Loading…
Quantifying the competing relationship between adduction range of motion and baseplate micromotion with lateralization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
Abstract Lateralizing the center of rotation (COR) of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) could improve functional outcomes and mitigate scapular notching, a commonly occurring complication of the procedure. However, resulting increases in torque at the bone-implant interface may negatively a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of biomechanics 2017-02, Vol.52, p.24-30 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c620t-d57b92ff3c0c70795c9c935fb11e7f9a8d13ca4e566f355ff361674f94e709c93 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c620t-d57b92ff3c0c70795c9c935fb11e7f9a8d13ca4e566f355ff361674f94e709c93 |
container_end_page | 30 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 24 |
container_title | Journal of biomechanics |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Elwell, Josie Choi, Joseph Willing, Ryan |
description | Abstract Lateralizing the center of rotation (COR) of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) could improve functional outcomes and mitigate scapular notching, a commonly occurring complication of the procedure. However, resulting increases in torque at the bone-implant interface may negatively affect initial fixation of the glenoid-side component, especially if only two fixation screws can be placed. Shoulder-specific finite element (FE) models of four fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were constructed. Scapular geometry and material property distributions were derived from CT data. Generic baseplates with two and four fixation screws were virtually implanted, after which superiorly-oriented shear loads, accompanied by a compressive load, were applied incrementally further from the glenoid surface to simulate lateralization of the COR. Relationships between lateralization, adduction range of motion (ROM), the number of fixation screws and micromotion of the baseplate (initial implant fixation) were characterized. Lateralization significantly increases micromotion ( p =0.015) and adduction ROM ( p =0.001). Using two, versus four, baseplate fixation screws significantly increases micromotion ( p =0.008). The effect of lateralization and the number of screws on adduction ROM and baseplate fixation is variable on a shoulder-specific basis. Trade-offs exist between functional outcomes, namely adduction ROM, and initial implant fixation and the negative effect of lateralization on implant fixation is amplified when only two fixation screws are used. The possibility of lateralizing the COR in order to improve functional outcomes of the procedure should be considered on a patient-specific basis accounting for factors such as availability and quality of bone stock. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.053 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5309173</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0021929016312325</els_id><sourcerecordid>1884116663</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c620t-d57b92ff3c0c70795c9c935fb11e7f9a8d13ca4e566f355ff361674f94e709c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEokvhL1SWuHDZxR-xnVwqUFU-pEoIAWfLcSYbL4m92M5Wy3_hv-J0twV6oSdrxs-84_G8RXFG8IpgIl5vVpvG-hFMv6I5XhGywpw9KhakkmxJWYUfFwuMKVnWtMYnxbMYNxhjWcr6aXFCK0xLIeii-PV50i7Zbm_dGqUekPHjFtIcBRh0st7F3m5RA-kawCHdtpOZsyhotwbkOzT6m1i7FjU6wjZXARqtCf54c21Tj-Zs0IP9eaM51wXYQYiAkk96QLH309BCQDqkPvisEtP-efGk00OEF8fztPj27vLrxYfl1af3Hy_eXi2NoDgtWy6bmnYdM9hILGtualMz3jWEgOxqXbWEGV0CF6JjnGdQECHLri5B4hk9Lc4PutupGaE14FJ-q9oGO-qwV15b9e-Ns71a-53iDNdEsizw6igQ_I8JYlKjjQaGQTvwU1SkqkpChBAPQSWtsizGD0A5Y7wqy3mCl_fQjZ-Cy5-WKSFrwnL7TIkDlZcTY4DubkSC1ewrtVG3vlKzrxQhKvsqF579_UF3ZbdGysCbAwB5TTsLQUVjwRlobQCTVOvt_3uc35Mwg3XW6OE77CH-mUdFqrD6Mrt7Nneei1BGOfsNj3L7ng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1867913116</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantifying the competing relationship between adduction range of motion and baseplate micromotion with lateralization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Elwell, Josie ; Choi, Joseph ; Willing, Ryan</creator><creatorcontrib>Elwell, Josie ; Choi, Joseph ; Willing, Ryan</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Lateralizing the center of rotation (COR) of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) could improve functional outcomes and mitigate scapular notching, a commonly occurring complication of the procedure. However, resulting increases in torque at the bone-implant interface may negatively affect initial fixation of the glenoid-side component, especially if only two fixation screws can be placed. Shoulder-specific finite element (FE) models of four fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were constructed. Scapular geometry and material property distributions were derived from CT data. Generic baseplates with two and four fixation screws were virtually implanted, after which superiorly-oriented shear loads, accompanied by a compressive load, were applied incrementally further from the glenoid surface to simulate lateralization of the COR. Relationships between lateralization, adduction range of motion (ROM), the number of fixation screws and micromotion of the baseplate (initial implant fixation) were characterized. Lateralization significantly increases micromotion ( p =0.015) and adduction ROM ( p =0.001). Using two, versus four, baseplate fixation screws significantly increases micromotion ( p =0.008). The effect of lateralization and the number of screws on adduction ROM and baseplate fixation is variable on a shoulder-specific basis. Trade-offs exist between functional outcomes, namely adduction ROM, and initial implant fixation and the negative effect of lateralization on implant fixation is amplified when only two fixation screws are used. The possibility of lateralizing the COR in order to improve functional outcomes of the procedure should be considered on a patient-specific basis accounting for factors such as availability and quality of bone stock.