Loading…

Breast cancer screening outreach effectiveness: Mammogram-specific reminders vs. comprehensive preventive services birthday letters

We compared the effectiveness of two outreach strategies on timely mammography adherence: a mammogram-specific reminder letter (sent just before a woman was due) to a birthday letter (addresses multiple preventive services and not timed around due dates). We evaluated screening mammography adherence...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Preventive medicine 2017-09, Vol.102, p.49-58
Main Authors: Buist, Diana S.M., Gao, Hongyuan, Anderson, Melissa L., Onega, Tracy, Brandzel, Susan, Rabelhofer, Melissa A., Bradford, Susan Carol, Aiello Bowles, Erin J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-d52fef2be883ee538409be97ec615a9e6ae71d050f771147d0b6b00fd1b13b953
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-d52fef2be883ee538409be97ec615a9e6ae71d050f771147d0b6b00fd1b13b953
container_end_page 58
container_issue
container_start_page 49
container_title Preventive medicine
container_volume 102
creator Buist, Diana S.M.
Gao, Hongyuan
Anderson, Melissa L.
Onega, Tracy
Brandzel, Susan
Rabelhofer, Melissa A.
Bradford, Susan Carol
Aiello Bowles, Erin J.
description We compared the effectiveness of two outreach strategies on timely mammography adherence: a mammogram-specific reminder letter (sent just before a woman was due) to a birthday letter (addresses multiple preventive services and not timed around due dates). We evaluated screening mammography adherence following 79,848 mammogram-specific and 151,626 birthday letters mailed between 2002 and 2012 to women aged 40–74years enrolled in Kaiser Permanente Washington. Screening mammogram adherence was specifically tied to due date and was evaluated separately by age group and up-to-date or overdue status at the time of mailing. We used generalized estimating equations to account for correlation between repeated observations, to model the odds of screening mammography adherence by letter type. Among women up-to-date, adherence following birthday letters was 22–76% lower compared to the mammogram-specific reminders, with the greatest decreases in adherence in women aged 70–74. Birthday letters were more effective at activating screening uptake among some subgroups of overdue women aged 50–69 and most overdue women aged 70–74, but universally low adherence rates were observed in overdue women. Increasing number of recommended services for women aged 50–74 who were up-to-date resulted in 12–17% lower mammography adherence, but had no effect in women aged 40–49 or in overdue women. Birthday letters are less effective than mammogram-specific reminder letters at prompting women to undergo timely breast cancer screening, particularly among women up-to-date with screening. Birthday letters may be effective at increasing overall preventive care; however, supplemental outreach may be needed around the due date to increase timely preventive services receipt. •This study compared two outreach strategies on breast cancer screening adherence•Annual prevention reminder letters are less effective than mammogram-specific letters.•Annual birthday prevention reminders were more effective in overdue women aged 50–74.•Tying reminders to due dates may improve uptake of timely preventive services.•Additional outreach is needed for women overdue for preventive services.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.06.028
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5638650</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0091743517302335</els_id><sourcerecordid>1914579610</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-d52fef2be883ee538409be97ec615a9e6ae71d050f771147d0b6b00fd1b13b953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU-LFDEQxYMo7rj6CQTJ0Uu3le5OultQWBd3FVa86Dmkk8pMhv5nqqdhzn5xM8666MVTAvXeq-L9GHspIBcg1Jt9fpwHdHkBos5B5VA0j9hGQKsyKBQ8ZhuAVmR1VcoL9oxoDyCEguopuygaJaWs6g37-SGioYVbM1qMnGxEHMO45dNhSRO74-g92iWsOCLRW_7FDMO0jWbIaEYbfLA84hBGh5H4Sjm30zBH3OFIycPTNzlPdk4Y12CReBfisnPmyHtclmR7zp540xO-uH8v2febj9-uP2V3X28_X1_dZbaS7ZI5WXj0RYdNUyLKsqmg7bCt0SohTYvKYC0cSPB1LURVO-hUB-Cd6ETZtbK8ZO_PufOhS8XZdFc0vZ5jGEw86skE_e9kDDu9nVYtVZkKgxTw-j4gTj8OSIseAlnsezPidCAtWlHJulXiJC3PUhsnooj-YY0AfcKn9_o3Pn3Cp0HphC-5Xv194YPnD68keHcWYOppDRg12YAJnQsxUdJuCv9d8AuNxbJe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1914579610</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Breast cancer screening outreach effectiveness: Mammogram-specific reminders vs. comprehensive preventive services birthday letters</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Buist, Diana S.M. ; Gao, Hongyuan ; Anderson, Melissa L. ; Onega, Tracy ; Brandzel, Susan ; Rabelhofer, Melissa A. ; Bradford, Susan Carol ; Aiello Bowles, Erin J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Buist, Diana S.M. ; Gao, Hongyuan ; Anderson, Melissa L. ; Onega, Tracy ; Brandzel, Susan ; Rabelhofer, Melissa A. ; Bradford, Susan Carol ; Aiello Bowles, Erin J.