Loading…
Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors
Abstract Objective To explore authors' attitudes towards open access publishing and author charges, their perceptions of journals that charge authors, and whether they would be willing to submit to these journals. Design Semistructured telephone interviews. Participants 28 randomly selected int...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMJ 2005-04, Vol.330 (7494), p.756-759 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b586t-f6d7e2a55a3f3c0de00b7129d4d4c7989f2942b1ce57aa9c62a232bb80c43c2b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b586t-f6d7e2a55a3f3c0de00b7129d4d4c7989f2942b1ce57aa9c62a232bb80c43c2b3 |
container_end_page | 759 |
container_issue | 7494 |
container_start_page | 756 |
container_title | BMJ |
container_volume | 330 |
creator | Schroter, Sara Tite, Leanne Smith, Richard |
description | Abstract Objective To explore authors' attitudes towards open access publishing and author charges, their perceptions of journals that charge authors, and whether they would be willing to submit to these journals. Design Semistructured telephone interviews. Participants 28 randomly selected international authors who submitted to the BMJ in 2003. Results Authors were more aware of the concepts of open access publishing and author pays models than previously reported. Almost all authors supported the concept of open access, but few had submitted to an open access journal, other than the BMJ. Reasons for not submitting included lack of awareness of which journals publish with open access, and journal quality taking a higher priority in decision making than the availability of open access. Authors disliked the idea of author charges without institutional support and were concerned about implications for authors from developing countries and those without research funding. However, many said they would probably continue to submit to journals they perceived as being of high quality even if they charged authors. Conclusions Authors consider perceived journal quality as more important than open access when deciding where to submit papers. New journals with open access may need to do more to reassure authors of the quality of their journals. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmj.38359.695220.82 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_555876</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25459310</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25459310</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b586t-f6d7e2a55a3f3c0de00b7129d4d4c7989f2942b1ce57aa9c62a232bb80c43c2b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtv1DAUhS0EoqOhvwCBIhDsEvx-ILFA0xaQClTiIXaW4zgdD5l4sJMW_j0eEk0BCYmVF-c71_fcA8B9BCuECH9WbzcVkYSpiiuGMawkvgUWiHJZMknIbbCAiqlSIiKPwHFKGwghJkIqzu6CI8S4EISTBTi7cNG63eBDn4rQFmHn-sJY61IqdmPd-bT2_eXzwveDi1feXafi2g_rYhPG2JuuMOOwDjHdA3da0yV3PL9L8Ons9OPqdXn-_tWb1cvzsmaSD2XLG-GwYcyQlljYOAhrgbBqaEOtUFK1WFFcI-uYMEZZjg0muK4ltJRYXJMleDHNzbttXWNdP0TT6V30WxN_6GC8_lPp_VpfhivNGJOCZ__T2R_Dt9GlQW99sq7rTO_CmDQXjEuer7YEj_4C58RJY0ghwVDtocf_gpAQEgoiqMoUmSgbQ0rRtYd1EdT7MnUuU_8qU09laomz6-HvSW88c3UZeDIDJlnTtdH01qcbjnMqONx__2DiNmkI8aBjRpkiCGa9nHSfBvf9oJv4NV-DCKbffV5pvDr5cKHeUv0l89XE77f-nyQ_AaEvzyk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1778073749</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>BMJ Journals</source><creator>Schroter, Sara ; Tite, Leanne ; Smith, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>Schroter, Sara ; Tite, Leanne ; Smith, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective To explore authors' attitudes towards open access publishing and author charges, their perceptions of journals that charge authors, and whether they would be willing to submit to these journals. Design Semistructured telephone interviews. Participants 28 randomly selected international authors who submitted to the BMJ in 2003. Results Authors were more aware of the concepts of open access publishing and author pays models than previously reported. Almost all authors supported the concept of open access, but few had submitted to an open access journal, other than the BMJ. Reasons for not submitting included lack of awareness of which journals publish with open access, and journal quality taking a higher priority in decision making than the availability of open access. Authors disliked the idea of author charges without institutional support and were concerned about implications for authors from developing countries and those without research funding. However, many said they would probably continue to submit to journals they perceived as being of high quality even if they charged authors. Conclusions Authors consider perceived journal quality as more important than open access when deciding where to submit papers. New journals with open access may need to do more to reassure authors of the quality of their journals.