Loading…

Face Pareidolia in the Rhesus Monkey

Face perception in humans and nonhuman primates is rapid and accurate [1–4]. In the human brain, a network of visual-processing regions is specialized for faces [5–7]. Although face processing is a priority of the primate visual system, face detection is not infallible. Face pareidolia is the compel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Current biology 2017-08, Vol.27 (16), p.2505-2509.e2
Main Authors: Taubert, Jessica, Wardle, Susan G., Flessert, Molly, Leopold, David A., Ungerleider, Leslie G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-83fb9a72ddb35328f8a52aed9d92f5332c2ebdf39732e793df7aceb01f1ed2983
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-83fb9a72ddb35328f8a52aed9d92f5332c2ebdf39732e793df7aceb01f1ed2983
container_end_page 2509.e2
container_issue 16
container_start_page 2505
container_title Current biology
container_volume 27
creator Taubert, Jessica
Wardle, Susan G.
Flessert, Molly
Leopold, David A.
Ungerleider, Leslie G.
description Face perception in humans and nonhuman primates is rapid and accurate [1–4]. In the human brain, a network of visual-processing regions is specialized for faces [5–7]. Although face processing is a priority of the primate visual system, face detection is not infallible. Face pareidolia is the compelling illusion of perceiving facial features on inanimate objects, such as the illusory face on the surface of the moon. Although face pareidolia is commonly experienced by humans, its presence in other species is unknown. Here we provide evidence for face pareidolia in a species known to possess a complex face-processing system [8–10]: the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). In a visual preference task [11, 12], monkeys looked longer at photographs of objects that elicited face pareidolia in human observers than at photographs of similar objects that did not elicit illusory faces. Examination of eye movements revealed that monkeys fixated the illusory internal facial features in a pattern consistent with how they view photographs of faces [13]. Although the specialized response to faces observed in humans [1, 3, 5–7, 14] is often argued to be continuous across primates [4, 15], it was previously unclear whether face pareidolia arose from a uniquely human capacity. For example, pareidolia could be a product of the human aptitude for perceptual abstraction or result from frequent exposure to cartoons and illustrations that anthropomorphize inanimate objects. Instead, our results indicate that the perception of illusory facial features on inanimate objects is driven by a broadly tuned face-detection mechanism that we share with other species. [Display omitted] •Face pareidolia is not a uniquely human-specific trait or experience•Eye movements reveal rhesus monkeys perceive illusory faces on inanimate objects•Monkeys consistently fixate on the illusory internal features (eyes and mouth)•Pareidolia is driven by a mechanism highly tolerant of variation in visual features Taubert et al. provide the first empirical evidence of face pareidolia in any species other than our own. The data show that, like humans, rhesus monkeys spontaneously perceive illusory facial structure on inanimate objects. This suggests that both species share a broadly tuned face detection system robust to highly variable visual properties.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.075
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5584612</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960982217308126</els_id><sourcerecordid>1928781294</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-83fb9a72ddb35328f8a52aed9d92f5332c2ebdf39732e793df7aceb01f1ed2983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-AC-SgwcvifuRZHcRBClWhYoiel42uxO7NU10Nyn035vSWvTiaQ7zvs8MD0KnBCcEk_xynpiuSCgmPMF5gnm2h4ZEcBnjNM320RDLHMdSUDpARyHMMSZUyPwQDagQmAnOh-h8og1Ez9qDs03ldOTqqJ1B9DKD0IXosak_YHWMDkpdBTjZzhF6m9y-ju_j6dPdw_hmGps0I20sWFlIzam1BcsYFaXQGdVgpZW0zBijhkJhSyY5o8AlsyXvjxeYlAQslYKN0PWG-9kVC7AG6tbrSn16t9B-pRrt1N9N7WbqvVmqLBNpTmgPuNgCfPPVQWjVwgUDVaVraLqgiKSCC0Jl2kfJJmp8E4KHcneGYLW2q-aqt6vWdhXOVW-375z9_m_X-NHZB642AegtLR14FYyD2oB1HkyrbOP-wX8DH12KqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928781294</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Face Pareidolia in the Rhesus Monkey</title><source>BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS</source><creator>Taubert, Jessica ; Wardle, Susan G. ; Flessert, Molly ; Leopold, David A. ; Ungerleider, Leslie G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Taubert, Jessica ; Wardle, Susan G. ; Flessert, Molly ; Leopold, David A. ; Ungerleider, Leslie G.</creatorcontrib><description>Face perception in humans and nonhuman primates is rapid and accurate [1–4]. In the human brain, a network of visual-processing regions is specialized for faces [5–7]. Although face processing is a priority of the primate visual system, face detection is not infallible. Face pareidolia is the compelling illusion of perceiving facial features on inanimate objects, such as the illusory face on the surface of the moon. Although face pareidolia is commonly experienced by humans, its presence in other species is unknown. Here we provide evidence for face pareidolia in a species known to possess a complex face-processing system [8–10]: the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). In a visual preference task [11, 12], monkeys looked longer at photographs of objects that elicited face pareidolia in human observers than at photographs of similar objects that did not elicit illusory faces. Examination of eye movements revealed that monkeys fixated the illusory internal facial features in a pattern consistent with how they view photographs of faces [13]. Although the specialized response to faces