</creatorcontrib><description>We compared the effectiveness of two outreach strategies on timely mammography adherence: a mammogram-specific reminder letter (sent just before a woman was due) to a birthday letter (addresses multiple preventive services and not timed around due dates). We evaluated screening mammography adherence following 79,848 mammogram-specific and 151,626 birthday letters mailed between 2002 and 2012 to women aged 40–74years enrolled in Kaiser Permanente Washington. Screening mammogram adherence was specifically tied to due date and was evaluated separately by age group and up-to-date or overdue status at the time of mailing. We used generalized estimating equations to account for correlation between repeated observations, to model the odds of screening mammography adherence by letter type. Among women up-to-date, adherence following birthday letters was 22–76% lower compared to the mammogram-specific reminders, with the greatest decreases in adherence in women aged 70–74. Birthday letters were more effective at activating screening uptake among some subgroups of overdue women aged 50–69 and most overdue women aged 70–74, but universally low adherence rates were observed in overdue women. Increasing number of recommended services for women aged 50–74 who were up-to-date resulted in 12–17% lower mammography adherence, but had no effect in women aged 40–49 or in overdue women. Birthday letters are less effective than mammogram-specific reminder letters at prompting women to undergo timely breast cancer screening, particularly among women up-to-date with screening. Birthday letters may be effective at increasing overall preventive care; however, supplemental outreach may be needed around the due date to increase timely preventive services receipt. •This study compared two outreach strategies on breast cancer screening adherence•Annual prevention reminder letters are less effective than mammogram-specific letters.•Annual birthday prevention reminders were more effective in overdue women aged 50–74.•Tying reminders to due dates may improve uptake of timely preventive services.•Additional outreach is needed for women overdue for preventive services.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-7435</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0260</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.06.028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28655547</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adherence ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Breast cancer screening ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Early Detection of Cancer ; Female ; Humans ; Mammography - methods ; Mass Screening - methods ; Middle Aged ; Outreach ; Postal Service ; Preventive care ; Preventive services ; Reminder letters ; Reminder Systems ; Screening programs ; Washington</subject><ispartof>Preventive medicine, 2017-09, Vol.102, p.49-58</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-d52fef2be883ee538409be97ec615a9e6ae71d050f771147d0b6b00fd1b13b953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-d52fef2be883ee538409be97ec615a9e6ae71d050f771147d0b6b00fd1b13b953</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28655547$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buist, Diana S.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Hongyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Melissa L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onega, Tracy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandzel, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabelhofer, Melissa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradford, Susan Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aiello Bowles, Erin J.