Loading…

Does involvement in a cohort study improve health and affect health inequalities? A natural experiment

Evidence suggests that the process of taking part in health research can improve participants' health, independent of any intended intervention. However, no research has yet explored whether these effects differ across socioeconomic groups. If the effect of mere participation in health research...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC health services research 2017-01, Vol.17 (1), p.79-79, Article 79
Main Authors: Quick, Annie, Böhnke, Jan R, Wright, John, Pickett, Kate E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-c313eb8a8b88f6ce6e143868cd32586ba1e4f975cc8ef6579996b25f90b99e473
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-c313eb8a8b88f6ce6e143868cd32586ba1e4f975cc8ef6579996b25f90b99e473
container_end_page 79
container_issue 1
container_start_page 79
container_title BMC health services research
container_volume 17
creator Quick, Annie
Böhnke, Jan R
Wright, John
Pickett, Kate E
description Evidence suggests that the process of taking part in health research can improve participants' health, independent of any intended intervention. However, no research has yet explored whether these effects differ across socioeconomic groups. If the effect of mere participation in health research also has a social gradient this could increase health inequalities and bias research results. This study used the Born in Bradford family cohort (BIB) to explore whether simply taking part in BIB had improved participants' health and, if so, whether this effect was mediated by socioeconomic status. Survey data on self-reported health behaviours were collected between 2007 and 2010 as part of BIB. These were augmented by clinical data on birth weight. Pregnant women on their second pregnancy, joining BIB for the first time formed the control group. Their health was compared to women on their second pregnancy who had both pregnancies within the study, who formed the exposed group. In order to limit the inherent bias in a non-randomised study, propensity score analysis was used, matching on age, ethnicity, education and date of questionnaire. The results were then compared according to mothers' education. Of six outcomes tested, only alcohol consumption showed a statistically significant reduction with exposure to BIB (OR: 0.35, 95% CIs 0.13, 0.92). Although effect estimates were larger for women with higher education compared to lower education, these effects were not statistically significant. Despite one significant finding, these results overall are insufficient to conclude that simply taking part in BIB affected participants' health. We recommend that socioeconomic status is considered in future studies testing effects of research participation, and that randomised studies with larger sample sizes are conducted.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12913-017-2016-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5264453</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A480609054</galeid><sourcerecordid>A480609054</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-c313eb8a8b88f6ce6e143868cd32586ba1e4f975cc8ef6579996b25f90b99e473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk1v1DAQtRCIlsIP4IIsceGS4q849gW0Kp9SJS5wthxn3HWV2Fs7WdF_j8NuqxYhHzwav3nzZvwQek3JOaVKvi-UacobQruGESqb7gk6paJjjdSSP30Qn6AXpVyTClSse45OmKKMScpOkf-UoOAQ92ncwwRxrjG22KVtyjMu8zLc4jDtctoD3oId5y22ccDWe3DzXSZEuFnsGOYA5SPe4GjnJdsRw-8d5LCyvkTPvB0LvDreZ-jXl88_L741lz--fr_YXDZOaDE3jlMOvbKqV8pLBxKo4EoqN3DWKtlbCsLrrnVOgZdtp7WWPWu9Jr3WIDp-hj4ceHdLP8HgausqxOyqCptvTbLBPH6JYWuu0t60TArR8krw7kiQ080CZTZTKA7G0UZISzF17YwpobWo0Lf_QK_TkmMdb0UJIpn-q-iIurIjmBB9qn3dSmo2QhFJNGlXrvP_oOoZYAouRfCh5h8V0EOBy6mUDP5-RkrMag5zMIepf25Wc5hVypuHy7mvuHMD_wOnfbT5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1864062947</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does involvement in a cohort study improve health and affect health inequalities? A natural experiment</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Quick, Annie ; Böhnke, Jan R ; Wright, John ; Pickett, Kate E</creator><creatorcontrib>Quick, Annie ; Böhnke, Jan R ; Wright, John ; Pickett, Kate E</creatorcontrib><description>Evidence suggests that the process of taking part in health research can improve participants' health, independent of any intended intervention. However, no research has yet explored whether these effects differ across socioeconomic groups. If the effect of mere participation in health research also has a social gradient this could increase health inequalities and bias research results. This study used the Born in Bradford family cohort (BIB) to explore whether simply taking part in BIB had improved participants' health and, if so, whether this effect was mediated by socioeconomic status. Survey data on self-reported health behaviours were collected between 2007 and 2010 as part of BIB. These were augmented by clinical data on birth weight. Pregnant women on their second pregnancy, joining BIB for the first time formed the control group. Their health was compared to women on their second pregnancy who had both pregnancies within the study, who formed the exposed group. In order to limit the inherent bias in a non-randomised study, propensity score analysis was used, matching on age, ethnicity, education and date of questionnaire. The results were then compared according to mothers' education. Of six outcomes tested, only alcohol consumption showed a statistically significant reduction with