Loading…
Alignment of Healthy Dietary Patterns and Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Review
To support food security for current and future generations, there is a need to understand the relation between sustainable diets and the health of a population. In recent years, a number of studies have investigated and compared different dietary patterns to better understand which foods and eating...
Saved in:
Published in: | Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) Md.), 2016-11, Vol.7 (6), p.1005-1025 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6dcf3c96b9a3c50278c796ad5c91cf78a386b59109dabc23b8962337711022bc3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6dcf3c96b9a3c50278c796ad5c91cf78a386b59109dabc23b8962337711022bc3 |
container_end_page | 1025 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1005 |
container_title | Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Nelson, Miriam E Hamm, Michael W Hu, Frank B Abrams, Steven A Griffin, Timothy S |
description | To support food security for current and future generations, there is a need to understand the relation between sustainable diets and the health of a population. In recent years, a number of studies have investigated and compared different dietary patterns to better understand which foods and eating patterns have less of an environmental impact while meeting nutritional needs and promoting health. This systematic review (SR) of population-level dietary patterns and food sustainability extends and updates the SR that was conducted by the 2015 US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, an expert committee commissioned by the federal government to inform dietary guidance as it relates to the committee’s original conclusions. In the original SR, 15 studies met the criteria for inclusion; since then, an additional 8 studies have been identified and included. The relations between dietary intake patterns and both health and environmental outcomes were compared across studies, with methodologies that included modeling, life cycle assessment, and land use analysis. Across studies, consistent evidence indicated that a dietary pattern higher in plant-based foods (e.g., vegetables, fruits, legumes, seeds, nuts, whole grains) and lower in animal-based foods (especially red meat), as well as lower in total energy, is both healthier and associated with a lesser impact on the environment. This dietary pattern differs from current average consumption patterns in the United States. Our updated SR confirms and strengthens the conclusions of the original US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee SR, which found that adherence to several well-characterized dietary patterns, including vegetarian (with variations) diets, dietary guidelines–related diets, Mediterranean-style diets, the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet, and other sustainable diet scenarios, promotes greater health and has a less negative impact on the environment than current average dietary intakes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3945/an.116.012567 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5105037</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2161831322007864</els_id><sourcerecordid>2176339063</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6dcf3c96b9a3c50278c796ad5c91cf78a386b59109dabc23b8962337711022bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kb1vFDEQxS0EItElJS1ySbMXf5ztNQXSKeQDKVIQgYrCmvXOJka73mD7Dt1_H4cLERS4GFuan96M3yPkDWdLaVfqBOKSc71kXChtXpBDwZVulDT65eNb86aVXB6Q45x_sHqUaI2Wr8mBaPmKScEOyff1GG7jhLHQeaCXCGO529GPAQukHf0MpWCKmULs6VnchjT_ZmGkN5tcIETowhjK7j1d05tdLjhBCZ5-wW3AX0fk1QBjxuOne0G-nZ99Pb1srq4vPp2urxqv5Ko0uveD9FZ3FqRXTJjWG6uhV95yP5gWZKs7ZTmzPXReyK61WkhpDOdMiM7LBfmw173fdBP2vi6YYHT3KUz1E26G4P7txHDnbuetU5wpJk0VePckkOafG8zFTSF7HEeIOG-yE7zaJi2rZUGaPerTnHPC4XkMZ-4xEwfR1UzcPpPKv_17t2f6TwIVMHsAq0PVteSyDxg99iGhL66fw3-kHwCOMZrb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2176339063</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Alignment of Healthy Dietary Patterns and Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Review</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Nelson, Miriam E ; Hamm, Michael W ; Hu, Frank B ; Abrams, Steven A ; Griffin, Timothy S</creator><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Miriam E ; Hamm, Michael W ; Hu, Frank B ; Abrams, Steven A ; Griffin, Timothy S</creatorcontrib><description>To support food security for current and future generations, there is a need to understand the relation between sustainable diets and the health of a population. In recent years, a number of studies have investigated and compared different dietary patterns to better understand which foods and eating patterns have less of an environmental impact while meeting nutritional needs and promoting health. This systematic review (SR) of population-level dietary patterns and food sustainability extends and updates the SR that was conducted by the 2015 US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, an expert committee commissioned by the federal government to inform dietary guidance as it relates to the committee’s original conclusions. In the original SR, 15 studies met the criteria for inclusion; since then, an additional 8 studies have been identified and included. The relations between dietary intake patterns and both health and environmental outcomes were compared across studies, with methodologies that included modeling, life cycle assessment, and land use analysis. Across studies, consistent evidence indicated that a dietary pattern higher in plant-based foods (e.g., vegetables, fruits, legumes, seeds, nuts, whole grains) and lower in animal-based foods (especially red meat), as well as lower in total energy, is both healthier and associated with a lesser impact on the environment. This dietary pattern differs from current average consumption patterns in the United States. Our updated SR confirms and strengthens the conclusions of the original US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee SR, which found that adherence to several well-characterized dietary patterns, including vegetarian (with variations) diets, dietary guidelines–related diets, Mediterranean-style diets, the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet, and