Patients' and clinicians' views on the optimum schedules for self-monitoring of blood pressure: a qualitative focus group and interview study

• Published in: British journal of general practice 2016-11, Vol.66 (652), p.e819-e830
• Main Authors: Grant, Sabrina, Hodgkinson, James A, Milner, Siobhan L, Martin, Una, Tompson, Alice, Hobbs, Fd Richard, Mant, Jonathan, McManus, Richard J, Greenfield, Sheila M
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Antihypertensive Agents; Appointments and Schedules; Attitude of Health Personnel; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; England - epidemiology; Feasibility Studies; Female; Focus Groups; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Humans; Hypertension - diagnosis; Hypertension - epidemiology; Hypertension - prevention & control; Interviews as Topic; Male; Middle Aged; Primary Health Care - organization & administration; Qualitative Research; Secondary Care - organization & administration; Self Care
• ISSN: 0960-1643; 1478-5242
• DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X686149

Self-monitoring of blood pressure is common but guidance on how it should be carried out varies and it is currently unclear how such guidance is viewed. To explore patients' and healthcare professionals' (HCPs) views and experiences of the use of different self-monitoring regimens to determine what is acceptable and feasible, and to inform future recommendations. Thirteen focus groups and four HCP interviews were held, with a total of 66 participants (41 patients and 25 HCPs) from primary and secondary care with and without experience of self-monitoring. Standard and shortened self-monitoring protocols were both considered. Focus groups and interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using the constant comparative method. Patients generally supported structured schedules but with sufficient flexibility to allow adaptation to individual routine. They preferred a shorter (3-day) schedule to longer (7-day) regimens. Although HCPs could describe benefits for patients of using a schedule, they were reluctant to recommend a specific schedule. Concerns surrounded the use of different schedules for diagnosis and subsequent monitoring. Appropriate education was seen as vital by all participants to enable a self-monitoring schedule to be followed at home. There is not a 'one size fits all approach' to developing the optimum protocol from the perspective of users and those implementing it. An approach whereby patients are asked to complete the minimum number of readings required for accurate blood pressure estimation in a flexible manner seems most likely to succeed. Informative advice and guidance should incorporate such flexibility for patients and professionals alike.