Secondary implant stability outcome of immediate versus late placed variable-thread implants in the maxilla. A retrospective cohort study

The healing of xenograft augmentated intra-alveolar gaps following immediate implant placement (IMIP) after tooth extraction is likely to differ in time and density compared to the native bone part that directly contacts the implant. Secondary implant stability (SIS) data recorded 2-3 months followi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry 2017-09, Vol.9 (9), p.e1129-e1135
Main Authors: Grognard, Nicolas, Verleye, Gino, Mavreas, Dimitrios, Vande-Vannet, Bart
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page e1135
container_issue 9
container_start_page e1129
container_title Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry
container_volume 9
creator Grognard, Nicolas
Verleye, Gino
Mavreas, Dimitrios
Vande-Vannet, Bart
description The healing of xenograft augmentated intra-alveolar gaps following immediate implant placement (IMIP) after tooth extraction is likely to differ in time and density compared to the native bone part that directly contacts the implant. Secondary implant stability (SIS) data recorded 2-3 months following a late implant placement protocol (LIP) (n= 43) and 6-8 months following an immediate implant placement protocol (IMIP) (n=33) of variable-thread implants (Nobel Active™) in the maxilla were retrospectively collected from files of 63 patients (42 females, 21 males). Statistical analysis was performed using a generalized estimating equation model (GEE). Data split-up according to implant diameter (RP, Ø= 4.3mm) , narrow platform (NP, Ø= 3.5mm) was adopted. For NP implants, the mean ISQ (±SD) values were 70.84 (±4.86) in LIP group and 72.41 (±3.89) in the IMIP group. For RP implants, mean ISQ (±SD) values were 73.45 (±8.77) in the LIP group and 75.93 (±5.73) in the IMIP group. Significant effect of treatment modus in favour of the IMIP and gender in favour of males and implant position was noted (
doi_str_mv 10.4317/jced.54147
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5650216</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1957475199</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2527-bc7279fa72f08cf45cec610674afdf8bdab3f783d6fa7f264358380cc71000f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1LxDAQDaKorHvxB0iOInRt2qZJL4KIX7DgQT2HNJ24WdpmTdLF_Qn-a1NdF80lA_PmvXnzEDol6azICbtcKmhmtCAF20PHpOJVQgvO9__UR2jq_TKNj5E84-QQHWVVyuJMeYw-n0HZvpFug023amUfsA-yNq0JG2yHoGwH2OrY7KAxMgBeg_ODx-1Yx4Eoj9fSGVm3kISFA9n8MnlsehwWgDv5YdpWzvA1dhCc9StQwawBK7uwblQcms0JOtCy9TDd_hP0enf7cvOQzJ_uH2-u54nKaMaSWrGMVVqyTKdc6YIqUCVJS1ZI3WheN7LONeN5U0aMzsoipzznqVKMxAvoKp-gqx_e1VBHTwr64GQrVs508QrCSiP-d3qzEG92LWhJ04yUkeB8S-Ds-wA-iM54BdFgD3bwglSUFYySatS6-IGqaNo70DsZkooxPjHGJ77ji-Czv4vtoL9h5V8KJ5qX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1957475199</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Secondary implant stability outcome of immediate versus late placed variable-thread implants in the maxilla. A retrospective cohort study</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Grognard, Nicolas ; Verleye, Gino ; Mavreas, Dimitrios ; Vande-Vannet, Bart</creator><creatorcontrib>Grognard, Nicolas ; Verleye, Gino ; Mavreas, Dimitrios ; Vande-Vannet, Bart</creatorcontrib><description>The healing of xenograft augmentated intra-alveolar gaps following immediate implant placement (IMIP) after tooth extraction is likely to differ in time and density compared to the native bone part that directly contacts the implant. Secondary implant stability (SIS) data recorded 2-3 months following a late implant placement protocol (LIP) (n= 43) and 6-8 months following an immediate implant placement protocol (IMIP) (n=33) of variable-thread implants (Nobel Active™) in the maxilla were retrospectively collected from files of 63 patients (42 females, 21 males). Statistical analysis was performed using a generalized estimating equation model (GEE). Data split-up according to implant diameter (RP, Ø= 4.3mm) , narrow platform (NP, Ø= 3.5mm) was adopted. For NP implants, the mean ISQ (±SD) values were 70.84 (±4.86) in LIP group and 72.41 (±3.89) in the IMIP group. For RP implants, mean