25G compared with 20G vitrectomy under Resight non-contact wide-angle lenses for Terson syndrome

The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of 25G vitrectomy to standard 20G vitrectomy for treatment of Terson syndrome under Resight non-contact wide-angle lenses. This was a case-control study of 20 patients with Terson syndrome (study group) that underwent 25G vitrectomy under...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Experimental and therapeutic medicine 2017-08, Vol.14 (2), p.1193-1197
Main Authors: Mao, Xinbang, You, Zhipeng
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
20G vitrectomy
25G vitrectomy
Care and treatment
Cataracts
Cell adhesion & migration
Comparative analysis
Diabetic retinopathy
Diagnosis
Hemorrhage
intraocular pressure
Methods
non-contact wide angle lenses
Patients
Standard deviation
Statistical analysis
Studies
Surgery
Terson syndrome
Ultrasonic imaging
Vitrectomy
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of 25G vitrectomy to standard 20G vitrectomy for treatment of Terson syndrome under Resight non-contact wide-angle lenses. This was a case-control study of 20 patients with Terson syndrome (study group) that underwent 25G vitrectomy under Resight non-contact wide-angle lenses, with those of 20 matched patients that underwent 20G vitrectomy (control group). Medical records were reviewed from between July 2011 and October 2013. Data included results of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study examination, ophthalmology B-scan ultrasonography and fundus photography. The mean age, follow-up time, the preoperative visual acuity of LogMAR and the preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) were all comparable in the two groups (all P>0.05). There were statistically significant differences in postoperative visual acuity of LogMAR compared with preoperative visual acuity (P
ISSN:1792-0981
1792-1015
DOI:10.3892/etm.2017.4592