</description><edition>International edition</edition><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8138</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8146</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-5833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38359.695220.82</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15677363</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BMJOAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: British Medical Journal Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attitude ; Authors ; Authorship ; Biological and medical sciences ; Developing countries ; Electronic journals ; Fees ; Fees and Charges ; Funding ; General aspects ; Humans ; Impact factor ; Medical research ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Modeling ; Open access publications ; Peer review ; Perception ; Periodicals as Topic - utilization ; Publishing ; Publishing industry ; Writers</subject><ispartof>BMJ, 2005-04, Vol.330 (7494), p.756-759</ispartof><rights>2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 2005 (c) 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group Apr 2, 2005</rights><rights>Copyright © 2005, BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b586t-f6d7e2a55a3f3c0de00b7129d4d4c7989f2942b1ce57aa9c62a232bb80c43c2b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b586t-f6d7e2a55a3f3c0de00b7129d4d4c7989f2942b1ce57aa9c62a232bb80c43c2b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/330/7494/756.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/330/7494/756.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>112,113,230,314,780,784,885,3194,27924,27925,30999,58238,58471,77594,77595</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16647609$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15677363$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schroter, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tite, Leanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors</title><title>BMJ</title><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective To explore authors' attitudes towards open access publishing and author charges, their perceptions of journals that charge authors, and whether they would be willing to submit to these journals. Design Semistructured telephone interviews. Participants 28 randomly selected international authors who submitted to the BMJ in 2003. Results Authors were more aware of the concepts of open access publishing and author pays models than previously reported. Almost all authors supported the concept of open access, but few had submitted to an open access journal, other than the BMJ. Reasons for not submitting included lack of awareness of which journals publish with open access, and journal quality taking a higher priority in decision making than the availability of open access. Authors disliked the idea of author charges without institutional support and were concerned about implications for authors from developing countries and those without research funding. However, many said they would probably continue to submit to journals they perceived as being of high quality even if they charged authors. Conclusions Authors consider perceived journal quality as more important than open access when deciding where to submit papers. New journals with open access may need to do more to reassure authors of the quality of their journals.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attitude</subject><subject>Authors</subject><subject>Authorship</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Electronic journals</subject><subject>Fees</subject><subject>Fees and Charges</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Impact factor</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Open access publications</subject><subject>Peer review</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Periodicals as Topic - utilization</subject><subject>Publishing</subject><subject>Publishing industry</subject><subject>Writers</subject><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>0959-8146</issn><issn>1468-5833</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtv1DAUhS0EoqOhvwCBIhDsEvx-ILFA0xaQClTiIXaW4zgdD5l4sJMW_j0eEk0BCYmVF-c71_fcA8B9BCuECH9WbzcVkYSpiiuGMawkvgUWiHJZMknIbbCAiqlSIiKPwHFKGwghJkIqzu6CI8S4EISTBTi7cNG63eBDn4rQFmHn-sJY61IqdmPd-bT2_eXzwveDi1feXafi2g_rYhPG2JuuMOOwDjHdA3da0yV3PL9L8Ons9OPqdXn-_tWb1cvzsmaSD2XLG-GwYcyQlljYOAhrgbBqaEOtUFK1WFFcI-uYMEZZjg0muK4ltJRYXJMleDHNzbttXWNdP0TT6V30WxN_6GC8_lPp_VpfhivNGJOCZ__T2R_Dt9GlQW99sq7rTO_CmDQXjEuer7YEj_4C58RJY0ghwVDtocf_gpAQEgoiqMoUmSgbQ0rRtYd1EdT7MnUuU_8qU09laomz6-HvSW88c3UZeDIDJlnTtdH01qcbjnMqONx__2DiNmkI8aBjRpkiCGa9nHSfBvf9oJv4NV-DCKbffV5pvDr5cKHeUv0l89XE77f-nyQ_AaEvzyk</recordid><startdate>20050402</startdate><enddate>20050402</enddate><creator>Schroter, Sara</creator><creator>Tite, Leanne</creator><creator>Smith, Richard</creator><general>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</general><general>British