Loading…
Incidence, characteristics and management of recently diagnosed, microscopically invasive breast cancer by receptor status: Iowa SEER 2000-2013
Abstract Background Recent incidence, treatment patterns and outcomes for node negative microscopically invasive breast cancer (MIBC) have not been reported. Methods State Health Registry of Iowa data identified women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), MIBC, and Stage I breast cancer excluding MI...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American journal of surgery 2017-08, Vol.214 (2), p.323-328 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-6b0f4a6945a4a405cbcee393c1dde3b3389f6c4f9ec670529c3955e18316acff3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-6b0f4a6945a4a405cbcee393c1dde3b3389f6c4f9ec670529c3955e18316acff3 |
container_end_page | 328 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 323 |
container_title | The American journal of surgery |
container_volume | 214 |
creator | Thomas, Alexandra, MD Weigel, Ronald J., MD, PhD Lynch, Charles F., MD, PhD Spanheimer, Philip M., MD Breitbach, Elizabeth K., MD Schroeder, Mary C., PhD |
description | Abstract Background Recent incidence, treatment patterns and outcomes for node negative microscopically invasive breast cancer (MIBC) have not been reported. Methods State Health Registry of Iowa data identified women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), MIBC, and Stage I breast cancer excluding MIBC (Stage 1BC). Results From 2000-2013, 1,706, 193 and 4,514 women were diagnosed with DCIS, MIBC and Stage 1BC, respectively. MIBC increased at an annual percentage change of 2.1 (p=0.041). MIBC was more frequently human epidermal-growth-factor-receptor-2 positive than Stage 1BC (39.7% vs 9.6%, p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.08.008 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5334458</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002961016305049</els_id><sourcerecordid>1835352018</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-6b0f4a6945a4a405cbcee393c1dde3b3389f6c4f9ec670529c3955e18316acff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUsFu1DAQjRCIbgufALLEhUMT7DjOxhyKULXASpWQKJytiTPZOiT21k4W7Vf0l3HYpUAvnOzRvHkzb94kyQtGM0ZZ-abLYOjC5DdZHsOMVhml1aNkwaqlTFlV8cfJglKap7Jk9CQ5DaGLIWMFf5qc5MtS5kuZL5K7tdWmQavxnOgb8KBH9CaMRgcCtiEDWNjggHYkriUedfz1e9IY2FgXsDkng9HeBe22RkMfU8buIJgdktojhJFoiOSe1Ptf1dvReRJGGKfwlqzdDyDXq9UXksfZ0iiEP0uetNAHfH58z5JvH1ZfLz-lV58_ri_fX6VaCDqmZU3bAkpZCCigoELXGpFLrlnTIK85r2Rb6qKVqMslFbnUXAqBrOKsBN22_Cy5OPBup3rAZpbloVdbbwbwe-XAqH8z1tyojdspwXlRiCoSvD4SeHc7YRjVYILGvgeLbgoqthJcREkz9NUDaOcmb6M8xWSeV6LkchlR4oCa1xk8tvfDMKpmy1Wnjpar2XJFKxUtj3Uv_1ZyX_Xb4wh4dwBg3OfOoFdBm9nxxkRHRtU4898WFw8YdG_s7Pd33GP4o0aFXFF1Pd_dfHas5FTQQvKfATfWkw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1922856397</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incidence, characteristics and management of recently diagnosed, microscopically invasive breast cancer by receptor status: Iowa SEER 2000-2013</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Thomas, Alexandra, MD ; Weigel, Ronald J., MD, PhD ; Lynch, Charles F., MD, PhD ; Spanheimer, Philip M., MD ; Breitbach, Elizabeth K., MD ; Schroeder, Mary C., PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Alexandra, MD ; Weigel, Ronald J., MD, PhD ; Lynch, Charles F., MD, PhD ; Spanheimer, Philip M., MD ; Breitbach, Elizabeth K., MD ; Schroeder, Mary C., PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Recent incidence, treatment patterns and outcomes for node negative microscopically invasive breast cancer (MIBC) have not been reported. Methods State Health Registry of Iowa data identified women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), MIBC, and Stage I breast cancer excluding MIBC (Stage 1BC). Results From 2000-2013, 1,706, 193 and 4,514 women were diagnosed with DCIS, MIBC and Stage 1BC, respectively. MIBC increased at an annual percentage change of 2.1 (p=0.041). MIBC was more frequently human epidermal-growth-factor-receptor-2 positive than Stage 1BC (39.7% vs 9.6%, p<0.001). Mastectomy was performed more frequently in MIBC than DCIS (40.9% vs 30.6%, p=0.014) or Stage 1BC (40.9% vs 33.8%, p=0.119). Chemotherapy was given to 4.1% of women with MIBC. Survival for women with MIBC was intermediate between DCIS and Stage 1BC. Conclusions Management of MIBC is an increasingly frequent clinical scenario. Women with MIBC receive more aggressive local and systemic therapy than women with DCIS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.08.