Loading…

The role of digital breast tomosynthesis in the breast assessment clinic: a review

Mammography has long been considered as the primary technique in breast cancer detection and assessment. Despite low specificity, mammography has been preferred over other contemporary techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) due to super...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of medical radiation sciences 2017-09, Vol.64 (3), p.203-211
Main Authors: Mall, Suneeta, Lewis, Sarah, Brennan, Patrick, Noakes, Jennie, Mello‐Thoms, Claudia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4940-2bed46d054b0ee9ac6e55382fa16ae1f90cc4d145ce9bde3657c3a701b875e1c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4940-2bed46d054b0ee9ac6e55382fa16ae1f90cc4d145ce9bde3657c3a701b875e1c3
container_end_page 211
container_issue 3
container_start_page 203
container_title Journal of medical radiation sciences
container_volume 64
creator Mall, Suneeta
Lewis, Sarah
Brennan, Patrick
Noakes, Jennie
Mello‐Thoms, Claudia
description Mammography has long been considered as the primary technique in breast cancer detection and assessment. Despite low specificity, mammography has been preferred over other contemporary techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) due to superior sensitivity and significant health economic benefits. The development of a new technique, a limited angle cone beam pseudo‐three‐dimensional tomosynthesis, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), has gained momentum. Several preliminary studies and ongoing trials are showing evidence of the benefits of DBT in improving lesion visibility, accuracy of cancer detection and observer performance. This raises the possibility of adoption of DBT in the breast cancer assessment clinic, wherein confirming or dismissing the presence of malignancy (at the potential site identified during screening) is of utmost importance. Identification of suspected malignancy in terms of lesion characteristics and location is also essential in assessment. In this literature review, we evaluate the role of DBT for use in breast cancer assessment and its future in biopsy. Mammography has long been considered as the primary technique in breast cancer detection and assessment. Despite low specificity, mammography has been preferred over other contemporary techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) due to superior sensitivity and significant health economic benefits in a screening setting. In the last decade, the development of a new technique, a limited angle cone beam pseudo‐three‐dimensional tomosynthesis, known as digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), has gained momentum. The pseudo‐three‐dimensional nature of DBT is currently being investigated for advances in lesion visibility, sensitivity, specificity, recall rates and observer performance. Several preliminary studies and ongoing trials are showing evidence of the benefits of DBT over mammography for screening. This raises the possibility of adoption of DBT in breast cancer assessment. In this article we focus on the role of DBT for use in breast cancer assessment (also known as diagnostic workup) and its future as a biopsy imaging modality.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jmrs.230
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5587657</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1884170152</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4940-2bed46d054b0ee9ac6e55382fa16ae1f90cc4d145ce9bde3657c3a701b875e1c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kVtr3DAQRkVpSUIayC8ogrz0xelItiyrD4ESkl5IKeTyLGR5nNViW6nGm7D_PlqSTS_QPmlgDmdm9DF2KOBYAMgPyzHRsSzhFduToERRGjCvt3Vj1C47IFoCgAAtpYEdtiubUlcK5B67vF4gT3FAHnvehdswu4G3CR3NfI5jpPU0L5AC8TDxXG17jgiJRpxm7ocwBf-RO57wPuDDW_amdwPhwfO7z27Oz65PvxQXPz5_Pf10UfjKVFDIFruq7kBVLSAa52tUqmxk70TtUPQGvK86USmPpu2wrJX2pdMg2kYrFL7cZydP3rtVO2Ln8y7JDfYuhdGltY0u2D87U1jY23hvlWp0tmXB-2dBij9XSLMdA3kcBjdhXJEVTVOJPFDJjB79hS7jKk35PLv5Ul03da3_RwlT1qC0UeLXWJ8iUcL-ZWUBdpOo3SRqc6IZfff7iS_gNr8MFE_AQxhw_U-R_fb98mojfASCnKq1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290768667</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of digital breast tomosynthesis in the breast assessment clinic: a review</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Mall, Suneeta ; Lewis, Sarah ; Brennan, Patrick ; Noakes, Jennie ; Mello‐Thoms, Claudia</creator><creatorcontrib>Mall, Suneeta ; Lewis, Sarah ; Brennan, Patrick ; Noakes, Jennie ; Mello‐Thoms, Claudia</creatorcontrib><description>Mammography has long been considered as the primary technique in breast cancer detection and assessment. Despite low specificity, mammography has been preferred over other contemporary techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) due to superior sensitivity and significant health economic benefits. The development of a new technique, a limited angle cone beam pseudo‐three‐dimensional tomosynthesis, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), has gained momentum. Several preliminary studies and ongoing trials are showing evidence of the benefits of DBT in improving lesion visibility, accuracy of cancer detection and observer performance. This raises the possibility of adoption of DBT in the breast cancer assessment clinic, wherein confirming or dismissing the presence of malignancy (at the potential site identified during screening) is of utmost importance. Identification of suspected malignancy in terms of lesion characteristics and location is also essential in assessment. In this literature review, we evaluate the role of DBT for use in breast cancer assessment and its future in biopsy. Mammography has long been considered as the primary technique in breast cancer detection and assessment. Despite low specificity, mammography has been preferred over other contemporary techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) due to superior sensitivity and significant health economic benefits in a screening setting. In the last decade, the development of a new