Loading…

Predictors and Outcomes of Crossover to Surgery from Physical Therapy for Meniscal Tear and Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Trial Comparing Physical Therapy and Surgery

Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) combined with physical therapy (PT) have yielded pain relief similar to that provided by PT alone in randomized trials of subjects with a degenerative meniscal tear. However, many patients randomized to PT received APM before assessment of the primary outcome....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2016-11, Vol.98 (22), p.1890-1896
Main Authors: Katz, Jeffrey N., Wright, John, Spindler, Kurt P., Mandl, Lisa A., Safran-Norton, Clare E., Reinke, Emily K., Levy, Bruce A., Wright, Rick W., Jones, Morgan H., Martin, Scott D., Marx, Robert G., Losina, Elena
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3494-8b521bd509e28bdfdb27d6c34c9d792d4a32c24e7ce865b391faa0b870ed1db43
container_end_page 1896
container_issue 22
container_start_page 1890
container_title Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
container_volume 98
creator Katz, Jeffrey N.
Wright, John
Spindler, Kurt P.
Mandl, Lisa A.
Safran-Norton, Clare E.
Reinke, Emily K.
Levy, Bruce A.
Wright, Rick W.
Jones, Morgan H.
Martin, Scott D.
Marx, Robert G.
Losina, Elena
description Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) combined with physical therapy (PT) have yielded pain relief similar to that provided by PT alone in randomized trials of subjects with a degenerative meniscal tear. However, many patients randomized to PT received APM before assessment of the primary outcome. We sought to identify factors associated with crossing over to APM and to compare pain relief between patients who had crossed over to APM and those who had been randomized to APM. We used data from the MeTeOR (Meniscal Tear in Osteoarthritis Research) Trial of APM with PT versus PT alone in subjects ≥45 years old who had mild-to-moderate osteoarthritis and a degenerative meniscal tear. We assessed independent predictors of crossover to APM among those randomized to PT. We also compared pain relief at 6 months among those randomized to PT who crossed over to APM, those who did not cross over, and those originally randomized to APM. One hundred and sixty-four subjects were randomized to and received APM and 177 were randomized to PT, of whom 48 (27%) crossed over to receive APM in the first 140 days after randomization. In multivariate analyses, factors associated with a higher likelihood of crossing over to APM among those who had originally been randomized to PT included a baseline Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score of ≥40 (risk ratio [RR] = 1.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00, 3.93) and symptom duration of
doi_str_mv 10.2106/JBJS.15.01466
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5125163</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1841135769</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3494-8b521bd509e28bdfdb27d6c34c9d792d4a32c24e7ce865b391faa0b870ed1db43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkU1v1DAQhiMEoqVw5Ip85JLFY8dOwgGprPiqilrR5Ww58WRjSOJlnLRa_g__k-wHFYiTpXcePWPNmyTPgS8EcP3q4u3FzQLUgkOm9YPkFJRUKchCP0xOOReQllKpk-RJjN8451nG88fJicgLJUquTpNf14TO12OgyOzg2NU01qHHyELDlhRiDLdIbAzsZqI10pY1FHp23W6jr23HVi2S3cxpIPYZBx_3IVo6yOKIwdLYkh99fM3O2Zc5Dr3_iY6tyM_sMvQbS35Y_-_cGY5bnyaPGttFfHZ8z5Kv79-tlh_Ty6sPn5bnl2ktszJLi0oJqJziJYqico2rRO70PKtLl5fCZVaKWmSY11hoVckSGmt5VeQcHbgqk2fJm4N3M1U9uhqHkWxnNuR7S1sTrDf_TgbfmnW4NQqEAi1nwcujgMKPCeNo-vkm2HV2wDBFA0UGIFWuyxlND2i9OzNhc78GuNlVa3bVGlBmX-3Mv_j7b_f0ny5nIDsAd6EbkeL3brpDMi3abmwN37WvhUwFBw0Amqf7SP4GyWCzYw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1841135769</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predictors and Outcomes of Crossover to Surgery from Physical Therapy for Meniscal Tear and Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Trial Comparing Physical Therapy and Surgery</title><source>HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</source><creator>Katz, Jeffrey N. ; Wright, John ; Spindler, Kurt P. ; Mandl, Lisa A. ; Safran-Norton, Clare E. ; Reinke, Emily K. ; Levy, Bruce A. ; Wright, Rick W. ; Jones, Morgan H. ; Martin, Scott D. ; Marx, Robert G. ; Losina, Elena</creator><creatorcontrib>Katz, Jeffrey N. ; Wright, John ; Spindler, Kurt P. ; Mandl, Lisa A. ; Safran-Norton, Clare E. ; Reinke, Emily K. ; Levy, Bruce A. ; Wright, Rick W. ; Jones, Morgan H. ; Martin, Scott D. ; Marx, Robert G. ; Losina, Elena</creatorcontrib><description>Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) combined with physical therapy (PT) have yielded pain relief similar to that provided by PT alone in randomized trials of subjects with