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27692792</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Breast cancer ; Breast neoplasms ; Breast Neoplasms - chemistry ; Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - therapy ; Cancer ; Cancer incidence ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - chemistry ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - epidemiology ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - pathology ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - therapy ; Chemotherapy ; Epidermal growth factor ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; Invasiveness ; Iowa ; Mammography ; Mastectomy ; Methyl isobutyl carbinol ; Microinvasive tumor ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; Neoplasm Staging ; Receptor, ErbB-2 - analysis ; SEER Program ; Surgery ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 2017-08, Vol.214 (2), p.323-328</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Aug 1, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-6b0f4a6945a4a405cbcee393c1dde3b3389f6c4f9ec670529c3955e18316acff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-6b0f4a6945a4a405cbcee393c1dde3b3389f6c4f9ec670529c3955e18316acff3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1043-8140</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27692792$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Alexandra, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weigel, Ronald J., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Charles F., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spanheimer, Philip M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breitbach, Elizabeth K., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Mary C., PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Incidence, characteristics and management of recently diagnosed, microscopically invasive breast cancer by receptor status: Iowa SEER 2000-2013</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Recent incidence, treatment patterns and outcomes for node negative microscopically invasive breast cancer (MIBC) have not been reported. Methods State Health Registry of Iowa data identified women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), MIBC, and Stage I breast cancer excluding MIBC (Stage 1BC). Results From 2000-2013, 1,706, 193 and 4,514 women were diagnosed with DCIS, MIBC and Stage 1BC, respectively. MIBC increased at an annual percentage change of 2.1 (p=0.041). MIBC was more frequently human epidermal-growth-factor-receptor-2 positive than Stage 1BC (39.7% vs 9.6%, p<0.001). Mastectomy was performed more frequently in MIBC than DCIS (40.9% vs 30.6%, p=0.014) or Stage 1BC (40.9% vs 33.8%, p=0.119). Chemotherapy was given to 4.1% of women with MIBC. Survival for women with MIBC was intermediate between DCIS and Stage 1BC. Conclusions Management of MIBC is an increasingly frequent clinical scenario. Women with MIBC receive more aggressive local and systemic therapy than women with DCIS.</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast neoplasms</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - chemistry</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer incidence</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - chemistry</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - epidemiology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - therapy</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Epidermal growth factor</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Invasiveness</subject><subject>Iowa</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Mastectomy</subject><subject>Methyl isobutyl carbinol</subject><subject>Microinvasive tumor</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Receptor, ErbB-2 - analysis</subject><subject>SEER Program</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUsFu1DAQjRCIbgufALLEhUMT7DjOxhyKULXASpWQKJytiTPZOiT21k4W7Vf0l3HYpUAvnOzRvHkzb94kyQtGM0ZZ-abLYOjC5DdZHsOMVhml1aNkwaqlTFlV8cfJglKap7Jk9CQ5DaGLIWMFf5qc5MtS5kuZL5K7tdWmQavxnOgb8KBH9CaMRgcCtiEDWNjggHYkriUedfz1e9IY2FgXsDkng9HeBe22RkMfU8buIJgdktojhJFoiOSe1Ptf1dvReRJGGKfwlqzdDyDXq9UXksfZ0iiEP0uetNAHfH58z5JvH1ZfLz-lV58_ri_fX6VaCDqmZU3bAkpZCCigoELXGpFLrlnTIK85r2Rb6qKVqMslFbnUXAqBrOKsBN22_Cy5OPBup3rAZpbloVdbbwbwe-XAqH8z1tyojdspwXlRiCoSvD4SeHc7YRjVYILGvgeLbgoqthJcREkz9NUDaOcmb6M8xWSeV6LkchlR4oCa1xk8tvfDMKpmy1Wnjpar2XJFKxUtj3Uv_1ZyX_Xb4wh4dwBg3OfOoFdBm9nxxkRHRtU4898WFw8YdG_s7Pd33GP4o0aFXFF1Pd_dfHas5FTQQvKfATfWkw</recordid><startdate>20170801</startdate><enddate>20170801</enddate><creator>Thomas, Alexandra, MD</creator><creator>Weigel, Ronald J., MD, PhD</creator><creator>Lynch, Charles F., MD, PhD</creator><creator>Spanheimer, Philip M., MD</creator><creator>Breitbach, Elizabeth K., MD</creator><creator>Schroeder, Mary C., PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1043-8140</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170801</creationdate><title>Incidence, characteristics and management of recently diagnosed, microscopically invasive breast cancer by receptor status: Iowa SEER 2000-2013</title><author>Thomas, Alexandra, MD ; Weigel, Ronald J., MD, PhD ; Lynch, Charles F., MD, PhD ; Spanheimer, Philip M., MD ; Breitbach, Elizabeth K., MD ; Schroeder, Mary C., PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-6b0f4a6945a4a405cbcee393c1dde3b3389f6c4f9ec670529c3955e18316acff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast neoplasms</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - chemistry</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer incidence</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - chemistry</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - epidemiology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - therapy</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Epidermal growth factor</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Invasiveness</topic><topic>Iowa</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Mastectomy</topic><topic>Methyl isobutyl carbinol</topic><topic>Microinvasive tumor</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Receptor, ErbB-2 - analysis</topic><topic>SEER Program</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Alexandra, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weigel, Ronald J., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Charles F., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spanheimer, Philip M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breitbach, Elizabeth K., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Mary C., PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thomas, Alexandra, MD</au><au>Weigel, Ronald J., MD, PhD</au><au>Lynch, Charles F., MD, PhD</au><au>Spanheimer, Philip M., MD</au><au>Breitbach, Elizabeth K., MD</au><au>Schroeder, Mary C., PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incidence, characteristics and management of recently diagnosed, microscopically invasive breast cancer by receptor status: Iowa SEER 2000-2013</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>2017-08-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>214</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>323</spage><epage>328</epage><pages>323-328</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Recent incidence, treatment patterns and outcomes for node negative microscopically invasive breast cancer (MIBC) have not been reported. Methods State Health Registry of Iowa data identified women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), MIBC, and Stage I breast cancer excluding MIBC (Stage 1BC). Results From 2000-2013, 1,706, 193 and 4,514 women were diagnosed with DCIS, MIBC and Stage 1BC, respectively. MIBC increased at an annual percentage change of 2.1 (p=0.041). MIBC was more frequently human epidermal-growth-factor-receptor-2 positive than Stage 1BC (39.7% vs 9.6%, p<0.001). Mastectomy was performed more frequently in MIBC than DCIS (40.9% vs 30.6%, p=0.014) or Stage 1BC (40.9% vs 33.8%, p=0.119). Chemotherapy was given to 4.1% of women with MIBC. Survival for women with MIBC was intermediate between DCIS and Stage 1BC. Conclusions Management of MIBC is an increasingly frequent clinical scenario. Women with MIBC receive more aggressive local and systemic therapy than women with DCIS.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27692792</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.08.008</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1043-8140</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9610 |
ispartof | The American journal of surgery, 2017-08, Vol.214 (2), p.323-328 |
issn | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5334458 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Biopsy Breast cancer Breast neoplasms Breast Neoplasms - chemistry Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology Breast Neoplasms - pathology Breast Neoplasms - therapy Cancer Cancer incidence Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - chemistry Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - epidemiology Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - pathology Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - therapy Chemotherapy Epidermal growth factor Female Humans Incidence Invasiveness Iowa Mammography Mastectomy Methyl isobutyl carbinol Microinvasive tumor Middle Aged Neoplasm Invasiveness Neoplasm Staging Receptor, ErbB-2 - analysis SEER Program Surgery Womens health |
title | Incidence, characteristics and management of recently diagnosed, microscopically invasive breast cancer by receptor status: Iowa SEER 2000-2013 |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T13%3A27%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incidence,%20characteristics%20and%20management%20of%20recently%20diagnosed,%20microscopically%20invasive%20breast%20cancer%20by%20receptor%20status:%20Iowa%20SEER%202000-2013&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Thomas,%20Alexandra,%20MD&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.volume=214&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=323&rft.epage=328&rft.pages=323-328&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.08.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1835352018%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-6b0f4a6945a4a405cbcee393c1dde3b3389f6c4f9ec670529c3955e18316acff3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1922856397&rft_id=info:pmid/27692792&rfr_iscdi=true |