Loading…
A technician-delivered ‘virtual clinic’ for triaging low-risk glaucoma referrals
Purpose The purpose of this study is to describe the outcomes of a technician-delivered glaucoma referral triaging service with ‘virtual review’ of resultant data by a consultant ophthalmologist. Patients and methods The Glaucoma Screening Clinic reviewed new optometrist or GP-initiated glaucoma sus...
Saved in:
Published in: | Eye (London) 2017-06, Vol.31 (6), p.899-905 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose
The purpose of this study is to describe the outcomes of a technician-delivered glaucoma referral triaging service with ‘virtual review’ of resultant data by a consultant ophthalmologist.
Patients and methods
The Glaucoma Screening Clinic reviewed new optometrist or GP-initiated glaucoma suspect referrals into a specialist ophthalmic hospital. Patients underwent testing by three ophthalmic technicians in a dedicated clinical facility. Data were reviewed at a different time and date by a consultant glaucoma ophthalmologist. Approximately 10% of discharged patients were reviewed in a face-to-face consultant-led clinic to examine the false-negative rate of the service.
Results
Between 1 March 2014 and 31 March 2016, 1380 patients were seen in the clinic. The number of patients discharged following consultant virtual review was 855 (62%). The positive predictive value of onward referrals was 84%. Three of the 82 patients brought back for face-to-face review were deemed to require treatment, equating to negative predictive value of 96%.
Conclusions
Our technician-delivered glaucoma referral triaging clinic incorporates consultant ‘virtual review’ to provide a service model that significantly reduces the number of onward referrals into the glaucoma outpatient department. This model may be an alternative to departments where there are difficulties in implementing optometrist-led community-based referral refinement schemes. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0950-222X 1476-5454 |
DOI: | 10.1038/eye.2017.9 |