Maxillofacial Prosthesis in Dentofacial Traumas: A Retrospective Clinical Study and Introduction of New Classification Method

Background. Maxillofacial trauma represents a field of common interest as regards both the maxillofacial surgery and prosthodontics, especially for the functional and aesthetic stomatognathic rehabilitation. This condition necessitates relationship between maxillofacial surgeon and prosthodontist, t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BioMed research international 2017-01, Vol.2017 (2017), p.1-8
Main Authors: Valentini, Valentino, De Angelis, Francesca, Jamshir, S., Quarato, A., Pompa, Giorgio, Brauner, E., Di Carlo, Stefano
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adolescent
Adult
Bone Transplantation
Classification
Clinical Study
Dental implants
Female
Fractures
Humans
Lasers
Male
Mandible - physiopathology
Mandible - surgery
Maxilla - physiopathology
Maxilla - surgery
Maxilla - transplantation
Maxillofacial Injuries - pathology
Maxillofacial Injuries - surgery
Maxillofacial Injuries - therapy
Maxillofacial Prosthesis
Medical prognosis
Patient Care Planning
Patient outcomes
Patients
Prostheses
Rehabilitation
Skin & tissue grafts
Sports injuries
Substance abuse treatment
Surgeons
Surgery
Teeth
Trauma
Treatment Outcome
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background. Maxillofacial trauma represents a field of common interest as regards both the maxillofacial surgery and prosthodontics, especially for the functional and aesthetic stomatognathic rehabilitation. This condition necessitates relationship between maxillofacial surgeon and prosthodontist, to achieve the ultimate treatment goal. Purpose. The purpose of this study is to make predictable patients outcomes classifying their clinical data, using certain parameters and introducing a new classification method. Materials and Methods. We have chosen 7 parameters to classify the entity of the damage of these patients and to make their treatment and their prognosis predictable: number of teeth lost (T1–T4), upper/lower maxilla (U/L), alveolar/basal bone (Alv/B), gingival tissues (G), soft tissues (S), adult/child (a/c), and reconstructed patient (R). Results and Conclusions. The multidisciplinary approach and the collaboration between multiple clinical figures are therefore critical for the success of the treatment of these patients. The presence and quantification of above parameters influence the treatment protocol; patients undergo different levels of treatment depending on the measured data. The recognition of certain clinical parameters is fundamental to frame diagnosis and successful treatment planning.
ISSN:2314-6133
2314-6141
DOI:10.1155/2017/8136878