a degenerative meniscal tear. However, many patients randomized to PT received APM before assessment of the primary outcome. We sought to identify factors associated with crossing over to APM and to compare pain relief between patients who had crossed over to APM and those who had been randomized to APM. We used data from the MeTeOR (Meniscal Tear in Osteoarthritis Research) Trial of APM with PT versus PT alone in subjects ≥45 years old who had mild-to-moderate osteoarthritis and a degenerative meniscal tear. We assessed independent predictors of crossover to APM among those randomized to PT. We also compared pain relief at 6 months among those randomized to PT who crossed over to APM, those who did not cross over, and those originally randomized to APM. One hundred and sixty-four subjects were randomized to and received APM and 177 were randomized to PT, of whom 48 (27%) crossed over to receive APM in the first 140 days after randomization. In multivariate analyses, factors associated with a higher likelihood of crossing over to APM among those who had originally been randomized to PT included a baseline Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score of ≥40 (risk ratio [RR] = 1.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00, 3.93) and symptom duration of &lt;1 year (RR = 1.74; 95% CI = 0.98, 3.08). Eighty-one percent of subjects who crossed over to APM and 82% of those randomized to APM had an improvement of ≥10 points in their pain score at 6 months, as did 73% of those who were randomized to and received only PT. Subjects who crossed over to APM had presented with a shorter symptom duration and greater baseline pain than those who did not cross over from PT. Subjects who crossed over had rates of surgical success similar to those of the patients who had been randomized to surgery. Our findings also suggest that an initial course of rigorous PT prior to APM may not compromise surgical outcome. Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01466</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27852905</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</publisher><subject>Activities of Daily Living ; Aged ; Cross-Over Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Knee Joint - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedic Procedures - methods ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - therapy ; Pain Measurement ; Physical Therapy Modalities ; Prognosis ; Recovery of Function - physiology ; Scientific ; Tibial Meniscus Injuries - surgery ; Tibial Meniscus Injuries - therapy ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2016-11, Vol.98 (22), p.1890-1896</ispartof><rights>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3494-8b521bd509e28bdfdb27d6c34c9d792d4a32c24e7ce865b391faa0b870ed1db43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27852905$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Katz, Jeffrey N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spindler, Kurt P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandl, Lisa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safran-Norton, Clare E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinke, Emily K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Bruce A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Rick W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Morgan H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Scott D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marx, Robert G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Losina, Elena</creatorcontrib><title>Predictors and Outcomes of Crossover to Surgery from Physical Therapy for Meniscal Tear and Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Trial Comparing Physical Therapy and Surgery</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</title><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><description>Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) combined with physical therapy (PT) have yielded pain relief similar to that provided by PT alone in randomized trials of subjects with a degenerative meniscal tear. However, many patients randomized to PT received APM before assessment of the primary outcome. We sought to identify factors associated with crossing over to APM and to compare pain relief between patients who had crossed over to APM and those who had been randomized to APM. We used data from the MeTeOR (Meniscal Tear in Osteoarthritis Research) Trial of APM with PT versus PT alone in subjects ≥45 years old who had mild-to-moderate osteoarthritis and a degenerative meniscal tear. We assessed independent predictors of crossover to APM among those randomized to PT. We also compared pain relief at 6 months among those randomized to PT who crossed over to APM, those who did not cross over, and those originally randomized to APM. One hundred and sixty-four subjects were randomized to and received APM and 177 were randomized to PT, of whom 48 (27%) crossed over to receive APM in the first 140 days after randomization. In multivariate analyses, factors associated with a higher likelihood of crossing over to APM among those who had originally been randomized to PT included a baseline Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score of ≥40 (risk ratio [RR] = 1.