Responses of Atriplex spongiosa and Suaeda monoica to salinity

The growth and tissue water, K+, Na+, Cl-, proline and glycinebetaine contents of the shoots and roots of two Chenopodiaceae, Atriplex spongiosa and Suaeda monoica have been measured over a range of external NaCl salinities. Both species showed some fresh weight response to low salinity mainly due t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Plant physiology (Bethesda) 1979, Vol.63 (1), p.156-162
Main Authors: Storey, Richard, R. Gareth Wyn Jones
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cytoplasm
Halophytes
Osmosis
Plant roots
Plants
Salinity
Salt tolerance
Solutes
Table salt
Vacuoles
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The growth and tissue water, K+, Na+, Cl-, proline and glycinebetaine contents of the shoots and roots of two Chenopodiaceae, Atriplex spongiosa and Suaeda monoica have been measured over a range of external NaCl salinities. Both species showed some fresh weight response to low salinity mainly due to increased succulence. S. monoica showed both a greater increase in succulence (at low salinities) and tolerance of high salinities than A. spongiosa. Both species had high affinities for Na+ and maintained constant but low shoot K+ contents with increasing salinity. These trends were more marked with S. monoica in which Na+ stimulated the accumulation of K+ in roots. An association between high leaf Na+ accumulation, high osmotic pressure, succulence, and a positive growth response at low salinities was noted. Proline accumulation was observed in shoot tissues with suboptimal water contents. High glycinebetaine contents were found in the shoots of both species. These correlated closely with the sap osmotic pressure and it is suggested that glycinebetaine is the major cytoplasmic osmoticum (with K+ salts) in these species at high salinities. Na+ salts may be preferentially utilized as vacuolar osmotica.
ISSN:0032-0889
1532-2548
DOI:10.1104/pp.63.1.156