Loading…

Resurgence and alternative‐reinforcer magnitude

Resurgence is defined as an increase in the frequency of a previously reinforced target response when an alternative source of reinforcement is suspended. Despite an extensive body of research examining factors that affect resurgence, the effects of alternative‐reinforcer magnitude have not been exa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 2017-03, Vol.107 (2), p.218-233
Main Authors: Craig, Andrew R., Browning, Kaitlyn O., Nall, Rusty W., Marshall, Ciara M., Shahan, Timothy A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4385-114fd751c528804cd91966e9e02485405cd052e7aeb57b9902e0b75060853ea23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4385-114fd751c528804cd91966e9e02485405cd052e7aeb57b9902e0b75060853ea23
container_end_page 233
container_issue 2
container_start_page 218
container_title Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
container_volume 107
creator Craig, Andrew R.
Browning, Kaitlyn O.
Nall, Rusty W.
Marshall, Ciara M.
Shahan, Timothy A.
description Resurgence is defined as an increase in the frequency of a previously reinforced target response when an alternative source of reinforcement is suspended. Despite an extensive body of research examining factors that affect resurgence, the effects of alternative‐reinforcer magnitude have not been examined. Thus, the present experiments aimed to fill this gap in the literature. In Experiment 1, rats pressed levers for single‐pellet reinforcers during Phase 1. In Phase 2, target‐lever pressing was extinguished, and alternative‐lever pressing produced either five‐pellet, one‐pellet, or no alternative reinforcement. In Phase 3, alternative reinforcement was suspended to test for resurgence. Five‐pellet alternative reinforcement produced faster elimination and greater resurgence of target‐lever pressing than one‐pellet alternative reinforcement. In Experiment 2, effects of decreasing alternative‐reinforcer magnitude on resurgence were examined. Rats pressed levers and pulled chains for six‐pellet reinforcers during Phases 1 and 2, respectively. In Phase 3, alternative reinforcement was decreased to three pellets for one group, one pellet for a second group, and suspended altogether for a third group. Shifting from six‐pellet to one‐pellet alternative reinforcement produced as much resurgence as suspending alternative reinforcement altogether, while shifting from six pellets to three pellets did not produce resurgence. These results suggest that alternative‐reinforcer magnitude has effects on elimination and resurgence of target behavior that are similar to those of alternative‐reinforcer rate. Thus, both suppression of target behavior during alternative reinforcement and resurgence when conditions of alternative reinforcement are altered may be related to variables that affect the value of the alternative‐reinforcement source.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jeab.245
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5565204</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1868395678</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4385-114fd751c528804cd91966e9e02485405cd052e7aeb57b9902e0b75060853ea23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kdtKAzEQhoMoth7AJ5CCN95sTbKbTXIj1FJPFATR65DNztYte6jJbqV3PoLP6JOYpbWo4M3MwHx8DPMjdELwkGBML-agkyGN2A7qExmKIOSE7KK-X9GA-dpDB87N_SBjTvdRjwoiIy7DPiKP4Fo7g8rAQFfpQBcN2Eo3-RI-3z8s5FVWWwN2UOpZlTdtCkdoL9OFg-NNP0TP15On8W0wfbi5G4-mgYlCwQJCoizljBhGhcCRSSWRcQwSMI0EizAzKWYUuIaE8URKTAEnnOEYCxaCpuEhulx7F21SQmqgaqwu1MLmpbYrVetc_d5U-Yua1UvFWMwojrzgfCOw9WsLrlFl7gwUha6gbp0iIhahZDEXHj37g87r1r-h6CiBKeZraiM0tnbOQrY9hmDV5aC6HJTPwaOnP4_fgt-P90CwBt7yAlb_itT9ZHTVCb8ADVGRbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1880207678</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resurgence and alternative‐reinforcer magnitude</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Craig, Andrew R. ; Browning, Kaitlyn O. ; Nall, Rusty W. ; Marshall, Ciara M. ; Shahan, Timothy A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Craig, Andrew R. ; Browning, Kaitlyn O. ; Nall, Rusty W. ; Marshall, Ciara M. ; Shahan, Timothy A.</creatorcontrib><description>Resurgence is defined as an increase in the frequency of a previously reinforced target response when an alternative source of reinforcement is suspended. Despite an extensive body of research examining factors that affect resurgence, the effects of alternative‐reinforcer magnitude have not been examined. Thus, the present experiments aimed to fill this gap in the literature. In Experiment 1, rats pressed levers for single‐pellet reinforcers during Phase 1. In Phase 2, target‐lever pressing was extinguished, and alternative‐lever pressing produced either five‐pellet, one‐pellet, or no alternative reinforcement. In Phase 3, alternative reinforcement was suspended to test for resurgence. Five‐pellet alternative reinforcement produced faster elimination and greater resurgence of target‐lever pressing than one‐pellet alternative reinforcement. In Experiment 2, effects of decreasing alternative‐reinforcer magnitude on resurgence were examined. Rats pressed levers and pulled chains for six‐pellet