Loading…

Structural Mechanics Predictions Relating to Clinical Coronary Stent Fracture in a 5 Year Period in FDA MAUDE Database

Endovascular stents are the mainstay of interventional cardiovascular medicine. Technological advances have reduced biological and clinical complications but not mechanical failure. Stent strut fracture is increasingly recognized as of paramount clinical importance. Though consensus reigns that frac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of biomedical engineering 2016-02, Vol.44 (2), p.391-403
Main Authors: Everett, Kay D., Conway, Claire, Desany, Gerard J., Baker, Brian L., Choi, Gilwoo, Taylor, Charles A., Edelman, Elazer R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-e336f59a029a91ed0915dad3d12f18fdc58054f52c4de262103cc6e8e0cc570b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-e336f59a029a91ed0915dad3d12f18fdc58054f52c4de262103cc6e8e0cc570b3
container_end_page 403
container_issue 2
container_start_page 391
container_title Annals of biomedical engineering
container_volume 44
creator Everett, Kay D.
Conway, Claire
Desany, Gerard J.
Baker, Brian L.
Choi, Gilwoo
Taylor, Charles A.
Edelman, Elazer R.
description Endovascular stents are the mainstay of interventional cardiovascular medicine. Technological advances have reduced biological and clinical complications but not mechanical failure. Stent strut fracture is increasingly recognized as of paramount clinical importance. Though consensus reigns that fractures can result from material fatigue, how fracture is induced and the mechanisms underlying its clinical sequelae remain ill-defined. In this study, strut fractures were identified in the prospectively maintained Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database (MAUDE), covering years 2006–2011, and differentiated based on specific coronary artery implantation site and device configuration. These data, and knowledge of the extent of dynamic arterial deformations obtained from patient CT images and published data, were used to define boundary conditions for 3D finite element models incorporating multimodal, multi-cycle deformation. The structural response for a range of stent designs and configurations was predicted by computational models and included estimation of maximum principal, minimum principal and equivalent plastic strains. Fatigue assessment was performed with Goodman diagrams and safe/unsafe regions defined for different stent designs. Von Mises stress and maximum principal strain increased with multimodal, fully reversed deformation. Spatial maps of unsafe locations corresponded to the identified locations of fracture in different coronary arteries in the clinical database. These findings, for the first time, provide insight into a potential link between patient adverse events and computational modeling of stent deformation. Understanding of the mechanical forces imposed under different implantation conditions may assist in rational design and optimal placement of these devices.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10439-015-1476-3
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5082979</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1768169509</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-e336f59a029a91ed0915dad3d12f18fdc58054f52c4de262103cc6e8e0cc570b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNktFqFDEUhoModl19AG8k4I03oyfJJDO5EZbdbi20WKy98CpkM5ltymxSk4zi2_gsPlkzbFuqIHoVyPnOf_5z-BF6SeAtAWjeJQI1kxUQXpG6ERV7hGaEN6ySohWP0QxAQiWkqA_Qs5SuAAhpGX-KDqioRcM5naHv5zmOJo9RD_jUmkvtnUn4LNrOmeyCT_iTHXR2fotzwMvBlXpBlyEGr-MPfJ6tz3gd9aRhsfNYY_7r5xerIz6z0YVu-luvFvh0cbE6xCud9UYn-xw96fWQ7Ivbd44u1oeflx-qk49Hx8vFSWUEiFxZxkTPpQYqtSS2A0l4pzvWEdqTtu8Mb4HXPaem7iwVlAAzRtjWgjG8gQ2bo_d73etxs7OdKW7Lquo6ul2xr4J26veKd5dqG74pDi2VjSwCb24FYvg62pTVziVjh0F7G8akSAvAAWjL_o02jRCCM1n_BypaIiSHycDrP9CrMEZfjjYJEpCUleFzRPaUiSGlaPv7FQmoKSxqHxZVwqKmsKjJ76uHt7nvuEtHAegeSKXktzY-GP1X1RtJ28nJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1771092328</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Structural Mechanics Predictions Relating to Clinical Coronary Stent Fracture in a 5 Year Period in FDA MAUDE Database</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Everett, Kay D. ; Conway, Claire ; Desany, Gerard J. ; Baker, Brian L. ; Choi, Gilwoo ; Taylor, Charles A. ; Edelman, Elazer R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Everett, Kay D. ; Conway, Claire ; Desany, Gerard J. ; Baker, Brian L. ; Choi, Gilwoo ; Taylor, Charles A. ; Edelman, Elazer R.</creatorcontrib><description>Endovascular stents are the mainstay of interventional cardiovascular medicine. Technological advances have reduced biological and clinical complications but not mechanical failure. Stent strut fracture is increasingly recognized as of paramount clinical importance. Though consensus reigns that fractures can result from material fatigue, how fracture is induced and the mechanisms underlying its clinical sequelae remain ill-defined. In this study, strut fractures were identified in the prospectively maintained Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database (MAUDE), covering years 2006–2011, and differentiated based on specific coronary artery implantation site and device configuration. These data, and knowledge of the extent of dynamic arterial deformations obtained from patient CT images and published data, were used to define boundary conditions for 3D finite element models incorporating multimodal, multi-cycle deformation. The structural response for a range of stent designs and configurations was predicted by computational models and included estimation of maximum principal, minimum principal and equivalent plastic strains. Fatigue assessment was performed with Goodman diagrams and safe/unsafe regions defined for different stent designs. Von Mises stress and maximum principal strain increased with multimodal, fully reversed deformation. Spatial maps of unsafe locations corresponded to the identified locations of fracture in different coronary arteries in the clinical database. These findings, for the first