Loading…

Comment on "How will induced seismicity in Oklahoma respond to decreased saltwater injection rates?" by C. Langenbruch and M. D. Zoback

The state of Oklahoma has experienced an unprecedented increase in earthquake activity since 2009, likely driven by large-scale wastewater injection operations. Statewide injection rates peaked in early 2015 and steadily decreased thereafter, approximately coinciding with collapsing oil prices and r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Science advances 2017-08, Vol.3 (8), p.e1700441-e1700441
Main Authors: Goebel, Thomas H W, Walter, Jacob I, Murray, Kyle, Brodsky, Emily E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-4fa23b53da092318f10d51fefc623c07a28ac64c19a1eb83d000bf72c31f37423
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-4fa23b53da092318f10d51fefc623c07a28ac64c19a1eb83d000bf72c31f37423
container_end_page e1700441
container_issue 8
container_start_page e1700441
container_title Science advances
container_volume 3
creator Goebel, Thomas H W
Walter, Jacob I
Murray, Kyle
Brodsky, Emily E
description The state of Oklahoma has experienced an unprecedented increase in earthquake activity since 2009, likely driven by large-scale wastewater injection operations. Statewide injection rates peaked in early 2015 and steadily decreased thereafter, approximately coinciding with collapsing oil prices and regulatory action. If seismic activity is primarily driven by fluid injection, a noticeable seismogenic response to the decrease in injection rates is expected. Langenbruch and Zoback suggest that "the probability of potentially damaging larger events, should significantly decrease by the end of 2016 and approach historic levels within a few years." We agree that the rate of small earthquakes has decreased toward the second half of 2016. However, their specific predictions about seismic hazard require reexamination. We test the influence of the model parameters of Langenbruch and Zoback based on fits to observed seismicity distributions. The results suggest that a range of realistic aftershock decay rates and values can lead to an increase in moderate earthquake probabilities from 37 to 80% in 2017 without any further alteration to the model. In addition, the observation that all four ≥ 5 earthquakes to date occurred when injection rates were below the triggering threshold of Langenbruch and Zoback challenges the applicability of the model for the most societally significant events.
doi_str_mv 10.1126/sciadv.1700441
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5550223</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1929106475</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-4fa23b53da092318f10d51fefc623c07a28ac64c19a1eb83d000bf72c31f37423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1vGyEQhldVqyZKcu2xQj714i0D7NelVeV-pJKrXJJLL2gW2JhkF1xgY_kX9G-XyG6UnBiYZ97h1VsU74CWAKz-GJVF_VBCQ6kQ8Ko4ZbyplqwS7etn9UlxEeMdpRREXVfQvS1OWNvStm7htPi78tNkXCLekcWl35GdHUdinZ6V0SQaGyerbNrnJ3J1P-LGT0iCiVvvNEmeaKOCwfjI4ph2mEzI6J1RyWbFkO_x84L0e7IqyRrdrXF9mNWGYB7_VZKvJfnte1T358WbAcdoLo7nWXHz_dv16nK5vvrxc_VlvVQCmrQUAzLeV1wj7RiHdgCqKxjMoGrGFW2QtahqoaBDMH3LdbbdDw1THAbeCMbPik8H3e3cT0arbD3gKLfBThj20qOVLzvObuStf5BVVVHGeBZYHAR8TFbmBJJRG-Wdy5Yl1JxSRjP04bgl-D-ziUlONiozjuiMn6OEjnVAa9FUGS0PqAo-xmCGp78AlY8py0PK8phyHnj_3MET_j9T_g8de6SD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1929106475</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comment on "How will induced seismicity in Oklahoma respond to decreased saltwater injection rates?" by C. Langenbruch and M. D. Zoback</title><source>American Association for the Advancement of Science</source><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><creator>Goebel, Thomas H W ; Walter, Jacob I ; Murray, Kyle ; Brodsky, Emily E</creator><creatorcontrib>Goebel, Thomas H W ; Walter, Jacob I ; Murray, Kyle ; Brodsky, Emily E ; Univ. of California, Santa Cruz, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>The state of Oklahoma has experienced an unprecedented increase in earthquake activity since 2009, likely driven by large-scale wastewater injection operations. Statewide injection rates peaked in early 2015 and steadily decreased thereafter, approximately coinciding with collapsing oil prices and regulatory action. If seismic activity is primarily driven by fluid injection, a noticeable seismogenic response to the decrease in injection rates is expected. Langenbruch and Zoback suggest that "the probability of potentially damaging larger events, should significantly decrease by the end of 2016 and approach historic levels within a few years." We agree that the rate of small earthquakes has decreased toward the second half of 2016. However, their specific predictions about seismic hazard require reexamination. We test the influence of the model parameters of Langenbruch and Zoback based on fits to observed seismicity distributions. The results suggest that a range of realistic aftershock decay rates and values can lead to an increase in moderate earthquake probabilities from 37 to 80% in 2017 without any further alteration to the model. In addition, the observation that all four ≥ 5 earthquakes to date occurred when injection rates were below the triggering threshold of Langenbruch and Zoback challenges the applicability of the model for the most societally significant events.