Loading…

Facilitating admissions of diverse students: A six-point, evidence-informed framework for pipeline and program development

Introduction Several national level calls have encouraged reconsideration of diversity issues in medical education. Particular interest has been placed on admissions, as decisions made here shape the nature of the future physician workforce. Critical analysis of current practices paired with evidenc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Perspectives on medical education 2017-04, Vol.6 (2), p.82-90
Main Authors: Young, Meredith E., Thomas, Aliki, Varpio, Lara, Razack, Saleem I., Hanson, Mark D., Slade, Steve, Dayem, Katharine L., McKnight, David J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-7a31385582cf599fdfb5e0a8c12140fbb50f9b1c30460e1897db672955d0db933
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-7a31385582cf599fdfb5e0a8c12140fbb50f9b1c30460e1897db672955d0db933
container_end_page 90
container_issue 2
container_start_page 82
container_title Perspectives on medical education
container_volume 6
creator Young, Meredith E.
Thomas, Aliki
Varpio, Lara
Razack, Saleem I.
Hanson, Mark D.
Slade, Steve
Dayem, Katharine L.
McKnight, David J.
description Introduction Several national level calls have encouraged reconsideration of diversity issues in medical education. Particular interest has been placed on admissions, as decisions made here shape the nature of the future physician workforce. Critical analysis of current practices paired with evidence-informed policies may counter some of the barriers impeding access for underrepresented groups. Methods We present a framework for diversity-related program development and evaluation grounded within a knowledge translation framework, and supported by the initiation of longitudinal collection of diversity-related data. We provide an illustrative case study for each component of the framework. Descriptive analyses are presented of pre/post intervention diversity metrics if applicable and available. Results The framework’s focal points are: 1) data-driven identification of underrepresented groups, 2) pipeline development and targeted recruitment, 3) ensuring an inclusive process, 4) ensuring inclusive assessment, 5) ensuring inclusive selection, and 6) iterative use of diversity-related data . Case studies ranged from wording changes on admissions websites to the establishment of educational and administrative offices addressing needs of underrepresented populations. Conclusions We propose that diversity-related data must be collected on a variety of markers, developed in partnership with stakeholders who are most likely to facilitate implementation of best practices and new policies. These data can facilitate the design, implementation, and evaluation of evidence-informed diversity initiatives and provide a structure for continued investigation into ‘interventions’ supporting diversity-related initiatives.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s40037-017-0341-5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5383574</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1885040022</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-7a31385582cf599fdfb5e0a8c12140fbb50f9b1c30460e1897db672955d0db933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1rFTEUDWKx5bU_wI0E3Ljo2HxMJhkXQilWhUIXKrgLmcnNM3UmGZOZp-Kf8bf4y0x9z0dVMBAS7j0599zcg9BDSp5SQuRZrgnhsiK0bF7TStxDR4xRVjEp39_f3xt6iE5yviFlKSlbph6gQ6ZYLRmRR-jbpen94Gcz-7DGxo4-Zx9DxtFh6zeQMuA8LxbCnJ_h8x_fs_9STdGH-RTDxpd4D5UPLqYRLHbJjPA5po-4BPDkJxh8AGyCxVOK65LFFjYwxGkshMfowJkhw8nuXKF3ly_eXryqrq5fvr44v6p6QfhcScMpV0Io1jvRts66TgAxqqeM1sR1nSCu7WjPSd0QoKqVtmska4WwxHYt5yv0fMs7LV1R2ZfSyQx6Sn406auOxus_M8F_0Ou40YIrLmRdCJ7sCFL8tECedfmmHobBBIhL1lRJzluheFugj_-C3sQlhdKeZo0kghLV8P-hqFKClNEyVlB0i-pTzDmB20umRN96QL_55QFdPKBvPVAEr9Cju73uX_yeeAGwLSCXVFhDulN6x5r_Yf0JZCq-Yg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2670510863</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Facilitating admissions of diverse students: A six-point, evidence-informed framework for pipeline and program development</title><source>Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Young, Meredith E. ; Thomas, Aliki ; Varpio, Lara ; Razack, Saleem I. ; Hanson, Mark D. ; Slade, Steve ; Dayem, Katharine L. ; McKnight, David J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Young, Meredith E. ; Thomas, Aliki ; Varpio, Lara ; Razack, Saleem I. ; Hanson, Mark D. ; Slade, Steve ; Dayem, Katharine L. ; McKnight, David J.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Several national level calls have encouraged reconsideration of diversity issues in medical education. Particular interest has been placed on admissions, as decisions made here shape the nature of the future physician workforce. Critical analysis of current practices paired with evidence-informed policies may counter some of the barriers impeding access for underrepresented groups. Methods We present a framework for diversity-related program development and evaluation grounded within a knowledge translation framework, and supported by the initiation of longitudinal collection of diversity-related data. We provide an illustrative case study for each component of the framework. Descriptive analyses are presented of pre/post intervention diversity metrics if applicable and available. Results The framework’s focal points are: 1) data-driven identification of underrepresented groups, 2) pipeline development and targeted recruitment, 3) ensuring an inclusive process, 4) ensuring inclusive assessment, 5) ensuring inclusive selection, and 