Loading…
Does involvement in a cohort study improve health and affect health inequalities? A natural experiment
Evidence suggests that the process of taking part in health research can improve participants' health, independent of any intended intervention. However, no research has yet explored whether these effects differ across socioeconomic groups. If the effect of mere participation in health research...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMC health services research 2017-01, Vol.17 (1), p.79-79, Article 79 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-c313eb8a8b88f6ce6e143868cd32586ba1e4f975cc8ef6579996b25f90b99e473 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-c313eb8a8b88f6ce6e143868cd32586ba1e4f975cc8ef6579996b25f90b99e473 |
container_end_page | 79 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 79 |
container_title | BMC health services research |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Quick, Annie Böhnke, Jan R Wright, John Pickett, Kate E |
description | Evidence suggests that the process of taking part in health research can improve participants' health, independent of any intended intervention. However, no research has yet explored whether these effects differ across socioeconomic groups. If the effect of mere participation in health research also has a social gradient this could increase health inequalities and bias research results. This study used the Born in Bradford family cohort (BIB) to explore whether simply taking part in BIB had improved participants' health and, if so, whether this effect was mediated by socioeconomic status.
Survey data on self-reported health behaviours were collected between 2007 and 2010 as part of BIB. These were augmented by clinical data on birth weight. Pregnant women on their second pregnancy, joining BIB for the first time formed the control group. Their health was compared to women on their second pregnancy who had both pregnancies within the study, who formed the exposed group. In order to limit the inherent bias in a non-randomised study, propensity score analysis was used, matching on age, ethnicity, education and date of questionnaire. The results were then compared according to mothers' education.
Of six outcomes tested, only alcohol consumption showed a statistically significant reduction with exposure to BIB (OR: 0.35, 95% CIs 0.13, 0.92). Although effect estimates were larger for women with higher education compared to lower education, these effects were not statistically significant.
Despite one significant finding, these results overall are insufficient to conclude that simply taking part in BIB affected participants' health. We recommend that socioeconomic status is considered in future studies testing effects of research participation, and that randomised studies with larger sample sizes are conducted. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12913-017-2016-7 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5264453</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A480609054</galeid><sourcerecordid>A480609054</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-c313eb8a8b88f6ce6e143868cd32586ba1e4f975cc8ef6579996b25f90b99e473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk1v1DAQtRCIlsIP4IIsceGS4q849gW0Kp9SJS5wthxn3HWV2Fs7WdF_j8NuqxYhHzwav3nzZvwQek3JOaVKvi-UacobQruGESqb7gk6paJjjdSSP30Qn6AXpVyTClSse45OmKKMScpOkf-UoOAQ92ncwwRxrjG22KVtyjMu8zLc4jDtctoD3oId5y22ccDWe3DzXSZEuFnsGOYA5SPe4GjnJdsRw-8d5LCyvkTPvB0LvDreZ-jXl88_L741lz--fr_YXDZOaDE3jlMOvbKqV8pLBxKo4EoqN3DWKtlbCsLrrnVOgZdtp7WWPWu9Jr3WIDp-hj4ceHdLP8HgausqxOyqCptvTbLBPH6JYWuu0t60TArR8krw7kiQ080CZTZTKA7G0UZISzF17YwpobWo0Lf_QK_TkmMdb0UJIpn-q-iIurIjmBB9qn3dSmo2QhFJNGlXrvP_oOoZYAouRfCh5h8V0EOBy6mUDP5-RkrMag5zMIepf25Wc5hVypuHy7mvuHMD_wOnfbT5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1864062947</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does involvement in a cohort study improve health and affect health inequalities? A natural experiment</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Quick, Annie ; Böhnke, Jan R ; Wright, John ; Pickett, Kate E</creator><creatorcontrib>Quick, Annie ; Böhnke, Jan R ; Wright, John ; Pickett, Kate E</creatorcontrib><description>Evidence suggests that the process of taking part in health research can improve participants' health, independent of any intended intervention. However, no research has yet explored whether these effects differ across socioeconomic groups. If the effect of mere participation in health research also has a social gradient this could increase health inequalities and bias research results. This study used the Born in Bradford family cohort (BIB) to explore whether simply taking part in BIB had improved participants' health and, if so, whether this effect was mediated by socioeconomic status.
