Loading…
The role of digital breast tomosynthesis in the breast assessment clinic: a review
Mammography has long been considered as the primary technique in breast cancer detection and assessment. Despite low specificity, mammography has been preferred over other contemporary techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) due to super...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of medical radiation sciences 2017-09, Vol.64 (3), p.203-211 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4940-2bed46d054b0ee9ac6e55382fa16ae1f90cc4d145ce9bde3657c3a701b875e1c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4940-2bed46d054b0ee9ac6e55382fa16ae1f90cc4d145ce9bde3657c3a701b875e1c3 |
container_end_page | 211 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 203 |
container_title | Journal of medical radiation sciences |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | Mall, Suneeta Lewis, Sarah Brennan, Patrick Noakes, Jennie Mello‐Thoms, Claudia |
description | Mammography has long been considered as the primary technique in breast cancer detection and assessment. Despite low specificity, mammography has been preferred over other contemporary techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) due to superior sensitivity and significant health economic benefits. The development of a new technique, a limited angle cone beam pseudo‐three‐dimensional tomosynthesis, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), has gained momentum. Several preliminary studies and ongoing trials are showing evidence of the benefits of DBT in improving lesion visibility, accuracy of cancer detection and observer performance. This raises the possibility of adoption of DBT in the breast cancer assessment clinic, wherein confirming or dismissing the presence of malignancy (at the potential site identified during screening) is of utmost importance. Identification of suspected malignancy in terms of lesion characteristics and location is also essential in assessment. In this literature review, we evaluate the role of DBT for use in breast cancer assessment and its future in biopsy.
Mammography has long been considered as the primary technique in breast cancer detection and assessment. Despite low specificity, mammography has been preferred over other contemporary techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) due to superior sensitivity and significant health economic benefits in a screening setting. In the last decade, the development of a new technique, a limited angle cone beam pseudo‐three‐dimensional tomosynthesis, known as digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), has gained momentum. The pseudo‐three‐dimensional nature of DBT is currently being investigated for advances in lesion visibility, sensitivity, specificity, recall rates and observer performance. Several preliminary studies and ongoing trials are showing evidence of the benefits of DBT over mammography for screening. This raises the possibility of adoption of DBT in breast cancer assessment. In this article we focus on the role of DBT for use in breast cancer assessment (also known as diagnostic workup) and its future as a biopsy imaging modality. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jmrs.230 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5587657</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1884170152</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4940-2bed46d054b0ee9ac6e55382fa16ae1f90cc4d145ce9bde3657c3a701b875e1c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kVtr3DAQRkVpSUIayC8ogrz0xelItiyrD4ESkl5IKeTyLGR5nNViW6nGm7D_PlqSTS_QPmlgDmdm9DF2KOBYAMgPyzHRsSzhFduToERRGjCvt3Vj1C47IFoCgAAtpYEdtiubUlcK5B67vF4gT3FAHnvehdswu4G3CR3NfI5jpPU0L5AC8TDxXG17jgiJRpxm7ocwBf-RO57wPuDDW_amdwPhwfO7z27Oz65PvxQXPz5_Pf10UfjKVFDIFruq7kBVLSAa52tUqmxk70TtUPQGvK86USmPpu2wrJX2pdMg2kYrFL7cZydP3rtVO2Ln8y7JDfYuhdGltY0u2D87U1jY23hvlWp0tmXB-2dBij9XSLMdA3kcBjdhXJEVTVOJPFDJjB79hS7jKk35PLv5Ul03da3_RwlT1qC0UeLXWJ8iUcL-ZWUBdpOo3SRqc6IZfff7iS_gNr8MFE_AQxhw_U-R_fb98mojfASCnKq1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290768667</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of digital breast tomosynthesis in the breast assessment clinic: a review</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Mall, Suneeta ; Lewis, Sarah ; Brennan, Patrick ; Noakes, Jennie ; Mello‐Thoms, Claudia</creator><creatorcontrib>Mall, Suneeta ; Lewis, Sarah ; Brennan, Patrick ; Noakes, Jennie ; Mello‐Thoms, Claudia</creatorcontrib><description>Mammography has long been considered as the primary technique in breast cancer detection and assessment. Despite low specificity, mammography has been preferred over other contemporary techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) due to superior sensitivity and significant health economic benefits. The development of a new technique, a limited angle cone beam pseudo‐three‐dimensional tomosynthesis, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), has gained momentum. Several preliminary studies and ongoing trials are showing evidence of the benefits of DBT in improving lesion visibility, accuracy of cancer detection and observer performance. This raises the possibility of adoption of DBT in the breast cancer assessment clinic, wherein confirming or dismissing the presence of malignancy (at the potential site identified during screening) is of utmost importance. Identification of suspected malignancy in terms of lesion characteristics and location is also essential in assessment. In this literature review, we evaluate the role of DBT for use in breast cancer assessment and its future in biopsy.
