Loading…
Self‐gated MRI of multiple beat morphologies in the presence of arrhythmias
Purpose Develop self‐gated MRI for distinct heartbeat morphologies in subjects with arrhythmias. Methods Golden angle radial data was obtained in seven sinus and eight arrhythmias subjects. An image‐based cardiac navigator was derived from single‐shot images, distinct beat types were identified, and...
Saved in:
Published in: | Magnetic resonance in medicine 2017-08, Vol.78 (2), p.678-688 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose
Develop self‐gated MRI for distinct heartbeat morphologies in subjects with arrhythmias.
Methods
Golden angle radial data was obtained in seven sinus and eight arrhythmias subjects. An image‐based cardiac navigator was derived from single‐shot images, distinct beat types were identified, and images were reconstructed for repeated morphologies. Image sharpness, contrast, and volume variation were quantified and compared with self‐gated MRI. Images were scored for image quality and artifacts. Hemodynamic parameters were computed for each distinct beat morphology in bigeminy and trigeminy subjects and for sinus beats in patients with infrequent premature ventricular contractions.
Results
Images of distinct beat types were reconstructed except for two patients with infrequent premature ventricular contractions. Image contrast and sharpness were similar to sinus self‐gated images (contrast = 0.45 ± 0.13 and 0.43 ± 0.15; sharpness = 0.21 ± 0.11 and 0.20 ± 0.05). Visual scoring was highest in self‐gated images (4.1 ± 0.3) compared with real‐time (3.9 ± 0.4) and ECG‐gated cine (3.4 ± 1.5). ECG‐gated cine had less artifacts than self‐gating (2.3 ± 0.7 and 2.1 ± 0.2), but was affected by misgating in two subjects. Among arrhythmia subjects, post‐extrasystole/sinus (58.1 ± 8.6 mL) and interrupted sinus (61.4 ± 5.9 mL) stroke volume was higher than extrasystole (32.0 ± 16.5 mL; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0740-3194 1522-2594 |
DOI: | 10.1002/mrm.26381 |