other sustainable diet scenarios, promotes greater health and has a less negative impact on the environment than current average dietary intakes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2161-8313</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2156-5376</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-5376</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3945/an.116.012567</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28140320</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>animal-based foods ; Diet ; Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension diet ; Dietary Guidelines ; dietary patterns ; eating habits ; energy ; Environment ; environmental impact ; federal government ; Feeding Behavior ; food intake ; food security ; Food Supply ; fruit products ; health promotion ; Humans ; land use ; legumes ; life cycle assessment ; Meat ; nutrient requirements ; Nutrition Policy ; nuts ; plant-based foods ; Plants ; red meat ; Reviews ; seeds ; sustainable diets ; systematic review ; United States ; vegetables ; vegetarian diet ; whole grain foods</subject><ispartof>Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2016-11, Vol.7 (6), p.1005-1025</ispartof><rights>2016 American Society for Nutrition</rights><rights>2016 American Society for Nutrition.</rights><rights>2016 American Society for Nutrition 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6dcf3c96b9a3c50278c796ad5c91cf78a386b59109dabc23b8962337711022bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6dcf3c96b9a3c50278c796ad5c91cf78a386b59109dabc23b8962337711022bc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5105037/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5105037/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28140320$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Miriam E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamm, Michael W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Frank B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Steven A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Timothy S</creatorcontrib><title>Alignment of Healthy Dietary Patterns and Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Review</title><title>Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)</title><addtitle>Adv Nutr</addtitle><description>To support food security for current and future generations, there is a need to understand the relation between sustainable diets and the health of a population. In recent years, a number of studies have investigated and compared different dietary patterns to better understand which foods and eating patterns have less of an environmental impact while meeting nutritional needs and promoting health. This systematic review (SR) of population-level dietary patterns and food sustainability extends and updates the SR that was conducted by the 2015 US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, an expert committee commissioned by the federal government to inform dietary guidance as it relates to the committee’s original conclusions. In the original SR, 15 studies met the criteria for inclusion; since then, an additional 8 studies have been identified and included. The relations between dietary intake patterns and both health and environmental outcomes were compared across studies, with methodologies that included modeling, life cycle assessment, and land use analysis. Across studies, consistent evidence indicated that a dietary pattern higher in plant-based foods (e.g., vegetables, fruits, legumes, seeds, nuts, whole grains) and lower in animal-based foods (especially red meat), as well as lower in total energy, is both healthier and associated with a lesser impact on the environment. This dietary pattern differs from current average consumption patterns in the United States. Our updated SR confirms and strengthens the conclusions of the original US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee SR, which found that adherence to several well-characterized dietary patterns, including vegetarian (with variations) diets, dietary guidelines–related diets, Mediterranean-style diets, the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet, and other sustainable diet scenarios, promotes greater health and has a less negative impact on the environment than current average dietary intakes.</description><subject>animal-based foods</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension diet</subject><subject>Dietary Guidelines</subject><subject>dietary patterns</subject><subject>eating habits</subject><subject>energy</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>environmental impact</subject><subject>federal government</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>food intake</subject><subject>food security</subject><subject>Food Supply</subject><subject>fruit products</subject><subject>health promotion</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>land use</subject><subject>legumes</subject><subject>life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>nutrient requirements</subject><subject>Nutrition Policy</subject><subject>nuts</subject><subject>plant-based foods</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>red meat</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>seeds</subject><subject>sustainable diets</subject><subject>systematic review</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>vegetables</subject><subject>vegetarian diet</subject><subject>whole grain foods</subject><issn>2161-8313</issn><issn>2156-5376</issn><issn>2156-5376</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kb1vFDEQxS0EItElJS1ySbMXf5ztNQXSKeQDKVIQgYrCmvXOJka73mD7Dt1_H4cLERS4GFuan96M3yPkDWdLaVfqBOKSc71kXChtXpBDwZVulDT65eNb86aVXB6Q45x_sHqUaI2Wr8mBaPmKScEOyff1GG7jhLHQeaCXCGO529GPAQukHf0MpWCKmULs6VnchjT_ZmGkN5tcIETowhjK7j1d05tdLjhBCZ5-wW3AX0fk1QBjxuOne0G-nZ99Pb1srq4vPp2urxqv5Ko0uveD9FZ3FqRXTJjWG6uhV95yP5gWZKs7ZTmzPXReyK61WkhpDOdMiM7LBfmw173fdBP2vi6YYHT3KUz1E26G4P7txHDnbuetU5wpJk0VePckkOafG8zFTSF7HEeIOG-yE7zaJi2rZUGaPerTnHPC4XkMZ-4xEwfR1UzcPpPKv_17t2f6TwIVMHsAq0PVteSyDxg99iGhL66fw3-kHwCOMZrb</recordid><startdate>20161101</startdate><enddate>20161101</enddate><creator>Nelson, Miriam E</creator><creator>Hamm, Michael W</creator><creator>Hu, Frank