exposure to BIB (OR: 0.35, 95% CIs 0.13, 0.92). Although effect estimates were larger for women with higher education compared to lower education, these effects were not statistically significant. Despite one significant finding, these results overall are insufficient to conclude that simply taking part in BIB affected participants' health. We recommend that socioeconomic status is considered in future studies testing effects of research participation, and that randomised studies with larger sample sizes are conducted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-6963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-6963</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2016-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28122612</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cohort analysis ; Cohort Studies ; Education ; Effect Modifier, Epidemiologic ; Exercise ; Female ; Health aspects ; Health Behavior ; Health disparities ; Health promotion ; Health Status Disparities ; Humans ; Intervention ; Maternal &amp; child health ; Participant observation ; Pregnancy ; Pregnant women ; Propensity Score ; Questionnaires ; Smoking cessation ; Social Class ; Socioeconomic factors ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>BMC health services research, 2017-01, Vol.17 (1), p.79-79, Article 79</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright BioMed Central 2017</rights><rights>The Author(s). 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-c313eb8a8b88f6ce6e143868cd32586ba1e4f975cc8ef6579996b25f90b99e473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-c313eb8a8b88f6ce6e143868cd32586ba1e4f975cc8ef6579996b25f90b99e473</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9224-7331</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5264453/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1864062947?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,11688,25753,27924,27925,36060,36061,37012,37013,44363,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28122612$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quick, Annie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böhnke, Jan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickett, Kate E</creatorcontrib><title>Does involvement in a cohort study improve health and affect health inequalities? A natural experiment</title><title>BMC health services research</title><addtitle>BMC Health Serv Res</addtitle><description>Evidence suggests that the process of taking part in health research can improve participants' health, independent of any intended intervention. However, no research has yet explored whether these effects differ across socioeconomic groups. If the effect of mere participation in health research also has a social gradient this could increase health inequalities and bias research results. This study used the Born in Bradford family cohort (BIB) to explore whether simply taking part in BIB had improved participants' health and, if so, whether this effect was mediated by socioeconomic status. Survey data on self-reported health behaviours were collected between 2007 and 2010 as part of BIB. These were augmented by clinical data on birth weight. Pregnant women on their second pregnancy, joining BIB for the first time formed the control group. Their health was compared to women on their second pregnancy who had both pregnancies within the study, who formed the exposed group. In order to limit the inherent bias in a non-randomised study, propensity score analysis was used, matching on age, ethnicity, education and date of questionnaire. The results were then compared according to mothers' education. Of six outcomes tested, only alcohol consumption showed a statistically significant reduction with exposure to BIB (OR: 0.35, 95% CIs 0.13, 0.92). Although effect estimates were larger for women with higher education compared to lower education, these effects were not statistically significant. Despite one significant finding, these results overall are insufficient to conclude that simply taking part in BIB affected participants' health. We recommend that socioeconomic status is considered in future studies testing effects of research participation, and that randomised studies with larger sample sizes are conducted.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Effect Modifier, Epidemiologic</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Health disparities</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Health Status Disparities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Maternal &amp; child health</subject><subject>Participant observation</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnant women</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Smoking cessation</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1472-6963</issn><issn>1472-6963</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk1v1DAQtRCIlsIP4IIsceGS4q849gW0Kp9SJS5wthxn3HWV2Fs7WdF_j8NuqxYhHzwav3nzZvwQek3JOaVKvi-UacobQruGESqb7gk6paJjjdSSP30Qn6AXpVyTClSse45OmKKMScpOkf-UoOAQ92ncwwRxrjG22KVtyjMu8zLc4jDtctoD3oId5y22ccDWe3DzXSZEuFnsGOYA5SPe4GjnJdsRw-8d5LCyvkTPvB0LvDreZ-jXl88_L741lz--fr_YXDZOaDE3jlMOvbKqV8pLBxKo4EoqN3DWKtlbCsLrrnVOgZdtp7WWPWu9Jr3WIDp-hj4ceHdLP8HgausqxOyqCptvTbLBPH6JYWuu0t60TArR8krw7kiQ080CZTZTKA7G0UZISzF17YwpobWo0Lf_QK_TkmMdb0UJIpn-q-iIurIjmBB9qn3dSmo2QhFJNGlXrvP_oOoZYAouRfCh5h8V0EOBy6mUDP5-RkrMag5zMIepf25Wc5hVypuHy7mvuHMD_wOnfbT5</recordid><startdate>20170125</startdate><enddate>20170125</enddate><creator>Quick, Annie</creator><creator>Böhnke, Jan