Loading…

‘Opt-out’ referrals after identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled air carbon monoxide: impact on engagement with smoking cessation support

BackgroundIn the UK, free smoking cessation support is available to pregnant women; only a minority accesses this. ‘Opt-out’ referrals to stop smoking services (SSS) are recommended by UK guidelines. These involve identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) and referring them for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Tobacco control 2017-05, Vol.26 (3), p.300-306
Main Authors: Campbell, Katarzyna A, Cooper, Sue, Fahy, Samantha J, Bowker, Katharine, Leonardi-Bee, Jo, McEwen, Andy, Whitemore, Rachel, Coleman, Tim
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b555t-e546ca3d4ed85a228fc3e7d9a43f4f31bbac116d18aade9b23be7413bb6ff2253
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b555t-e546ca3d4ed85a228fc3e7d9a43f4f31bbac116d18aade9b23be7413bb6ff2253
container_end_page 306
container_issue 3
container_start_page 300
container_title Tobacco control
container_volume 26
creator Campbell, Katarzyna A
Cooper, Sue
Fahy, Samantha J
Bowker, Katharine
Leonardi-Bee, Jo
McEwen, Andy
Whitemore, Rachel
Coleman, Tim
description BackgroundIn the UK, free smoking cessation support is available to pregnant women; only a minority accesses this. ‘Opt-out’ referrals to stop smoking services (SSS) are recommended by UK guidelines. These involve identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) and referring them for support unless they object.MethodsTo assess the impact of ‘opt-out’ referrals for pregnant smokers on SSS uptake and effectiveness, we conducted a ‘before–after’ service development evaluation. In the 6-month ‘before’ period, there was a routine ‘opt-in’ referral system for self-reported smokers at antenatal ‘booking’ appointments. In the 6-month ‘after’ period, additional ‘opt-out’ referrals were introduced at the 12-week ultrasound appointments; women with CO≥4 ppm were referred to, and outcome data were collected from, local SSS.ResultsApproximately 2300 women attended antenatal care in each period. Before the implementation, 536 (23.4%) women reported smoking at ‘booking’ and 290 (12.7%) were referred to SSS. After the implementation, 524 (22.9%) women reported smoking at ‘booking’, an additional 156 smokers (6.8%) were identified via the ‘opt-out’ referrals and, in total, 421 (18.4%) were referred to SSS. Over twice as many women set a quit date with the SSS after ‘opt-out’ referrals were implemented (121 (5.3%, 95% CI 4.4% to 6.3%) compared to 57 (2.5%, 95% CI 1.9% to 3.2%) before implementation) and reported being abstinent 4 weeks later (93 (4.1%, 95% CI 3.3% to 4.9%) compared to 46 (2.0%, 1.5% to 2.7%) before implementation).ConclusionsIn a hospital with an ‘opt-in’ referral system, adding CO screening with ‘opt-out’ referrals as women attended ultrasound examinations doubled the numbers of pregnant smokers setting quit dates and reporting smoking cessation.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052662
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5520259</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44652278</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44652278</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b555t-e546ca3d4ed85a228fc3e7d9a43f4f31bbac116d18aade9b23be7413bb6ff2253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkc1u1DAUhS0EosPAI4As2HQT8E_sJF0goar8SJW6gbXlODczHiZ2sB1od30FdvB6fRIcUkaUHStLvt85vscHoeeUvKSUy1fJt9oYb7xLwe8LRqgoiGBSsntoRUtZF5zT-j5akUaWRSkkP0KPYtwRQnkl6EN0xCrGBKHVCn2_uf5xMabCT-nm-icO0EMIeh-x7hMEbDtwyfZX1m3wGGDjtEs4Dv4zhIinOF_D5VbvocPaBmx0aL3Dg3f-MktPsB1GbRLOd-A2egNDtsPfbNr-NpnlBmLUyWYiTuPoQ3qMHvR5AXhye67Rp7dnH0_fF-cX7z6cvjkvWiFEKkCU0mjeldDVQjNW94ZD1TW65H3Zc9rmP6JUdrTWuoOmZbyFqqS8bWXf5_R8jV4vvuPUDtCZvFkOrsZgBx2ulNdW3Z04u1Ub_1UJwQgTTTY4vjUI_ssEManBRgP7vXbgp6ho3VS8oYSSjL74B935Kbgcb6ZyY3Jm1-hkoUzwMeYqDstQoubm1d3m1dy8WprP4md_xzlI_1SdgacLsIvJh8O8LKVgrKrzXCzzdtj9z8O_AIO80cY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1894686897</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>‘Opt-out’ referrals after identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled air carbon monoxide: impact on engagement with smoking cessation support</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Campbell, Katarzyna A ; Cooper, Sue ; Fahy, Samantha J ; Bowker, Katharine ; Leonardi-Bee, Jo ; McEwen, Andy ; Whitemore, Rachel ; Coleman, Tim</creator><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Katarzyna A ; Cooper, Sue ; Fahy, Samantha J ; Bowker, Katharine ; Leonardi-Bee, Jo ; McEwen, Andy ; Whitemore, Rachel ; Coleman, Tim</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundIn the UK, free smoking cessation support is available to pregnant women; only a minority accesses this. ‘Opt-out’ referrals to stop smoking