Loading…

Evaluation of Yield and Drought Using Active and Passive Spectral Sensing Systems at the Reproductive Stage in Wheat

Active and passive sensors are available for ground-based, high-throughput phenotyping in the field. However, these sensor systems have seldom been compared with respect to their determination of plant water status and water use efficiency related parameters under drought conditions. In this study,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in plant science 2017-03, Vol.8, p.379-379
Main Authors: Becker, Elisabeth, Schmidhalter, Urs
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-3134add831c732ad16c8da937f488a794fbde3a1bf59710234572e6af968592f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-3134add831c732ad16c8da937f488a794fbde3a1bf59710234572e6af968592f3
container_end_page 379
container_issue
container_start_page 379
container_title Frontiers in plant science
container_volume 8
creator Becker, Elisabeth
Schmidhalter, Urs
description Active and passive sensors are available for ground-based, high-throughput phenotyping in the field. However, these sensor systems have seldom been compared with respect to their determination of plant water status and water use efficiency related parameters under drought conditions. In this study, five passive and active reflectance sensors, including a hyperspectral passive sensor, an active flash sensor (AFS), the Crop Circle, and the GreenSeeker, were evaluated to assess drought-related destructive and non-destructive morphophysiological parameters (ground cover, relative leaf water content, leaf temperature, and carbon isotope discrimination of leaves and grain) and grain yield of twenty wheat ( L.) cultivars. Measurements were conducted in a 2-year study, including a drought stress and a control environment under field conditions. A comparison of the active sensors at the heading, anthesis and grain-filling stages indicated that the Crop Circle provided the most significant and robust relationships with drought-related parameters (relative leaf water content and leaf and grain carbon isotope discrimination). In comparison with the passive sensor, the five water and normalized water indices (WI and NWI-1 to 4), which are only provided by the passive sensor, showed the strongest relationships with the drought stress-related parameters ( = -0.49 to -0.86) and grain yield ( = -0.88) at anthesis. This paper indicates that precision phenotyping allows the integration of water indices in breeding programs to rapidly and cost-effectively identify drought-tolerant genotypes. This is supported by the fact that grain yield and the water indices showed the same heritability under drought conditions.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fpls.2017.00379
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5372809</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1891091221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-3134add831c732ad16c8da937f488a794fbde3a1bf59710234572e6af968592f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1rGzEQxUVJaUKac29Bx17s6GN3JV0KId8QSIkTkp7EeDWyVdar7UpryH8fr52EdC4z8N68GfgR8oOzqZTanPiuSVPBuJoyJpX5Qg54VRWTohLPe5_mfXKU0l-2qZIxY9Q3si90IQrFqgOSL9bQDJBDbGn09E_AxlFoHT3v47BYZvqYQrugp3UOa9wKvyGlcZ51WOceGjrDduuZvaSMq0Qh07xEeo9dH92wW5xlWCANLX1aIuTv5KuHJuHRWz8kj5cXD2fXk9u7q5uz09tJLY3ME8llAc5pyWslBThe1dqBkcoXWoMyhZ87lMDnvjSKMyGLUgmswJtKl0Z4eUh-7XK7Yb5CV2M7Pmy7Pqygf7ERgv1facPSLuLallIJzcwm4OdbQB__DZiyXYVUY9NAi3FIlmvDmeFC8I31ZGet-5hSj_7jDGd2xGVHXHbEZbe4NhvHn7_78L_Dka-CmpMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1891091221</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Yield and Drought Using Active and Passive Spectral Sensing Systems at the Reproductive Stage in Wheat</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Becker, Elisabeth ; Schmidhalter, Urs</creator><creatorcontrib>Becker, Elisabeth ; Schmidhalter, Urs</creatorcontrib><description>Active and passive sensors are available for ground-based, high-throughput phenotyping in the field. However, these sensor systems have seldom been compared with respect to their determination of plant water status and water use efficiency related parameters under drought conditions. In this study, five passive and active reflectance sensors, including a hyperspectral passive sensor, an active flash sensor (AFS), the Crop Circle, and the GreenSeeker, were evaluated to assess drought-related destructive and non-destructive morphophysiological parameters (ground cover, relative leaf water content, leaf temperature, and carbon isotope discrimination of leaves and grain) and grain yield of twenty wheat ( L.) cultivars. Measurements were conducted in a 2-year study, including a drought stress and a control environment under field conditions. A comparison of the active sensors at the heading, anthesis and grain-filling stages indicated that the Crop Circle provided the most significant and robust relationships with drought-related parameters (relative leaf water content and leaf and grain carbon isotope discrimination). In comparison with the passive sensor, the five water and normalized water indices (WI and NWI-1 to 4), which are only provided by the passive sensor, showed the strongest relationships with the drought stress-related parameters ( = -0.49 to -0.86) and grain yield ( = -0.88) at anthesis. This paper indicates that precision phenotyping allows the integration of water indices in breeding programs to rapidly and cost-effectively identify drought-tolerant genotypes. This is supported by the fact that grain yield and the water indices showed the same heritability under drought conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-462X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-462X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00379</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28424706</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>Plant Science</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in plant science, 2017-03, Vol.8, p.379-379</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 Becker and Schmidhalter. 