Loading…
Funding for cerebral palsy research in Australia, 2000–2015: an observational study
ObjectivesTo examine the funding for cerebral palsy (CP) research in Australia, as compared with the National Institutes of Health (NIH).DesignObservational study.SettingFor Australia, philanthropic funding from Cerebral Palsy Alliance Research Foundation (CPARF) (2005–2015) was compared with Nation...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMJ open 2016-10, Vol.6 (10), p.e012924-e012924 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | ObjectivesTo examine the funding for cerebral palsy (CP) research in Australia, as compared with the National Institutes of Health (NIH).DesignObservational study.SettingFor Australia, philanthropic funding from Cerebral Palsy Alliance Research Foundation (CPARF) (2005–2015) was compared with National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC, 2000–2015) and Australian Research Council (ARC, 2004–2015) and CPARF and NHMRC funding were compared with NIH funding (USA).ParticipantsCerebral Palsy researchers funded by CPARF, NHMRC or NIH.ResultsOver 10 years, total CPARF philanthropic funding was $21.9 million, including people, infrastructure, strategic and project support. As competitive grants, CPARF funded $11.1 million, NHMRC funded $53.5 million and Australian Research Council funded $1.5 million. CPARF, NHMRC and NIH funding has increased in real terms, but only the NIH statistically significantly increased in real terms (mean annual increase US$4.9 million per year, 95% CI 3.6 to 6.2, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2044-6055 2044-6055 |
DOI: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012924 |