Survey data on self-reported health behaviours were collected between 2007 and 2010 as part of BIB. These were augmented by clinical data on birth weight. Pregnant women on their second pregnancy, joining BIB for the first time formed the control group. Their health was compared to women on their second pregnancy who had both pregnancies within the study, who formed the exposed group. In order to limit the inherent bias in a non-randomised study, propensity score analysis was used, matching on age, ethnicity, education and date of questionnaire. The results were then compared according to mothers' education.
Of six outcomes tested, only alcohol consumption showed a statistically significant reduction with exposure to BIB (OR: 0.35, 95% CIs 0.13, 0.92). Although effect estimates were larger for women with higher education compared to lower education, these effects were not statistically significant.
Despite one significant finding, these results overall are insufficient to conclude that simply taking part in BIB affected participants' health. We recommend that socioeconomic status is considered in future studies testing effects of research participation, and that randomised studies with larger sample sizes are conducted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-6963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-6963</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2016-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28122612</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cohort analysis ; Cohort Studies ; Education ; Effect Modifier, Epidemiologic ; Exercise ; Female ; Health aspects ; Health Behavior ; Health disparities ; Health promotion ; Health Status Disparities ; Humans ; Intervention ; Maternal & child health ; Participant observation ; Pregnancy ; Pregnant women ; Propensity Score ; Questionnaires ; Smoking cessation ; Social Class ; Socioeconomic factors ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>BMC health services research, 2017-01, Vol.17 (1), p.79-79, Article 79</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright BioMed Central 2017</rights><rights>The Author(s). 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-c313eb8a8b88f6ce6e143868cd32586ba1e4f975cc8ef6579996b25f90b99e473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-c313eb8a8b88f6ce6e143868cd32586ba1e4f975cc8ef6579996b25f90b99e473</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9224-7331</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5264453/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1864062947?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,11688,25753,27924,27925,36060,36061,37012,37013,44363,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28122612$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quick, Annie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böhnke, Jan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickett, Kate E</creatorcontrib><title>Does involvement in a cohort study improve health and affect health inequalities? A natural experiment</title><title>BMC health services research</title><addtitle>BMC Health Serv Res</addtitle><description>Evidence suggests that the process of taking part in health research can improve participants' health, independent of any intended intervention. However, no research has yet explored whether these effects differ across socioeconomic groups. If the effect of mere participation in health research also has a social gradient this could increase health inequalities and bias research results. This study used the Born in Bradford family cohort (BIB) to explore whether simply taking part in BIB had improved participants' health and, if so, whether this effect was mediated by socioeconomic status.
Survey data on self-reported health behaviours were collected between 2007 and 2010 as part of BIB. These were augmented by clinical data on birth weight. Pregnant women on their second pregnancy, joining BIB for the first time formed the control group. Their health was compared to women on their second pregnancy who had both pregnancies within the study, who formed the exposed group. In order to limit the inherent bias in a non-randomised study, propensity score analysis was used, matching on age, ethnicity, education and date of questionnaire. The results were then compared according to mothers' education.
Of six outcomes tested, only alcohol consumption showed a statistically significant reduction with exposure to BIB (OR: 0.35, 95% CIs 0.13, 0.92). Although effect estimates were larger for women with higher education compared to lower education, these effects were not statistically significant.
