Loading…
Dexmedetomidine Effect on Emergence Agitation and Delirium in Children Undergoing Laparoscopic Hernia Repair: a Preliminary Study
Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine (Dex) to prevent emergence agitation (EA) and delirium (ED) in children undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair under general anesthesia. Methods 100 children (1–5 years, 10–25 kg) were randomized into four groups: controls (saline) and...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of international medical research 2017-06, Vol.45 (3), p.973-983 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-54c08e884ce9b5be11d87bb2e9abbd34d4518c9189f273b0d656b9295ea19a913 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-54c08e884ce9b5be11d87bb2e9abbd34d4518c9189f273b0d656b9295ea19a913 |
container_end_page | 983 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 973 |
container_title | Journal of international medical research |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Sun, Yingying Li, Yuanhai Sun, Yajuan Wang, Xing Ye, Hongwu Yuan, Xianren |
description | Objective
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine (Dex) to prevent emergence agitation (EA) and delirium (ED) in children undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair under general anesthesia.
Methods
100 children (1–5 years, 10–25 kg) were randomized into four groups: controls (saline) and intravenous Dex at 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 µg/kg (D1, D2, D3, respectively). Dex/saline infusion was started following anesthesia. EA and ED were evaluated on a 5-point scale.
Results
For the C, D1, D2, and D3 groups, respectively, EA frequencies were 45.8%, 30.4%, 12%, 4%; ED frequencies 29.1%, 13%, 4%, 4%; CHIPPS scores 8, 6, 3, 3; sevoflurane doses from 13.2 ± 3.4 (controls) to 9.4 ± 3.5 ml (D3). Intervals until mask removal/spontaneous eye opening were significantly longer for D2 and D3 than controls. PACU stay was longer for D3.
Conclusions
There was significantly less postoperative EA and pain, with less sevoflurane required, using Dex. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0300060517699467 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5536412</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0300060517699467</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1895276436</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-54c08e884ce9b5be11d87bb2e9abbd34d4518c9189f273b0d656b9295ea19a913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UUtv1DAQthCIbgt3TshHLgE7sZ2YA1K1XVqklUBAz5Yfk9RVYgc7QfTIP8erLRUgcRppvsc8PoReUPKa0rZ9QxpCiCCctkJKJtpHaENZ21R16T9GmwNcHfATdJrzLSGsFrx-ik7qjrWEErJBPy_gxwQOljh55wPgXd-DXXAMeDdBGiBYwOeDX_TiS08Hhy9g9MmvE_YBb2_86BIEfB1cYUcfBrzXs04x2zh7i68gBa_xZ5i1T2-xxp9SkU8-6HSHvyyru3uGnvR6zPD8vp6h6_e7r9urav_x8sP2fF9Z1rCl4sySDrqOWZCGG6DUda0xNUhtjGuYY5x2VtJO9nXbGOIEF0bWkoOmUkvanKF3R995NeViC2FJelRz8lPZRUXt1d9I8DdqiN8V541gtC4Gr-4NUvy2Ql7U5LOFcdQB4ppVGc3rVrBGFCo5Um15RE7QP4yhRB2SU_8mVyQv_1zvQfA7qkKojoSsB1C3cU2hvOv_hr8AwEujBA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1895276436</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dexmedetomidine Effect on Emergence Agitation and Delirium in Children Undergoing Laparoscopic Hernia Repair: a Preliminary Study</title><source>PubMed Central (Open Access)</source><source>SAGE Open Access</source><creator>Sun, Yingying ; Li, Yuanhai ; Sun, Yajuan ; Wang, Xing ; Ye, Hongwu ; Yuan, Xianren</creator><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yingying ; Li, Yuanhai ; Sun, Yajuan ; Wang, Xing ; Ye, Hongwu ; Yuan, Xianren</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine (Dex) to prevent emergence agitation (EA) and delirium (ED) in children undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair under general anesthesia.