services (SSS) are recommended by UK guidelines. These involve identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) and referring them for support unless they object.MethodsTo assess the impact of ‘opt-out’ referrals for pregnant smokers on SSS uptake and effectiveness, we conducted a ‘before–after’ service development evaluation. In the 6-month ‘before’ period, there was a routine ‘opt-in’ referral system for self-reported smokers at antenatal ‘booking’ appointments. In the 6-month ‘after’ period, additional ‘opt-out’ referrals were introduced at the 12-week ultrasound appointments; women with CO≥4 ppm were referred to, and outcome data were collected from, local SSS.ResultsApproximately 2300 women attended antenatal care in each period. Before the implementation, 536 (23.4%) women reported smoking at ‘booking’ and 290 (12.7%) were referred to SSS. After the implementation, 524 (22.9%) women reported smoking at ‘booking’, an additional 156 smokers (6.8%) were identified via the ‘opt-out’ referrals and, in total, 421 (18.4%) were referred to SSS. Over twice as many women set a quit date with the SSS after ‘opt-out’ referrals were implemented (121 (5.3%, 95% CI 4.4% to 6.3%) compared to 57 (2.5%, 95% CI 1.9% to 3.2%) before implementation) and reported being abstinent 4 weeks later (93 (4.1%, 95% CI 3.3% to 4.9%) compared to 46 (2.0%, 1.5% to 2.7%) before implementation).ConclusionsIn a hospital with an ‘opt-in’ referral system, adding CO screening with ‘opt-out’ referrals as women attended ultrasound examinations doubled the numbers of pregnant smokers setting quit dates and reporting smoking cessation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-4563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3318</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052662</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27225017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Adult ; Appointments &amp; personnel changes ; Carbon monoxide ; Carbon Monoxide - analysis ; Data collection ; Electronic health records ; Female ; Humans ; Identification ; Medical records ; Midwifery ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications - diagnosis ; Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology ; Pregnancy Complications - prevention &amp; control ; Prenatal care ; Prenatal Care - organization &amp; administration ; Referral and Consultation - organization &amp; administration ; Referral and Consultation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Research Paper ; Smoking ; Smoking cessation ; Smoking Cessation - methods ; Smoking Prevention ; Ultrasonic imaging ; United Kingdom ; Womens health ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Tobacco control, 2017-05, Vol.26 (3), p.300-306</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing</rights><rights>2017 BMJ Publishing Group</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2016 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b555t-e546ca3d4ed85a228fc3e7d9a43f4f31bbac116d18aade9b23be7413bb6ff2253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b555t-e546ca3d4ed85a228fc3e7d9a43f4f31bbac116d18aade9b23be7413bb6ff2253</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1994-6395 ; 0000-0001-7453-9138 ; 0000-0002-9033-0884 ; 0000-0002-7303-4805 ; 0000-0002-2013-6154</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44652278$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44652278$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27225017$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Katarzyna A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Sue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fahy, Samantha J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowker, Katharine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonardi-Bee, Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEwen, Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitemore, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Tim</creatorcontrib><title>‘Opt-out’ referrals after identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled air carbon monoxide: impact on engagement with smoking cessation support</title><title>Tobacco control</title><addtitle>Tob Control</addtitle><description>BackgroundIn the UK, free smoking cessation support is available to pregnant women; only a minority accesses this. ‘Opt-out’ referrals to stop smoking services (SSS) are recommended by UK guidelines. These involve identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) and referring them for support unless they object.MethodsTo assess the impact of ‘opt-out’ referrals for pregnant smokers on SSS uptake and effectiveness, we conducted a ‘before–after’ service development evaluation. In the 6-month ‘before’ period, there was a routine ‘opt-in’ referral system for self-reported smokers at