Despite one significant finding, these results overall are insufficient to conclude that simply taking part in BIB affected participants' health. We recommend that socioeconomic status is considered in future studies testing effects of research participation, and that randomised studies with larger sample sizes are conducted.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Effect Modifier, Epidemiologic</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Health disparities</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Health Status Disparities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Maternal & child health</subject><subject>Participant observation</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnant women</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Smoking cessation</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1472-6963</issn><issn>1472-6963</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk1v1DAQtRCIlsIP4IIsceGS4q849gW0Kp9SJS5wthxn3HWV2Fs7WdF_j8NuqxYhHzwav3nzZvwQek3JOaVKvi-UacobQruGESqb7gk6paJjjdSSP30Qn6AXpVyTClSse45OmKKMScpOkf-UoOAQ92ncwwRxrjG22KVtyjMu8zLc4jDtctoD3oId5y22ccDWe3DzXSZEuFnsGOYA5SPe4GjnJdsRw-8d5LCyvkTPvB0LvDreZ-jXl88_L741lz--fr_YXDZOaDE3jlMOvbKqV8pLBxKo4EoqN3DWKtlbCsLrrnVOgZdtp7WWPWu9Jr3WIDp-hj4ceHdLP8HgausqxOyqCptvTbLBPH6JYWuu0t60TArR8krw7kiQ080CZTZTKA7G0UZISzF17YwpobWo0Lf_QK_TkmMdb0UJIpn-q-iIurIjmBB9qn3dSmo2QhFJNGlXrvP_oOoZYAouRfCh5h8V0EOBy6mUDP5-RkrMag5zMIepf25Wc5hVypuHy7mvuHMD_wOnfbT5</recordid><startdate>20170125</startdate><enddate>20170125</enddate><creator>Quick, Annie</creator><creator>Böhnke, Jan R</creator><creator>Wright, John</creator><creator>Pickett, Kate E</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9224-7331</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170125</creationdate><title>Does involvement in a cohort study improve health and affect health inequalities? A natural experiment</title><author>Quick, Annie ; Böhnke, Jan R ; Wright, John ; Pickett, Kate E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-c313eb8a8b88f6ce6e143868cd32586ba1e4f975cc8ef6579996b25f90b99e473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Effect Modifier, Epidemiologic</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Health disparities</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Health Status Disparities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Maternal & child health</topic><topic>Participant observation</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnant women</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Smoking cessation</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quick, Annie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böhnke, Jan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickett, Kate E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMC health services research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quick, Annie</au><au>Böhnke, Jan R</au><au>Wright, John</au><au>Pickett, Kate E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does involvement in a cohort study improve health and affect health inequalities? A natural experiment</atitle><jtitle>BMC health services research</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Health Serv Res</addtitle><date>2017-01-25</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>79</epage><pages>79-79</pages><artnum>79</artnum><issn>1472-6963</issn><eissn>1472-6963</eissn><abstract>Evidence suggests that the process of taking part in health research can improve participants' health, independent of any intended intervention. However, no research has yet explored whether these effects differ across socioeconomic groups. If the effect of mere participation in health research also has a social gradient this could increase health inequalities and bias research results. This study used the Born in Bradford family cohort (BIB) to explore whether simply taking part in BIB had improved participants' health and, if so, whether this effect was mediated by socioeconomic status.
Survey data on self-reported health behaviours were collected between 2007 and 2010 as part of BIB. These were augmented by clinical data on birth weight. Pregnant women on their second pregnancy, joining BIB for the first time formed the control group. Their health was compared to women on their second pregnancy who had both pregnancies within the study, who formed the exposed group. In order to limit the inherent bias in a non-randomised study, propensity score analysis was used, matching on age, ethnicity, education and date of questionnaire. The results were then compared according to mothers' education.
Of six outcomes tested, only alcohol consumption showed a statistically significant reduction with exposure to BIB (OR: 0.35, 95% CIs 0.13, 0.92). Although effect estimates were larger for women with higher education compared to lower education, these effects were not statistically significant.
Despite one significant finding, these results overall are insufficient to conclude that simply taking part in BIB affected participants' health. We recommend that socioeconomic status is considered in future studies testing effects of research participation, and that randomised studies with larger sample sizes are conducted.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>28122612</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12913-017-2016-7</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9224-7331</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1472-6963 |
ispartof | BMC health services research, 2017-01, Vol.17 (1), p.79-79, Article 79 |
issn | 1472-6963 1472-6963 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5264453 |
source | ABI/INFORM global; Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Cohort analysis Cohort Studies Education Effect Modifier, Epidemiologic Exercise Female Health aspects Health Behavior Health disparities Health promotion Health Status Disparities Humans Intervention Maternal & child health Participant observation Pregnancy Pregnant women Propensity Score Questionnaires Smoking cessation Social Class Socioeconomic factors Surveys and Questionnaires Womens health |
title | Does involvement in a cohort study improve health and affect health inequalities? A natural experiment |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T10%3A31%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20involvement%20in%20a%20cohort%20study%20improve%20health%20and%20affect%20health%20inequalities?%20A%20natural%20experiment&rft.jtitle=BMC%20health%20services%20research&rft.au=Quick,%20Annie&rft.date=2017-01-25&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=79&rft.pages=79-79&rft.artnum=79&rft.issn=1472-6963&rft.eissn=1472-6963&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12913-017-2016-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA480609054%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-c313eb8a8b88f6ce6e143868cd32586ba1e4f975cc8ef6579996b25f90b99e473%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1864062947&rft_id=info:pmid/28122612&rft_galeid=A480609054&rfr_iscdi=true |