Transcriptional Characterization of a Widely-Used Grapevine Rootstock Genotype under Different Iron-Limited Conditions

• Published in: Frontiers in plant science 2017-01, Vol.7, p.1994-1994
• Main Authors: Vannozzi, Alessandro, Donnini, Silvia, Vigani, Gianpiero, Corso, Massimiliano, Valle, Giorgio, Vitulo, Nicola, Bonghi, Claudio, Zocchi, Graziano, Lucchin, Margherita
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biochemistry, Molecular Biology; Biodiversity; Genomics; Life Sciences; Molecular Networks; Plant breeding; Plant Science; Vegetal Biology
• ISSN: 1664-462X; 1664-462X
• DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01994

Iron chlorosis is a serious deficiency that affects orchards and vineyards reducing quality and yield production. Chlorotic plants show abnormal photosynthesis and yellowing shoots. In grapevine iron uptake and homeostasis are most likely controlled by a mechanism known as "Strategy I," characteristic of non-graminaceous plants and based on a system of soil acidification, iron reduction and transporter-mediated uptake. Nowadays, grafting of varieties of economic interest on tolerant rootstocks is widely used practice against many biotic and abiotic stresses. Nevertheless, many interspecific rootstocks, and in particular those obtained by crossing exclusively genotypes, can show limited nutrient uptake and transport, in particular for what concerns iron. In the present study, 101.14, a commonly used rootstock characterized by susceptibility to iron chlorosis was subjected to both Fe-absence and Fe-limiting conditions. Grapevine plantlets were grown in control, Fe-deprived, and bicarbonate-supplemented hydroponic solutions. Whole transcriptome analyses, via mRNA-Seq, were performed on root apices of stressed and unstressed plants. Analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) confirmed that Strategy I is the mechanism responsible for iron uptake in grapevine, since many orthologs genes to the "ferrome" were differentially regulated in stressed plant. Molecular differences in the plant responses to Fe absence and presence of bicarbonate were also identified indicating the two treatments are able to induce response-mechanisms only partially overlapping. Finally, we measured the expression of a subset of genes differentially expressed in 101.14 (such as / ) or known to be fundamental in the "strategy I" mechanism ( and ) also in a tolerant rootstock (M1) finding important differences which could be responsible for the different degrees of tolerance observed.