antenatal ‘booking’ appointments. In the 6-month ‘after’ period, additional ‘opt-out’ referrals were introduced at the 12-week ultrasound appointments; women with CO≥4 ppm were referred to, and outcome data were collected from, local SSS.ResultsApproximately 2300 women attended antenatal care in each period. Before the implementation, 536 (23.4%) women reported smoking at ‘booking’ and 290 (12.7%) were referred to SSS. After the implementation, 524 (22.9%) women reported smoking at ‘booking’, an additional 156 smokers (6.8%) were identified via the ‘opt-out’ referrals and, in total, 421 (18.4%) were referred to SSS. Over twice as many women set a quit date with the SSS after ‘opt-out’ referrals were implemented (121 (5.3%, 95% CI 4.4% to 6.3%) compared to 57 (2.5%, 95% CI 1.9% to 3.2%) before implementation) and reported being abstinent 4 weeks later (93 (4.1%, 95% CI 3.3% to 4.9%) compared to 46 (2.0%, 1.5% to 2.7%) before implementation).ConclusionsIn a hospital with an ‘opt-in’ referral system, adding CO screening with ‘opt-out’ referrals as women attended ultrasound examinations doubled the numbers of pregnant smokers setting quit dates and reporting smoking cessation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Appointments &amp; personnel changes</subject><subject>Carbon monoxide</subject><subject>Carbon Monoxide - analysis</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Midwifery</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Prenatal care</subject><subject>Prenatal Care - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Smoking cessation</subject><subject>Smoking Cessation - methods</subject><subject>Smoking Prevention</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0964-4563</issn><issn>1468-3318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkc1u1DAUhS0EosPAI4As2HQT8E_sJF0goar8SJW6gbXlODczHiZ2sB1od30FdvB6fRIcUkaUHStLvt85vscHoeeUvKSUy1fJt9oYb7xLwe8LRqgoiGBSsntoRUtZF5zT-j5akUaWRSkkP0KPYtwRQnkl6EN0xCrGBKHVCn2_uf5xMabCT-nm-icO0EMIeh-x7hMEbDtwyfZX1m3wGGDjtEs4Dv4zhIinOF_D5VbvocPaBmx0aL3Dg3f-MktPsB1GbRLOd-A2egNDtsPfbNr-NpnlBmLUyWYiTuPoQ3qMHvR5AXhye67Rp7dnH0_fF-cX7z6cvjkvWiFEKkCU0mjeldDVQjNW94ZD1TW65H3Zc9rmP6JUdrTWuoOmZbyFqqS8bWXf5_R8jV4vvuPUDtCZvFkOrsZgBx2ulNdW3Z04u1Ub_1UJwQgTTTY4vjUI_ssEManBRgP7vXbgp6ho3VS8oYSSjL74B935Kbgcb6ZyY3Jm1-hkoUzwMeYqDstQoubm1d3m1dy8WprP4md_xzlI_1SdgacLsIvJh8O8LKVgrKrzXCzzdtj9z8O_AIO80cY</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Campbell, Katarzyna A</creator><creator>Cooper, Sue</creator><creator>Fahy, Samantha J</creator><creator>Bowker, Katharine</creator><creator>Leonardi-Bee, Jo</creator><creator>McEwen, Andy</creator><creator>Whitemore, Rachel</creator><creator>Coleman, Tim</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1994-6395</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7453-9138</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9033-0884</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7303-4805</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2013-6154</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>‘Opt-out’ referrals after identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled air carbon monoxide: impact on engagement with smoking cessation support</title><author>Campbell, Katarzyna A ; Cooper, Sue ; Fahy, Samantha J ; Bowker, Katharine ; Leonardi-Bee, Jo ; McEwen, Andy ; Whitemore, Rachel ; Coleman, Tim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b555t-e546ca3d4ed85a228fc3e7d9a43f4f31bbac116d18aade9b23be7413bb6ff2253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Appointments &amp; personnel changes</topic><topic>Carbon monoxide</topic><topic>Carbon Monoxide - analysis</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Midwifery</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Prenatal care</topic><topic>Prenatal Care - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Smoking cessation</topic><topic>Smoking Cessation - methods</topic><topic>Smoking Prevention</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Katarzyna A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Sue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fahy, Samantha J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowker, Katharine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonardi-Bee, Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEwen, Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitemore, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Tim</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Journals (Open Access)</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI-INFORM Complete</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health &amp; Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Family Health Database (ProQuest Medical &amp; Health Databases)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Tobacco