Loading…

Alignment of Healthy Dietary Patterns and Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Review

To support food security for current and future generations, there is a need to understand the relation between sustainable diets and the health of a population. In recent years, a number of studies have investigated and compared different dietary patterns to better understand which foods and eating...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) Md.), 2016-11, Vol.7 (6), p.1005-1025
Main Authors: Nelson, Miriam E, Hamm, Michael W, Hu, Frank B, Abrams, Steven A, Griffin, Timothy S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6dcf3c96b9a3c50278c796ad5c91cf78a386b59109dabc23b8962337711022bc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6dcf3c96b9a3c50278c796ad5c91cf78a386b59109dabc23b8962337711022bc3
container_end_page 1025
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1005
container_title Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)
container_volume 7
creator Nelson, Miriam E
Hamm, Michael W
Hu, Frank B
Abrams, Steven A
Griffin, Timothy S
description To support food security for current and future generations, there is a need to understand the relation between sustainable diets and the health of a population. In recent years, a number of studies have investigated and compared different dietary patterns to better understand which foods and eating patterns have less of an environmental impact while meeting nutritional needs and promoting health. This systematic review (SR) of population-level dietary patterns and food sustainability extends and updates the SR that was conducted by the 2015 US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, an expert committee commissioned by the federal government to inform dietary guidance as it relates to the committee’s original conclusions. In the original SR, 15 studies met the criteria for inclusion; since then, an additional 8 studies have been identified and included. The relations between dietary intake patterns and both health and environmental outcomes were compared across studies, with methodologies that included modeling, life cycle assessment, and land use analysis. Across studies, consistent evidence indicated that a dietary pattern higher in plant-based foods (e.g., vegetables, fruits, legumes, seeds, nuts, whole grains) and lower in animal-based foods (especially red meat), as well as lower in total energy, is both healthier and associated with a lesser impact on the environment. This dietary pattern differs from current average consumption patterns in the United States. Our updated SR confirms and strengthens the conclusions of the original US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee SR, which found that adherence to several well-characterized dietary patterns, including vegetarian (with variations) diets, dietary guidelines–related diets, Mediterranean-style diets, the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet, and other sustainable diet scenarios, promotes greater health and has a less negative impact on the environment than current average dietary intakes.
doi_str_mv 10.3945/an.116.012567
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5105037</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2161831322007864</els_id><sourcerecordid>2176339063</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6dcf3c96b9a3c50278c796ad5c91cf78a386b59109dabc23b8962337711022bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kb1vFDEQxS0EItElJS1ySbMXf5ztNQXSKeQDKVIQgYrCmvXOJka73mD7Dt1_H4cLERS4GFuan96M3yPkDWdLaVfqBOKSc71kXChtXpBDwZVulDT65eNb86aVXB6Q45x_sHqUaI2Wr8mBaPmKScEOyff1GG7jhLHQeaCXCGO529GPAQukHf0MpWCKmULs6VnchjT_ZmGkN5tcIETowhjK7j1d05tdLjhBCZ5-wW3AX0fk1QBjxuOne0G-nZ99Pb1srq4vPp2urxqv5Ko0uveD9FZ3FqRXTJjWG6uhV95yP5gWZKs7ZTmzPXReyK61WkhpDOdMiM7LBfmw173fdBP2vi6YYHT3KUz1E26G4P7txHDnbuetU5wpJk0VePckkOafG8zFTSF7HEeIOG-yE7zaJi2rZUGaPerTnHPC4XkMZ-4xEwfR1UzcPpPKv_17t2f6TwIVMHsAq0PVteSyDxg99iGhL66fw3-kHwCOMZrb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2176339063</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Alignment of Healthy Dietary Patterns and Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Review</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Nelson, Miriam E ; Hamm, Michael W ; Hu, Frank B ; Abrams, Steven A ; Griffin, Timothy S</creator><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Miriam E ; Hamm, Michael W ; Hu, Frank B ; Abrams, Steven A ; Griffin, Timothy S</creatorcontrib><description>To support food security for current and future generations, there is a need to understand the relation between sustainable diets and the health of a population. In recent years, a number of studies have investigated and compared different dietary patterns to better understand which foods and eating patterns have less of an environmental impact while meeting nutritional needs and promoting health. This systematic review (SR) of population-level dietary patterns and food sustainability extends and updates the SR that was conducted by the 2015 US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, an expert committee commissioned by the federal government to inform dietary guidance as it relates to the committee’s original conclusions. In the original SR, 15 studies met the criteria for inclusion; since then, an additional 8 studies have been identified and included. The relations between dietary intake patterns and both health and environmental outcomes were compared across studies, with methodologies that included modeling, life cycle assessment, and land use analysis. Across studies, consistent evidence indicated that a dietary pattern higher in plant-based foods (e.g., vegetables, fruits, legumes, seeds, nuts, whole grains) and lower in animal-based foods (especially red meat), as well as lower in total energy, is both healthier and associated with a lesser impact on the environment. This dietary pattern differs from current average consumption patterns in the United States. Our updated SR confirms and strengthens the conclusions of the original US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee SR, which found that adherence to several well-characterized dietary patterns, including vegetarian (with variations) diets, dietary guidelines–related diets, Mediterranean-style