Loading…
Association between the ratio of triglyceride to high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol and incident type 2 diabetes in Singapore Chinese men and women
Background Increased triglycerides (TG) and decreased high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL‐C) are risk factors for type 2 diabetes (T2D). The relationship between TG:HDL‐C ratio and T2D risk is not clear, and it is not known whether the association is modified by gender, body mass index, or fas...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of diabetes 2017-07, Vol.9 (7), p.689-698 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Increased triglycerides (TG) and decreased high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL‐C) are risk factors for type 2 diabetes (T2D). The relationship between TG:HDL‐C ratio and T2D risk is not clear, and it is not known whether the association is modified by gender, body mass index, or fasting status. This study examined the relationship between TG:HDL‐C ratio and risk of incident T2D, and the predictive ability of the ratio on top of other diabetes risk factors.
Methods
Blood biomarkers were determined in 571 T2D cases and 571 controls nested within a prospective, population‐based cohort study, the Singapore Chinese Health Study. Participants were free of diagnosed diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer at the time of blood collection (1999–2004). Incident self‐reported T2D cases were identified at follow‐up interview (2006–10). Controls were matched 1: 1 for age, sex, dialect group, and date of blood collection. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compute the odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI).
Results
The ORs (95 % CI) of T2D per 1‐SD increment in TG and TG: HDL‐C ratio were 1.70 (1.39–2.09) and 1.72 (1.37–2.17), respectively. The relationships were stronger among females than males (Pinteraction = 0.028 and 0.017, respectively), and stronger among lean ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1753-0393 1753-0407 |
DOI: | 10.1111/1753-0407.12477 |