Hand Hygiene Practices and Microbial Investigation of Hand Contact Swab among Physiotherapists in an Ebola Endemic Region: Implications for Public Health

• Published in: BioMed research international 2017-01, Vol.2017 (2017), p.1-13
• Main Authors: Fortwengel, Gerhard, Onyemelukwe, N. F., Ettu, Theresa, Ezuma, Amarachi, Ibeneme, Georgian, Maduako, V., Ibeneme, Sam, Limaye, Dnyanesh
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology; Bacteria - growth & development; Bacteria - isolation & purification; Colleges & universities; Colony Count, Microbial; Compliance; Endemic Diseases - statistics & numerical data; Epidemics; Female; Focus Groups; Hand - microbiology; Hand Hygiene; Hand washing; Hands; Health aspects; Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola - epidemiology; Hospitals, Teaching - statistics & numerical data; Humans; Hygiene; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Nigeria - epidemiology; Nosocomial infections; Physical Therapists; Public Health; Tertiary Care Centers
• ISSN: 2314-6133; 2314-6141
• DOI: 10.1155/2017/5841805

Background. Hand hygiene practices (HHP), as a critical component of infection prevention/control, were investigated among physiotherapists in an Ebola endemic region. Method. A standardized instrument was administered to 44 randomly selected physiotherapists (23 males and 21 females), from three tertiary hospitals in Enugu, Nigeria. Fifteen participants (aged 22–59 years) participated in focus group discussions (FGDs) and comprised 19 participants in a subsequent laboratory study. After treatment, the palms/fingers of physiotherapists were swabbed and cultured, then incubated aerobically overnight at 37°C, and examined for microbial growths. An antibiogram of the bacterial isolates was obtained. Results. The majority (34/77.3%) of physiotherapists were aware of the HHP protocol, yet only 15/44.1% rated self-compliance at 71–100%. FGDs identified forgetfulness/inadequate HHP materials/infrastructure as the major barriers to HHP. Staphylococcus aureus were the most prevalent organisms, prior to (8/53.33%) and after (4/26.67%) HPP, while Pseudomonas spp. were acquired thereafter. E. coli were the most antibiotic resistant microbes but were completely removed after HHP. Ciprofloxacin and streptomycin were the most effective antibiotics. Conclusion. Poor implementation of HPP was observed due to inadequate materials/infrastructure/poor behavioral orientation. Possibly, some HPP materials were contaminated; hence, new microbes were acquired. Since HPP removed the most antibiotic resistant microbes, it might be more effective in infection control than antibiotic medication.