Loading…
Individual differences in voluntary alcohol intake in rats: relationship with impulsivity, decision making and Pavlovian conditioned approach
Rationale Alcohol use disorder (AUD) has been associated with suboptimal decision making, exaggerated impulsivity, and aberrant responses to reward-paired cues, but the relationship between AUD and these behaviors is incompletely understood. Objectives This study aims to assess decision making, impu...
Saved in:
Published in: | Psychopharmacology 2017-07, Vol.234 (14), p.2177-2196 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-ccd92ee8851497187ea5a515280a3a50bfc314ccb1cbd91a3f1baf54b22ee8533 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-ccd92ee8851497187ea5a515280a3a50bfc314ccb1cbd91a3f1baf54b22ee8533 |
container_end_page | 2196 |
container_issue | 14 |
container_start_page | 2177 |
container_title | Psychopharmacology |
container_volume | 234 |
creator | Spoelder, Marcia Flores Dourojeanni, Jacques P. de Git, Kathy C. G. Baars, Annemarie M. Lesscher, Heidi M. B. Vanderschuren, Louk J. M. J. |
description | Rationale
Alcohol use disorder (AUD) has been associated with suboptimal decision making, exaggerated impulsivity, and aberrant responses to reward-paired cues, but the relationship between AUD and these behaviors is incompletely understood.
Objectives
This study aims to assess decision making, impulsivity, and Pavlovian-conditioned approach in rats that voluntarily consume low (LD) or high (HD) amounts of alcohol.
Methods
LD and HD were tested in the rat gambling task (rGT) or the delayed reward task (DRT). Next, the effect of alcohol (0–1.0 g/kg) was tested in these tasks. Pavlovian-conditioned approach (PCA) was assessed both prior to and after intermittent alcohol access (IAA). Principal component analyses were performed to identify relationships between the most important behavioral parameters.
Results
HD showed more optimal decision making in the rGT. In the DRT, HD transiently showed reduced impulsive choice. In both LD and HD, alcohol treatment increased optimal decision making in the rGT and increased impulsive choice in the DRT. PCA prior to and after IAA was comparable for LD and HD. When PCA was tested after IAA only, HD showed a more sign-tracking behavior. The principal component analyses indicated dimensional relationships between alcohol intake, impulsivity, and sign-tracking behavior in the PCA task after IAA.
Conclusions
HD showed a more efficient performance in the rGT and DRT. Moreover, alcohol consumption enhanced approach behavior to reward-predictive cues, but sign-tracking did not predict the level of alcohol consumption. Taken together, these findings suggest that high levels of voluntary alcohol intake are associated with enhanced cue- and reward-driven behavior. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00213-017-4617-6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5486936</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A496610086</galeid><sourcerecordid>A496610086</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-ccd92ee8851497187ea5a515280a3a50bfc314ccb1cbd91a3f1baf54b22ee8533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Us1u1DAQjhCILoUH4IIsceFAisd2EocDUlXxU6kSHOBsTRxn161jBztZ1IfgnXG0pbQIbMmW5vsZjf0VxXOgJ0Bp8yZRyoCXFJpS1PmoHxQbEJyVjDbsYbGhlPOSQyWPiicpXdK8hBSPiyMmBTRQi03x89z3dm_7BR3p7TCYaLw2iVhP9sEtfsZ4TdDpsAsuF2e8MisWcU5vSTQOZxt82tmJ_LDzjthxWlzKhvP1a9IbbVOGyYhX1m8J-p58wb0Le4ue6JA7r2rTE5ymGFDvnhaPBnTJPLu5j4tvH95_PftUXnz-eH52elHqijdzqXXfMmOkrEC0DcjGYIUVVExS5FjRbtAchNYd6K5vAfkAHQ6V6Niqqjg_Lt4dfKelG02vjZ8jOjVFO-Z5VUCr7iPe7tQ27FUlZN3yOhu8ujGI4fti0qxGm7RxDr0JS1IgZcslb3ibqS__ol6GJfo8noIWmJANk_CHtUVnlPVDyH31aqpORVvX-b_l2vbkH6y8ezPa_KBmsLl-TwAHgY4hpWiG2xmBqjVD6pAhlTOk1gypVfPi7uPcKn6HJhPYgZAy5Lcm3pnov66_AI6J1Jw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1912487281</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Individual differences in voluntary alcohol intake in rats: relationship with impulsivity, decision making and Pavlovian conditioned approach</title><source>Springer Link</source><source>SPORTDiscus with Full Text (EBSCO)</source><creator>Spoelder, Marcia ; Flores Dourojeanni, Jacques P. ; de Git, Kathy C. G. ; Baars, Annemarie M. ; Lesscher, Heidi M. B. ; Vanderschuren, Louk J. M. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Spoelder, Marcia ; Flores Dourojeanni, Jacques P. ; de Git, Kathy C. G. ; Baars, Annemarie M. ; Lesscher, Heidi M. B. ; Vanderschuren, Louk J. M. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Rationale
Alcohol use disorder (AUD) has been associated with suboptimal decision making, exaggerated impulsivity, and aberrant responses to reward-paired cues, but the relationship between AUD and these behaviors is incompletely understood.