ISQ (±SD) values were 73.45 (±8.77) in the LIP group and 75.93 (±5.73) in the IMIP group. Significant effect of treatment modus in favour of the IMIP and gender in favour of males and implant position was noted ( &lt;0.05). SIS following a IMIP protocol after 6-8 months is comparable to LIP protocol after 2-3 months. A minor ISQ outcome difference in favour of the IMIP protocol can be attributed to a difference in hard tissue alteration during healing of the xenograft part. Secondary implant stability, RFA, Osstell Mentor, variable thread implants, Nobel Active, Bio-Oss, immediate implant placement, late implant placement, non-submerged healing, gap.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1989-5488</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1989-5488</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4317/jced.54147</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29075416</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Spain: Medicina Oral S.L</publisher><ispartof>Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2017-09, Vol.9 (9), p.e1129-e1135</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2017 Medicina Oral S.L. 2017</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5650216/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5650216/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29075416$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grognard, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verleye, Gino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mavreas, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vande-Vannet, Bart</creatorcontrib><title>Secondary implant stability outcome of immediate versus late placed variable-thread implants in the maxilla. A retrospective cohort study</title><title>Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry</title><addtitle>J Clin Exp Dent</addtitle><description>The healing of xenograft augmentated intra-alveolar gaps following immediate implant placement (IMIP) after tooth extraction is likely to differ in time and density compared to the native bone part that directly contacts the implant. Secondary implant stability (SIS) data recorded 2-3 months following a late implant placement protocol (LIP) (n= 43) and 6-8 months following an immediate implant placement protocol (IMIP) (n=33) of variable-thread implants (Nobel Active™) in the maxilla were retrospectively collected from files of 63 patients (42 females, 21 males). Statistical analysis was performed using a generalized estimating equation model (GEE). Data split-up according to implant diameter (RP, Ø= 4.3mm) , narrow platform (NP, Ø= 3.5mm) was adopted. For NP implants, the mean ISQ (±SD) values were 70.84 (±4.86) in LIP group and 72.41 (±3.89) in the IMIP group. For RP implants, mean ISQ (±SD) values were 73.45 (±8.77) in the LIP group and 75.93 (±5.73) in the IMIP group. Significant effect of treatment modus in favour of the IMIP and gender in favour of males and implant position was noted ( &lt;0.05). SIS following a IMIP protocol after 6-8 months is comparable to LIP protocol after 2-3 months. A minor ISQ outcome difference in favour of the IMIP protocol can be attributed to a difference in hard tissue alteration during healing of the xenograft part. Secondary implant stability, RFA, Osstell Mentor, variable thread implants, Nobel Active, Bio-Oss, immediate implant placement, late implant placement, non-submerged healing, gap.</description><issn>1989-5488</issn><issn>1989-5488</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUU1LxDAQDaKorHvxB0iOInRt2qZJL4KIX7DgQT2HNJ24WdpmTdLF_Qn-a1NdF80lA_PmvXnzEDol6azICbtcKmhmtCAF20PHpOJVQgvO9__UR2jq_TKNj5E84-QQHWVVyuJMeYw-n0HZvpFug023amUfsA-yNq0JG2yHoGwH2OrY7KAxMgBeg_ODx-1Yx4Eoj9fSGVm3kISFA9n8MnlsehwWgDv5YdpWzvA1dhCc9StQwawBK7uwblQcms0JOtCy9TDd_hP0enf7cvOQzJ_uH2-u54nKaMaSWrGMVVqyTKdc6YIqUCVJS1ZI3WheN7LONeN5U0aMzsoipzznqVKMxAvoKp-gqx_e1VBHTwr64GQrVs508QrCSiP-d3qzEG92LWhJ04yUkeB8S-Ds-wA-iM54BdFgD3bwglSUFYySatS6-IGqaNo70DsZkooxPjHGJ77ji-Czv4vtoL9h5V8KJ5qX</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Grognard, Nicolas</creator><creator>Verleye, Gino</creator><creator>Mavreas, Dimitrios</creator><creator>Vande-Vannet, Bart</creator><general>Medicina