technique, a limited angle cone beam pseudo‐three‐dimensional tomosynthesis, known as digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), has gained momentum. The pseudo‐three‐dimensional nature of DBT is currently being investigated for advances in lesion visibility, sensitivity, specificity, recall rates and observer performance. Several preliminary studies and ongoing trials are showing evidence of the benefits of DBT over mammography for screening. This raises the possibility of adoption of DBT in breast cancer assessment. In this article we focus on the role of DBT for use in breast cancer assessment (also known as diagnostic workup) and its future as a biopsy imaging modality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2051-3895</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2051-3909</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.230</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28374502</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Assessment ; biopsy ; Breast - diagnostic imaging ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Cancer ; Computed tomography ; DBT ; diagnosis ; digital breast tomosynthesis ; Humans ; Literature reviews ; Localization ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Mammography ; Mammography - methods ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical screening ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Review ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Studies ; Visibility</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2017-09, Vol.64 (3), p.203-211</ispartof><rights>2017 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology.</rights><rights>2017 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology.</rights><rights>2017 Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology</rights><rights>2017. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4940-2bed46d054b0ee9ac6e55382fa16ae1f90cc4d145ce9bde3657c3a701b875e1c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4940-2bed46d054b0ee9ac6e55382fa16ae1f90cc4d145ce9bde3657c3a701b875e1c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6763-7514</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2290768667/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2290768667?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,11541,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,46027,46451,53766,53768,74869</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28374502$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mall, Suneeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noakes, Jennie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mello‐Thoms, Claudia</creatorcontrib><title>The role of digital breast tomosynthesis in the breast assessment clinic: a review</title><title>Journal of medical radiation sciences</title><addtitle>J Med Radiat Sci</addtitle><description>Mammography has long been considered as the primary technique in breast cancer detection and assessment. Despite low specificity, mammography has been preferred over other contemporary techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) due to superior sensitivity and significant health economic benefits. The development of a new technique, a limited angle cone beam pseudo‐three‐dimensional tomosynthesis, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), has gained momentum. Several preliminary studies and ongoing trials are showing evidence of the benefits of DBT in improving lesion visibility, accuracy of cancer detection and observer performance. This raises the possibility of adoption of DBT in the breast cancer assessment clinic, wherein confirming or dismissing the presence of malignancy (at the potential site identified during screening) is of utmost importance. Identification of suspected malignancy in terms of lesion characteristics and location is also essential in assessment. In this literature review, we evaluate the role of DBT for use in breast cancer assessment and its future in biopsy. Mammography has long been considered as the primary technique in breast cancer detection and assessment. Despite low specificity, mammography has been preferred over other contemporary techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) due to superior sensitivity and significant health economic benefits in a screening setting. In the last decade, the development of a new technique, a limited angle cone beam pseudo‐three‐dimensional tomosynthesis, known as digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), has gained momentum. The pseudo‐three‐dimensional nature of DBT is currently being investigated for advances in lesion visibility, sensitivity, specificity, recall rates and observer performance. Several preliminary studies and ongoing trials are showing evidence of the benefits of DBT over mammography for screening. This raises the possibility of adoption of DBT in breast cancer assessment. In this article we focus on the role of DBT for use in breast cancer assessment (also known as diagnostic workup) and its future as a biopsy imaging modality.</description><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>biopsy</subject><subject>Breast - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>DBT</subject><subject>diagnosis</subject><subject>digital breast tomosynthesis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Localization</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Mammography - methods</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Visibility</subject><issn>2051-3895</issn><issn>2051-3909</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kVtr3DAQRkVpSUIayC8ogrz0xelItiyrD4ESkl5IKeTyLGR5nNViW6nGm7D_PlqSTS_QPmlgDmdm9DF2KOBYAMgPyzHRsSzhFduToERRGjCvt3Vj1C47IFoCgAAtpYEdtiubUlcK5B67vF4gT3FAHnvehdswu4G3CR3NfI5jpPU0L5AC8TDxXG17jgiJRpxm7ocwBf-RO57wPuDDW_amdwPhwfO7z27Oz65PvxQXPz5_Pf10UfjKVFDIFruq7kBVLSAa52tUqmxk70TtUPQGvK86USmPpu2wrJX2pdMg2kYrFL7cZydP3rtVO2Ln8y7JDfYuhdGltY0u2D87U1jY23hvlWp0tmXB-2dBij9XSLMdA3kcBjdhXJEVTVOJPFDJjB79hS7jKk35PLv5Ul03da3_RwlT1qC0UeLXWJ8iUcL-ZWUBdpOo3SRqc6IZfff7iS_gNr8MFE_AQxhw_U-R_fb98mojfASCnKq1</recordid><startdate>201709</startdate><enddate>201709</enddate><creator>Mall, Suneeta</creator><creator>Lewis, Sarah</creator><creator>Brennan, Patrick</creator><creator>Noakes, Jennie</creator><creator>Mello‐Thoms, Claudia</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6763-7514</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201709</creationdate><title>The