Loading…
Asexual and sexual morphs of Moesziomyces revisited
Yeasts of the now unused asexually typified genus belong to the smut fungi ( ) and are mostly believed to be apathogenic asexual yeasts derived from smut fungi that have lost pathogenicity on plants. However, phylogenetic studies have shown that most species are phylogenetically close to smut fungi...
Saved in:
Published in: | IMA fungus 2017-06, Vol.8 (1), p.117-129 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Yeasts of the now unused asexually typified genus
belong to the smut fungi (
) and are mostly believed to be apathogenic asexual yeasts derived from smut fungi that have lost pathogenicity on plants. However, phylogenetic studies have shown that most
species are phylogenetically close to smut fungi parasitic to plants, suggesting that some of the species might represent adventitious isolations of the yeast morph of otherwise plant pathogenic smut fungi. However, there are some species, such as
(syn.
) that are isolated throughout the world and sometimes are also found in clinical samples and do not have a known plant pathogenic sexual morph. In this study, it is revealed by phylogenetic investigations that isolates of the biocontrol agent
are interspersed with
sexual lineages, suggesting conspecificity. This raises doubts regarding the apathogenic nature of asexual morphs previously placed in
, but suggests that there might also be pathogenic sexual morph counterparts for those species known only from asexual morphs. The finding that several additional species currently only known from their yeast morphs are embedded within the genus
, suggests that the yeast morph might play a more dominant role in this genus as compared to other genera of
. In addition, phylogenetic reconstructions demonstrated that
has a narrow host range and that some previously described but not widely used species names should be applied for
on other host genera than
. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2210-6340 2210-6359 2210-6359 |
DOI: | 10.5598/imafungus.2017.08.01.09 |