observed in humans [1, 3, 5–7, 14] is often argued to be continuous across primates [4, 15], it was previously unclear whether face pareidolia arose from a uniquely human capacity. For example, pareidolia could be a product of the human aptitude for perceptual abstraction or result from frequent exposure to cartoons and illustrations that anthropomorphize inanimate objects. Instead, our results indicate that the perception of illusory facial features on inanimate objects is driven by a broadly tuned face-detection mechanism that we share with other species. [Display omitted] •Face pareidolia is not a uniquely human-specific trait or experience•Eye movements reveal rhesus monkeys perceive illusory faces on inanimate objects•Monkeys consistently fixate on the illusory internal features (eyes and mouth)•Pareidolia is driven by a mechanism highly tolerant of variation in visual features Taubert et al. provide the first empirical evidence of face pareidolia in any species other than our own. The data show that, like humans, rhesus monkeys spontaneously perceive illusory facial structure on inanimate objects. This suggests that both species share a broadly tuned face detection system robust to highly variable visual properties.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-9822</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0445</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.075</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28803877</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Eye Movements ; face detection ; face perception ; Facial Recognition ; Female ; Humans ; Illusions - physiology ; Macaca mulatta - physiology ; Male ; monkey behavior ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; visual preference ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Current biology, 2017-08, Vol.27 (16), p.2505-2509.e2</ispartof><rights>2017</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-83fb9a72ddb35328f8a52aed9d92f5332c2ebdf39732e793df7aceb01f1ed2983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-83fb9a72ddb35328f8a52aed9d92f5332c2ebdf39732e793df7aceb01f1ed2983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28803877$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taubert, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wardle, Susan G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flessert, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leopold, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ungerleider, Leslie G.</creatorcontrib><title>Face Pareidolia in the Rhesus Monkey</title><title>Current biology</title><addtitle>Curr Biol</addtitle><description>Face perception in humans and nonhuman primates is rapid and accurate [1–4]. In the human brain, a network of visual-processing regions is specialized for faces [5–7]. Although face processing is a priority of the primate visual system, face detection is not infallible. Face pareidolia is the compelling illusion of perceiving facial features on inanimate objects, such as the illusory face on the surface of the moon. Although face pareidolia is commonly experienced by humans, its presence in other species is unknown. Here we provide evidence for face pareidolia in a species known to possess a complex face-processing system [8–10]: the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). In a visual preference task [11, 12], monkeys looked longer at photographs of objects that elicited face pareidolia in human observers than at photographs of similar objects that did not elicit illusory faces. Examination of eye movements revealed that monkeys fixated the illusory internal facial features in a pattern consistent with how they view photographs of faces [13]. Although the specialized response to faces observed in humans [1, 3, 5–7, 14] is often argued to be continuous across primates [4, 15], it was previously unclear whether face pareidolia arose from a uniquely human capacity. For example, pareidolia could be a product of the human aptitude for perceptual abstraction or result from frequent exposure to cartoons and illustrations that anthropomorphize inanimate objects. Instead, our results indicate that the perception of illusory facial features on inanimate objects is driven by a broadly tuned face-detection mechanism that we share with other species. [Display omitted] •Face pareidolia is not a uniquely human-specific trait or experience•Eye movements reveal rhesus monkeys perceive illusory faces on inanimate objects•Monkeys consistently fixate on the illusory internal features (eyes and mouth)•Pareidolia is driven by a mechanism highly tolerant of variation in visual features Taubert et al. provide the first empirical evidence of face pareidolia in any species other than our own. The data show that, like humans, rhesus monkeys spontaneously perceive illusory facial structure on inanimate objects. This suggests that both species share a broadly tuned face detection system robust to highly variable visual properties.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Eye Movements</subject><subject>face detection</subject><subject>face perception</subject><subject>Facial Recognition</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Illusions - physiology</subject><subject>Macaca mulatta - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>monkey behavior</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>visual preference</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0960-9822</issn><issn>1879-0445</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-AC-SgwcvifuRZHcRBClWhYoiel42uxO7NU10Nyn035vSWvTiaQ7zvs8MD0KnBCcEk_xynpiuSCgmPMF5gnm2h4ZEcBnjNM320RDLHMdSUDpARyHMMSZUyPwQDagQmAnOh-h8og1Ez9qDs03ldOTqqJ1B9DKD0IXosak_YHWMDkpdBTjZzhF6m9y-ju_j6dPdw_hmGps0I20sWFlIzam1BcsYFaXQGdVgpZW0zBijhkJhSyY5o8AlsyXvjxeYlAQslYKN0PWG-9kVC7AG6tbrSn16t9B-pRrt1N9N7WbqvVmqLBNpTmgPuNgCfPPVQWjVwgUDVaVraLqgiKSCC0Jl2kfJJmp8E4KHcneGYLW2q-aqt6vWdhXOVW-375z9_m_X-NHZB642AegtLR14FYyD2oB1HkyrbOP-wX8DH12KqA</recordid><startdate>20170821</startdate><enddate>20170821</enddate><creator>Taubert, Jessica</creator><creator>Wardle, Susan G.