R</creator><creator>Wright, John</creator><creator>Pickett, Kate E</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9224-7331</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170125</creationdate><title>Does involvement in a cohort study improve health and affect health inequalities? A natural experiment</title><author>Quick, Annie ; Böhnke, Jan R ; Wright, John ; Pickett, Kate E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-c313eb8a8b88f6ce6e143868cd32586ba1e4f975cc8ef6579996b25f90b99e473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Effect Modifier, Epidemiologic</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Health disparities</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Health Status Disparities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Maternal &amp; child health</topic><topic>Participant observation</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnant women</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Smoking cessation</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quick, Annie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böhnke, Jan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickett, Kate E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMC health services research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quick, Annie</au><au>Böhnke, Jan R</au><au>Wright, John</au><au>Pickett, Kate E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does involvement in a cohort study improve health and affect health inequalities? A natural experiment</atitle><jtitle>BMC health services research</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Health Serv Res</addtitle><date>2017-01-25</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>79</epage><pages>79-79</pages><artnum>79</artnum><issn>1472-6963</issn><eissn>1472-6963</eissn><abstract>Evidence suggests that the process of taking part in health research can improve participants' health, independent of any intended intervention. However, no research has yet explored whether these effects differ across socioeconomic groups. If the effect of mere participation in health research also has a social gradient this could increase health inequalities and bias research results. This study used the Born in Bradford family cohort (BIB) to explore whether simply taking part in BIB had improved participants' health and, if so, whether this effect was mediated by socioeconomic status. Survey data on self-reported health behaviours were collected between 2007 and 2010 as part of BIB. These were augmented by clinical data on birth weight. Pregnant women on their second pregnancy, joining BIB for the first time formed the control group. Their health was compared to women on their second pregnancy who had both pregnancies within the study, who formed the exposed group. In order to limit the inherent bias in a non-randomised study, propensity score analysis was used, matching on age, ethnicity, education and date of questionnaire. The results were then compared according to mothers' education. Of six outcomes tested, only alcohol consumption showed a statistically significant reduction with exposure to BIB (OR: 0.35, 95% CIs 0.13, 0.92). Although effect estimates were larger for women with higher education compared to lower education, these effects were not statistically significant. Despite one significant finding, these results overall are insufficient to conclude that simply taking part in BIB affected participants' health. We recommend that socioeconomic status is considered in future studies testing effects of research participation, and that randomised studies with larger sample sizes are conducted.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>28122612</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12913-017-2016-7</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9224-7331</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1472-6963
ispartof BMC health services research, 2017-01, Vol.17 (1), p.79-79, Article 79
issn 1472-6963
1472-6963
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5264453
source ABI/INFORM global; Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Cohort analysis
Cohort Studies
Education
Effect Modifier, Epidemiologic
Exercise
Female
Health aspects
Health Behavior
Health disparities
Health promotion
Health Status Disparities
Humans
Intervention
Maternal & child health
Participant observation
Pregnancy
Pregnant women
Propensity Score
Questionnaires
Smoking cessation
Social Class
Socioeconomic factors
Surveys and Questionnaires
Womens health
title Does involvement in a cohort study improve health and affect health inequalities? A natural experiment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T10%3A31%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20involvement%20in%20a%20cohort%20study%20improve%20health%20and%20affect%20health%20inequalities?%20A%20natural%20experiment&rft.jtitle=BMC%20health%20services%20research&rft.au=Quick,%20Annie&rft.date=2017-01-25&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=79&rft.pages=79-79&rft.artnum=79&rft.issn=1472-6963&rft.eissn=1472-6963&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12913-017-2016-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA480609054%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-c313eb8a8b88f6ce6e143868cd32586ba1e4f975cc8ef6579996b25f90b99e473%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1864062947&rft_id=info:pmid/28122612&rft_galeid=A480609054&rfr_iscdi=true