B</creator><creator>Abrams, Steven A</creator><creator>Griffin, Timothy S</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>American Society for Nutrition</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161101</creationdate><title>Alignment of Healthy Dietary Patterns and Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Review</title><author>Nelson, Miriam E ; Hamm, Michael W ; Hu, Frank B ; Abrams, Steven A ; Griffin, Timothy S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6dcf3c96b9a3c50278c796ad5c91cf78a386b59109dabc23b8962337711022bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>animal-based foods</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension diet</topic><topic>Dietary Guidelines</topic><topic>dietary patterns</topic><topic>eating habits</topic><topic>energy</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>environmental impact</topic><topic>federal government</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>food intake</topic><topic>food security</topic><topic>Food Supply</topic><topic>fruit products</topic><topic>health promotion</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>land use</topic><topic>legumes</topic><topic>life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>nutrient requirements</topic><topic>Nutrition Policy</topic><topic>nuts</topic><topic>plant-based foods</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>red meat</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>seeds</topic><topic>sustainable diets</topic><topic>systematic review</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>vegetables</topic><topic>vegetarian diet</topic><topic>whole grain foods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Miriam E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamm, Michael W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Frank B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Steven A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Timothy S</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nelson, Miriam E</au><au>Hamm, Michael W</au><au>Hu, Frank B</au><au>Abrams, Steven A</au><au>Griffin, Timothy S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Alignment of Healthy Dietary Patterns and Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)</jtitle><addtitle>Adv Nutr</addtitle><date>2016-11-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1005</spage><epage>1025</epage><pages>1005-1025</pages><issn>2161-8313</issn><issn>2156-5376</issn><eissn>2156-5376</eissn><abstract>To support food security for current and future generations, there is a need to understand the relation between sustainable diets and the health of a population. In recent years, a number of studies have investigated and compared different dietary patterns to better understand which foods and eating patterns have less of an environmental impact while meeting nutritional needs and promoting health. This systematic review (SR) of population-level dietary patterns and food sustainability extends and updates the SR that was conducted by the 2015 US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, an expert committee commissioned by the federal government to inform dietary guidance as it relates to the committee’s original conclusions. In the original SR, 15 studies met the criteria for inclusion; since then, an additional 8 studies have been identified and included. The relations between dietary intake patterns and both health and environmental outcomes were compared across studies, with methodologies that included modeling, life cycle assessment, and land use analysis. Across studies, consistent evidence indicated that a dietary pattern higher in plant-based foods (e.g., vegetables, fruits, legumes, seeds, nuts, whole grains) and lower in animal-based foods (especially red meat), as well as lower in total energy, is both healthier and associated with a lesser impact on the environment. This dietary pattern differs from current average consumption patterns in the United States. Our updated SR confirms and strengthens the conclusions of the original US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee SR, which found that adherence to several well-characterized dietary patterns, including vegetarian (with variations) diets, dietary guidelines–related diets, Mediterranean-style diets, the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet, and other sustainable diet scenarios, promotes greater health and has a less negative impact on the environment than current average dietary intakes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28140320</pmid><doi>10.3945/an.116.012567</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2161-8313 |
ispartof | Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2016-11, Vol.7 (6), p.1005-1025 |
issn | 2161-8313 2156-5376 2156-5376 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5105037 |
source | PubMed (Medline); Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | animal-based foods Diet Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension diet Dietary Guidelines dietary patterns eating habits energy Environment environmental impact federal government Feeding Behavior food intake food security Food Supply fruit products health promotion Humans land use legumes life cycle assessment Meat nutrient requirements Nutrition Policy nuts plant-based foods Plants red meat Reviews seeds sustainable diets systematic review United States vegetables vegetarian diet whole grain foods |
title | Alignment of Healthy Dietary Patterns and Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T23%3A48%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Alignment%20of%20Healthy%20Dietary%20Patterns%20and%20Environmental%20Sustainability:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20nutrition%20(Bethesda,%20Md.)&rft.au=Nelson,%20Miriam%20E&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1005&rft.epage=1025&rft.pages=1005-1025&rft.issn=2161-8313&rft.eissn=2156-5376&rft_id=info:doi/10.3945/an.116.012567&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2176339063%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6dcf3c96b9a3c50278c796ad5c91cf78a386b59109dabc23b8962337711022bc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2176339063&rft_id=info:pmid/28140320&rfr_iscdi=true |