Loading…

The Effect of Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate Versus Intravenous Sufentanil on the Duration of Analgesia and Postoperative Pain in Patients with Tibia Fracture

In the recent decades controlling postoperative pain has become a popular topic as it leads to the patients' wellbeing and improved life quality, while it reduces the costs for both patients and medical facilities. This study aimed at comparing intravenous magnesium sulfate versus intravenous s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Anesthesiology and pain medicine 2017-04, Vol.7 (2), p.e44035-e44035
Main Authors: Olapour, Ali Reza, Mohtadi, Ahmad Reza, Soltanzadeh, Mansour, Ghomeishi, Ali, Akhondzadeh, Reza, Jafari, Maryam
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3195-8d4298d70ad8145d4effbc148f2f6d1f21f932af5e4b70610601b2d073ec3d323
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3195-8d4298d70ad8145d4effbc148f2f6d1f21f932af5e4b70610601b2d073ec3d323
container_end_page e44035
container_issue 2
container_start_page e44035
container_title Anesthesiology and pain medicine
container_volume 7
creator Olapour, Ali Reza
Mohtadi, Ahmad Reza
Soltanzadeh, Mansour
Ghomeishi, Ali
Akhondzadeh, Reza
Jafari, Maryam
description In the recent decades controlling postoperative pain has become a popular topic as it leads to the patients' wellbeing and improved life quality, while it reduces the costs for both patients and medical facilities. This study aimed at comparing intravenous magnesium sulfate versus intravenous sufentanil on the duration of analgesia and postoperative pain in patients undergoing tibia fracture surgery. This double blind clinical trial study was performed on 70 candidates of tibia fractures between the ages of 18 and 55 years with American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) class I and II. The patients were randomly divided to 2 groups, 1 receiving magnesium sulfate (M) and another receiving sufentanil (S). Both of the groups underwent spinal anesthesia with 10 mg bupivacaine 0.5%. One hour after ensuring the sensorimotor blockade, in the S group 0.1 µg/kg/hour and in the M group 8 mg/kg/hour was diluted in 1 liter of Ringer's solution and infused. In this study, full weakness of the lower limb was considered as the sign of sensorimotor blockade initiation. The postoperative pain intensity was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), 0, 1, 4, 8, 16, and 24 hours after the end of anesthesia duration. In case of VAS ≥ 3, the patients received 0.3 mg/kg pethidine, intravenously. At last, the time of requesting the first narcotic drug and the total usage of pethidine were recorded. Sufentanil was found to be more effective than magnesium sulfate in reducing postoperative pain and the time of first narcotics request was later in patients receiving sufentanil (P < 0.05).
doi_str_mv 10.5812/aapm.44035
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5594416</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1940188173</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3195-8d4298d70ad8145d4effbc148f2f6d1f21f932af5e4b70610601b2d073ec3d323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkV1rFDEUhoMottTe-AMklyJszedM5kYo_dBCxYWu3obM5GQ3MpOsSWbFH9P_2qytS4VAcjgPz0nyIvSWkjOpKPtozHY6E4Jw-QIdM8bUopWcvjycGT9Cpzn_JIRQSoRsxGt0xFTHCJHsGN2vNoCvnIOh4OjwTSjJ7CDEOeOvZh0g-3nCd_PoTAH8A1KujefQ3ewgFBP8iGPApcou52SKr0XVnQczrqvDYBMsXsZc4hb27R3gpfEB17WsZVVk_NuXDV75vtLXyQxlTvAGvXJmzHD6tJ-g79dXq4svi9tvn28uzm8XA6edXCgrWKdsS4xVVEgrwLl-oEI55hpLHaOu48w4CaJvSUNJQ2jPLGk5DNxyxk_Qp0fvdu4nsAPsXzjqbfKTSX90NF7_3wl-o9dxp6XshKBNFbx_EqT4a4Zc9OTzAONoAtRv0rQThCpFW17RD4_okGLOCdxhDCV6H6neR6r_Rlrhd88vdkD_BcgfAIQyoEc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1940188173</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effect of Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate Versus Intravenous Sufentanil on the Duration of Analgesia and Postoperative Pain in Patients with Tibia Fracture</title><source>PubMed Central(OpenAccess)</source><creator>Olapour, Ali Reza ; Mohtadi, Ahmad Reza ; Soltanzadeh, Mansour ; Ghomeishi, Ali ; Akhondzadeh, Reza ; Jafari, Maryam</creator><creatorcontrib>Olapour, Ali Reza ; Mohtadi, Ahmad Reza ; Soltanzadeh, Mansour ; Ghomeishi, Ali ; Akhondzadeh, Reza ; Jafari, Maryam</creatorcontrib><description>In the recent decades controlling postoperative pain has become a popular topic as it leads to the patients' wellbeing and improved life quality, while it reduces the costs for both patients and medical facilities. This study aimed at comparing intravenous magnesium sulfate versus intravenous sufentanil on the duration of analgesia and postoperative pain in patients undergoing tibia fracture surgery. This double blind clinical trial study was performed on 70 candidates of tibia fractures between the ages of 18 and 55 years with American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) class I and II. The patients were randomly