time, provide insight into a potential link between patient adverse events and computational modeling of stent deformation. Understanding of the mechanical forces imposed under different implantation conditions may assist in rational design and optimal placement of these devices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-6964</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-9686</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10439-015-1476-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26467552</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biochemistry ; Biological and Medical Physics ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering ; Biomedicine ; Biophysics ; Boundary conditions ; Classical Mechanics ; Coronary Vessels - pathology ; Coronary Vessels - physiopathology ; Coronary Vessels - surgery ; Databases, Factual ; Deformation ; Design engineering ; Devices ; Fatigue ; Female ; Fracture mechanics ; Humans ; Male ; Mathematical models ; Mechanical failure ; Medical devices ; Medical Stents: State of the Art and Future Directions ; Middle Aged ; Models, Cardiovascular ; Prosthesis Design ; Prosthesis Failure ; Retrospective Studies ; Stents ; Surgical implants ; United States ; United States Food and Drug Administration</subject><ispartof>Annals of biomedical engineering, 2016-02, Vol.44 (2), p.391-403</ispartof><rights>Biomedical Engineering Society 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-e336f59a029a91ed0915dad3d12f18fdc58054f52c4de262103cc6e8e0cc570b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-e336f59a029a91ed0915dad3d12f18fdc58054f52c4de262103cc6e8e0cc570b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26467552$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Everett, Kay D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conway, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desany, Gerard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Brian L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Gilwoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Charles A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edelman, Elazer R.</creatorcontrib><title>Structural Mechanics Predictions Relating to Clinical Coronary Stent Fracture in a 5 Year Period in FDA MAUDE Database</title><title>Annals of biomedical engineering</title><addtitle>Ann Biomed Eng</addtitle><addtitle>Ann Biomed Eng</addtitle><description>Endovascular stents are the mainstay of interventional cardiovascular medicine. Technological advances have reduced biological and clinical complications but not mechanical failure. Stent strut fracture is increasingly recognized as of paramount clinical importance. Though consensus reigns that fractures can result from material fatigue, how fracture is induced and the mechanisms underlying its clinical sequelae remain ill-defined. In this study, strut fractures were identified in the prospectively maintained Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database (MAUDE), covering years 2006–2011, and differentiated based on specific coronary artery implantation site and device configuration. These data, and knowledge of the extent of dynamic arterial deformations obtained from patient CT images and published data, were used to define boundary conditions for 3D finite element models incorporating multimodal, multi-cycle deformation. The structural response for a range of stent designs and configurations was predicted by computational models and included estimation of maximum principal, minimum principal and equivalent plastic strains. Fatigue assessment was performed with Goodman diagrams and safe/unsafe regions defined for different stent designs. Von Mises stress and maximum principal strain increased with multimodal, fully reversed deformation. Spatial maps of unsafe locations corresponded to the identified locations of fracture in different coronary arteries in the clinical database. These findings, for the first time, provide insight into a potential link between patient adverse events and computational modeling of stent deformation. Understanding of the mechanical forces imposed under different implantation conditions may assist in rational design and optimal placement of these devices.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biological and Medical Physics</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Biophysics</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Classical Mechanics</subject><subject>Coronary Vessels - pathology</subject><subject>Coronary Vessels - physiopathology</subject><subject>Coronary Vessels - surgery</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Devices</subject><subject>Fatigue</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fracture mechanics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mechanical failure</subject><subject>Medical devices</subject><subject>Medical Stents: State of the Art and Future Directions</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States Food and Drug Administration</subject><issn>0090-6964</issn><issn>1573-9686</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNktFqFDEUhoModl19AG8k4I03oyfJJDO5EZbdbi20WKy98CpkM5ltymxSk4zi2_gsPlkzbFuqIHoVyPnOf_5z-BF6SeAtAWjeJQI1kxUQXpG6ERV7hGaEN6ySohWP0QxAQiWkqA_Qs5SuAAhpGX-KDqioRcM5naHv5zmOJo9RD_jUmkvtnUn4LNrOmeyCT_iTHXR2fotzwMvBlXpBlyEGr-MPfJ6tz3gd9aRhsfNYY_7r5xerIz6z0YVu-luvFvh0cbE6xCud9UYn-xw96fWQ7Ivbd44u1oeflx-qk49Hx8vFSWUEiFxZxkTPpQYqtSS2A0l4pzvWEdqTtu8Mb4HXPaem7iwVlAAzRtjWgjG8gQ2bo_d73etxs7OdKW7Lquo6ul2xr4J26veKd5dqG74pDi2VjSwCb24FYvg62pTVziVjh0F7G8akSAvAAWjL_o02jRCCM1n_BypaIiSHycDrP9CrMEZfjjYJEpCUleFzRPaUiSGlaPv7FQmoKSxqHxZVwqKmsKjJ76uHt7nvuEtHAegeSKXktzY-GP1X1RtJ28nJ</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Everett, Kay D.</creator><creator>Conway, Claire</creator><creator>Desany, Gerard J.</creator><creator>Baker, Brian L.</creator><creator>Choi, Gilwoo</creator><creator>Taylor, Charles A.</creator><creator>Edelman, Elazer R.