Immediate vs non-immediate loading post-extractive implants: a comparative study of implant stability quotient (ISQ)

This study aims to evaluate differences in implant stability between post-extractive implants immediately placed post-extractive implants by resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Patients were grouped into two different categories. In Group A 10 patients had an immediate post-extractive implant, then...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oral & implantology 2016-07, Vol.9 (3), p.123-131
Main Authors: Milillo, L, Fiandaca, C, Giannoulis, F, Ottria, L, Lucchese, A, Silvestre, F, Petruzzi, M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Original
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 131
container_issue 3
container_start_page 123
container_title Oral & implantology
container_volume 9
creator Milillo, L
Fiandaca, C
Giannoulis, F
Ottria, L
Lucchese, A
Silvestre, F
Petruzzi, M
description This study aims to evaluate differences in implant stability between post-extractive implants immediately placed post-extractive implants by resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Patients were grouped into two different categories. In Group A 10 patients had an immediate post-extractive implant, then a provisional, acrylic resin crown was placed (immediate loading). In Group B (control group) 10 patients only had an immediate post-extractive implant. Both upper and lower premolars were chosen as post-extractive sites. Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) was measured thanks to RFA measurements (Osstell®). Five intervals were considered: immediately after surgery (T0) and every four weeks, until five months after implant placement (T1, T2, T3, T4,T5). A statistical analysis by means of Student's T-test (significance set at p
doi_str_mv 10.11138/orl/2016.9.3.123
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5159929</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1854803782</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p181t-2b4de0edd178e585ade702ef500cee7490f8b6740d4e93e9003a380ba4060a6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkEtLxTAQhYMoelF_gBvpUhe9Tl5t4kIQ8XFBEFHXJW3maqRtapNevP_e4AudzcA3hzNzhpADCnNKKVcnfmxPGNBirud8ThnfIDMGXOZMFGqTzKguRS4LoXbIfgivkKoAyZXeJjtMgWBCwIzERdehdSZitgpZ7_vc_YLWG-v652zwIeb4HkfTRLfCzHVDa_oYTjOTNb4bzGg-eYiTXWd--SNIwNSudXGdvU0-OkzoaPFwf7xHtpamDbj_3XfJ09Xl48VNfnt3vbg4v80HqmjMWS0sAlpLS4VSSWOxBIZLCdAglkLDUtVFKcAK1Bw1ADdcQW1ESmoKy3fJ2ZfvMNUpVJMOGE1bDaPrzLiuvHHV_0nvXqpnv6oklVoznQyOvg1G_zZhiFXnQoNtSod-ChVVUijgpWJJevh31--Sn1fzD7LihSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1854803782</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Immediate vs non-immediate loading post-extractive implants: a comparative study of implant stability quotient (ISQ)</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Milillo, L ; Fiandaca, C ; Giannoulis, F ; Ottria, L ; Lucchese, A ; Silvestre, F ; Petruzzi, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Milillo, L ; Fiandaca, C ; Giannoulis, F ; Ottria, L ; Lucchese, A ; Silvestre, F ; Petruzzi, M</creatorcontrib><description>This study aims to evaluate differences in implant stability between post-extractive implants immediately placed post-extractive implants by resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Patients were grouped into two different categories. In Group A 10 patients had an immediate post-extractive implant, then a provisional, acrylic resin crown was placed (immediate loading). In Group B (control group) 10 patients only had an immediate post-extractive implant. Both upper and lower premolars were chosen as post-extractive sites. Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) was measured thanks to RFA measurements (Osstell®). Five intervals were considered: immediately after surgery (T0) and every four weeks, until five months after implant placement (T1, T2, T3, T4,T5). A statistical analysis by means of Student's T-test (significance set at p&lt;0.05) for independent sample was carried out in order to compare Groups A and B. The ISQ value between the two groups showed a statistically significant difference (p&lt;0.02) at T1. No statistically significant difference in ISQ was assessed at T0, T2, T3, T4 and T5. After clinical assessment it is possible to confirm that provisional and immediate prosthetic surgery in post-extraction sites with cone-shaped implants, platform-switching abutment and bioactive surface can facilitate osseointegration, reducing healing time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1974-5648</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2035-2468</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.11138/orl/2016.9.3.123</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28042440</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Italy: CIC Edizioni Internazionali</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>Oral &amp; implantology, 2016-07, Vol.9 (3), p.123-131</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2016, CIC Edizioni Internazionali, Roma 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5159929/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5159929/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28042440$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Milillo, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiandaca, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannoulis, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ottria, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucchese, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silvestre, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petruzzi, M</creatorcontrib><title>Immediate vs non-immediate loading post-extractive implants: a comparative study of implant stability quotient (ISQ)</title><title>Oral &amp; implantology</title><addtitle>Oral Implantol (Rome)</addtitle><description>This study aims to evaluate differences in implant stability between post-extractive implants immediately placed post-extractive implants by resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Patients were grouped into two different categories. In Group A 10 patients had an immediate post-extractive implant, then a provisional, acrylic resin crown was placed (immediate loading). In Group B (control group) 10 patients only had an immediate post-extractive implant. Both upper and lower premolars were chosen as post-extractive sites. Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) was measured thanks to RFA measurements (Osstell®). Five intervals were considered: immediately after surgery (T0) and every four weeks, until five months after implant placement (T1, T2, T3, T4,T5). A statistical analysis by means of Student's T-test (significance set at p&lt;0.05) for independent sample was carried out in order to compare Groups A and B. The ISQ value between the two groups showed a statistically significant difference (p&lt;0.02) at T1. No statistically significant difference in ISQ was assessed at T0, T2, T3, T4 and T5. After clinical assessment it is possible to confirm that provisional and immediate prosthetic surgery in post-extraction sites with cone-shaped implants, platform-switching abutment and bioactive surface can facilitate osseointegration, reducing healing time.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>1974-5648</issn><issn>2035-2468</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkEtLxTAQhYMoelF_gBvpUhe9Tl5t4kIQ8XFBEFHXJW3maqRtapNevP_e4AudzcA3hzNzhpADCnNKKVcnfmxPGNBirud8ThnfIDMGXOZMFGqTzKguRS4LoXbIfgivkKoAyZXeJjtMgWBCwIzERdehdSZitgpZ7_vc_YLWG-v652zwIeb4HkfTRLfCzHVDa_oYTjOTNb4bzGg-eYiTXWd--SNIwNSudXGdvU0-OkzoaPFwf7xHtpamDbj_3XfJ09Xl48VNfnt3vbg4v80HqmjMWS0sAlpLS4VSSWOxBIZLCdAglkLDUtVFKcAK1Bw1ADdcQW1ESmoKy3fJ2ZfvMNUpVJMOGE1bDaPrzLiuvHHV_0nvXqpnv6oklVoznQyOvg1G_zZhiFXnQoNtSod-ChVVUijgpWJJevh31--Sn1fzD7LihSg</recordid><startdate>201607</startdate><enddate>201607</enddate><creator>Milillo, L</creator><creator>Fiandaca, C</creator><creator>Giannoulis, F</creator><creator>Ottria, L</creator><creator>Lucchese, A</creator><creator>Silvestre, F</creator><creator>Petruzzi, M</creator><general>CIC Edizioni Internazionali</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201607</creationdate><title>Immediate vs non-immediate loading post-extractive implants: a comparative study of implant stability quotient (ISQ)</title><author>Milillo, L ; Fiandaca, C ; Giannoulis, F ; Ottria, L ; Lucchese, A ; Silvestre, F ; Petruzzi, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p181t-2b4de0edd178e585ade702ef500cee7490f8b6740d4e93e9003a380ba4060a6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Milillo, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiandaca, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannoulis, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ottria, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucchese, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silvestre, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petruzzi, M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Oral &amp; implantology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Milillo, L</au><au>Fiandaca, C</au><au>Giannoulis, F</au><au>Ottria, L</au><au>Lucchese, A</au><au>Silvestre, F</au><au>Petruzzi, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Immediate vs non-immediate loading post-extractive implants: a comparative study of implant stability quotient (ISQ)</atitle><jtitle>Oral &amp; implantology</jtitle><addtitle>Oral Implantol (Rome)</addtitle><date>2016-07</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>123</spage><epage>131</epage><pages>123-131</pages><issn>1974-5648</issn><eissn>2035-2468</eissn><abstract>This study aims to evaluate differences in implant stability between post-extractive implants immediately placed post-extractive implants by resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Patients were grouped into two different categories. In Group A 10 patients had an immediate post-extractive implant, then a provisional, acrylic resin crown was placed (immediate loading). In Group B (control group) 10 patients only had an immediate post-extractive implant. Both upper and lower premolars were chosen as post-extractive sites. Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) was measured thanks to RFA measurements (Osstell®). Five intervals were considered: immediately after surgery (T0) and every four weeks, until five months after implant placement (T1, T2, T3, T4,T5). A statistical analysis by means of Student's T-test (significance set at p&lt;0.05) for independent sample was carried out in order to compare Groups A and B. The ISQ value between the two groups showed a statistically significant difference (p&lt;0.02) at T1. No statistically significant difference in ISQ was assessed at T0, T2, T3, T4 and T5. After clinical assessment it is possible to confirm that provisional and immediate prosthetic surgery in post-extraction sites with cone-shaped implants, platform-switching abutment and bioactive surface can facilitate osseointegration, reducing healing time.</abstract><cop>Italy</cop><pub>CIC Edizioni Internazionali</pub><pmid>28042440</pmid><doi>10.11138/orl/2016.9.3.123</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1974-5648
ispartof Oral & implantology, 2016-07, Vol.9 (3), p.123-131
issn 1974-5648
2035-2468
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5159929
source PubMed Central
subjects Original
title Immediate vs non-immediate loading post-extractive implants: a comparative study of implant stability quotient (ISQ)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A12%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Immediate%20vs%20non-immediate%20loading%20post-extractive%20implants:%20a%20comparative%20study%20of%20implant%20stability%20quotient%20(ISQ)&rft.jtitle=Oral%20&%20implantology&rft.au=Milillo,%20L&rft.date=2016-07&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=131&rft.pages=123-131&rft.issn=1974-5648&rft.eissn=2035-2468&rft_id=info:doi/10.11138/orl/2016.9.3.123&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1854803782%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p181t-2b4de0edd178e585ade702ef500cee7490f8b6740d4e93e9003a380ba4060a6d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1854803782&rft_id=info:pmid/28042440&rfr_iscdi=true