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00, 3.93) and symptom duration of &lt;1 year (RR = 1.74; 95% CI = 0.98, 3.08). Eighty-one percent of subjects who crossed over to APM and 82% of those randomized to APM had an improvement of ≥10 points in their pain score at 6 months, as did 73% of those who were randomized to and received only PT. Subjects who crossed over to APM had presented with a shorter symptom duration and greater baseline pain than those who did not cross over from PT. Subjects who crossed over had rates of surgical success similar to those of the patients who had been randomized to surgery. Our findings also suggest that an initial course of rigorous PT prior to APM may not compromise surgical outcome. Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedic Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - therapy</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Physical Therapy Modalities</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Recovery of Function - physiology</subject><subject>Scientific</subject><subject>Tibial Meniscus Injuries - surgery</subject><subject>Tibial Meniscus Injuries - therapy</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0021-9355</issn><issn>1535-1386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkU1v1DAQhiMEoqVw5Ip85JLFY8dOwgGprPiqilrR5Ww58WRjSOJlnLRa_g__k-wHFYiTpXcePWPNmyTPgS8EcP3q4u3FzQLUgkOm9YPkFJRUKchCP0xOOReQllKpk-RJjN8451nG88fJicgLJUquTpNf14TO12OgyOzg2NU01qHHyELDlhRiDLdIbAzsZqI10pY1FHp23W6jr23HVi2S3cxpIPYZBx_3IVo6yOKIwdLYkh99fM3O2Zc5Dr3_iY6tyM_sMvQbS35Y_-_cGY5bnyaPGttFfHZ8z5Kv79-tlh_Ty6sPn5bnl2ktszJLi0oJqJziJYqico2rRO70PKtLl5fCZVaKWmSY11hoVckSGmt5VeQcHbgqk2fJm4N3M1U9uhqHkWxnNuR7S1sTrDf_TgbfmnW4NQqEAi1nwcujgMKPCeNo-vkm2HV2wDBFA0UGIFWuyxlND2i9OzNhc78GuNlVa3bVGlBmX-3Mv_j7b_f0ny5nIDsAd6EbkeL3brpDMi3abmwN37WvhUwFBw0Amqf7SP4GyWCzYw</recordid><startdate>20161116</startdate><enddate>20161116</enddate><creator>Katz, Jeffrey N.</creator><creator>Wright, John</creator><creator>Spindler, Kurt P.</creator><creator>Mandl, Lisa A.</creator><creator>Safran-Norton, Clare E.</creator><creator>Reinke, Emily K.</creator><creator>Levy, Bruce A.</creator><creator>Wright, Rick W.</creator><creator>Jones, Morgan H.</creator><creator>Martin, Scott D.</creator><creator>Marx, Robert G.</creator><creator>Losina, Elena</creator><general>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161116</creationdate><title>Predictors and Outcomes of Crossover to Surgery from Physical Therapy for Meniscal Tear and Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Trial Comparing Physical Therapy and Surgery</title><author>Katz, Jeffrey N. ; Wright, John ; Spindler, Kurt P. ; Mandl, Lisa A. ; Safran-Norton, Clare E. ; Reinke, Emily K. ; Levy, Bruce A. ; Wright, Rick W. ; Jones, Morgan H. ; Martin, Scott D. ; Marx, Robert G. ; Losina, Elena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3494-8b521bd509e28bdfdb27d6c34c9d792d4a32c24e7ce865b391faa0b870ed1db43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedic Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - therapy</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Physical Therapy Modalities</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Recovery of Function - physiology</topic><topic>Scientific</topic><topic>Tibial Meniscus Injuries - surgery</topic><topic>Tibial Meniscus Injuries - therapy</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Katz, Jeffrey N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spindler, Kurt P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandl, Lisa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safran-Norton, Clare E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinke, Emily K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Bruce A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Rick W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Morgan H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Scott D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marx, Robert G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Losina, Elena</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Katz, Jeffrey N.</au><au>Wright, John</au><au>Spindler, Kurt P.</au><au>Mandl, Lisa A.