A novel method in the removal of impacted mandibular third molar: buccal drainage

• Published in: Scientific reports 2017-10, Vol.7 (1), p.12602-6, Article 12602
• Main Authors: Hu, Ting, Zhang, Ji, Ma, Jing zhi, Shao, Le nan, Gu, Yi fei, Li, Dian qi, Jiang, Liang, Yang, Yun qiang
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 692/308/409; 692/700/3032/3099/3111/3116; Bleeding; Food; Humanities and Social Sciences; Mandible; Molars; multidisciplinary; Pain; Rubber; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Teeth; Wound drainage; Wound healing
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12722-8

Food impaction after impacted mandibular third molar extraction is a serious problem that should not be ignored. Incomplete suturing of the distal incision in the conventional method is the main cause of food impaction and delayed wound healing. The present study introduces a novel suture and drainage technology that requires hermetic suturing of the distal incision and rubber drainage for buccal drainage. 76 patients with horizontally/mesially impacted third molars (bilateral) were enrolled in this prospective study. An impacted tooth on one side of each patient was extracted by occlusal drainage using the conventional method, whereas the other side tooth was extracted by buccal drainage using the novel method. The differences in wound healing, facial swelling, bleeding and dry socket between the two sides of each patient were compared postoperatively, and the trends for patient selection of the surgical method were also compared. The results indicated that buccal drainage had obvious advantages in wound healing and reduced the risk of postoperative bleeding, and most patients preferred this technique; there were no significant differences in postoperative facial swelling or pain. Thus, buccal drainage can solve the problem of long-term food impaction induced by traditional incision postoperatively and is worthy of clinical promotion.