Loading…
‘Opt-out’ referrals after identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled air carbon monoxide: impact on engagement with smoking cessation support
BackgroundIn the UK, free smoking cessation support is available to pregnant women; only a minority accesses this. ‘Opt-out’ referrals to stop smoking services (SSS) are recommended by UK guidelines. These involve identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) and referring them for...
Saved in:
Published in: | Tobacco control 2017-05, Vol.26 (3), p.300-306 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b555t-e546ca3d4ed85a228fc3e7d9a43f4f31bbac116d18aade9b23be7413bb6ff2253 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b555t-e546ca3d4ed85a228fc3e7d9a43f4f31bbac116d18aade9b23be7413bb6ff2253 |
container_end_page | 306 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 300 |
container_title | Tobacco control |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Campbell, Katarzyna A Cooper, Sue Fahy, Samantha J Bowker, Katharine Leonardi-Bee, Jo McEwen, Andy Whitemore, Rachel Coleman, Tim |
description | BackgroundIn the UK, free smoking cessation support is available to pregnant women; only a minority accesses this. ‘Opt-out’ referrals to stop smoking services (SSS) are recommended by UK guidelines. These involve identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) and referring them for support unless they object.MethodsTo assess the impact of ‘opt-out’ referrals for pregnant smokers on SSS uptake and effectiveness, we conducted a ‘before–after’ service development evaluation. In the 6-month ‘before’ period, there was a routine ‘opt-in’ referral system for self-reported smokers at antenatal ‘booking’ appointments. In the 6-month ‘after’ period, additional ‘opt-out’ referrals were introduced at the 12-week ultrasound appointments; women with CO≥4 ppm were referred to, and outcome data were collected from, local SSS.ResultsApproximately 2300 women attended antenatal care in each period. Before the implementation, 536 (23.4%) women reported smoking at ‘booking’ and 290 (12.7%) were referred to SSS. After the implementation, 524 (22.9%) women reported smoking at ‘booking’, an additional 156 smokers (6.8%) were identified via the ‘opt-out’ referrals and, in total, 421 (18.4%) were referred to SSS. Over twice as many women set a quit date with the SSS after ‘opt-out’ referrals were implemented (121 (5.3%, 95% CI 4.4% to 6.3%) compared to 57 (2.5%, 95% CI 1.9% to 3.2%) before implementation) and reported being abstinent 4 weeks later (93 (4.1%, 95% CI 3.3% to 4.9%) compared to 46 (2.0%, 1.5% to 2.7%) before implementation).ConclusionsIn a hospital with an ‘opt-in’ referral system, adding CO screening with ‘opt-out’ referrals as women attended ultrasound examinations doubled the numbers of pregnant smokers setting quit dates and reporting smoking cessation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052662 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5520259</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44652278</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44652278</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b555t-e546ca3d4ed85a228fc3e7d9a43f4f31bbac116d18aade9b23be7413bb6ff2253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkc1u1DAUhS0EosPAI4As2HQT8E_sJF0goar8SJW6gbXlODczHiZ2sB1od30FdvB6fRIcUkaUHStLvt85vscHoeeUvKSUy1fJt9oYb7xLwe8LRqgoiGBSsntoRUtZF5zT-j5akUaWRSkkP0KPYtwRQnkl6EN0xCrGBKHVCn2_uf5xMabCT-nm-icO0EMIeh-x7hMEbDtwyfZX1m3wGGDjtEs4Dv4zhIinOF_D5VbvocPaBmx0aL3Dg3f-MktPsB1GbRLOd-A2egNDtsPfbNr-NpnlBmLUyWYiTuPoQ3qMHvR5AXhye67Rp7dnH0_fF-cX7z6cvjkvWiFEKkCU0mjeldDVQjNW94ZD1TW65H3Zc9rmP6JUdrTWuoOmZbyFqqS8bWXf5_R8jV4vvuPUDtCZvFkOrsZgBx2ulNdW3Z04u1Ub_1UJwQgTTTY4vjUI_ssEManBRgP7vXbgp6ho3VS8oYSSjL74B935Kbgcb6ZyY3Jm1-hkoUzwMeYqDstQoubm1d3m1dy8WprP4md_xzlI_1SdgacLsIvJh8O8LKVgrKrzXCzzdtj9z8O_AIO80cY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1894686897</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>‘Opt-out’ referrals after identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled air carbon monoxide: impact on engagement with smoking cessation support</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Campbell, Katarzyna A ; Cooper, Sue ; Fahy, Samantha J ; Bowker, Katharine ; Leonardi-Bee, Jo ; McEwen, Andy ; Whitemore, Rachel ; Coleman, Tim</creator><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Katarzyna A ; Cooper, Sue ; Fahy, Samantha J ; Bowker, Katharine ; Leonardi-Bee, Jo ; McEwen, Andy ; Whitemore, Rachel ; Coleman, Tim</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundIn the UK, free smoking cessation support is available to pregnant women; only a minority accesses this. ‘Opt-out’ referrals to stop smoking services (SSS) are recommended by UK guidelines. These involve identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) and referring them for support unless