</creatorcontrib><title>Breast cancer screening outreach effectiveness: Mammogram-specific reminders vs. comprehensive preventive services birthday letters</title><title>Preventive medicine</title><addtitle>Prev Med</addtitle><description>We compared the effectiveness of two outreach strategies on timely mammography adherence: a mammogram-specific reminder letter (sent just before a woman was due) to a birthday letter (addresses multiple preventive services and not timed around due dates). We evaluated screening mammography adherence following 79,848 mammogram-specific and 151,626 birthday letters mailed between 2002 and 2012 to women aged 40–74years enrolled in Kaiser Permanente Washington. Screening mammogram adherence was specifically tied to due date and was evaluated separately by age group and up-to-date or overdue status at the time of mailing. We used generalized estimating equations to account for correlation between repeated observations, to model the odds of screening mammography adherence by letter type. Among women up-to-date, adherence following birthday letters was 22–76% lower compared to the mammogram-specific reminders, with the greatest decreases in adherence in women aged 70–74. Birthday letters were more effective at activating screening uptake among some subgroups of overdue women aged 50–69 and most overdue women aged 70–74, but universally low adherence rates were observed in overdue women. Increasing number of recommended services for women aged 50–74 who were up-to-date resulted in 12–17% lower mammography adherence, but had no effect in women aged 40–49 or in overdue women. Birthday letters are less effective than mammogram-specific reminder letters at prompting women to undergo timely breast cancer screening, particularly among women up-to-date with screening. Birthday letters may be effective at increasing overall preventive care; however, supplemental outreach may be needed around the due date to increase timely preventive services receipt. •This study compared two outreach strategies on breast cancer screening adherence•Annual prevention reminder letters are less effective than mammogram-specific letters.•Annual birthday prevention reminders were more effective in overdue women aged 50–74.•Tying reminders to due dates may improve uptake of timely preventive services.•Additional outreach is needed for women overdue for preventive services.</description><subject>Adherence</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Breast cancer screening</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammography - methods</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Outreach</subject><subject>Postal Service</subject><subject>Preventive care</subject><subject>Preventive services</subject><subject>Reminder letters</subject><subject>Reminder Systems</subject><subject>Screening programs</subject><subject>Washington</subject><issn>0091-7435</issn><issn>1096-0260</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU-LFDEQxYMo7rj6CQTJ0Uu3le5OultQWBd3FVa86Dmkk8pMhv5nqqdhzn5xM8666MVTAvXeq-L9GHspIBcg1Jt9fpwHdHkBos5B5VA0j9hGQKsyKBQ8ZhuAVmR1VcoL9oxoDyCEguopuygaJaWs6g37-SGioYVbM1qMnGxEHMO45dNhSRO74-g92iWsOCLRW_7FDMO0jWbIaEYbfLA84hBGh5H4Sjm30zBH3OFIycPTNzlPdk4Y12CReBfisnPmyHtclmR7zp540xO-uH8v2febj9-uP2V3X28_X1_dZbaS7ZI5WXj0RYdNUyLKsqmg7bCt0SohTYvKYC0cSPB1LURVO-hUB-Cd6ETZtbK8ZO_PufOhS8XZdFc0vZ5jGEw86skE_e9kDDu9nVYtVZkKgxTw-j4gTj8OSIseAlnsezPidCAtWlHJulXiJC3PUhsnooj-YY0AfcKn9_o3Pn3Cp0HphC-5Xv194YPnD68keHcWYOppDRg12YAJnQsxUdJuCv9d8AuNxbJe</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Buist, Diana S.M.</creator><creator>Gao, Hongyuan</creator><creator>Anderson, Melissa L.</creator><creator>Onega, Tracy</creator><creator>Brandzel, Susan</creator><creator>Rabelhofer, Melissa A.</creator><creator>Bradford, Susan Carol</creator><creator>Aiello Bowles, Erin J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>Breast cancer screening outreach effectiveness: Mammogram-specific reminders vs. comprehensive preventive services birthday letters</title><author>Buist, Diana S.M. ; Gao, Hongyuan ; Anderson, Melissa L. ; Onega, Tracy ; Brandzel, Susan ; Rabelhofer, Melissa A. ; Bradford, Susan Carol ; Aiello Bowles, Erin J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-d52fef2be883ee538409be97ec615a9e6ae71d050f771147d0b6b00fd1b13b953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adherence</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Breast cancer screening</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammography - methods</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Outreach</topic><topic>Postal Service</topic><topic>Preventive care</topic><topic>Preventive services</topic><topic>Reminder letters</topic><topic>Reminder Systems</topic><topic>Screening programs</topic><topic>Washington</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buist, Diana S.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Hongyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Melissa L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onega, Tracy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandzel, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabelhofer, Melissa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradford, Susan Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aiello Bowles, Erin J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Preventive medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buist, Diana S.M.