2017 Becker and Schmidhalter</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-3134add831c732ad16c8da937f488a794fbde3a1bf59710234572e6af968592f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-3134add831c732ad16c8da937f488a794fbde3a1bf59710234572e6af968592f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5372809/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5372809/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28424706$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Becker, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidhalter, Urs</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Yield and Drought Using Active and Passive Spectral Sensing Systems at the Reproductive Stage in Wheat</title><title>Frontiers in plant science</title><addtitle>Front Plant Sci</addtitle><description>Active and passive sensors are available for ground-based, high-throughput phenotyping in the field. However, these sensor systems have seldom been compared with respect to their determination of plant water status and water use efficiency related parameters under drought conditions. In this study, five passive and active reflectance sensors, including a hyperspectral passive sensor, an active flash sensor (AFS), the Crop Circle, and the GreenSeeker, were evaluated to assess drought-related destructive and non-destructive morphophysiological parameters (ground cover, relative leaf water content, leaf temperature, and carbon isotope discrimination of leaves and grain) and grain yield of twenty wheat ( L.) cultivars. Measurements were conducted in a 2-year study, including a drought stress and a control environment under field conditions. A comparison of the active sensors at the heading, anthesis and grain-filling stages indicated that the Crop Circle provided the most significant and robust relationships with drought-related parameters (relative leaf water content and leaf and grain carbon isotope discrimination). In comparison with the passive sensor, the five water and normalized water indices (WI and NWI-1 to 4), which are only provided by the passive sensor, showed the strongest relationships with the drought stress-related parameters ( = -0.49 to -0.86) and grain yield ( = -0.88) at anthesis. This paper indicates that precision phenotyping allows the integration of water indices in breeding programs to rapidly and cost-effectively identify drought-tolerant genotypes. This is supported by the fact that grain yield and the water indices showed the same heritability under drought conditions.</description><subject>Plant Science</subject><issn>1664-462X</issn><issn>1664-462X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkc1rGzEQxUVJaUKac29Bx17s6GN3JV0KId8QSIkTkp7EeDWyVdar7UpryH8fr52EdC4z8N68GfgR8oOzqZTanPiuSVPBuJoyJpX5Qg54VRWTohLPe5_mfXKU0l-2qZIxY9Q3si90IQrFqgOSL9bQDJBDbGn09E_AxlFoHT3v47BYZvqYQrugp3UOa9wKvyGlcZ51WOceGjrDduuZvaSMq0Qh07xEeo9dH92wW5xlWCANLX1aIuTv5KuHJuHRWz8kj5cXD2fXk9u7q5uz09tJLY3ME8llAc5pyWslBThe1dqBkcoXWoMyhZ87lMDnvjSKMyGLUgmswJtKl0Z4eUh-7XK7Yb5CV2M7Pmy7Pqygf7ERgv1facPSLuLallIJzcwm4OdbQB__DZiyXYVUY9NAi3FIlmvDmeFC8I31ZGet-5hSj_7jDGd2xGVHXHbEZbe4NhvHn7_78L_Dka-CmpMg</recordid><startdate>20170329</startdate><enddate>20170329</enddate><creator>Becker, Elisabeth</creator><creator>Schmidhalter, Urs</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170329</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Yield and Drought Using Active and Passive Spectral Sensing Systems at the Reproductive Stage in Wheat</title><author>Becker, Elisabeth ; Schmidhalter, Urs</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-3134add831c732ad16c8da937f488a794fbde3a1bf59710234572e6af968592f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Plant Science</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Becker, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidhalter, Urs</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in plant science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Becker, Elisabeth</au><au>Schmidhalter, Urs</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Yield and Drought Using Active and Passive Spectral Sensing Systems at the Reproductive Stage in Wheat</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in plant science</jtitle><addtitle>Front Plant Sci</addtitle><date>2017-03-29</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>8</volume><spage>379</spage><epage>379</epage><pages>379-379</pages><issn>1664-462X</issn><eissn>1664-462X</eissn><abstract>Active and passive sensors are available for ground-based, high-throughput phenotyping in the field. However, these sensor systems have seldom been compared with respect to their determination of plant water status and water use efficiency related parameters under drought conditions. In this study, five passive and active reflectance sensors, including a hyperspectral passive sensor, an active flash sensor (AFS), the Crop Circle, and the GreenSeeker, were evaluated to assess drought-related destructive and non-destructive morphophysiological parameters (ground cover, relative leaf water content, leaf temperature, and carbon isotope discrimination of leaves and grain) and grain yield of twenty wheat ( L.) cultivars. Measurements were conducted in a 2-year study, including a drought stress and a control environment under field conditions. A comparison of the active sensors at the heading, anthesis and grain-filling stages indicated that the Crop Circle provided the most significant and robust relationships with drought-related parameters (relative leaf water content and leaf and grain carbon isotope discrimination). In comparison with the passive sensor, the five water and normalized water indices (WI and NWI-1 to 4), which are only provided by the passive sensor, showed the strongest relationships with the drought stress-related parameters ( = -0.49 to -0.86) and grain yield ( = -0.88) at anthesis. This paper indicates that precision phenotyping allows the integration of water indices in breeding programs to rapidly and cost-effectively identify drought-tolerant genotypes. This is supported by the fact that grain yield and the water indices showed the same heritability under drought conditions.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>28424706</pmid><doi>10.3389/fpls.2017.00379</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1664-462X
ispartof Frontiers in plant science, 2017-03, Vol.8, p.379-379
issn 1664-462X
1664-462X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5372809
source PubMed Central
subjects Plant Science
title Evaluation of Yield and Drought Using Active and Passive Spectral Sensing Systems at the Reproductive Stage in Wheat
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T18%3A57%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Yield%20and%20Drought%20Using%20Active%20and%20Passive%20Spectral%20Sensing%20Systems%20at%20the%20Reproductive%20Stage%20in%20Wheat&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20plant%20science&rft.au=Becker,%20Elisabeth&rft.date=2017-03-29&rft.volume=8&rft.spage=379&rft.epage=379&rft.pages=379-379&rft.issn=1664-462X&rft.eissn=1664-462X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fpls.2017.00379&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1891091221%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-3134add831c732ad16c8da937f488a794fbde3a1bf59710234572e6af968592f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1891091221&rft_id=info:pmid/28424706&rfr_iscdi=true