Medical Association</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050402</creationdate><title>Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors</title><author>Schroter, Sara ; Tite, Leanne ; Smith, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b586t-f6d7e2a55a3f3c0de00b7129d4d4c7989f2942b1ce57aa9c62a232bb80c43c2b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attitude</topic><topic>Authors</topic><topic>Authorship</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Electronic journals</topic><topic>Fees</topic><topic>Fees and Charges</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Impact factor</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Open access publications</topic><topic>Peer review</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Periodicals as Topic - utilization</topic><topic>Publishing</topic><topic>Publishing industry</topic><topic>Writers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schroter, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tite, Leanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schroter, Sara</au><au>Tite, Leanne</au><au>Smith, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors</atitle><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><date>2005-04-02</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>330</volume><issue>7494</issue><spage>756</spage><epage>759</epage><pages>756-759</pages><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>0959-8146</issn><eissn>1468-5833</eissn><eissn>1756-1833</eissn><coden>BMJOAE</coden><abstract>Abstract Objective To explore authors' attitudes towards open access publishing and author charges, their perceptions of journals that charge authors, and whether they would be willing to submit to these journals. Design Semistructured telephone interviews. Participants 28 randomly selected international authors who submitted to the BMJ in 2003. Results Authors were more aware of the concepts of open access publishing and author pays models than previously reported. Almost all authors supported the concept of open access, but few had submitted to an open access journal, other than the BMJ. Reasons for not submitting included lack of awareness of which journals publish with open access, and journal quality taking a higher priority in decision making than the availability of open access. Authors disliked the idea of author charges without institutional support and were concerned about implications for authors from developing countries and those without research funding. However, many said they would probably continue to submit to journals they perceived as being of high quality even if they charged authors. Conclusions Authors consider perceived journal quality as more important than open access when deciding where to submit papers. New journals with open access may need to do more to reassure authors of the quality of their journals.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</pub><pmid>15677363</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmj.38359.695220.82</doi><tpages>4</tpages><edition>International edition</edition><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-8138 |
ispartof | BMJ, 2005-04, Vol.330 (7494), p.756-759 |
issn | 0959-8138 0959-8146 1468-5833 1756-1833 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_555876 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; BMJ Journals |
subjects | Adult Attitude Authors Authorship Biological and medical sciences Developing countries Electronic journals Fees Fees and Charges Funding General aspects Humans Impact factor Medical research Medical sciences Middle Aged Modeling Open access publications Peer review Perception Periodicals as Topic - utilization Publishing Publishing industry Writers |
title | Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T01%3A08%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perceptions%20of%20open%20access%20publishing:%20interviews%20with%20journal%20authors&rft.jtitle=BMJ&rft.au=Schroter,%20Sara&rft.date=2005-04-02&rft.volume=330&rft.issue=7494&rft.spage=756&rft.epage=759&rft.pages=756-759&rft.issn=0959-8138&rft.eissn=1468-5833&rft.coden=BMJOAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmj.38359.695220.82&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E25459310%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b586t-f6d7e2a55a3f3c0de00b7129d4d4c7989f2942b1ce57aa9c62a232bb80c43c2b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1778073749&rft_id=info:pmid/15677363&rft_jstor_id=25459310&rfr_iscdi=true |