6) iterative use of diversity-related data . Case studies ranged from wording changes on admissions websites to the establishment of educational and administrative offices addressing needs of underrepresented populations. Conclusions We propose that diversity-related data must be collected on a variety of markers, developed in partnership with stakeholders who are most likely to facilitate implementation of best practices and new policies. These data can facilitate the design, implementation, and evaluation of evidence-informed diversity initiatives and provide a structure for continued investigation into ‘interventions’ supporting diversity-related initiatives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2212-2761</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2212-277X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2212-277X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40037-017-0341-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28247207</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum</publisher><subject>Admissions policies ; Case Studies ; Education ; Evidence ; Knowledge ; Medical Education ; Medical schools ; Medicine ; Original ; Original Article ; Program Development ; School admissions ; Students ; Workforce ; Workplace diversity</subject><ispartof>Perspectives on medical education, 2017-04, Vol.6 (2), p.82-90</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media 2017</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2017. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-7a31385582cf599fdfb5e0a8c12140fbb50f9b1c30460e1897db672955d0db933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-7a31385582cf599fdfb5e0a8c12140fbb50f9b1c30460e1897db672955d0db933</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5383574/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5383574/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28247207$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Young, Meredith E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Aliki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varpio, Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razack, Saleem I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanson, Mark D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slade, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dayem, Katharine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKnight, David J.</creatorcontrib><title>Facilitating admissions of diverse students: A six-point, evidence-informed framework for pipeline and program development</title><title>Perspectives on medical education</title><addtitle>Perspect Med Educ</addtitle><addtitle>Perspect Med Educ</addtitle><description>Introduction Several national level calls have encouraged reconsideration of diversity issues in medical education. Particular interest has been placed on admissions, as decisions made here shape the nature of the future physician workforce. Critical analysis of current practices paired with evidence-informed policies may counter some of the barriers impeding access for underrepresented groups. Methods We present a framework for diversity-related program development and evaluation grounded within a knowledge translation framework, and supported by the initiation of longitudinal collection of diversity-related data. We provide an illustrative case study for each component of the framework. Descriptive analyses are presented of pre/post intervention diversity metrics if applicable and available. Results The framework’s focal points are: 1) data-driven identification of underrepresented groups, 2) pipeline development and targeted recruitment, 3) ensuring an inclusive process, 4) ensuring inclusive assessment, 5) ensuring inclusive selection, and 6) iterative use of diversity-related data . Case studies ranged from wording changes on admissions websites to the establishment of educational and administrative offices addressing needs of underrepresented populations. Conclusions We propose that diversity-related data must be collected on a variety of markers, developed in partnership with stakeholders who are most likely to facilitate implementation of best practices and new policies. These data can facilitate the design, implementation, and evaluation of evidence-informed diversity initiatives and provide a structure for continued investigation into ‘interventions’ supporting diversity-related initiatives.</description><subject>Admissions policies</subject><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Medical schools</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Program Development</subject><subject>School admissions</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><subject>Workplace diversity</subject><issn>2212-2761</issn><issn>2212-277X</issn><issn>2212-277X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1rFTEUDWKx5bU_wI0E3Ljo2HxMJhkXQilWhUIXKrgLmcnNM3UmGZOZp-Kf8bf4y0x9z0dVMBAS7j0599zcg9BDSp5SQuRZrgnhsiK0bF7TStxDR4xRVjEp39_f3xt6iE5yviFlKSlbph6gQ6ZYLRmRR-jbpen94Gcz-7DGxo4-Zx9DxtFh6zeQMuA8LxbCnJ_h8x_fs_9STdGH-RTDxpd4D5UPLqYRLHbJjPA5po-4BPDkJxh8AGyCxVOK65LFFjYwxGkshMfowJkhw8nuXKF3ly_eXryqrq5fvr44v6p6QfhcScMpV0Io1jvRts66TgAxqqeM1sR1nSCu7WjPSd0QoKqVtmska4WwxHYt5yv0fMs7LV1R2ZfSyQx6Sn406auOxus_M8F_0Ou40YIrLmRdCJ7sCFL8tECedfmmHobBBIhL1lRJzluheFugj_-C3sQlhdKeZo0kghLV8P-hqFKClNEyVlB0i-pTzDmB20umRN96QL_55QFdPKBvPVAEr9Cju73uX_yeeAGwLSCXVFhDulN6x5r_Yf0JZCq-Yg</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Young, Meredith E.</creator><creator>Thomas, Aliki</creator><creator>Varpio, Lara</creator><creator>Razack, Saleem I.