Mammography has long been considered as the primary technique in breast cancer detection and assessment. Despite low specificity, mammography has been preferred over other contemporary techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) due to superior sensitivity and significant health economic benefits in a screening setting. In the last decade, the development of a new technique, a limited angle cone beam pseudo‐three‐dimensional tomosynthesis, known as digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), has gained momentum. The pseudo‐three‐dimensional nature of DBT is currently being investigated for advances in lesion visibility, sensitivity, specificity, recall rates and observer performance. Several preliminary studies and ongoing trials are showing evidence of the benefits of DBT over mammography for screening. This raises the possibility of adoption of DBT in breast cancer assessment. In this article we focus on the role of DBT for use in breast cancer assessment (also known as diagnostic workup) and its future as a biopsy imaging modality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2051-3895</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2051-3909</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.230</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28374502</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Assessment ; biopsy ; Breast - diagnostic imaging ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Cancer ; Computed tomography ; DBT ; diagnosis ; digital breast tomosynthesis ; Humans ; Literature reviews ; Localization ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Mammography ; Mammography - methods ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical screening ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Review ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Studies ; Visibility</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2017-09, Vol.64 (3), p.203-211</ispartof><rights>2017 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology.</rights><rights>2017 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology.</rights><rights>2017 Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology</rights><rights>2017. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4940-2bed46d054b0ee9ac6e55382fa16ae1f90cc4d145ce9bde3657c3a701b875e1c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4940-2bed46d054b0ee9ac6e55382fa16ae1f90cc4d145ce9bde3657c3a701b875e1c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6763-7514</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2290768667/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2290768667?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,11541,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,46027,46451,53766,53768,74869</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28374502$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mall, Suneeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noakes, Jennie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mello‐Thoms, Claudia</creatorcontrib><title>The role of digital breast tomosynthesis in the breast assessment clinic: a review</title><title>Journal of medical radiation sciences</title><addtitle>J Med Radiat Sci</addtitle><description>Mammography has long been considered as the primary technique in breast cancer detection and assessment. Despite low specificity, mammography has been preferred over other contemporary techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) due to superior sensitivity and significant health economic benefits. The development of a new technique, a limited angle cone beam pseudo‐three‐dimensional tomosynthesis, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), has gained momentum. Several preliminary studies and ongoing trials are showing evidence of the benefits of DBT in improving lesion visibility, accuracy of cancer detection and observer performance. This raises the possibility of adoption of DBT in the breast cancer assessment clinic, wherein confirming or dismissing the presence of malignancy (at the potential site identified during screening) is of utmost importance. Identification of suspected malignancy in terms of lesion characteristics and location is also essential in assessment. In this literature review, we evaluate the role of DBT for use in breast cancer assessment and its future in biopsy.
Mammography has long been considered as the primary technique in breast cancer detection and assessment. Despite low specificity, mammography has been preferred over other contemporary techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) due to superior sensitivity and significant health economic benefits in a screening setting. In the last decade, the development of a new technique, a limited angle cone beam pseudo‐three‐dimensional tomosynthesis, known as digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), has gained momentum. The pseudo‐three‐dimensional nature of DBT is currently being investigated for advances in lesion visibility, sensitivity, specificity, recall rates and observer performance. Several preliminary studies and ongoing trials are showing evidence of the benefits of DBT over mammography for screening. This raises the possibility of adoption of DBT in breast cancer assessment. In this article we focus on the role of DBT for use in breast cancer assessment (also known as diagnostic workup) and its future as a biopsy imaging modality.