reinforcers during Phases 1 and 2, respectively. In Phase 3, alternative reinforcement was decreased to three pellets for one group, one pellet for a second group, and suspended altogether for a third group. Shifting from six‐pellet to one‐pellet alternative reinforcement produced as much resurgence as suspending alternative reinforcement altogether, while shifting from six pellets to three pellets did not produce resurgence. These results suggest that alternative‐reinforcer magnitude has effects on elimination and resurgence of target behavior that are similar to those of alternative‐reinforcer rate. Thus, both suppression of target behavior during alternative reinforcement and resurgence when conditions of alternative reinforcement are altered may be related to variables that affect the value of the alternative‐reinforcement source.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5002</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jeab.245</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28194793</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEABAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Conditioning, Operant ; extinction ; Extinction, Psychological ; Male ; operant behavior ; Rats ; Rats, Long-Evans ; Reinforcement (Psychology) ; Reinforcement Schedule ; reinforcer magnitude ; relapse ; resurgence</subject><ispartof>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2017-03, Vol.107 (2), p.218-233</ispartof><rights>2017 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</rights><rights>2017 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4385-114fd751c528804cd91966e9e02485405cd052e7aeb57b9902e0b75060853ea23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4385-114fd751c528804cd91966e9e02485405cd052e7aeb57b9902e0b75060853ea23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28194793$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Craig, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browning, Kaitlyn O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nall, Rusty W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Ciara M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahan, Timothy A.</creatorcontrib><title>Resurgence and alternative‐reinforcer magnitude</title><title>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</title><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><description>Resurgence is defined as an increase in the frequency of a previously reinforced target response when an alternative source of reinforcement is suspended. Despite an extensive body of research examining factors that affect resurgence, the effects of alternative‐reinforcer magnitude have not been examined. Thus, the present experiments aimed to fill this gap in the literature. In Experiment 1, rats pressed levers for single‐pellet reinforcers during Phase 1. In Phase 2, target‐lever pressing was extinguished, and alternative‐lever pressing produced either five‐pellet, one‐pellet, or no alternative reinforcement. In Phase 3, alternative reinforcement was suspended to test for resurgence. Five‐pellet alternative reinforcement produced faster elimination and greater resurgence of target‐lever pressing than one‐pellet alternative reinforcement. In Experiment 2, effects of decreasing alternative‐reinforcer magnitude on resurgence were examined. Rats pressed levers and pulled chains for six‐pellet reinforcers during Phases 1 and 2, respectively. In Phase 3, alternative reinforcement was decreased to three pellets for one group, one pellet for a second group, and suspended altogether for a third group. Shifting from six‐pellet to one‐pellet alternative reinforcement produced as much resurgence as suspending alternative reinforcement altogether, while shifting from six pellets to three pellets did not produce resurgence. These results suggest that alternative‐reinforcer magnitude has effects on elimination and resurgence of target behavior that are similar to those of alternative‐reinforcer rate. Thus, both suppression of target behavior during alternative reinforcement and resurgence when conditions of alternative reinforcement are altered may be related to variables that affect the value of the alternative‐reinforcement source.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Conditioning, Operant</subject><subject>extinction</subject><subject>Extinction, Psychological</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>operant behavior</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Long-Evans</subject><subject>Reinforcement (Psychology)</subject><subject>Reinforcement Schedule</subject><subject>reinforcer magnitude</subject><subject>relapse</subject><subject>resurgence</subject><issn>0022-5002</issn><issn>1938-3711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kdtKAzEQhoMoth7AJ5CCN95sTbKbTXIj1FJPFATR65DNztYte6jJbqV3PoLP6JOYpbWo4M3MwHx8DPMjdELwkGBML-agkyGN2A7qExmKIOSE7KK-X9GA-dpDB87N_SBjTvdRjwoiIy7DPiKP4Fo7g8rAQFfpQBcN2Eo3-RI-3z8s5FVWWwN2UOpZlTdtCkdoL9OFg-NNP0TP15On8W0wfbi5G4-mgYlCwQJCoizljBhGhcCRSSWRcQwSMI0EizAzKWYUuIaE8URKTAEnnOEYCxaCpuEhulx7F21SQmqgaqwu1MLmpbYrVetc_d5U-Yua1UvFWMwojrzgfCOw9WsLrlFl7gwUha6gbp0iIhahZDEXHj37g87r1r-h6CiBKeZraiM0tnbOQrY9hmDV5aC6HJTPwaOnP4_fgt-P90CwBt7yAlb_itT9ZHTVCb8ADVGRbQ</recordid><startdate>201703</startdate><enddate>201703</enddate><creator>Craig, Andrew R.