they object.MethodsTo assess the impact of ‘opt-out’ referrals for pregnant smokers on SSS uptake and effectiveness, we conducted a ‘before–after’ service development evaluation. In the 6-month ‘before’ period, there was a routine ‘opt-in’ referral system for self-reported smokers at antenatal ‘booking’ appointments. In the 6-month ‘after’ period, additional ‘opt-out’ referrals were introduced at the 12-week ultrasound appointments; women with CO≥4 ppm were referred to, and outcome data were collected from, local SSS.ResultsApproximately 2300 women attended antenatal care in each period. Before the implementation, 536 (23.4%) women reported smoking at ‘booking’ and 290 (12.7%) were referred to SSS. After the implementation, 524 (22.9%) women reported smoking at ‘booking’, an additional 156 smokers (6.8%) were identified via the ‘opt-out’ referrals and, in total, 421 (18.4%) were referred to SSS. Over twice as many women set a quit date with the SSS after ‘opt-out’ referrals were implemented (121 (5.3%, 95% CI 4.4% to 6.3%) compared to 57 (2.5%, 95% CI 1.9% to 3.2%) before implementation) and reported being abstinent 4 weeks later (93 (4.1%, 95% CI 3.3% to 4.9%) compared to 46 (2.0%, 1.5% to 2.7%) before implementation).ConclusionsIn a hospital with an ‘opt-in’ referral system, adding CO screening with ‘opt-out’ referrals as women attended ultrasound examinations doubled the numbers of pregnant smokers setting quit dates and reporting smoking cessation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-4563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3318</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052662</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27225017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Adult ; Appointments & personnel changes ; Carbon monoxide ; Carbon Monoxide - analysis ; Data collection ; Electronic health records ; Female ; Humans ; Identification ; Medical records ; Midwifery ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications - diagnosis ; Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology ; Pregnancy Complications - prevention & control ; Prenatal care ; Prenatal Care - organization & administration ; Referral and Consultation - organization & administration ; Referral and Consultation - statistics & numerical data ; Research Paper ; Smoking ; Smoking cessation ; Smoking Cessation - methods ; Smoking Prevention ; Ultrasonic imaging ; United Kingdom ; Womens health ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Tobacco control, 2017-05, Vol.26 (3), p.300-306</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing</rights><rights>2017 BMJ Publishing Group</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2016 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b555t-e546ca3d4ed85a228fc3e7d9a43f4f31bbac116d18aade9b23be7413bb6ff2253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b555t-e546ca3d4ed85a228fc3e7d9a43f4f31bbac116d18aade9b23be7413bb6ff2253</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1994-6395 ; 0000-0001-7453-9138 ; 0000-0002-9033-0884 ; 0000-0002-7303-4805 ; 0000-0002-2013-6154</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44652278$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44652278$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27225017$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Katarzyna A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Sue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fahy, Samantha J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowker, Katharine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonardi-Bee, Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEwen, Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitemore, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Tim</creatorcontrib><title>‘Opt-out’ referrals after identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled air carbon monoxide: impact on engagement with smoking cessation support</title><title>Tobacco control</title><addtitle>Tob Control</addtitle><description>BackgroundIn the UK, free smoking cessation support is available to pregnant women; only a minority accesses this. ‘Opt-out’ referrals to stop smoking services (SSS) are recommended by UK guidelines. These involve identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) and referring them for support unless they object.MethodsTo assess the impact of ‘opt-out’ referrals for pregnant smokers on SSS uptake and effectiveness, we conducted a ‘before–after’ service development evaluation. In the 6-month ‘before’ period, there was a routine ‘opt-in’ referral system for self-reported smokers at antenatal ‘booking’ appointments. In the 6-month ‘after’ period, additional ‘opt-out’ referrals were introduced at the 12-week ultrasound appointments; women with CO≥4 ppm were referred to, and outcome data were collected from, local