</description><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>biopsy</subject><subject>Breast - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>DBT</subject><subject>diagnosis</subject><subject>digital breast tomosynthesis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Localization</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Mammography - methods</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Visibility</subject><issn>2051-3895</issn><issn>2051-3909</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kVtr3DAQRkVpSUIayC8ogrz0xelItiyrD4ESkl5IKeTyLGR5nNViW6nGm7D_PlqSTS_QPmlgDmdm9DF2KOBYAMgPyzHRsSzhFduToERRGjCvt3Vj1C47IFoCgAAtpYEdtiubUlcK5B67vF4gT3FAHnvehdswu4G3CR3NfI5jpPU0L5AC8TDxXG17jgiJRpxm7ocwBf-RO57wPuDDW_amdwPhwfO7z27Oz65PvxQXPz5_Pf10UfjKVFDIFruq7kBVLSAa52tUqmxk70TtUPQGvK86USmPpu2wrJX2pdMg2kYrFL7cZydP3rtVO2Ln8y7JDfYuhdGltY0u2D87U1jY23hvlWp0tmXB-2dBij9XSLMdA3kcBjdhXJEVTVOJPFDJjB79hS7jKk35PLv5Ul03da3_RwlT1qC0UeLXWJ8iUcL-ZWUBdpOo3SRqc6IZfff7iS_gNr8MFE_AQxhw_U-R_fb98mojfASCnKq1</recordid><startdate>201709</startdate><enddate>201709</enddate><creator>Mall, Suneeta</creator><creator>Lewis, Sarah</creator><creator>Brennan, Patrick</creator><creator>Noakes, Jennie</creator><creator>Mello‐Thoms, Claudia</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6763-7514</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201709</creationdate><title>The role of digital breast tomosynthesis in the breast assessment clinic: a review</title><author>Mall, Suneeta ; Lewis, Sarah ; Brennan, Patrick ; Noakes, Jennie ; Mello‐Thoms, Claudia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4940-2bed46d054b0ee9ac6e55382fa16ae1f90cc4d145ce9bde3657c3a701b875e1c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>biopsy</topic><topic>Breast - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>DBT</topic><topic>diagnosis</topic><topic>digital breast tomosynthesis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Localization</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Mammography - methods</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Visibility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mall, Suneeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noakes, Jennie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mello‐Thoms, Claudia</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Source (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical radiation sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mall, Suneeta</au><au>Lewis, Sarah</au><au>Brennan, Patrick</au><au>Noakes, Jennie</au><au>Mello‐Thoms, Claudia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of digital breast tomosynthesis in the breast assessment clinic: a review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical radiation sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Radiat Sci</addtitle><date>2017-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>203</spage><epage>211</epage><pages>203-211</pages><issn>2051-3895</issn><eissn>2051-3909</eissn><abstract>Mammography has long been considered as the primary technique in breast cancer detection and assessment. Despite low specificity, mammography has been preferred over other contemporary techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) due to superior sensitivity and significant health economic benefits. The development of a new technique, a limited angle cone beam pseudo‐three‐dimensional tomosynthesis, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), has gained momentum. Several preliminary studies and ongoing trials are showing evidence of the benefits of DBT in improving lesion visibility, accuracy of cancer detection and observer performance. This raises the possibility of adoption of DBT in the breast cancer assessment clinic, wherein confirming or dismissing the presence of malignancy (at the potential site identified during screening) is of utmost importance. Identification of suspected malignancy in terms of lesion characteristics and location is also essential in assessment. In this literature review, we evaluate the role of DBT for use in breast cancer assessment and its future in biopsy.
Mammography has long been considered as the primary technique in breast cancer detection and assessment. Despite low specificity, mammography has been preferred over other contemporary techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) due to superior sensitivity and significant health economic benefits in a screening setting. In the last decade, the development of a new technique, a limited angle cone beam pseudo‐three‐dimensional tomosynthesis, known as digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), has gained momentum. The pseudo‐three‐dimensional nature of DBT is currently being investigated for advances in lesion visibility, sensitivity, specificity, recall rates and observer performance. Several preliminary studies and ongoing trials are showing evidence of the benefits of DBT over mammography for screening. This raises the possibility of adoption of DBT in breast cancer assessment. In this article we focus on the role of DBT for use in breast cancer assessment (also known as diagnostic workup) and its future as a biopsy imaging modality.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28374502</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmrs.230</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6763-7514</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2051-3895 |
ispartof | Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2017-09, Vol.64 (3), p.203-211 |
issn | 2051-3895 2051-3909 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5587657 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection; Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Assessment biopsy Breast - diagnostic imaging Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Cancer Computed tomography DBT diagnosis digital breast tomosynthesis Humans Literature reviews Localization Magnetic resonance imaging Mammography Mammography - methods Medical diagnosis Medical screening NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance Review Sensitivity and Specificity Studies Visibility |
title | The role of digital breast tomosynthesis in the breast assessment clinic: a review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T15%3A57%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20digital%20breast%20tomosynthesis%20in%20the%20breast%20assessment%20clinic:%20a%20review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20radiation%20sciences&rft.au=Mall,%20Suneeta&rft.date=2017-09&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=203&rft.epage=211&rft.pages=203-211&rft.issn=2051-3895&rft.eissn=2051-3909&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmrs.230&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1884170152%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4940-2bed46d054b0ee9ac6e55382fa16ae1f90cc4d145ce9bde3657c3a701b875e1c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290768667&rft_id=info:pmid/28374502&rfr_iscdi=true |