Loading…

TFIID or not TFIID, a continuing transcriptional SAGA

Eukaryotic protein‐coding genes are typically classified into two groups: those with expression regulated by specific signals versus the relatively constant “housekeeping” genes. Although these differences are associated with alternative modes of RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) pre‐initiation complex (P...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The EMBO journal 2017-02, Vol.36 (3), p.248-249
Main Authors: Kubik, Slawomir, Bruzzone, Maria Jessica, Shore, David
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5132-95f37f31575b624f798e127f50446be7aefb2be03939ad424778e9d154d1dddf3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5132-95f37f31575b624f798e127f50446be7aefb2be03939ad424778e9d154d1dddf3
container_end_page 249
container_issue 3
container_start_page 248
container_title The EMBO journal
container_volume 36
creator Kubik, Slawomir
Bruzzone, Maria Jessica
Shore, David
description Eukaryotic protein‐coding genes are typically classified into two groups: those with expression regulated by specific signals versus the relatively constant “housekeeping” genes. Although these differences are associated with alternative modes of RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) pre‐initiation complex (PIC) assembly, a role for gene‐specific activators in controlling “regulatability” has been difficult to rule out. To address this question, de Jonge et al ( 2017 ) studied a group of genes controlled by a common activator but dependent on either TFIID or SAGA and found that the magnitude of regulation strongly correlates with the mechanism of PIC assembly. Graphical Abstract Alternative modes of transcriptional pre‐initiation complex assembly rather than gene‐specific activators differentiate housekeeping gene expression from regulated gene expression.
doi_str_mv 10.15252/embj.201696152
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5286358</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1857371509</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5132-95f37f31575b624f798e127f50446be7aefb2be03939ad424778e9d154d1dddf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1LwzAAxYMoOj_O3qTgxYPVJM1H40GYuulE8aCeQ9qmM6NLZtIq_vdGp2MK4ikk-b3HezwAdhE8QhRTfKynxeQIQ8QEiw8roIcIgymGnK6CHsQMpQTlYgNshjCBENKco3WwgXPIBIe8B-jDcDS6SJxPrGuTz8thopLS2dbYzthx0nplQ-nNrDXOqia571_2t8FarZqgd77OLfA4HDycX6U3d5ej8_5NWlKU4VTQOuN1hiinBcOk5iLXCPOaQkJYobnSdYELDTORCVURTDjPtagQJRWqqqrOtsDp3HfWFVNdldrGNI2ceTNV_k06ZeTPH2ue5Ni9SIpzltE8Ghx8GXj33OnQyqkJpW4aZbXrgkQ55RlHFIqI7v9CJ67zsfEHxWIJBgmO1PGcKr0Lwet6EQZB-TmJ_JhELiaJir3lDgv-e4MInMyBV9Pot__85OD27HrZHc7FIersWPul1H8EegdrGKXP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1863156042</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>TFIID or not TFIID, a continuing transcriptional SAGA</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kubik, Slawomir ; Bruzzone, Maria Jessica ; Shore, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Kubik, Slawomir ; Bruzzone, Maria Jessica ; Shore, David</creatorcontrib><description>Eukaryotic protein‐coding genes are typically classified into two groups: those with expression regulated by specific signals versus the relatively constant “housekeeping” genes. Although these differences are associated with alternative modes of RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) pre‐initiation complex (PIC) assembly, a role for gene‐specific activators in controlling “regulatability” has been difficult to rule out. To address this question, de Jonge et al ( 2017 ) studied a group of genes controlled by a common activator but dependent on either TFIID or SAGA and found that the magnitude of regulation strongly correlates with the mechanism of PIC assembly. Graphical Abstract Alternative modes of transcriptional pre‐initiation complex assembly rather than gene‐specific activators differentiate housekeeping gene expression from regulated gene expression.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-4189</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2075</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15252/embj.201696152</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28069707</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EMJODG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>EMBO09 ; EMBO44 ; Eukaryotes ; Gene expression ; Humans ; News &amp; Views ; Proteins ; RNA polymerase ; Saccharomyces cerevisiae - genetics ; Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins - genetics ; TATA-Binding Protein Associated Factors - genetics ; Transcription Factor TFIID - genetics ; Transcription, Genetic ; Views</subject><ispartof>The EMBO journal, 2017-02, Vol.36 (3), p.248-249</ispartof><rights>The Authors 2017</rights><rights>2017 The Authors</rights><rights>2017 EMBO</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5132-95f37f31575b624f798e127f50446be7aefb2be03939ad424778e9d154d1dddf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5132-95f37f31575b624f798e127f50446be7aefb2be03939ad424778e9d154d1dddf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9859-143X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5286358/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5286358/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28069707$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kubik, Slawomir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruzzone, Maria Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shore, David</creatorcontrib><title>TFIID or not TFIID, a continuing transcriptional SAGA</title><title>The EMBO journal</title><addtitle>EMBO J</addtitle><addtitle>EMBO J</addtitle><description>Eukaryotic protein‐coding genes are typically classified into two groups: those with expression regulated by specific signals versus the relatively constant “housekeeping” genes. Although these differences are associated with alternative modes of RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) pre‐initiation complex (PIC) assembly, a role for gene‐specific activators in controlling “regulatability” has been difficult to rule out. To address this question, de Jonge et al ( 2017 ) studied a group of genes controlled by a common activator but dependent on either TFIID or SAGA and found that the magnitude of regulation strongly correlates with the mechanism of PIC assembly. Graphical Abstract Alternative modes of transcriptional pre‐initiation complex assembly rather than gene‐specific activators differentiate housekeeping gene expression from regulated gene expression.