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2375-2548</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2375-2548</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1700441</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28808681</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: AAAS</publisher><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ; Physical Sciences ; SciAdv t-comment ; Seismology ; Technical Comment ; Technical Comments</subject><ispartof>Science advances, 2017-08, Vol.3 (8), p.e1700441-e1700441</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC). 2017 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-4fa23b53da092318f10d51fefc623c07a28ac64c19a1eb83d000bf72c31f37423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-4fa23b53da092318f10d51fefc623c07a28ac64c19a1eb83d000bf72c31f37423</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6855-6860 ; 0000000268556860</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5550223/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5550223/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,2884,2885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28808681$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1630020$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goebel, Thomas H W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walter, Jacob I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brodsky, Emily E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Univ. of California, Santa Cruz, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Comment on "How will induced seismicity in Oklahoma respond to decreased saltwater injection rates?" by C. Langenbruch and M. D. Zoback</title><title>Science advances</title><addtitle>Sci Adv</addtitle><description>The state of Oklahoma has experienced an unprecedented increase in earthquake activity since 2009, likely driven by large-scale wastewater injection operations. Statewide injection rates peaked in early 2015 and steadily decreased thereafter, approximately coinciding with collapsing oil prices and regulatory action. If seismic activity is primarily driven by fluid injection, a noticeable seismogenic response to the decrease in injection rates is expected. Langenbruch and Zoback suggest that "the probability of potentially damaging larger events, should significantly decrease by the end of 2016 and approach historic levels within a few years." We agree that the rate of small earthquakes has decreased toward the second half of 2016. However, their specific predictions about seismic hazard require reexamination. We test the influence of the model parameters of Langenbruch and Zoback based on fits to observed seismicity distributions. The results suggest that a range of realistic aftershock decay rates and values can lead to an increase in moderate earthquake probabilities from 37 to 80% in 2017 without any further alteration to the model. In addition, the observation that all four ≥ 5 earthquakes to date occurred when injection rates were below the triggering threshold of Langenbruch and Zoback challenges the applicability of the model for the most societally significant events.</description><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>SciAdv t-comment</subject><subject>Seismology</subject><subject>Technical Comment</subject><subject>Technical Comments</subject><issn>2375-2548</issn><issn>2375-2548</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkU1vGyEQhldVqyZKcu2xQj714i0D7NelVeV-pJKrXJJLL2gW2JhkF1xgY_kX9G-XyG6UnBiYZ97h1VsU74CWAKz-GJVF_VBCQ6kQ8Ko4ZbyplqwS7etn9UlxEeMdpRREXVfQvS1OWNvStm7htPi78tNkXCLekcWl35GdHUdinZ6V0SQaGyerbNrnJ3J1P-LGT0iCiVvvNEmeaKOCwfjI4ph2mEzI6J1RyWbFkO_x84L0e7IqyRrdrXF9mNWGYB7_VZKvJfnte1T358WbAcdoLo7nWXHz_dv16nK5vvrxc_VlvVQCmrQUAzLeV1wj7RiHdgCqKxjMoGrGFW2QtahqoaBDMH3LdbbdDw1THAbeCMbPik8H3e3cT0arbD3gKLfBThj20qOVLzvObuStf5BVVVHGeBZYHAR8TFbmBJJRG-Wdy5Yl1JxSRjP04bgl-D-ziUlONiozjuiMn6OEjnVAa9FUGS0PqAo-xmCGp78AlY8py0PK8phyHnj_3MET_j9T_g8de6SD</recordid><startdate>20170801</startdate><enddate>20170801</enddate><creator>Goebel, Thomas H W</creator><creator>Walter, Jacob I</creator><creator>Murray, Kyle</creator><creator>Brodsky, Emily E</creator><general>AAAS</general><general>American Association for the Advancement of