Objectives
This study aims to assess decision making, impulsivity, and Pavlovian-conditioned approach in rats that voluntarily consume low (LD) or high (HD) amounts of alcohol.
Methods
LD and HD were tested in the rat gambling task (rGT) or the delayed reward task (DRT). Next, the effect of alcohol (0–1.0 g/kg) was tested in these tasks. Pavlovian-conditioned approach (PCA) was assessed both prior to and after intermittent alcohol access (IAA). Principal component analyses were performed to identify relationships between the most important behavioral parameters.
Results
HD showed more optimal decision making in the rGT. In the DRT, HD transiently showed reduced impulsive choice. In both LD and HD, alcohol treatment increased optimal decision making in the rGT and increased impulsive choice in the DRT. PCA prior to and after IAA was comparable for LD and HD. When PCA was tested after IAA only, HD showed a more sign-tracking behavior. The principal component analyses indicated dimensional relationships between alcohol intake, impulsivity, and sign-tracking behavior in the PCA task after IAA.
Conclusions
HD showed a more efficient performance in the rGT and DRT. Moreover, alcohol consumption enhanced approach behavior to reward-predictive cues, but sign-tracking did not predict the level of alcohol consumption. Taken together, these findings suggest that high levels of voluntary alcohol intake are associated with enhanced cue- and reward-driven behavior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2072</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00213-017-4617-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28417164</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aggression ; Alcohol Drinking - metabolism ; Alcoholic beverages ; Alcoholism ; Alcohols ; Animal cognition ; Animals ; Approach behavior ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Choice Behavior - drug effects ; Conditioning ; Cues ; Decision making ; Decision Making - drug effects ; Dimensional analysis ; Ethanol - administration & dosage ; Gambling ; Impulsive behavior ; Impulsive Behavior - physiology ; Impulsivity ; Male ; Neurosciences ; Original Investigation ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Physiological aspects ; Psychiatry ; Rats ; Reinforcement ; Reward ; Rodents</subject><ispartof>Psychopharmacology, 2017-07, Vol.234 (14), p.2177-2196</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Springer</rights><rights>Psychopharmacology is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-ccd92ee8851497187ea5a515280a3a50bfc314ccb1cbd91a3f1baf54b22ee8533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-ccd92ee8851497187ea5a515280a3a50bfc314ccb1cbd91a3f1baf54b22ee8533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28417164$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spoelder, Marcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flores Dourojeanni, Jacques P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Git, Kathy C. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baars, Annemarie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lesscher, Heidi M. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderschuren, Louk J. M. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Individual differences in voluntary alcohol intake in rats: relationship with impulsivity, decision making and Pavlovian conditioned approach</title><title>Psychopharmacology</title><addtitle>Psychopharmacology</addtitle><addtitle>Psychopharmacology (Berl)</addtitle><description>Rationale
Alcohol use disorder (AUD) has been associated with suboptimal decision making, exaggerated impulsivity, and aberrant responses to reward-paired cues, but the relationship between AUD and these behaviors is incompletely understood.
Objectives
This study aims to assess decision making, impulsivity, and Pavlovian-conditioned approach in rats that voluntarily consume low (LD) or high (HD) amounts of alcohol.