Oral S.L</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>Secondary implant stability outcome of immediate versus late placed variable-thread implants in the maxilla. A retrospective cohort study</title><author>Grognard, Nicolas ; Verleye, Gino ; Mavreas, Dimitrios ; Vande-Vannet, Bart</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2527-bc7279fa72f08cf45cec610674afdf8bdab3f783d6fa7f264358380cc71000f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grognard, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verleye, Gino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mavreas, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vande-Vannet, Bart</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grognard, Nicolas</au><au>Verleye, Gino</au><au>Mavreas, Dimitrios</au><au>Vande-Vannet, Bart</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Secondary implant stability outcome of immediate versus late placed variable-thread implants in the maxilla. A retrospective cohort study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Exp Dent</addtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e1129</spage><epage>e1135</epage><pages>e1129-e1135</pages><issn>1989-5488</issn><eissn>1989-5488</eissn><abstract>The healing of xenograft augmentated intra-alveolar gaps following immediate implant placement (IMIP) after tooth extraction is likely to differ in time and density compared to the native bone part that directly contacts the implant. Secondary implant stability (SIS) data recorded 2-3 months following a late implant placement protocol (LIP) (n= 43) and 6-8 months following an immediate implant placement protocol (IMIP) (n=33) of variable-thread implants (Nobel Active™) in the maxilla were retrospectively collected from files of 63 patients (42 females, 21 males). Statistical analysis was performed using a generalized estimating equation model (GEE). Data split-up according to implant diameter (RP, Ø= 4.3mm) , narrow platform (NP, Ø= 3.5mm) was adopted. For NP implants, the mean ISQ (±SD) values were 70.84 (±4.86) in LIP group and 72.41 (±3.89) in the IMIP group. For RP implants, mean ISQ (±SD) values were 73.45 (±8.77) in the LIP group and 75.93 (±5.73) in the IMIP group. Significant effect of treatment modus in favour of the IMIP and gender in favour of males and implant position was noted ( &lt;0.05). SIS following a IMIP protocol after 6-8 months is comparable to LIP protocol after 2-3 months. A minor ISQ outcome difference in favour of the IMIP protocol can be attributed to a difference in hard tissue alteration during healing of the xenograft part. Secondary implant stability, RFA, Osstell Mentor, variable thread implants, Nobel Active, Bio-Oss, immediate implant placement, late implant placement, non-submerged healing, gap.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pub>Medicina Oral S.L</pub><pmid>29075416</pmid><doi>10.4317/jced.54147</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1989-5488
ispartof Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2017-09, Vol.9 (9), p.e1129-e1135
issn 1989-5488
1989-5488
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5650216
source PubMed Central
title Secondary implant stability outcome of immediate versus late placed variable-thread implants in the maxilla. A retrospective cohort study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A11%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Secondary%20implant%20stability%20outcome%20of%20immediate%20versus%20late%20placed%20variable-thread%20implants%20in%20the%20maxilla.%20A%20retrospective%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20and%20experimental%20dentistry&rft.au=Grognard,%20Nicolas&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e1129&rft.epage=e1135&rft.pages=e1129-e1135&rft.issn=1989-5488&rft.eissn=1989-5488&rft_id=info:doi/10.4317/jced.54147&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1957475199%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2527-bc7279fa72f08cf45cec610674afdf8bdab3f783d6fa7f264358380cc71000f93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1957475199&rft_id=info:pmid/29075416&rfr_iscdi=true