random, and are associated with obstetrical characteristics from both the current and prior deliveries. As a consequence, resulting associations may be flawed.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>21948198</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10995-011-0882-x</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1092-7875
ispartof Maternal and child health journal, 2012-08, Vol.16 (6), p.1241-1246
issn 1092-7875
1573-6628
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5062744
source Springer Nature
subjects Accuracy
Adult
Bias
Birth Certificates
Childrens health
Delivery, Obstetric - statistics & numerical data
Female
Gestational Age
Gynecology
Hospitals
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infants (Premature)
Logistic Models
Male
Maternal and Child Health
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
New York - epidemiology
Pediatrics
Population Economics
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology
Premature birth
Premature Birth - epidemiology
Preventive medicine
Public Health
Recurrence
Registries
Reproducibility of Results
Reproductive History
Socioeconomic Factors
Sociology
Variables
Young Adult
title Is the Accuracy of Prior Preterm Birth History Biased by Delivery Characteristics?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T07%3A13%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20the%20Accuracy%20of%20Prior%20Preterm%20Birth%20History%20Biased%20by%20Delivery%20Characteristics?&rft.jtitle=Maternal%20and%20child%20health%20journal&rft.au=Hackney,%20David%20N.&rft.date=2012-08-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1241&rft.epage=1246&rft.pages=1241-1246&rft.issn=1092-7875&rft.eissn=1573-6628&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10995-011-0882-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA349721531%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c639t-5ec2218d37dedfd49b1b1dc68456a68bbf11e0955784bfce0745eaaa2724610a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1026717723&rft_id=info:pmid/21948198&rft_galeid=A349721531&rfr_iscdi=true