Methods
LD and HD were tested in the rat gambling task (rGT) or the delayed reward task (DRT). Next, the effect of alcohol (0–1.0 g/kg) was tested in these tasks. Pavlovian-conditioned approach (PCA) was assessed both prior to and after intermittent alcohol access (IAA). Principal component analyses were performed to identify relationships between the most important behavioral parameters.
Results
HD showed more optimal decision making in the rGT. In the DRT, HD transiently showed reduced impulsive choice. In both LD and HD, alcohol treatment increased optimal decision making in the rGT and increased impulsive choice in the DRT. PCA prior to and after IAA was comparable for LD and HD. When PCA was tested after IAA only, HD showed a more sign-tracking behavior. The principal component analyses indicated dimensional relationships between alcohol intake, impulsivity, and sign-tracking behavior in the PCA task after IAA.
Conclusions
HD showed a more efficient performance in the rGT and DRT. Moreover, alcohol consumption enhanced approach behavior to reward-predictive cues, but sign-tracking did not predict the level of alcohol consumption. Taken together, these findings suggest that high levels of voluntary alcohol intake are associated with enhanced cue- and reward-driven behavior.</description><subject>Aggression</subject><subject>Alcohol Drinking - metabolism</subject><subject>Alcoholic beverages</subject><subject>Alcoholism</subject><subject>Alcohols</subject><subject>Animal cognition</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Approach behavior</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Choice Behavior - drug effects</subject><subject>Conditioning</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision Making - drug effects</subject><subject>Dimensional analysis</subject><subject>Ethanol - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Gambling</subject><subject>Impulsive behavior</subject><subject>Impulsive Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Impulsivity</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Original Investigation</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Reward</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><issn>0033-3158</issn><issn>1432-2072</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1Us1u1DAQjhCILoUH4IIsceFAisd2EocDUlXxU6kSHOBsTRxn161jBztZ1IfgnXG0pbQIbMmW5vsZjf0VxXOgJ0Bp8yZRyoCXFJpS1PmoHxQbEJyVjDbsYbGhlPOSQyWPiicpXdK8hBSPiyMmBTRQi03x89z3dm_7BR3p7TCYaLw2iVhP9sEtfsZ4TdDpsAsuF2e8MisWcU5vSTQOZxt82tmJ_LDzjthxWlzKhvP1a9IbbVOGyYhX1m8J-p58wb0Le4ue6JA7r2rTE5ymGFDvnhaPBnTJPLu5j4tvH95_PftUXnz-eH52elHqijdzqXXfMmOkrEC0DcjGYIUVVExS5FjRbtAchNYd6K5vAfkAHQ6V6Niqqjg_Lt4dfKelG02vjZ8jOjVFO-Z5VUCr7iPe7tQ27FUlZN3yOhu8ujGI4fti0qxGm7RxDr0JS1IgZcslb3ibqS__ol6GJfo8noIWmJANk_CHtUVnlPVDyH31aqpORVvX-b_l2vbkH6y8ezPa_KBmsLl-TwAHgY4hpWiG2xmBqjVD6pAhlTOk1gypVfPi7uPcKn6HJhPYgZAy5Lcm3pnov66_AI6J1Jw</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Spoelder, Marcia</creator><creator>Flores Dourojeanni, Jacques P.</creator><creator>de Git, Kathy C. G.</creator><creator>Baars, Annemarie M.</creator><creator>Lesscher, Heidi M. B.</creator><creator>Vanderschuren, Louk J. M. J.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>Individual differences in voluntary alcohol intake in rats: relationship with impulsivity, decision making and Pavlovian conditioned approach</title><author>Spoelder, Marcia ; Flores Dourojeanni, Jacques P. ; de Git, Kathy C. G. ; Baars, Annemarie M. ; Lesscher, Heidi M. B. ; Vanderschuren, Louk J. M. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-ccd92ee8851497187ea5a515280a3a50bfc314ccb1cbd91a3f1baf54b22ee8533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aggression</topic><topic>Alcohol Drinking - metabolism</topic><topic>Alcoholic beverages</topic><topic>Alcoholism</topic><topic>Alcohols</topic><topic>Animal cognition</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Approach behavior</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Choice Behavior - drug effects</topic><topic>Conditioning</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision Making - drug effects</topic><topic>Dimensional analysis</topic><topic>Ethanol - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Gambling</topic><topic>Impulsive behavior</topic><topic>Impulsive Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Impulsivity</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Original Investigation</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Reward</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spoelder, Marcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flores Dourojeanni, Jacques P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Git, Kathy C. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baars, Annemarie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lesscher, Heidi M. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderschuren, Louk J. M. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Psychopharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spoelder, Marcia</au><au>Flores Dourojeanni, Jacques P.</au><au>de Git, Kathy C. G.</au><au>Baars, Annemarie M.</au><au>Lesscher, Heidi M. B.</au><au>Vanderschuren, Louk J. M. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Individual differences in voluntary alcohol intake in rats: relationship with impulsivity, decision making and Pavlovian conditioned approach</atitle><jtitle>Psychopharmacology</jtitle><stitle>Psychopharmacology</stitle><addtitle>Psychopharmacology (Berl)</addtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>234</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>2177</spage><epage>2196</epage><pages>2177-2196</pages><issn>0033-3158</issn><eissn>1432-2072</eissn><abstract>Rationale
Alcohol use disorder (AUD) has been associated with suboptimal decision making, exaggerated impulsivity, and aberrant responses to reward-paired cues, but the relationship between AUD and these behaviors is incompletely understood.