control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Campbell, Katarzyna A</au><au>Cooper, Sue</au><au>Fahy, Samantha J</au><au>Bowker, Katharine</au><au>Leonardi-Bee, Jo</au><au>McEwen, Andy</au><au>Whitemore, Rachel</au><au>Coleman, Tim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>‘Opt-out’ referrals after identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled air carbon monoxide: impact on engagement with smoking cessation support</atitle><jtitle>Tobacco control</jtitle><addtitle>Tob Control</addtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>300</spage><epage>306</epage><pages>300-306</pages><issn>0964-4563</issn><eissn>1468-3318</eissn><abstract>BackgroundIn the UK, free smoking cessation support is available to pregnant women; only a minority accesses this. ‘Opt-out’ referrals to stop smoking services (SSS) are recommended by UK guidelines. These involve identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) and referring them for support unless they object.MethodsTo assess the impact of ‘opt-out’ referrals for pregnant smokers on SSS uptake and effectiveness, we conducted a ‘before–after’ service development evaluation. In the 6-month ‘before’ period, there was a routine ‘opt-in’ referral system for self-reported smokers at antenatal ‘booking’ appointments. In the 6-month ‘after’ period, additional ‘opt-out’ referrals were introduced at the 12-week ultrasound appointments; women with CO≥4 ppm were referred to, and outcome data were collected from, local SSS.ResultsApproximately 2300 women attended antenatal care in each period. Before the implementation, 536 (23.4%) women reported smoking at ‘booking’ and 290 (12.7%) were referred to SSS. After the implementation, 524 (22.9%) women reported smoking at ‘booking’, an additional 156 smokers (6.8%) were identified via the ‘opt-out’ referrals and, in total, 421 (18.4%) were referred to SSS. Over twice as many women set a quit date with the SSS after ‘opt-out’ referrals were implemented (121 (5.3%, 95% CI 4.4% to 6.3%) compared to 57 (2.5%, 95% CI 1.9% to 3.2%) before implementation) and reported being abstinent 4 weeks later (93 (4.1%, 95% CI 3.3% to 4.9%) compared to 46 (2.0%, 1.5% to 2.7%) before implementation).ConclusionsIn a hospital with an ‘opt-in’ referral system, adding CO screening with ‘opt-out’ referrals as women attended ultrasound examinations doubled the numbers of pregnant smokers setting quit dates and reporting smoking cessation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group</pub><pmid>27225017</pmid><doi>10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052662</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1994-6395</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7453-9138</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9033-0884</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7303-4805</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2013-6154</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0964-4563
ispartof Tobacco control, 2017-05, Vol.26 (3), p.300-306
issn 0964-4563
1468-3318
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5520259
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Adult
Appointments & personnel changes
Carbon monoxide
Carbon Monoxide - analysis
Data collection
Electronic health records
Female
Humans
Identification
Medical records
Midwifery
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications - diagnosis
Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology
Pregnancy Complications - prevention & control
Prenatal care
Prenatal Care - organization & administration
Referral and Consultation - organization & administration
Referral and Consultation - statistics & numerical data
Research Paper
Smoking
Smoking cessation
Smoking Cessation - methods
Smoking Prevention
Ultrasonic imaging
United Kingdom
Womens health
Young Adult
title ‘Opt-out’ referrals after identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled air carbon monoxide: impact on engagement with smoking cessation support
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A00%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%98Opt-out%E2%80%99%20referrals%20after%20identifying%20pregnant%20smokers%20using%20exhaled%20air%20carbon%20monoxide:%20impact%20on%20engagement%20with%20smoking%20cessation%20support&rft.jtitle=Tobacco%20control&rft.au=Campbell,%20Katarzyna%20A&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=300&rft.epage=306&rft.pages=300-306&rft.issn=0964-4563&rft.eissn=1468-3318&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052662&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E44652278%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b555t-e546ca3d4ed85a228fc3e7d9a43f4f31bbac116d18aade9b23be7413bb6ff2253%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1894686897&rft_id=info:pmid/27225017&rft_jstor_id=44652278&rfr_iscdi=true