</au><au>Safran-Norton, Clare E.</au><au>Reinke, Emily K.</au><au>Levy, Bruce A.</au><au>Wright, Rick W.</au><au>Jones, Morgan H.</au><au>Martin, Scott D.</au><au>Marx, Robert G.</au><au>Losina, Elena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predictors and Outcomes of Crossover to Surgery from Physical Therapy for Meniscal Tear and Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Trial Comparing Physical Therapy and Surgery</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><date>2016-11-16</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>1890</spage><epage>1896</epage><pages>1890-1896</pages><issn>0021-9355</issn><eissn>1535-1386</eissn><abstract>Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) combined with physical therapy (PT) have yielded pain relief similar to that provided by PT alone in randomized trials of subjects with a degenerative meniscal tear. However, many patients randomized to PT received APM before assessment of the primary outcome. We sought to identify factors associated with crossing over to APM and to compare pain relief between patients who had crossed over to APM and those who had been randomized to APM. We used data from the MeTeOR (Meniscal Tear in Osteoarthritis Research) Trial of APM with PT versus PT alone in subjects ≥45 years old who had mild-to-moderate osteoarthritis and a degenerative meniscal tear. We assessed independent predictors of crossover to APM among those randomized to PT. We also compared pain relief at 6 months among those randomized to PT who crossed over to APM, those who did not cross over, and those originally randomized to APM. One hundred and sixty-four subjects were randomized to and received APM and 177 were randomized to PT, of whom 48 (27%) crossed over to receive APM in the first 140 days after randomization. In multivariate analyses, factors associated with a higher likelihood of crossing over to APM among those who had originally been randomized to PT included a baseline Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score of ≥40 (risk ratio [RR] = 1.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00, 3.93) and symptom duration of &lt;1 year (RR = 1.74; 95% CI = 0.98, 3.08). Eighty-one percent of subjects who crossed over to APM and 82% of those randomized to APM had an improvement of ≥10 points in their pain score at 6 months, as did 73% of those who were randomized to and received only PT. Subjects who crossed over to APM had presented with a shorter symptom duration and greater baseline pain than those who did not cross over from PT. Subjects who crossed over had rates of surgical success similar to those of the patients who had been randomized to surgery. Our findings also suggest that an initial course of rigorous PT prior to APM may not compromise surgical outcome. Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</pub><pmid>27852905</pmid><doi>10.2106/JBJS.15.01466</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9355
ispartof Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2016-11, Vol.98 (22), p.1890-1896
issn 0021-9355
1535-1386
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5125163
source HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
subjects Activities of Daily Living
Aged
Cross-Over Studies
Female
Humans
Knee Joint - surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Orthopedic Procedures - methods
Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery
Osteoarthritis, Knee - therapy
Pain Measurement
Physical Therapy Modalities
Prognosis
Recovery of Function - physiology
Scientific
Tibial Meniscus Injuries - surgery
Tibial Meniscus Injuries - therapy
Treatment Outcome
title Predictors and Outcomes of Crossover to Surgery from Physical Therapy for Meniscal Tear and Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Trial Comparing Physical Therapy and Surgery
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T15%3A28%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predictors%20and%20Outcomes%20of%20Crossover%20to%20Surgery%20from%20Physical%20Therapy%20for%20Meniscal%20Tear%20and%20Osteoarthritis:%20A%20Randomized%20Trial%20Comparing%20Physical%20Therapy%20and%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20American%20volume&rft.au=Katz,%20Jeffrey%20N.&rft.date=2016-11-16&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=1890&rft.epage=1896&rft.pages=1890-1896&rft.issn=0021-9355&rft.eissn=1535-1386&rft_id=info:doi/10.2106/JBJS.15.01466&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1841135769%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3494-8b521bd509e28bdfdb27d6c34c9d792d4a32c24e7ce865b391faa0b870ed1db43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1841135769&rft_id=info:pmid/27852905&rfr_iscdi=true