SSS.ResultsApproximately 2300 women attended antenatal care in each period. Before the implementation, 536 (23.4%) women reported smoking at ‘booking’ and 290 (12.7%) were referred to SSS. After the implementation, 524 (22.9%) women reported smoking at ‘booking’, an additional 156 smokers (6.8%) were identified via the ‘opt-out’ referrals and, in total, 421 (18.4%) were referred to SSS. Over twice as many women set a quit date with the SSS after ‘opt-out’ referrals were implemented (121 (5.3%, 95% CI 4.4% to 6.3%) compared to 57 (2.5%, 95% CI 1.9% to 3.2%) before implementation) and reported being abstinent 4 weeks later (93 (4.1%, 95% CI 3.3% to 4.9%) compared to 46 (2.0%, 1.5% to 2.7%) before implementation).ConclusionsIn a hospital with an ‘opt-in’ referral system, adding CO screening with ‘opt-out’ referrals as women attended ultrasound examinations doubled the numbers of pregnant smokers setting quit dates and reporting smoking cessation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Appointments & personnel changes</subject><subject>Carbon monoxide</subject><subject>Carbon Monoxide - analysis</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Midwifery</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications - prevention & control</subject><subject>Prenatal care</subject><subject>Prenatal Care - organization & administration</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation - organization & administration</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Smoking cessation</subject><subject>Smoking Cessation - methods</subject><subject>Smoking Prevention</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0964-4563</issn><issn>1468-3318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkc1u1DAUhS0EosPAI4As2HQT8E_sJF0goar8SJW6gbXlODczHiZ2sB1od30FdvB6fRIcUkaUHStLvt85vscHoeeUvKSUy1fJt9oYb7xLwe8LRqgoiGBSsntoRUtZF5zT-j5akUaWRSkkP0KPYtwRQnkl6EN0xCrGBKHVCn2_uf5xMabCT-nm-icO0EMIeh-x7hMEbDtwyfZX1m3wGGDjtEs4Dv4zhIinOF_D5VbvocPaBmx0aL3Dg3f-MktPsB1GbRLOd-A2egNDtsPfbNr-NpnlBmLUyWYiTuPoQ3qMHvR5AXhye67Rp7dnH0_fF-cX7z6cvjkvWiFEKkCU0mjeldDVQjNW94ZD1TW65H3Zc9rmP6JUdrTWuoOmZbyFqqS8bWXf5_R8jV4vvuPUDtCZvFkOrsZgBx2ulNdW3Z04u1Ub_1UJwQgTTTY4vjUI_ssEManBRgP7vXbgp6ho3VS8oYSSjL74B935Kbgcb6ZyY3Jm1-hkoUzwMeYqDstQoubm1d3m1dy8WprP4md_xzlI_1SdgacLsIvJh8O8LKVgrKrzXCzzdtj9z8O_AIO80cY</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Campbell, Katarzyna A</creator><creator>Cooper, Sue</creator><creator>Fahy, Samantha J</creator><creator>Bowker, Katharine</creator><creator>Leonardi-Bee, Jo</creator><creator>McEwen, Andy</creator><creator>Whitemore, Rachel</creator><creator>Coleman, Tim</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1994-6395</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7453-9138</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9033-0884</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7303-4805</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2013-6154</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>‘Opt-out’ referrals after identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled air carbon monoxide: impact on engagement with smoking cessation support</title><author>Campbell, Katarzyna A ; Cooper, Sue ; Fahy, Samantha J ; Bowker, Katharine ; Leonardi-Bee, Jo ; McEwen, Andy ; Whitemore, Rachel ; Coleman, Tim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b555t-e546ca3d4ed85a228fc3e7d9a43f4f31bbac116d18aade9b23be7413bb6ff2253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Appointments & personnel changes</topic><topic>Carbon monoxide</topic><topic>Carbon Monoxide - analysis</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Midwifery</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications - prevention & control</topic><topic>Prenatal care</topic><topic>Prenatal Care - organization & administration</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation - organization & administration</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Smoking cessation</topic><topic>Smoking Cessation - methods</topic><topic>Smoking Prevention</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Katarzyna A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Sue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fahy, Samantha J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowker, Katharine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonardi-Bee, Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEwen, Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitemore, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Tim</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Journals (Open Access)</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI-INFORM Complete</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health & Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Family Health Database (ProQuest Medical & Health Databases)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Tobacco