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.053</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28024662</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adduction range of motion ; Aged ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Biomedical materials ; Bone density ; Bone-Implant Interface - physiology ; Computer simulation ; Conflicts of interest ; Costs ; Female ; Finite element modelling ; Fixation ; Geometry ; Humans ; Implants ; Joint Prosthesis ; Joint surgery ; Lateralization ; Male ; Mathematical models ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty ; Scapula - physiology ; Screws ; Shoulder ; Shoulder Joint - physiology ; Shoulder Joint - surgery ; Shoulders ; Surgical implants ; Torque</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanics, 2017-02, Vol.52, p.24-30</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c620t-d57b92ff3c0c70795c9c935fb11e7f9a8d13ca4e566f355ff361674f94e709c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c620t-d57b92ff3c0c70795c9c935fb11e7f9a8d13ca4e566f355ff361674f94e709c93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28024662$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elwell, Josie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willing, Ryan</creatorcontrib><title>Quantifying the competing relationship between adduction range of motion and baseplate micromotion with lateralization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty</title><title>Journal of biomechanics</title><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><description>Abstract Lateralizing the center of rotation (COR) of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) could improve functional outcomes and mitigate scapular notching, a commonly occurring complication of the procedure. However, resulting increases in torque at the bone-implant interface may negatively affect initial fixation of the glenoid-side component, especially if only two fixation screws can be placed. Shoulder-specific finite element (FE) models of four fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were constructed. Scapular geometry and material property distributions were derived from CT data. Generic baseplates with two and four fixation screws were virtually implanted, after which superiorly-oriented shear loads, accompanied by a compressive load, were applied incrementally further from the glenoid surface to simulate lateralization of the COR. Relationships between lateralization, adduction range of motion (ROM), the number of fixation screws and micromotion of the baseplate (initial implant fixation) were characterized. Lateralization significantly increases micromotion ( p =0.015) and adduction ROM ( p =0.001). Using two, versus four, baseplate fixation screws significantly increases micromotion ( p =0.008). The effect of lateralization and the number of screws on adduction ROM and baseplate fixation is variable on a shoulder-specific basis. Trade-offs exist between functional outcomes, namely adduction ROM, and initial implant fixation and the negative effect of lateralization on implant fixation is amplified when only two fixation screws are used. The possibility of lateralizing the COR in order to improve functional outcomes of the procedure should be considered on a patient-specific basis accounting for factors such as availability and quality of bone stock.</description><subject>Adduction range of motion</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Bone density</subject><subject>Bone-Implant Interface - physiology</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Conflicts of interest</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Finite element modelling</subject><subject>Fixation</subject><subject>Geometry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implants</subject><subject>Joint Prosthesis</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Lateralization</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty</subject><subject>Scapula - physiology</subject><subject>Screws</subject><subject>Shoulder</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Shoulders</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>Torque</subject><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEokvhL1SWuHDZxR-xnVwqUFU-pEoIAWfLcSYbL4m92M5Wy3_hv-J0twV6oSdrxs-84_G8RXFG8IpgIl5vVpvG-hFMv6I5XhGywpw9KhakkmxJWYUfFwuMKVnWtMYnxbMYNxhjWcr6aXFCK0xLIeii-PV50i7Zbm_dGqUekPHjFtIcBRh0st7F3m5RA-kawCHdtpOZsyhotwbkOzT6m1i7FjU6wjZXARqtCf54c21Tj-Zs0IP9eaM51wXYQYiAkk96QLH309BCQDqkPvisEtP-efGk00OEF8fztPj27vLrxYfl1af3Hy_eXi2NoDgtWy6bmnYdM9hILGtualMz3jWEgOxqXbWEGV0CF6JjnGdQECHLri5B4hk9Lc4PutupGaE14FJ-q9oGO-qwV15b9e-Ns71a-53iDNdEsizw6igQ_I8JYlKjjQaGQTvwU1SkqkpChBAPQSWtsizGD0A5Y7wqy3mCl_fQjZ-Cy5-WKSFrwnL7TIkDlZcTY4DubkSC1ewrtVG3vlKzrxQhKvsqF579_UF3ZbdGysCbAwB5TTsLQUVjwRlobQCTVOvt_3uc35Mwg3XW6OE77CH-mUdFqrD6Mrt7Nneei1BGOfsNj3L7ng</recordid><startdate>20170208</startdate><enddate>20170208</enddate><creator>Elwell, Josie</creator><creator>Choi, Joseph</creator><creator>Willing, Ryan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170208</creationdate><title>Quantifying