Loading…

Factors affecting executive functions in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and volumetric changes in the prefrontal cortex

Purpose Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is associated with cognitive changes and executive functions are among the cognitive domains most affected. However, it is not completely understood which of the factor(s) among hypoxemia, repeated arousal, and sleepiness affect the executive functions...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:SpringerPlus 2016-11, Vol.5 (1), p.1934-1934, Article 1934
Main Authors: Yılmaz, Zahide, Voyvoda, Nuray, İnan, Eda, Şirinocak, Pınar Bekdik, Terzi, Rabia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is associated with cognitive changes and executive functions are among the cognitive domains most affected. However, it is not completely understood which of the factor(s) among hypoxemia, repeated arousal, and sleepiness affect the executive functions. This study aims to evaluate the possible relationship between the executive functions and nocturnal parameters, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) scores, and prefrontal cortex (PFC) volumes. Patients and methods A total of 28 patients aged between 18 and 60 years who were newly diagnosed with OSAS were included in this study. The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) and Stroop test which were used in the evaluation of executive functions were applied to all patients. Cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and volumetric measurements of the PFC were performed. Polysomnography (PSG), WCST, Stroop test, and cranial MRI were also applied to the control group which consisted of age- and education status-matched 15 healthy subjects. The correlation of WCST and Stroop tests and PFC volume, PSG parameters, and ESS scale was examined. Results The WCST-6 test scores were statistically significantly higher in the patient group (p = 0.022; p 
ISSN:2193-1801
2193-1801
DOI:10.1186/s40064-016-3609-z