</au><au>Gao, Hongyuan</au><au>Anderson, Melissa L.</au><au>Onega, Tracy</au><au>Brandzel, Susan</au><au>Rabelhofer, Melissa A.</au><au>Bradford, Susan Carol</au><au>Aiello Bowles, Erin J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Breast cancer screening outreach effectiveness: Mammogram-specific reminders vs. comprehensive preventive services birthday letters</atitle><jtitle>Preventive medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Prev Med</addtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>102</volume><spage>49</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>49-58</pages><issn>0091-7435</issn><eissn>1096-0260</eissn><abstract>We compared the effectiveness of two outreach strategies on timely mammography adherence: a mammogram-specific reminder letter (sent just before a woman was due) to a birthday letter (addresses multiple preventive services and not timed around due dates). We evaluated screening mammography adherence following 79,848 mammogram-specific and 151,626 birthday letters mailed between 2002 and 2012 to women aged 40–74years enrolled in Kaiser Permanente Washington. Screening mammogram adherence was specifically tied to due date and was evaluated separately by age group and up-to-date or overdue status at the time of mailing. We used generalized estimating equations to account for correlation between repeated observations, to model the odds of screening mammography adherence by letter type. Among women up-to-date, adherence following birthday letters was 22–76% lower compared to the mammogram-specific reminders, with the greatest decreases in adherence in women aged 70–74. Birthday letters were more effective at activating screening uptake among some subgroups of overdue women aged 50–69 and most overdue women aged 70–74, but universally low adherence rates were observed in overdue women. Increasing number of recommended services for women aged 50–74 who were up-to-date resulted in 12–17% lower mammography adherence, but had no effect in women aged 40–49 or in overdue women. Birthday letters are less effective than mammogram-specific reminder letters at prompting women to undergo timely breast cancer screening, particularly among women up-to-date with screening. Birthday letters may be effective at increasing overall preventive care; however, supplemental outreach may be needed around the due date to increase timely preventive services receipt. •This study compared two outreach strategies on breast cancer screening adherence•Annual prevention reminder letters are less effective than mammogram-specific letters.•Annual birthday prevention reminders were more effective in overdue women aged 50–74.•Tying reminders to due dates may improve uptake of timely preventive services.•Additional outreach is needed for women overdue for preventive services.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28655547</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.06.028</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0091-7435
ispartof Preventive medicine, 2017-09, Vol.102, p.49-58
issn 0091-7435
1096-0260
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5638650
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adherence
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Breast cancer screening
Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
Early Detection of Cancer
Female
Humans
Mammography - methods
Mass Screening - methods
Middle Aged
Outreach
Postal Service
Preventive care
Preventive services
Reminder letters
Reminder Systems
Screening programs
Washington
title Breast cancer screening outreach effectiveness: Mammogram-specific reminders vs. comprehensive preventive services birthday letters
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T19%3A07%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Breast%20cancer%20screening%20outreach%20effectiveness:%20Mammogram-specific%20reminders%20vs.%20comprehensive%20preventive%20services%20birthday%20letters&rft.jtitle=Preventive%20medicine&rft.au=Buist,%20Diana%20S.M.&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=102&rft.spage=49&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=49-58&rft.issn=0091-7435&rft.eissn=1096-0260&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.06.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1914579610%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-d52fef2be883ee538409be97ec615a9e6ae71d050f771147d0b6b00fd1b13b953%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1914579610&rft_id=info:pmid/28655547&rfr_iscdi=true