the competing relationship between adduction range of motion and baseplate micromotion with lateralization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty</title><author>Elwell, Josie ; Choi, Joseph ; Willing, Ryan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c620t-d57b92ff3c0c70795c9c935fb11e7f9a8d13ca4e566f355ff361674f94e709c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adduction range of motion</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Bone density</topic><topic>Bone-Implant Interface - physiology</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Conflicts of interest</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Finite element modelling</topic><topic>Fixation</topic><topic>Geometry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implants</topic><topic>Joint Prosthesis</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Lateralization</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty</topic><topic>Scapula - physiology</topic><topic>Screws</topic><topic>Shoulder</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Shoulders</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>Torque</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elwell, Josie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willing, Ryan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elwell, Josie</au><au>Choi, Joseph</au><au>Willing, Ryan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantifying the competing relationship between adduction range of motion and baseplate micromotion with lateralization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><date>2017-02-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>52</volume><spage>24</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>24-30</pages><issn>0021-9290</issn><eissn>1873-2380</eissn><abstract>Abstract Lateralizing the center of rotation (COR) of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) could improve functional outcomes and mitigate scapular notching, a commonly occurring complication of the procedure. However, resulting increases in torque at the bone-implant interface may negatively affect initial fixation of the glenoid-side component, especially if only two fixation screws can be placed. Shoulder-specific finite element (FE) models of four fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were constructed. Scapular geometry and material property distributions were derived from CT data. Generic baseplates with two and four fixation screws were virtually implanted, after which superiorly-oriented shear loads, accompanied by a compressive load, were applied incrementally further from the glenoid surface to simulate lateralization of the COR. Relationships between lateralization, adduction range of motion (ROM), the number of fixation screws and micromotion of the baseplate (initial implant fixation) were characterized. Lateralization significantly increases micromotion ( p =0.015) and adduction ROM ( p =0.001). Using two, versus four, baseplate fixation screws significantly increases micromotion ( p =0.008). The effect of lateralization and the number of screws on adduction ROM and baseplate fixation is variable on a shoulder-specific basis. Trade-offs exist between functional outcomes, namely adduction ROM, and initial implant fixation and the negative effect of lateralization on implant fixation is amplified when only two fixation screws are used. The possibility of lateralizing the COR in order to improve functional outcomes of the procedure should be considered on a patient-specific basis accounting for factors such as availability and quality of bone stock.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28024662</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.053</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9290 |
ispartof | Journal of biomechanics, 2017-02, Vol.52, p.24-30 |
issn | 0021-9290 1873-2380 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5309173 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Adduction range of motion Aged Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder Biomechanical Phenomena Biomedical materials Bone density Bone-Implant Interface - physiology Computer simulation Conflicts of interest Costs Female Finite element modelling Fixation Geometry Humans Implants Joint Prosthesis Joint surgery Lateralization Male Mathematical models Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Range of Motion, Articular Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty Scapula - physiology Screws Shoulder Shoulder Joint - physiology Shoulder Joint - surgery Shoulders Surgical implants Torque |
title | Quantifying the competing relationship between adduction range of motion and baseplate micromotion with lateralization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T06%3A50%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantifying%20the%20competing%20relationship%20between%20adduction%20range%20of%20motion%20and%20baseplate%20micromotion%20with%20lateralization%20of%20reverse%20total%20shoulder%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanics&rft.au=Elwell,%20Josie&rft.date=2017-02-08&rft.volume=52&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=24-30&rft.issn=0021-9290&rft.eissn=1873-2380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.053&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1884116663%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c620t-d57b92ff3c0c70795c9c935fb11e7f9a8d13ca4e566f355ff361674f94e709c93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1867913116&rft_id=info:pmid/28024662&rfr_iscdi=true |