Clinical and molecular cytogenetic analyses of four families with 1q21.1 microdeletion or microduplication

• Published in: The journal of gene medicine 2017-04, Vol.19 (4), p.n/a
• Main Authors: Wang, Hong‐Dan, Liu, Lin, Wu, Dong, Li, Tao, Cui, Cun‐Ying, Zhang, Lian‐Zhong, Wang, Cheng‐Zeng
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 1q21.1 microdeletion; 1q21.1 microduplication; Abnormalities, Multiple - diagnosis; Abnormalities, Multiple - genetics; Adolescent; Adult; array‐comparative genomic hybridization; Child; Child, Preschool; Chromosome Banding; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosome Duplication; Chromosomes; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1 - genetics; Comparative Genomic Hybridization; copy number variations; Cytogenetic Analysis; DNA Copy Number Variations; Female; Fetuses; Gene therapy; Genetic Association Studies; Genetic counseling; Heterozygote; Humans; Infant; Male; Megalencephaly - diagnosis; Megalencephaly - genetics; Pedigree; Penetrance; Phenotype; Ultrasonography, Prenatal; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1099-498X; 1521-2254
• DOI: 10.1002/jgm.2948

Background Little information is available regarding the penetrance of 1q21.1 copy number variants (CNVs). In the present study, we explored the clinical significance of 1q21.1 microdeletion or microduplication. Methods In four families, chromosome karyotype was analyzed using G‐banding karyotype analysis technology. CNVs were detected using array‐comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and then a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to validate candidate CNVs. Sequence signature in the breakpoint region was analyzed using University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC) databases. Results Except for karyotype 45, XX, der (13, 14) (q10, q10) in the mother (I2) of family 2, the karyotype was normal in all other members of the four families. In the mother (I2) and fetus (II2) of family 1, in newborn (II1) of family 2 and in fetus (II1) of family 3, there was 1.22‐Mb heterozygous microdeletion in the chromosome 1q21.1q21.2 region. The child (II1) of family 4 had a 1.46‐Mb heterozygous microduplication in the chromosome 1q21.1q21.2 region. The results of the qPCR were consistent with that of aCGH. There was large number of low copy repeats (LCRs) in the breakpoint region found by analysis of the UCSC database, and multiple LCRs were matched with sequences in the chromosome 1 short‐arm region. Conclusions 1q21.1 microdeletion and microduplication exhibit a variety of clinical manifestations and the specificity of their clinical features is not high. The penetrance of the distal 1q21.1 microdeletion may be affected by other factors in the present study. In summary, we report the discovery of a new distal 1q21.1 microduplication, which enriches the CNV spectrum in the 1q21.1 region and is conducive to prenatal genetic counseling.