Evaluation of an in-vehicle monitoring system (IVMS) to reduce risky driving behaviors in commercial drivers: Comparison of in-cab warning lights and supervisory coaching with videos of driving behavior

• Published in: Journal of safety research 2017-02, Vol.60, p.125-136
• Main Authors: Bell, Jennifer L., Taylor, Matthew A., Chen, Guang-Xiang, Kirk, Rachel D., Leatherman, Erin R.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accidents, Occupational - prevention & control; Accidents, Traffic - prevention & control; Automobile driving; Automobile safety; Driving; Feedback; In-vehicle monitoring system; Injury; Mentoring - methods; Monitoring systems; Motor vehicle; Motor Vehicles; Occupational safety; Risk Reduction Behavior; Risk-Taking; Safety Management - methods
• ISSN: 0022-4375; 1879-1247
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2016.12.008

Roadway incidents are the leading cause of work-related death in the United States. The objective of this research was to evaluate whether two types of feedback from a commercially available in-vehicle monitoring system (IVMS) would reduce the incidence of risky driving behaviors in drivers from two companies. IVMS were installed in 315 vehicles representing the industries of local truck transportation and oil and gas support operations, and data were collected over an approximate two-year period in intervention and control groups. In one period, intervention group drivers were given feedback from in-cab warning lights from an IVMS that indicated occurrence of harsh vehicle maneuvers. In another period, intervention group drivers viewed video recordings of their risky driving behaviors with supervisors, and were coached by supervisors on safe driving practices. Risky driving behaviors declined significantly more during the period with coaching plus instant feedback with lights in comparison to the period with lights-only feedback (ORadj=0.61 95% CI 0.43–0.86; Holm-adjusted p=0.035) and the control group (ORadj=0.52 95% CI 0.33–0.82; Holm-adjusted p=0.032). Lights-only feedback was not found to be significantly different than the control group's decline from baseline (ORadj=0.86 95% CI 0.51–1.43; Holm-adjusted p>0.05). The largest decline in the rate of risky driving behaviors occurred when feedback included both supervisory coaching and lights. Supervisory coaching is an effective form of feedback to improve driving habits in the workplace. The potential advantages and limitations of this IVMS-based intervention program are discussed. •Driving unbelted was the most frequently observed risky driving behavior.•Coaching was effective in reducing risky driving behaviors and driving unbelted.•Future research using collisions (not just behaviors) as an outcome would be useful.