Loading…
Undetected Small Accessory Mental Foramina Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
The accessory foramina could not be identified on some imaging modalities such as surface-rendered images. The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of surface-rendered images in detecting these foramina. We analyzed 20 accessory mental foramina (AMF) in nine mandibles removed from ca...
Saved in:
Published in: | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2017-05, Vol.9 (5), p.e1210-e1210 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The accessory foramina could not be identified on some imaging modalities such as surface-rendered images. The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of surface-rendered images in detecting these foramina.
We analyzed 20 accessory mental foramina (AMF) in nine mandibles removed from cadavers with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and assessed in surface-rendered images. All AMF were divided into three groups depending on their visibility.
Group 1 included AMF that were clearly visible as foramina, Group 2 were not clearly visible but could be recognized with concave parts, and Group 3 were not visible and the smooth surface of the bone was observed. Group 1 ranged from 1.3 to 5.1 mm
, Group 2 from 0.3 to 3.8 mm
, and Group 3 from 0.2 to 1.1 mm
. A statistically significant difference in the mean size between Groups 1 and 3 was observed. Even if the AMF are smaller (e.g., 1 mm in diameter), they should still be avoided to prevent injury.
The clinician should be aware that smaller foramina might not be detected on these images. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2168-8184 2168-8184 |
DOI: | 10.7759/cureus.1210 |