Loading…

Diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression/T2 image fusion for the diagnosis of colorectal polyp and cancer

Diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression/T2 image fusion (DWIBS/T2) is useful for the diagnosis of cancer as it presents a clear contrast between cancerous and non-cancerous tissue. The present study investigated the limitations and advantages of DWIBS/T2 with re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Experimental and therapeutic medicine 2017-02, Vol.13 (2), p.639-644
Main Authors: Tomizawa, Minoru, Shinozaki, Fuminobu, Uchida, Yoshitaka, Uchiyama, Katsuhiro, Fugo, Kazunori, Sunaoshi, Takafumi, Ozaki, Aika, Sugiyama, Eriko, Baba, Akira, Kano, Daisuke, Shite, Misaki, Haga, Ryota, Fukamizu, Yoshiya, Kagayama, Satoshi, Hasegawa, Rumiko, Shirai, Yoshinori, Motoyoshi, Yasufumi, Sugiyama, Takao, Yamamoto, Shigenori, Kishimoto, Takashi, Ishige, Naoki
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression/T2 image fusion (DWIBS/T2) is useful for the diagnosis of cancer as it presents a clear contrast between cancerous and non-cancerous tissue. The present study investigated the limitations and advantages of DWIBS/T2 with regards to the diagnosis of colorectal polyp (CP) or cancer (CRC). The current study included patients diagnosed with CP or CRC following colonoscopy, who were subjected to DWIBS/T2 between July 2012 and March 2015. Patient records were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were subjected to DWIBS/T2 when they presented with abdominal cancers or inflammation. Colonoscopy was performed as part of screening, or if patients had suspected colon cancer or inflammatory bowel disease. A total of 8 male and 7 female patients were enrolled in the present study. All patients, with the exception of one who had been diagnosed with CRC following colonoscopy, had positive results and all patients diagnosed with CP following a colonoscopy, with the exception of one, had negative results on DWIBS/T2. Thus, CRC was detected by DWIBS/T2, while CP was not (P=0.0028). The diameter of CRC lesions was significantly larger than that of CP (P
ISSN:1792-0981
1792-1015
DOI:10.3892/etm.2016.3981