Methods
100 children (1–5 years, 10–25 kg) were randomized into four groups: controls (saline) and intravenous Dex at 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 µg/kg (D1, D2, D3, respectively). Dex/saline infusion was started following anesthesia. EA and ED were evaluated on a 5-point scale.
Results
For the C, D1, D2, and D3 groups, respectively, EA frequencies were 45.8%, 30.4%, 12%, 4%; ED frequencies 29.1%, 13%, 4%, 4%; CHIPPS scores 8, 6, 3, 3; sevoflurane doses from 13.2 ± 3.4 (controls) to 9.4 ± 3.5 ml (D3). Intervals until mask removal/spontaneous eye opening were significantly longer for D2 and D3 than controls. PACU stay was longer for D3.
Conclusions
There was significantly less postoperative EA and pain, with less sevoflurane required, using Dex.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-0605</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-2300</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0300060517699467</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28470100</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Child, Preschool ; Delirium - drug therapy ; Dexmedetomidine - therapeutic use ; Female ; Herniorrhaphy - adverse effects ; Humans ; Laparoscopy - adverse effects ; Male ; Psychomotor Agitation - drug therapy ; Research Reports</subject><ispartof>Journal of international medical research, 2017-06, Vol.45 (3), p.973-983</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2017 2017 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-54c08e884ce9b5be11d87bb2e9abbd34d4518c9189f273b0d656b9295ea19a913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-54c08e884ce9b5be11d87bb2e9abbd34d4518c9189f273b0d656b9295ea19a913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5536412/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5536412/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,21966,27853,27924,27925,44945,45333,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28470100$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yingying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yuanhai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yajuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, Hongwu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Xianren</creatorcontrib><title>Dexmedetomidine Effect on Emergence Agitation and Delirium in Children Undergoing Laparoscopic Hernia Repair: a Preliminary Study</title><title>Journal of international medical research</title><addtitle>J Int Med Res</addtitle><description>Objective
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine (Dex) to prevent emergence agitation (EA) and delirium (ED) in children undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair under general anesthesia.
Methods
100 children (1–5 years, 10–25 kg) were randomized into four groups: controls (saline) and intravenous Dex at 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 µg/kg (D1, D2, D3, respectively). Dex/saline infusion was started following anesthesia. EA and ED were evaluated on a 5-point scale.
Results
For the C, D1, D2, and D3 groups, respectively, EA frequencies were 45.8%, 30.4%, 12%, 4%; ED frequencies 29.1%, 13%, 4%, 4%; CHIPPS scores 8, 6, 3, 3; sevoflurane doses from 13.2 ± 3.4 (controls) to 9.4 ± 3.5 ml (D3). Intervals until mask removal/spontaneous eye opening were significantly longer for D2 and D3 than controls. PACU stay was longer for D3.
Conclusions
There was significantly less postoperative EA and pain, with less sevoflurane required, using Dex.</description><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Delirium - drug therapy</subject><subject>Dexmedetomidine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Herniorrhaphy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Psychomotor Agitation - drug therapy</subject><subject>Research Reports</subject><issn>0300-0605</issn><issn>1473-2300</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UUtv1DAQthCIbgt3TshHLgE7sZ2YA1K1XVqklUBAz5Yfk9RVYgc7QfTIP8erLRUgcRppvsc8PoReUPKa0rZ9QxpCiCCctkJKJtpHaENZ21R16T9GmwNcHfATdJrzLSGsFrx-ik7qjrWEErJBPy_gxwQOljh55wPgXd-DXXAMeDdBGiBYwOeDX_TiS08Hhy9g9MmvE_YBb2_86BIEfB1cYUcfBrzXs04x2zh7i68gBa_xZ5i1T2-xxp9SkU8-6HSHvyyru3uGnvR6zPD8vp6h6_e7r9urav_x8sP2fF9Z1rCl4sySDrqOWZCGG6DUda0xNUhtjGuYY5x2VtJO9nXbGOIEF0bWkoOmUkvanKF3R995NeViC2FJelRz8lPZRUXt1d9I8DdqiN8V541gtC4Gr-4NUvy2Ql7U5LOFcdQB4ppVGc3rVrBGFCo5Um15RE7QP4yhRB2SU_8mVyQv_1zvQfA7qkKojoSsB1C3cU2hvOv_hr8AwEujBA</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Sun, Yingying</creator><creator>Li, Yuanhai</creator><creator>Sun, Yajuan</creator><creator>Wang, Xing</creator><creator>Ye, Hongwu</creator><creator>Yuan, Xianren</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>Dexmedetomidine