role of digital breast tomosynthesis in the breast assessment clinic: a review</title><author>Mall, Suneeta ; Lewis, Sarah ; Brennan, Patrick ; Noakes, Jennie ; Mello‐Thoms, Claudia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4940-2bed46d054b0ee9ac6e55382fa16ae1f90cc4d145ce9bde3657c3a701b875e1c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>biopsy</topic><topic>Breast - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>DBT</topic><topic>diagnosis</topic><topic>digital breast tomosynthesis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Localization</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Mammography - methods</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Visibility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mall, Suneeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noakes, Jennie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mello‐Thoms, Claudia</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical radiation sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mall, Suneeta</au><au>Lewis, Sarah</au><au>Brennan, Patrick</au><au>Noakes, Jennie</au><au>Mello‐Thoms, Claudia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of digital breast tomosynthesis in the breast assessment clinic: a review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical radiation sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Radiat Sci</addtitle><date>2017-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>203</spage><epage>211</epage><pages>203-211</pages><issn>2051-3895</issn><eissn>2051-3909</eissn><abstract>Mammography has long been considered as the primary technique in breast cancer detection and assessment. Despite low specificity, mammography has been preferred over other contemporary techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) due to superior sensitivity and significant health economic benefits. The development of a new technique, a limited angle cone beam pseudo‐three‐dimensional tomosynthesis, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), has gained momentum. Several preliminary studies and ongoing trials are showing evidence of the benefits of DBT in improving lesion visibility, accuracy of cancer detection and observer performance. This raises the possibility of adoption of DBT in the breast cancer assessment clinic, wherein confirming or dismissing the presence of malignancy (at the potential site identified during screening) is of utmost importance. Identification of suspected malignancy in terms of lesion characteristics and location is also essential in assessment. In this literature review, we evaluate the role of DBT for use in breast cancer assessment and its future in biopsy. Mammography has long been considered as the primary technique in breast cancer detection and assessment. Despite low specificity, mammography has been preferred over other contemporary techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) due to superior sensitivity and significant health economic benefits in a screening setting. In the last decade, the development of a new technique, a limited angle cone beam pseudo‐three‐dimensional tomosynthesis, known as digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), has gained momentum. The pseudo‐three‐dimensional nature of DBT is currently being investigated for advances in lesion visibility, sensitivity, specificity, recall rates and observer performance. Several preliminary studies and ongoing trials are showing evidence of the benefits of DBT over mammography for screening. This raises the possibility of adoption of DBT in breast cancer assessment. In this article we focus on the role of DBT for use in breast cancer assessment (also known as diagnostic workup) and its future as a biopsy imaging modality.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28374502</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmrs.230</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6763-7514</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2051-3895
ispartof Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2017-09, Vol.64 (3), p.203-211
issn 2051-3895
2051-3909
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5587657
source Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection; Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Assessment
biopsy
Breast - diagnostic imaging
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Cancer
Computed tomography
DBT
diagnosis
digital breast tomosynthesis
Humans
Literature reviews
Localization
Magnetic resonance imaging
Mammography
Mammography - methods
Medical diagnosis
Medical screening
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Review
Sensitivity and Specificity
Studies
Visibility
title The role of digital breast tomosynthesis in the breast assessment clinic: a review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T15%3A57%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20digital%20breast%20tomosynthesis%20in%20the%20breast%20assessment%20clinic:%20a%20review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20radiation%20sciences&rft.au=Mall,%20Suneeta&rft.date=2017-09&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=203&rft.epage=211&rft.pages=203-211&rft.issn=2051-3895&rft.eissn=2051-3909&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmrs.230&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1884170152%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4940-2bed46d054b0ee9ac6e55382fa16ae1f90cc4d145ce9bde3657c3a701b875e1c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290768667&rft_id=info:pmid/28374502&rfr_iscdi=true