diets, the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet, and other sustainable diet scenarios, promotes greater health and has a less negative impact on the environment than current average dietary intakes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2161-8313</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2156-5376</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-5376</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3945/an.116.012567</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28140320</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>animal-based foods ; Diet ; Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension diet ; Dietary Guidelines ; dietary patterns ; eating habits ; energy ; Environment ; environmental impact ; federal government ; Feeding Behavior ; food intake ; food security ; Food Supply ; fruit products ; health promotion ; Humans ; land use ; legumes ; life cycle assessment ; Meat ; nutrient requirements ; Nutrition Policy ; nuts ; plant-based foods ; Plants ; red meat ; Reviews ; seeds ; sustainable diets ; systematic review ; United States ; vegetables ; vegetarian diet ; whole grain foods</subject><ispartof>Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2016-11, Vol.7 (6), p.1005-1025</ispartof><rights>2016 American Society for Nutrition</rights><rights>2016 American Society for Nutrition.</rights><rights>2016 American Society for Nutrition 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6dcf3c96b9a3c50278c796ad5c91cf78a386b59109dabc23b8962337711022bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6dcf3c96b9a3c50278c796ad5c91cf78a386b59109dabc23b8962337711022bc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5105037/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5105037/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28140320$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Miriam E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamm, Michael W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Frank B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Steven A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Timothy S</creatorcontrib><title>Alignment of Healthy Dietary Patterns and Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Review</title><title>Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)</title><addtitle>Adv Nutr</addtitle><description>To support food security for current and future generations, there is a need to understand the relation between sustainable diets and the health of a population. In recent years, a number of studies have investigated and compared different dietary patterns to better understand which foods and eating patterns have less of an environmental impact while meeting nutritional needs and promoting health. This systematic review (SR) of population-level dietary patterns and food sustainability extends and updates the SR that was conducted by the 2015 US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, an expert committee commissioned by the federal government to inform dietary guidance as it relates to the committee’s original conclusions. In the original SR, 15 studies met the criteria for inclusion; since then, an additional 8 studies have been identified and included. The relations between dietary intake patterns and both health and environmental outcomes were compared across studies, with methodologies that included modeling, life cycle assessment, and land use analysis. Across studies, consistent evidence indicated that a dietary pattern higher in plant-based foods (e.g., vegetables, fruits, legumes, seeds, nuts, whole grains) and lower in animal-based foods (especially red meat), as well as lower in total energy, is both healthier and associated with a lesser impact on the environment. This dietary pattern differs from current average consumption patterns in the United States. Our updated SR confirms and strengthens the conclusions of the original US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee SR, which found that adherence to several well-characterized dietary patterns, including vegetarian (with variations) diets, dietary guidelines–related diets, Mediterranean-style diets, the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet, and other sustainable diet scenarios, promotes greater health and has a less negative impact on the environment than current average dietary intakes.</description><subject>animal-based foods</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension diet</subject><subject>Dietary Guidelines</subject><subject>dietary patterns</subject><subject>eating habits</subject><subject>energy</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>environmental impact</subject><subject>federal government</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>food intake</subject><subject>food security</subject><subject>Food Supply</subject><subject>fruit products</subject><subject>health promotion</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>land use</subject><subject>legumes</subject><subject>life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>nutrient requirements</subject><subject>Nutrition Policy</subject><subject>nuts</subject><subject>plant-based foods</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>red meat</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>seeds</subject><subject>sustainable diets</subject><subject>systematic review</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>vegetables</subject><subject>vegetarian diet</subject><subject>whole grain foods</subject><issn>2161-8313</issn><issn>2156-5376</issn><issn>2156-5376</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kb1vFDEQxS0EItElJS1ySbMXf5ztNQXSKeQDKVIQgYrCmvXOJka73mD7Dt1_H4cLERS4GFuan96M3yPkDWdLaVfqBOKSc71kXChtXpBDwZVulDT65eNb86aVXB6Q45x_sHqUaI2Wr8mBaPmKScEOyff1GG7jhLHQeaCXCGO529GPAQukHf0MpWCKmULs6VnchjT_ZmGkN5tcIETowhjK7j1d05tdLjhBCZ5-wW3AX0fk1QBjxuOne0G-nZ99Pb1srq4vPp2urxqv5Ko0uveD9FZ3FqRXTJjWG6uhV95yP5gWZKs7ZTmzPXReyK61WkhpDOdMiM7LBfmw173fdBP2vi6YYHT3KUz1E26G4P7txHDnbuetU5wpJk0VePckkOafG8zFTSF7HEeIOG-yE7zaJi2rZUGaPerTnHPC4XkMZ-4xEwfR1UzcPpPKv_17t2f6TwIVMHsAq0PVteSyDxg99iGhL66fw3-kHwCOMZrb</recordid><startdate>20161101</startdate><enddate>20161101</enddate><creator>Nelson, Miriam E</creator><creator>Hamm, Michael