Objectives
This study aims to assess decision making, impulsivity, and Pavlovian-conditioned approach in rats that voluntarily consume low (LD) or high (HD) amounts of alcohol.
Methods
LD and HD were tested in the rat gambling task (rGT) or the delayed reward task (DRT). Next, the effect of alcohol (0–1.0 g/kg) was tested in these tasks. Pavlovian-conditioned approach (PCA) was assessed both prior to and after intermittent alcohol access (IAA). Principal component analyses were performed to identify relationships between the most important behavioral parameters.
Results
HD showed more optimal decision making in the rGT. In the DRT, HD transiently showed reduced impulsive choice. In both LD and HD, alcohol treatment increased optimal decision making in the rGT and increased impulsive choice in the DRT. PCA prior to and after IAA was comparable for LD and HD. When PCA was tested after IAA only, HD showed a more sign-tracking behavior. The principal component analyses indicated dimensional relationships between alcohol intake, impulsivity, and sign-tracking behavior in the PCA task after IAA.
Conclusions
HD showed a more efficient performance in the rGT and DRT. Moreover, alcohol consumption enhanced approach behavior to reward-predictive cues, but sign-tracking did not predict the level of alcohol consumption. Taken together, these findings suggest that high levels of voluntary alcohol intake are associated with enhanced cue- and reward-driven behavior.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>28417164</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00213-017-4617-6</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-3158 |
ispartof | Psychopharmacology, 2017-07, Vol.234 (14), p.2177-2196 |
issn | 0033-3158 1432-2072 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5486936 |
source | Springer Link; SPORTDiscus with Full Text (EBSCO) |
subjects | Aggression Alcohol Drinking - metabolism Alcoholic beverages Alcoholism Alcohols Animal cognition Animals Approach behavior Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Choice Behavior - drug effects Conditioning Cues Decision making Decision Making - drug effects Dimensional analysis Ethanol - administration & dosage Gambling Impulsive behavior Impulsive Behavior - physiology Impulsivity Male Neurosciences Original Investigation Pharmacology/Toxicology Physiological aspects Psychiatry Rats Reinforcement Reward Rodents |
title | Individual differences in voluntary alcohol intake in rats: relationship with impulsivity, decision making and Pavlovian conditioned approach |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T21%3A35%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Individual%20differences%20in%20voluntary%20alcohol%20intake%20in%20rats:%20relationship%20with%20impulsivity,%20decision%20making%20and%20Pavlovian%20conditioned%20approach&rft.jtitle=Psychopharmacology&rft.au=Spoelder,%20Marcia&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=234&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=2177&rft.epage=2196&rft.pages=2177-2196&rft.issn=0033-3158&rft.eissn=1432-2072&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00213-017-4617-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA496610086%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-ccd92ee8851497187ea5a515280a3a50bfc314ccb1cbd91a3f1baf54b22ee8533%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1912487281&rft_id=info:pmid/28417164&rft_galeid=A496610086&rfr_iscdi=true |