</creator><creator>Browning, Kaitlyn O.</creator><creator>Nall, Rusty W.</creator><creator>Marshall, Ciara M.</creator><creator>Shahan, Timothy A.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201703</creationdate><title>Resurgence and alternative‐reinforcer magnitude</title><author>Craig, Andrew R. ; Browning, Kaitlyn O. ; Nall, Rusty W. ; Marshall, Ciara M. ; Shahan, Timothy A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4385-114fd751c528804cd91966e9e02485405cd052e7aeb57b9902e0b75060853ea23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Conditioning, Operant</topic><topic>extinction</topic><topic>Extinction, Psychological</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>operant behavior</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Long-Evans</topic><topic>Reinforcement (Psychology)</topic><topic>Reinforcement Schedule</topic><topic>reinforcer magnitude</topic><topic>relapse</topic><topic>resurgence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Craig, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browning, Kaitlyn O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nall, Rusty W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Ciara M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahan, Timothy A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Craig, Andrew R.</au><au>Browning, Kaitlyn O.</au><au>Nall, Rusty W.</au><au>Marshall, Ciara M.</au><au>Shahan, Timothy A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resurgence and alternative‐reinforcer magnitude</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><date>2017-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>218</spage><epage>233</epage><pages>218-233</pages><issn>0022-5002</issn><eissn>1938-3711</eissn><coden>JEABAU</coden><abstract>Resurgence is defined as an increase in the frequency of a previously reinforced target response when an alternative source of reinforcement is suspended. Despite an extensive body of research examining factors that affect resurgence, the effects of alternative‐reinforcer magnitude have not been examined. Thus, the present experiments aimed to fill this gap in the literature. In Experiment 1, rats pressed levers for single‐pellet reinforcers during Phase 1. In Phase 2, target‐lever pressing was extinguished, and alternative‐lever pressing produced either five‐pellet, one‐pellet, or no alternative reinforcement. In Phase 3, alternative reinforcement was suspended to test for resurgence. Five‐pellet alternative reinforcement produced faster elimination and greater resurgence of target‐lever pressing than one‐pellet alternative reinforcement. In Experiment 2, effects of decreasing alternative‐reinforcer magnitude on resurgence were examined. Rats pressed levers and pulled chains for six‐pellet reinforcers during Phases 1 and 2, respectively. In Phase 3, alternative reinforcement was decreased to three pellets for one group, one pellet for a second group, and suspended altogether for a third group. Shifting from six‐pellet to one‐pellet alternative reinforcement produced as much resurgence as suspending alternative reinforcement altogether, while shifting from six pellets to three pellets did not produce resurgence. These results suggest that alternative‐reinforcer magnitude has effects on elimination and resurgence of target behavior that are similar to those of alternative‐reinforcer rate. Thus, both suppression of target behavior during alternative reinforcement and resurgence when conditions of alternative reinforcement are altered may be related to variables that affect the value of the alternative‐reinforcement source.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28194793</pmid><doi>10.1002/jeab.245</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-5002
ispartof Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2017-03, Vol.107 (2), p.218-233
issn 0022-5002
1938-3711
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5565204
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Animals
Conditioning, Operant
extinction
Extinction, Psychological
Male
operant behavior
Rats
Rats, Long-Evans
Reinforcement (Psychology)
Reinforcement Schedule
reinforcer magnitude
relapse
resurgence
title Resurgence and alternative‐reinforcer magnitude
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T05%3A58%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resurgence%20and%20alternative%E2%80%90reinforcer%20magnitude&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20experimental%20analysis%20of%20behavior&rft.au=Craig,%20Andrew%20R.&rft.date=2017-03&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=218&rft.epage=233&rft.pages=218-233&rft.issn=0022-5002&rft.eissn=1938-3711&rft.coden=JEABAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jeab.245&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1868395678%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4385-114fd751c528804cd91966e9e02485405cd052e7aeb57b9902e0b75060853ea23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1880207678&rft_id=info:pmid/28194793&rfr_iscdi=true