divided to 2 groups, 1 receiving magnesium sulfate (M) and another receiving sufentanil (S). Both of the groups underwent spinal anesthesia with 10 mg bupivacaine 0.5%. One hour after ensuring the sensorimotor blockade, in the S group 0.1 µg/kg/hour and in the M group 8 mg/kg/hour was diluted in 1 liter of Ringer's solution and infused. In this study, full weakness of the lower limb was considered as the sign of sensorimotor blockade initiation. The postoperative pain intensity was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), 0, 1, 4, 8, 16, and 24 hours after the end of anesthesia duration. In case of VAS ≥ 3, the patients received 0.3 mg/kg pethidine, intravenously. At last, the time of requesting the first narcotic drug and the total usage of pethidine were recorded. Sufentanil was found to be more effective than magnesium sulfate in reducing postoperative pain and the time of first narcotics request was later in patients receiving sufentanil (P &lt; 0.05).</description><identifier>ISSN: 2228-7523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2228-7531</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5812/aapm.44035</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28920052</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Kowsar</publisher><ispartof>Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2017-04, Vol.7 (2), p.e44035-e44035</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017, Iranian Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ISRAPM) 2017</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3195-8d4298d70ad8145d4effbc148f2f6d1f21f932af5e4b70610601b2d073ec3d323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3195-8d4298d70ad8145d4effbc148f2f6d1f21f932af5e4b70610601b2d073ec3d323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594416/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594416/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28920052$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olapour, Ali Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohtadi, Ahmad Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soltanzadeh, Mansour</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghomeishi, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akhondzadeh, Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jafari, Maryam</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect of Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate Versus Intravenous Sufentanil on the Duration of Analgesia and Postoperative Pain in Patients with Tibia Fracture</title><title>Anesthesiology and pain medicine</title><addtitle>Anesth Pain Med</addtitle><description>In the recent decades controlling postoperative pain has become a popular topic as it leads to the patients' wellbeing and improved life quality, while it reduces the costs for both patients and medical facilities. This study aimed at comparing intravenous magnesium sulfate versus intravenous sufentanil on the duration of analgesia and postoperative pain in patients undergoing tibia fracture surgery. This double blind clinical trial study was performed on 70 candidates of tibia fractures between the ages of 18 and 55 years with American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) class I and II. The patients were randomly divided to 2 groups, 1 receiving magnesium sulfate (M) and another receiving sufentanil (S). Both of the groups underwent spinal anesthesia with 10 mg bupivacaine 0.5%. One hour after ensuring the sensorimotor blockade, in the S group 0.1 µg/kg/hour and in the M group 8 mg/kg/hour was diluted in 1 liter of Ringer's solution and infused. In this study, full weakness of the lower limb was considered as the sign of sensorimotor blockade initiation. The postoperative pain intensity was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), 0, 1, 4, 8, 16, and 24 hours after the end of anesthesia duration. In case of VAS ≥ 3, the patients received 0.3 mg/kg pethidine, intravenously. At last, the time of requesting the first narcotic drug and the total usage of pethidine were recorded. Sufentanil was found to be more effective than magnesium sulfate in reducing postoperative pain and the time of first narcotics request was later in patients receiving sufentanil (P &lt; 0.05).