Science</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6855-6860</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000268556860</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170801</creationdate><title>Comment on "How will induced seismicity in Oklahoma respond to decreased saltwater injection rates?" by C. Langenbruch and M. D. Zoback</title><author>Goebel, Thomas H W ; Walter, Jacob I ; Murray, Kyle ; Brodsky, Emily E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-4fa23b53da092318f10d51fefc623c07a28ac64c19a1eb83d000bf72c31f37423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>SciAdv t-comment</topic><topic>Seismology</topic><topic>Technical Comment</topic><topic>Technical Comments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goebel, Thomas H W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walter, Jacob I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brodsky, Emily E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Univ. of California, Santa Cruz, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Science advances</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goebel, Thomas H W</au><au>Walter, Jacob I</au><au>Murray, Kyle</au><au>Brodsky, Emily E</au><aucorp>Univ. of California, Santa Cruz, CA (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comment on "How will induced seismicity in Oklahoma respond to decreased saltwater injection rates?" by C. Langenbruch and M. D. Zoback</atitle><jtitle>Science advances</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Adv</addtitle><date>2017-08-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e1700441</spage><epage>e1700441</epage><pages>e1700441-e1700441</pages><issn>2375-2548</issn><eissn>2375-2548</eissn><abstract>The state of Oklahoma has experienced an unprecedented increase in earthquake activity since 2009, likely driven by large-scale wastewater injection operations. Statewide injection rates peaked in early 2015 and steadily decreased thereafter, approximately coinciding with collapsing oil prices and regulatory action. If seismic activity is primarily driven by fluid injection, a noticeable seismogenic response to the decrease in injection rates is expected. Langenbruch and Zoback suggest that "the probability of potentially damaging larger events, should significantly decrease by the end of 2016 and approach historic levels within a few years." We agree that the rate of small earthquakes has decreased toward the second half of 2016. However, their specific predictions about seismic hazard require reexamination. We test the influence of the model parameters of Langenbruch and Zoback based on fits to observed seismicity distributions. The results suggest that a range of realistic aftershock decay rates and values can lead to an increase in moderate earthquake probabilities from 37 to 80% in 2017 without any further alteration to the model. In addition, the observation that all four ≥ 5 earthquakes to date occurred when injection rates were below the triggering threshold of Langenbruch and Zoback challenges the applicability of the model for the most societally significant events.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>AAAS</pub><pmid>28808681</pmid><doi>10.1126/sciadv.1700441</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6855-6860</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000268556860</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2375-2548
ispartof Science advances, 2017-08, Vol.3 (8), p.e1700441-e1700441
issn 2375-2548
2375-2548
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5550223
source American Association for the Advancement of Science; Open Access: PubMed Central
subjects ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Physical Sciences
SciAdv t-comment
Seismology
Technical Comment
Technical Comments
title Comment on "How will induced seismicity in Oklahoma respond to decreased saltwater injection rates?" by C. Langenbruch and M. D. Zoback
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T01%3A42%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comment%20on%20%22How%20will%20induced%20seismicity%20in%20Oklahoma%20respond%20to%20decreased%20saltwater%20injection%20rates?%22%20by%20C.%20Langenbruch%20and%20M.%20D.%20Zoback&rft.jtitle=Science%20advances&rft.au=Goebel,%20Thomas%20H%20W&rft.aucorp=Univ.%20of%20California,%20Santa%20Cruz,%20CA%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e1700441&rft.epage=e1700441&rft.pages=e1700441-e1700441&rft.issn=2375-2548&rft.eissn=2375-2548&rft_id=info:doi/10.1126/sciadv.1700441&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1929106475%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-4fa23b53da092318f10d51fefc623c07a28ac64c19a1eb83d000bf72c31f37423%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1929106475&rft_id=info:pmid/28808681&rfr_iscdi=true