</description><subject>EMBO09</subject><subject>EMBO44</subject><subject>Eukaryotes</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>News &amp; Views</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>RNA polymerase</subject><subject>Saccharomyces cerevisiae - genetics</subject><subject>Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>TATA-Binding Protein Associated Factors - genetics</subject><subject>Transcription Factor TFIID - genetics</subject><subject>Transcription, Genetic</subject><subject>Views</subject><issn>0261-4189</issn><issn>1460-2075</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1LwzAAxYMoOj_O3qTgxYPVJM1H40GYuulE8aCeQ9qmM6NLZtIq_vdGp2MK4ikk-b3HezwAdhE8QhRTfKynxeQIQ8QEiw8roIcIgymGnK6CHsQMpQTlYgNshjCBENKco3WwgXPIBIe8B-jDcDS6SJxPrGuTz8thopLS2dbYzthx0nplQ-nNrDXOqia571_2t8FarZqgd77OLfA4HDycX6U3d5ej8_5NWlKU4VTQOuN1hiinBcOk5iLXCPOaQkJYobnSdYELDTORCVURTDjPtagQJRWqqqrOtsDp3HfWFVNdldrGNI2ceTNV_k06ZeTPH2ue5Ni9SIpzltE8Ghx8GXj33OnQyqkJpW4aZbXrgkQ55RlHFIqI7v9CJ67zsfEHxWIJBgmO1PGcKr0Lwet6EQZB-TmJ_JhELiaJir3lDgv-e4MInMyBV9Pot__85OD27HrZHc7FIersWPul1H8EegdrGKXP</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Kubik, Slawomir</creator><creator>Bruzzone, Maria Jessica</creator><creator>Shore, David</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9859-143X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>TFIID or not TFIID, a continuing transcriptional SAGA</title><author>Kubik, Slawomir ; Bruzzone, Maria Jessica ; Shore, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5132-95f37f31575b624f798e127f50446be7aefb2be03939ad424778e9d154d1dddf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>EMBO09</topic><topic>EMBO44</topic><topic>Eukaryotes</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>News &amp; Views</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>RNA polymerase</topic><topic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae - genetics</topic><topic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>TATA-Binding Protein Associated Factors - genetics</topic><topic>Transcription Factor TFIID - genetics</topic><topic>Transcription, Genetic</topic><topic>Views</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kubik, Slawomir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruzzone, Maria Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shore, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The EMBO journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kubik, Slawomir</au><au>Bruzzone, Maria Jessica</au><au>Shore, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>TFIID or not TFIID, a continuing transcriptional SAGA</atitle><jtitle>The EMBO journal</jtitle><stitle>EMBO J</stitle><addtitle>EMBO J</addtitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>248</spage><epage>249</epage><pages>248-249</pages><issn>0261-4189</issn><eissn>1460-2075</eissn><coden>EMJODG</coden><abstract>Eukaryotic protein‐coding genes are typically classified into two groups: those with expression regulated by specific signals versus the relatively constant “housekeeping” genes. Although these differences are associated with alternative modes of RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) pre‐initiation complex (PIC) assembly, a role for gene‐specific activators in controlling “regulatability” has been difficult to rule out. To address this question, de Jonge et al ( 2017 ) studied a group of genes controlled by a common activator but dependent on either TFIID or SAGA and found that the magnitude of regulation strongly correlates with the mechanism of PIC assembly. Graphical Abstract Alternative modes of transcriptional pre‐initiation complex assembly rather than gene‐specific activators differentiate housekeeping gene expression from regulated gene expression.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>28069707</pmid><doi>10.15252/embj.201696152</doi><tpages>2</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9859-143X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0261-4189
ispartof The EMBO journal, 2017-02, Vol.36 (3), p.248-249
issn 0261-4189
1460-2075
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5286358
source PubMed Central
subjects EMBO09
EMBO44
Eukaryotes
Gene expression
Humans
News & Views
Proteins
RNA polymerase
Saccharomyces cerevisiae - genetics
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins - genetics
TATA-Binding Protein Associated Factors - genetics
Transcription Factor TFIID - genetics
Transcription, Genetic
Views
title TFIID or not TFIID, a continuing transcriptional SAGA
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A47%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=TFIID%20or%20not%20TFIID,%20a%20continuing%20transcriptional%20SAGA&rft.jtitle=The%20EMBO%20journal&rft.au=Kubik,%20Slawomir&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=248&rft.epage=249&rft.pages=248-249&rft.issn=0261-4189&rft.eissn=1460-2075&rft.coden=EMJODG&rft_id=info:doi/10.15252/embj.201696152&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1857371509%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5132-95f37f31575b624f798e127f50446be7aefb2be03939ad424778e9d154d1dddf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1863156042&rft_id=info:pmid/28069707&rfr_iscdi=true