</creator><creator>Flessert, Molly</creator><creator>Leopold, David A.</creator><creator>Ungerleider, Leslie G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170821</creationdate><title>Face Pareidolia in the Rhesus Monkey</title><author>Taubert, Jessica ; Wardle, Susan G. ; Flessert, Molly ; Leopold, David A. ; Ungerleider, Leslie G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-83fb9a72ddb35328f8a52aed9d92f5332c2ebdf39732e793df7aceb01f1ed2983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Eye Movements</topic><topic>face detection</topic><topic>face perception</topic><topic>Facial Recognition</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Illusions - physiology</topic><topic>Macaca mulatta - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>monkey behavior</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>visual preference</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taubert, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wardle, Susan G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flessert, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leopold, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ungerleider, Leslie G.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Current biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taubert, Jessica</au><au>Wardle, Susan G.</au><au>Flessert, Molly</au><au>Leopold, David A.</au><au>Ungerleider, Leslie G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Face Pareidolia in the Rhesus Monkey</atitle><jtitle>Current biology</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Biol</addtitle><date>2017-08-21</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>2505</spage><epage>2509.e2</epage><pages>2505-2509.e2</pages><issn>0960-9822</issn><eissn>1879-0445</eissn><abstract>Face perception in humans and nonhuman primates is rapid and accurate [1–4]. In the human brain, a network of visual-processing regions is specialized for faces [5–7]. Although face processing is a priority of the primate visual system, face detection is not infallible. Face pareidolia is the compelling illusion of perceiving facial features on inanimate objects, such as the illusory face on the surface of the moon. Although face pareidolia is commonly experienced by humans, its presence in other species is unknown. Here we provide evidence for face pareidolia in a species known to possess a complex face-processing system [8–10]: the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). In a visual preference task [11, 12], monkeys looked longer at photographs of objects that elicited face pareidolia in human observers than at photographs of similar objects that did not elicit illusory faces. Examination of eye movements revealed that monkeys fixated the illusory internal facial features in a pattern consistent with how they view photographs of faces [13]. Although the specialized response to faces observed in humans [1, 3, 5–7, 14] is often argued to be continuous across primates [4, 15], it was previously unclear whether face pareidolia arose from a uniquely human capacity. For example, pareidolia could be a product of the human aptitude for perceptual abstraction or result from frequent exposure to cartoons and illustrations that anthropomorphize inanimate objects. Instead, our results indicate that the perception of illusory facial features on inanimate objects is driven by a broadly tuned face-detection mechanism that we share with other species. [Display omitted] •Face pareidolia is not a uniquely human-specific trait or experience•Eye movements reveal rhesus monkeys perceive illusory faces on inanimate objects•Monkeys consistently fixate on the illusory internal features (eyes and mouth)•Pareidolia is driven by a mechanism highly tolerant of variation in visual features Taubert et al. provide the first empirical evidence of face pareidolia in any species other than our own. The data show that, like humans, rhesus monkeys spontaneously perceive illusory facial structure on inanimate objects. This suggests that both species share a broadly tuned face detection system robust to highly variable visual properties.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28803877</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.075</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-9822
ispartof Current biology, 2017-08, Vol.27 (16), p.2505-2509.e2
issn 0960-9822
1879-0445
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5584612
source BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS
subjects Animals
Eye Movements
face detection
face perception
Facial Recognition
Female
Humans
Illusions - physiology
Macaca mulatta - physiology
Male
monkey behavior
Pattern Recognition, Visual
visual preference
Young Adult
title Face Pareidolia in the Rhesus Monkey
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T13%3A38%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Face%20Pareidolia%20in%20the%20Rhesus%20Monkey&rft.jtitle=Current%20biology&rft.au=Taubert,%20Jessica&rft.date=2017-08-21&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=2505&rft.epage=2509.e2&rft.pages=2505-2509.e2&rft.issn=0960-9822&rft.eissn=1879-0445&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.075&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1928781294%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-83fb9a72ddb35328f8a52aed9d92f5332c2ebdf39732e793df7aceb01f1ed2983%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928781294&rft_id=info:pmid/28803877&rfr_iscdi=true