Effect on Emergence Agitation and Delirium in Children Undergoing Laparoscopic Hernia Repair: a Preliminary Study</title><author>Sun, Yingying ; Li, Yuanhai ; Sun, Yajuan ; Wang, Xing ; Ye, Hongwu ; Yuan, Xianren</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-54c08e884ce9b5be11d87bb2e9abbd34d4518c9189f273b0d656b9295ea19a913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Delirium - drug therapy</topic><topic>Dexmedetomidine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Herniorrhaphy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Psychomotor Agitation - drug therapy</topic><topic>Research Reports</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yingying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yuanhai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yajuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, Hongwu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Xianren</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of international medical research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sun, Yingying</au><au>Li, Yuanhai</au><au>Sun, Yajuan</au><au>Wang, Xing</au><au>Ye, Hongwu</au><au>Yuan, Xianren</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dexmedetomidine Effect on Emergence Agitation and Delirium in Children Undergoing Laparoscopic Hernia Repair: a Preliminary Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of international medical research</jtitle><addtitle>J Int Med Res</addtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>973</spage><epage>983</epage><pages>973-983</pages><issn>0300-0605</issn><eissn>1473-2300</eissn><abstract>Objective
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine (Dex) to prevent emergence agitation (EA) and delirium (ED) in children undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair under general anesthesia.
Methods
100 children (1–5 years, 10–25 kg) were randomized into four groups: controls (saline) and intravenous Dex at 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 µg/kg (D1, D2, D3, respectively). Dex/saline infusion was started following anesthesia. EA and ED were evaluated on a 5-point scale.
Results
For the C, D1, D2, and D3 groups, respectively, EA frequencies were 45.8%, 30.4%, 12%, 4%; ED frequencies 29.1%, 13%, 4%, 4%; CHIPPS scores 8, 6, 3, 3; sevoflurane doses from 13.2 ± 3.4 (controls) to 9.4 ± 3.5 ml (D3). Intervals until mask removal/spontaneous eye opening were significantly longer for D2 and D3 than controls. PACU stay was longer for D3.
Conclusions
There was significantly less postoperative EA and pain, with less sevoflurane required, using Dex.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>28470100</pmid><doi>10.1177/0300060517699467</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0300-0605 |
ispartof | Journal of international medical research, 2017-06, Vol.45 (3), p.973-983 |
issn | 0300-0605 1473-2300 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5536412 |
source | PubMed Central (Open Access); SAGE Open Access |
subjects | Child, Preschool Delirium - drug therapy Dexmedetomidine - therapeutic use Female Herniorrhaphy - adverse effects Humans Laparoscopy - adverse effects Male Psychomotor Agitation - drug therapy Research Reports |
title | Dexmedetomidine Effect on Emergence Agitation and Delirium in Children Undergoing Laparoscopic Hernia Repair: a Preliminary Study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T09%3A41%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dexmedetomidine%20Effect%20on%20Emergence%20Agitation%20and%20Delirium%20in%20Children%20Undergoing%20Laparoscopic%20Hernia%20Repair:%20a%20Preliminary%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20international%20medical%20research&rft.au=Sun,%20Yingying&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=973&rft.epage=983&rft.pages=973-983&rft.issn=0300-0605&rft.eissn=1473-2300&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0300060517699467&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1895276436%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-54c08e884ce9b5be11d87bb2e9abbd34d4518c9189f273b0d656b9295ea19a913%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1895276436&rft_id=info:pmid/28470100&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0300060517699467&rfr_iscdi=true |