control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Campbell, Katarzyna A</au><au>Cooper, Sue</au><au>Fahy, Samantha J</au><au>Bowker, Katharine</au><au>Leonardi-Bee, Jo</au><au>McEwen, Andy</au><au>Whitemore, Rachel</au><au>Coleman, Tim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>‘Opt-out’ referrals after identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled air carbon monoxide: impact on engagement with smoking cessation support</atitle><jtitle>Tobacco control</jtitle><addtitle>Tob Control</addtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>300</spage><epage>306</epage><pages>300-306</pages><issn>0964-4563</issn><eissn>1468-3318</eissn><abstract>BackgroundIn the UK, free smoking cessation support is available to pregnant women; only a minority accesses this. ‘Opt-out’ referrals to stop smoking services (SSS) are recommended by UK guidelines. These involve identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) and referring them for support unless they object.MethodsTo assess the impact of ‘opt-out’ referrals for pregnant smokers on SSS uptake and effectiveness, we conducted a ‘before–after’ service development evaluation. In the 6-month ‘before’ period, there was a routine ‘opt-in’ referral system for self-reported smokers at antenatal ‘booking’ appointments. In the 6-month ‘after’ period, additional ‘opt-out’ referrals were introduced at the 12-week ultrasound appointments; women with CO≥4 ppm were referred to, and outcome data were collected from, local SSS.ResultsApproximately 2300 women attended antenatal care in each period. Before the implementation, 536 (23.4%) women reported smoking at ‘booking’ and 290 (12.7%) were referred to SSS. After the implementation, 524 (22.9%) women reported smoking at ‘booking’, an additional 156 smokers (6.8%) were identified via the ‘opt-out’ referrals and, in total, 421 (18.4%) were referred to SSS. Over twice as many women set a quit date with the SSS after ‘opt-out’ referrals were implemented (121 (5.3%, 95% CI 4.4% to 6.3%) compared to 57 (2.5%, 95% CI 1.9% to 3.2%) before implementation) and reported being abstinent 4 weeks later (93 (4.1%, 95% CI 3.3% to 4.9%) compared to 46 (2.0%, 1.5% to 2.7%) before implementation).ConclusionsIn a hospital with an ‘opt-in’ referral system, adding CO screening with ‘opt-out’ referrals as women attended ultrasound examinations doubled the numbers of pregnant smokers setting quit dates and reporting smoking cessation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group</pub><pmid>27225017</pmid><doi>10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052662</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1994-6395</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7453-9138</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9033-0884</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7303-4805</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2013-6154</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0964-4563 |
ispartof | Tobacco control, 2017-05, Vol.26 (3), p.300-306 |
issn | 0964-4563 1468-3318 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5520259 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | Adult Appointments & personnel changes Carbon monoxide Carbon Monoxide - analysis Data collection Electronic health records Female Humans Identification Medical records Midwifery Pregnancy Pregnancy Complications - diagnosis Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology Pregnancy Complications - prevention & control Prenatal care Prenatal Care - organization & administration Referral and Consultation - organization & administration Referral and Consultation - statistics & numerical data Research Paper Smoking Smoking cessation Smoking Cessation - methods Smoking Prevention Ultrasonic imaging United Kingdom Womens health Young Adult |
title | ‘Opt-out’ referrals after identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled air carbon monoxide: impact on engagement with smoking cessation support |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A00%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%98Opt-out%E2%80%99%20referrals%20after%20identifying%20pregnant%20smokers%20using%20exhaled%20air%20carbon%20monoxide:%20impact%20on%20engagement%20with%20smoking%20cessation%20support&rft.jtitle=Tobacco%20control&rft.au=Campbell,%20Katarzyna%20A&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=300&rft.epage=306&rft.pages=300-306&rft.issn=0964-4563&rft.eissn=1468-3318&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052662&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E44652278%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b555t-e546ca3d4ed85a228fc3e7d9a43f4f31bbac116d18aade9b23be7413bb6ff2253%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1894686897&rft_id=info:pmid/27225017&rft_jstor_id=44652278&rfr_iscdi=true |