Is Single-stage Revision Safe Following Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Critical Review

• Published in: Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2017-08, Vol.9 (8), p.e1629-e1629
• Main Authors: Vaishya, Raju, Agarwal, Amit Kumar, Rawat, Sudheer K, Singh, Harsh, Vijay, Vipul
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Antibiotics; Cement; Infections; Joint surgery; Knee; Orthopedics; Patients; Prostheses; Success; Surgeons; Surgery; Surgical outcomes; Transplants & implants
• ISSN: 2168-8184; 2168-8184
• DOI: 10.7759/cureus.1629

With the improvement in outcomes and modern prosthesis design, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has now become a commonly performed surgery. It is postulated that a total of 2-5% of the primary and revision TKA becomes infected every year, requiring a revision procedure which to date is the conventional two-stage revision. The diagnosis and treatment of these periprosthetic infections is a major and challenging task, as it requires precise identification of the pathogen, meticulous debridement, and postoperative rehabilitation. To date, there have been very few studies in existing literature comparing the outcomes of single-stage versus two-stage procedure in infected TKA. The aim of the review was to provide the clinicians an insight into the outcome of the single-stage procedure compared to two-stage procedures and to suggest ways to improve the results further. In the following critical review, a total of 669 cases that underwent either a single or two-stage revision for infected TKA were studied. The postoperative functional scores were comparable in most studies during the early postoperative period. Our data supports the use of a single-stage revision surgery in infected TKA as an alternative to a conventional two-stage procedure. However, larger prospective and multicentric trials are required to validate our findings.