W</creator><creator>Hu, Frank B</creator><creator>Abrams, Steven A</creator><creator>Griffin, Timothy S</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>American Society for Nutrition</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161101</creationdate><title>Alignment of Healthy Dietary Patterns and Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Review</title><author>Nelson, Miriam E ; Hamm, Michael W ; Hu, Frank B ; Abrams, Steven A ; Griffin, Timothy S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6dcf3c96b9a3c50278c796ad5c91cf78a386b59109dabc23b8962337711022bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>animal-based foods</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension diet</topic><topic>Dietary Guidelines</topic><topic>dietary patterns</topic><topic>eating habits</topic><topic>energy</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>environmental impact</topic><topic>federal government</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>food intake</topic><topic>food security</topic><topic>Food Supply</topic><topic>fruit products</topic><topic>health promotion</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>land use</topic><topic>legumes</topic><topic>life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>nutrient requirements</topic><topic>Nutrition Policy</topic><topic>nuts</topic><topic>plant-based foods</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>red meat</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>seeds</topic><topic>sustainable diets</topic><topic>systematic review</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>vegetables</topic><topic>vegetarian diet</topic><topic>whole grain foods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Miriam E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamm, Michael W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Frank B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Steven A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Timothy S</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nelson, Miriam E</au><au>Hamm, Michael W</au><au>Hu, Frank B</au><au>Abrams, Steven A</au><au>Griffin, Timothy S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Alignment of Healthy Dietary Patterns and Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)</jtitle><addtitle>Adv Nutr</addtitle><date>2016-11-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1005</spage><epage>1025</epage><pages>1005-1025</pages><issn>2161-8313</issn><issn>2156-5376</issn><eissn>2156-5376</eissn><abstract>To support food security for current and future generations, there is a need to understand the relation between sustainable diets and the health of a population. In recent years, a number of studies have investigated and compared different dietary patterns to better understand which foods and eating patterns have less of an environmental impact while meeting nutritional needs and promoting health. This systematic review (SR) of population-level dietary patterns and food sustainability extends and updates the SR that was conducted by the 2015 US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, an expert committee commissioned by the federal government to inform dietary guidance as it relates to the committee’s original conclusions. In the original SR, 15 studies met the criteria for inclusion; since then, an additional 8 studies have been identified and included. The relations between dietary intake patterns and both health and environmental outcomes were compared across studies, with methodologies that included modeling, life cycle assessment, and land use analysis. Across studies, consistent evidence indicated that a dietary pattern higher in plant-based foods (e.g., vegetables, fruits, legumes, seeds, nuts, whole grains) and lower in animal-based foods (especially red meat), as well as lower in total energy, is both healthier and associated with a lesser impact on the environment. This dietary pattern differs from current average consumption patterns in the United States. Our updated SR confirms and strengthens the conclusions of the original US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee SR, which found that adherence to several well-characterized dietary patterns, including vegetarian (with variations) diets, dietary guidelines–related diets, Mediterranean-style diets, the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet, and other sustainable diet scenarios, promotes greater health and has a less negative impact on the environment than current average dietary intakes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28140320</pmid><doi>10.3945/an.116.012567</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2161-8313
ispartof Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2016-11, Vol.7 (6), p.1005-1025
issn 2161-8313
2156-5376
2156-5376
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5105037
source PubMed (Medline); Oxford Journals Online
subjects animal-based foods
Diet
Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension diet
Dietary Guidelines
dietary patterns
eating habits
energy
Environment
environmental impact
federal government
Feeding Behavior
food intake
food security
Food Supply
fruit products
health promotion
Humans
land use
legumes
life cycle assessment
Meat
nutrient requirements
Nutrition Policy
nuts
plant-based foods
Plants
red meat
Reviews
seeds
sustainable diets
systematic review
United States
vegetables
vegetarian diet
whole grain foods
title Alignment of Healthy Dietary Patterns and Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T23%3A48%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Alignment%20of%20Healthy%20Dietary%20Patterns%20and%20Environmental%20Sustainability:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20nutrition%20(Bethesda,%20Md.)&rft.au=Nelson,%20Miriam%20E&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1005&rft.epage=1025&rft.pages=1005-1025&rft.issn=2161-8313&rft.eissn=2156-5376&rft_id=info:doi/10.3945/an.116.012567&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2176339063%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6dcf3c96b9a3c50278c796ad5c91cf78a386b59109dabc23b8962337711022bc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2176339063&rft_id=info:pmid/28140320&rfr_iscdi=true