</creator><creator>Hanson, Mark D.</creator><creator>Slade, Steve</creator><creator>Dayem, Katharine L.</creator><creator>McKnight, David J.</creator><general>Bohn Stafleu van Loghum</general><general>Ubiquity Press</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Facilitating admissions of diverse students: A six-point, evidence-informed framework for pipeline and program development</title><author>Young, Meredith E. ; Thomas, Aliki ; Varpio, Lara ; Razack, Saleem I. ; Hanson, Mark D. ; Slade, Steve ; Dayem, Katharine L. ; McKnight, David J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-7a31385582cf599fdfb5e0a8c12140fbb50f9b1c30460e1897db672955d0db933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Admissions policies</topic><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Medical schools</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Program Development</topic><topic>School admissions</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><topic>Workplace diversity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Young, Meredith E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Aliki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varpio, Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razack, Saleem I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanson, Mark D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slade, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dayem, Katharine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKnight, David J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Perspectives on medical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Young, Meredith E.</au><au>Thomas, Aliki</au><au>Varpio, Lara</au><au>Razack, Saleem I.</au><au>Hanson, Mark D.</au><au>Slade, Steve</au><au>Dayem, Katharine L.</au><au>McKnight, David J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Facilitating admissions of diverse students: A six-point, evidence-informed framework for pipeline and program development</atitle><jtitle>Perspectives on medical education</jtitle><stitle>Perspect Med Educ</stitle><addtitle>Perspect Med Educ</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>82</spage><epage>90</epage><pages>82-90</pages><issn>2212-2761</issn><issn>2212-277X</issn><eissn>2212-277X</eissn><abstract>Introduction Several national level calls have encouraged reconsideration of diversity issues in medical education. Particular interest has been placed on admissions, as decisions made here shape the nature of the future physician workforce. Critical analysis of current practices paired with evidence-informed policies may counter some of the barriers impeding access for underrepresented groups. Methods We present a framework for diversity-related program development and evaluation grounded within a knowledge translation framework, and supported by the initiation of longitudinal collection of diversity-related data. We provide an illustrative case study for each component of the framework. Descriptive analyses are presented of pre/post intervention diversity metrics if applicable and available. Results The framework’s focal points are: 1) data-driven identification of underrepresented groups, 2) pipeline development and targeted recruitment, 3) ensuring an inclusive process, 4) ensuring inclusive assessment, 5) ensuring inclusive selection, and 6) iterative use of diversity-related data . Case studies ranged from wording changes on admissions websites to the establishment of educational and administrative offices addressing needs of underrepresented populations. Conclusions We propose that diversity-related data must be collected on a variety of markers, developed in partnership with stakeholders who are most likely to facilitate implementation of best practices and new policies. These data can facilitate the design, implementation, and evaluation of evidence-informed diversity initiatives and provide a structure for continued investigation into ‘interventions’ supporting diversity-related initiatives.</abstract><cop>Houten</cop><pub>Bohn Stafleu van Loghum</pub><pmid>28247207</pmid><doi>10.1007/s40037-017-0341-5</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2212-2761
ispartof Perspectives on medical education, 2017-04, Vol.6 (2), p.82-90
issn 2212-2761
2212-277X
2212-277X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5383574
source Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Admissions policies
Case Studies
Education
Evidence
Knowledge
Medical Education
Medical schools
Medicine
Original
Original Article
Program Development
School admissions
Students
Workforce
Workplace diversity
title Facilitating admissions of diverse students: A six-point, evidence-informed framework for pipeline and program development
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A38%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Facilitating%20admissions%20of%20diverse%20students:%20A%C2%A0six-point,%20evidence-informed%20framework%20for%20pipeline%20and%20program%20development&rft.jtitle=Perspectives%20on%20medical%20education&rft.au=Young,%20Meredith%20E.&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=82&rft.epage=90&rft.pages=82-90&rft.issn=2212-2761&rft.eissn=2212-277X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40037-017-0341-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1885040022%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-7a31385582cf599fdfb5e0a8c12140fbb50f9b1c30460e1897db672955d0db933%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2670510863&rft_id=info:pmid/28247207&rfr_iscdi=true