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Structural Mechanics Predictions Relating to Clinical Coronary Stent Fracture in a 5 Year Period in FDA MAUDE Database</title><author>Everett, Kay D. ; Conway, Claire ; Desany, Gerard J. ; Baker, Brian L. ; Choi, Gilwoo ; Taylor, Charles A. ; Edelman, Elazer R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-e336f59a029a91ed0915dad3d12f18fdc58054f52c4de262103cc6e8e0cc570b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biological and Medical Physics</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Biophysics</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Classical Mechanics</topic><topic>Coronary Vessels - pathology</topic><topic>Coronary Vessels - physiopathology</topic><topic>Coronary Vessels - surgery</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Devices</topic><topic>Fatigue</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fracture mechanics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mechanical failure</topic><topic>Medical devices</topic><topic>Medical Stents: State of the Art and Future Directions</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States Food and Drug Administration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Everett, Kay D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conway, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desany, Gerard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Brian L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Gilwoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Charles A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edelman, Elazer R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of biomedical engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Everett, Kay D.</au><au>Conway, Claire</au><au>Desany, Gerard J.</au><au>Baker, Brian L.</au><au>Choi, Gilwoo</au><au>Taylor, Charles A.</au><au>Edelman, Elazer R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Structural Mechanics Predictions Relating to Clinical Coronary Stent Fracture in a 5 Year Period in FDA MAUDE Database</atitle><jtitle>Annals of biomedical engineering</jtitle><stitle>Ann Biomed Eng</stitle><addtitle>Ann Biomed Eng</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>391</spage><epage>403</epage><pages>391-403</pages><issn>0090-6964</issn><eissn>1573-9686</eissn><abstract>Endovascular stents are the mainstay of interventional cardiovascular medicine. Technological advances have reduced biological and clinical complications but not mechanical failure. Stent strut fracture is increasingly recognized as of paramount clinical importance. Though consensus reigns that fractures can result from material fatigue, how fracture is induced and the mechanisms underlying its clinical sequelae remain ill-defined. In this study, strut fractures were identified in the prospectively maintained Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database (MAUDE), covering years 2006–2011, and differentiated based on specific coronary artery implantation site and device configuration. These data, and knowledge of the extent of dynamic arterial deformations obtained from patient CT images and published data, were used to define boundary conditions for 3D finite element models incorporating multimodal, multi-cycle deformation. The structural response for a range of stent designs and configurations was predicted by computational models and included estimation of maximum principal, minimum principal and equivalent plastic strains. Fatigue assessment was performed with Goodman diagrams and safe/unsafe regions defined for different stent designs. Von Mises stress and maximum principal strain increased with multimodal, fully reversed deformation. Spatial maps of unsafe locations corresponded to the identified locations of fracture in different coronary arteries in the clinical database. These findings, for the first time, provide insight into a potential link between patient adverse events and computational modeling of stent deformation. Understanding of the mechanical forces imposed under different implantation conditions may assist in rational design and optimal placement of these devices.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>26467552</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10439-015-1476-3</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-6964
ispartof Annals of biomedical engineering, 2016-02, Vol.44 (2), p.391-403
issn 0090-6964
1573-9686
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5082979
source Springer Nature
subjects Aged
Biochemistry
Biological and Medical Physics
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering
Biomedicine
Biophysics
Boundary conditions
Classical Mechanics
Coronary Vessels - pathology
Coronary Vessels - physiopathology
Coronary Vessels - surgery
Databases, Factual
Deformation
Design engineering
Devices
Fatigue
Female
Fracture mechanics
Humans
Male
Mathematical models
Mechanical failure
Medical devices
Medical Stents: State of the Art and Future Directions
Middle Aged
Models, Cardiovascular
Prosthesis Design
Prosthesis Failure
Retrospective Studies
Stents
Surgical implants
United States
United States Food and Drug Administration
title Structural Mechanics Predictions Relating to Clinical Coronary Stent Fracture in a 5 Year Period in FDA MAUDE Database
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T13%3A13%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Structural%20Mechanics%20Predictions%20Relating%20to%20Clinical%20Coronary%20Stent%20Fracture%20in%20a%205%C2%A0Year%20Period%20in%20FDA%20MAUDE%20Database&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20biomedical%20engineering&rft.au=Everett,%20Kay%20D.&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=391&rft.epage=403&rft.pages=391-403&rft.issn=0090-6964&rft.eissn=1573-9686&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10439-015-1476-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1768169509%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-e336f59a029a91ed0915dad3d12f18fdc58054f52c4de262103cc6e8e0cc570b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1771092328&rft_id=info:pmid/26467552&rfr_iscdi=true