</description><issn>2228-7523</issn><issn>2228-7531</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkV1rFDEUhoMottTe-AMklyJszedM5kYo_dBCxYWu3obM5GQ3MpOsSWbFH9P_2qytS4VAcjgPz0nyIvSWkjOpKPtozHY6E4Jw-QIdM8bUopWcvjycGT9Cpzn_JIRQSoRsxGt0xFTHCJHsGN2vNoCvnIOh4OjwTSjJ7CDEOeOvZh0g-3nCd_PoTAH8A1KujefQ3ewgFBP8iGPApcou52SKr0XVnQczrqvDYBMsXsZc4hb27R3gpfEB17WsZVVk_NuXDV75vtLXyQxlTvAGvXJmzHD6tJ-g79dXq4svi9tvn28uzm8XA6edXCgrWKdsS4xVVEgrwLl-oEI55hpLHaOu48w4CaJvSUNJQ2jPLGk5DNxyxk_Qp0fvdu4nsAPsXzjqbfKTSX90NF7_3wl-o9dxp6XshKBNFbx_EqT4a4Zc9OTzAONoAtRv0rQThCpFW17RD4_okGLOCdxhDCV6H6neR6r_Rlrhd88vdkD_BcgfAIQyoEc</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Olapour, Ali Reza</creator><creator>Mohtadi, Ahmad Reza</creator><creator>Soltanzadeh, Mansour</creator><creator>Ghomeishi, Ali</creator><creator>Akhondzadeh, Reza</creator><creator>Jafari, Maryam</creator><general>Kowsar</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>The Effect of Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate Versus Intravenous Sufentanil on the Duration of Analgesia and Postoperative Pain in Patients with Tibia Fracture</title><author>Olapour, Ali Reza ; Mohtadi, Ahmad Reza ; Soltanzadeh, Mansour ; Ghomeishi, Ali ; Akhondzadeh, Reza ; Jafari, Maryam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3195-8d4298d70ad8145d4effbc148f2f6d1f21f932af5e4b70610601b2d073ec3d323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olapour, Ali Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohtadi, Ahmad Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soltanzadeh, Mansour</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghomeishi, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akhondzadeh, Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jafari, Maryam</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Anesthesiology and pain medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olapour, Ali Reza</au><au>Mohtadi, Ahmad Reza</au><au>Soltanzadeh, Mansour</au><au>Ghomeishi, Ali</au><au>Akhondzadeh, Reza</au><au>Jafari, Maryam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effect of Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate Versus Intravenous Sufentanil on the Duration of Analgesia and Postoperative Pain in Patients with Tibia Fracture</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesiology and pain medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Anesth Pain Med</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e44035</spage><epage>e44035</epage><pages>e44035-e44035</pages><issn>2228-7523</issn><eissn>2228-7531</eissn><abstract>In the recent decades controlling postoperative pain has become a popular topic as it leads to the patients' wellbeing and improved life quality, while it reduces the costs for both patients and medical facilities. This study aimed at comparing intravenous magnesium sulfate versus intravenous sufentanil on the duration of analgesia and postoperative pain in patients undergoing tibia fracture surgery. This double blind clinical trial study was performed on 70 candidates of tibia fractures between the ages of 18 and 55 years with American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) class I and II. The patients were randomly divided to 2 groups, 1 receiving magnesium sulfate (M) and another receiving sufentanil (S). Both of the groups underwent spinal anesthesia with 10 mg bupivacaine 0.5%. One hour after ensuring the sensorimotor blockade, in the S group 0.1 µg/kg/hour and in the M group 8 mg/kg/hour was diluted in 1 liter of Ringer's solution and infused. In this study, full weakness of the lower limb was considered as the sign of sensorimotor blockade initiation. The postoperative pain intensity was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), 0, 1, 4, 8, 16, and 24 hours after the end of anesthesia duration. In case of VAS ≥ 3, the patients received 0.3 mg/kg pethidine, intravenously. At last, the time of requesting the first narcotic drug and the total usage of pethidine were recorded. Sufentanil was found to be more effective than magnesium sulfate in reducing postoperative pain and the time of first narcotics request was later in patients receiving sufentanil (P &lt; 0.05).</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Kowsar</pub><pmid>28920052</pmid><doi>10.5812/aapm.44035</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2228-7523
ispartof Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2017-04, Vol.7 (2), p.e44035-e44035
issn 2228-7523
2228-7531
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5594416
source PubMed Central(OpenAccess)
title The Effect of Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate Versus Intravenous Sufentanil on the Duration of Analgesia and Postoperative Pain in Patients with Tibia Fracture
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T00%3A32%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effect%20of%20Intravenous%20Magnesium%20Sulfate%20Versus%20Intravenous%20Sufentanil%20on%20the%20Duration%20of%20Analgesia%20and%20Postoperative%20Pain%20in%20Patients%20with%20Tibia%20Fracture&rft.jtitle=Anesthesiology%20and%20pain%20medicine&rft.au=Olapour,%20Ali%20Reza&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e44035&rft.epage=e44035&rft.pages=e44035-e44035&rft.issn=2228-7523&rft.eissn=2228-7531&rft_id=info:doi/10.5812/aapm.44035&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1940188173%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3195-8d4298d70ad8145d4effbc148f2f6d1f21f932af5e4b70610601b2d073ec3d323%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1940188173&rft_id=info:pmid/28920052&rfr_iscdi=true