Loading…
Test-retest reliability of linear and nonlinear measures of postural stability during visual deprivation in healthy subjects
[Purpose] The purpose of this study is to evaluate the reliability of linear and nonlinear measures of the center of pressure (COP) during visual deprivation. [Subjects and Methods] Fifteen young adults participated in this study. COP signals were recorded in two conditions: eyes open and eyes close...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of Physical Therapy Science 2017, Vol.29(10), pp.1766-1771 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6206-5cdc8a278ca2c75e3bb17b48b9931364a245f6b22f7e73b832ef4aa467d28bb83 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6206-5cdc8a278ca2c75e3bb17b48b9931364a245f6b22f7e73b832ef4aa467d28bb83 |
container_end_page | 1771 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1766 |
container_title | Journal of Physical Therapy Science |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Ghofrani, Masoud Olyaei, Golamreza Talebian, Saeed Bagheri, Hossein Malmir, Kazem |
description | [Purpose] The purpose of this study is to evaluate the reliability of linear and nonlinear measures of the center of pressure (COP) during visual deprivation. [Subjects and Methods] Fifteen young adults participated in this study. COP signals were recorded in two conditions: eyes open and eyes closed. Three trials were performed in each condition with a rest period of approximately 1 min. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and standard error of measurement (SEM) were calculated. [Results] The investigation of ICC and SEM between trials showed that the Lyapunov exponent (ICC: 0.76–0.96, SEM: 0.03) and total mean velocity (ICC: 0.71–0.95, SEM: 0.05) were more reliable and repeatable than range and area (95% confidence ellipse), while area had the least reliability (ICC: 0.49–0.77, SEM: 0.56). [Conclusion] The Lyapunov exponent can be considered an appropriate postural control index, and the evaluation of postural stability should be done by considering linear and nonlinear tools. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1589/jpts.29.1766 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5684007</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1970272586</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6206-5cdc8a278ca2c75e3bb17b48b9931364a245f6b22f7e73b832ef4aa467d28bb83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU2P0zAQhiMEYsvCjTPKkQMpthN_XZDQCpaVVuKynC3bmbSOUrvYTqVK--NxSbcLF4_G8_qZ8bxV9R6jNaZCfh73Oa2JXGPO2ItqRbDgDWWEvaxWSGLaUCL4VfUmpREhwlEnXldXRGLREcFW1eMDpNxEyCXUESanjZtcPtZhqCfnQcda-772wZ-zHeg0R0gnwT6kPEc91Sk_Pevn6PymPrg0l_se9tEddHbB187XW9BT3h7rNJsRbE5vq1eDnhK8O8fr6tf3bw83P5r7n7d3N1_vG8sIYg21vRWacGE1sZxCawzmphNGyha3rNOkowMzhAwceGtES2DotO4Y74kwJb-uvizc_Wx20FvwuUytymw7HY8qaKf-r3i3VZtwUJSJDiFeAB_PgBh-z2VVaueShWnSHsKcFJa87JZQwYr00yK1MaQUYbi0wUidDFMnwxSR6mRYkX_4d7SL-MmhIrhdBKXqrJ4WI9QY5ujLzpTVYlyICHNVLJalD8LdX3w5OCZStJzSQrpbSGOxawOXVjpmZyd4ngudzmdm-dhFY7c6KvDtHzSpx3o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1970272586</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Test-retest reliability of linear and nonlinear measures of postural stability during visual deprivation in healthy subjects</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>J-STAGE Freely Available Titles - English</source><creator>Ghofrani, Masoud ; Olyaei, Golamreza ; Talebian, Saeed ; Bagheri, Hossein ; Malmir, Kazem</creator><creatorcontrib>Ghofrani, Masoud ; Olyaei, Golamreza ; Talebian, Saeed ; Bagheri, Hossein ; Malmir, Kazem ; Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services ; School of Rehabilitation ; Physical Therapy Department</creatorcontrib><description>[Purpose] The purpose of this study is to evaluate the reliability of linear and nonlinear measures of the center of pressure (COP) during visual deprivation. [Subjects and Methods] Fifteen young adults participated in this study. COP signals were recorded in two conditions: eyes open and eyes closed. Three trials were performed in each condition with a rest period of approximately 1 min. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and standard error of measurement (SEM) were calculated. [Results] The investigation of ICC and SEM between trials showed that the Lyapunov exponent (ICC: 0.76–0.96, SEM: 0.03) and total mean velocity (ICC: 0.71–0.95, SEM: 0.05) were more reliable and repeatable than range and area (95% confidence ellipse), while area had the least reliability (ICC: 0.49–0.77, SEM: 0.56). [Conclusion] The Lyapunov exponent can be considered an appropriate postural control index, and the evaluation of postural stability should be done by considering linear and nonlinear tools.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0915-5287</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2187-5626</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1589/jpts.29.1766</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29184286</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: The Society of Physical Therapy Science</publisher><subject>Nonlinear measure ; Original ; Postural stability ; Test-retest reliability</subject><ispartof>Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 2017, Vol.29(10), pp.1766-1771</ispartof><rights>2017 by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc.</rights><rights>2017©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. 2017</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6206-5cdc8a278ca2c75e3bb17b48b9931364a245f6b22f7e73b832ef4aa467d28bb83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6206-5cdc8a278ca2c75e3bb17b48b9931364a245f6b22f7e73b832ef4aa467d28bb83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5684007/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5684007/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1882,4024,27923,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29184286$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ghofrani, Masoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olyaei, Golamreza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talebian, Saeed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagheri, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malmir, Kazem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>School of Rehabilitation</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Physical Therapy Department</creatorcontrib><title>Test-retest reliability of linear and nonlinear measures of postural stability during visual deprivation in healthy subjects</title><title>Journal of Physical Therapy Science</title><addtitle>Journal of Physical Therapy Science</addtitle><description>[Purpose] The purpose of this study is to evaluate the reliability of linear and nonlinear measures of the center of pressure (COP) during visual deprivation. [Subjects and Methods] Fifteen young adults participated in this study. COP signals were recorded in two conditions: eyes open and eyes closed. Three trials were performed in each condition with a rest period of approximately 1 min. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and standard error of measurement (SEM) were calculated. [Results] The investigation of ICC and SEM between trials showed that the Lyapunov exponent (ICC: 0.76–0.96, SEM: 0.03) and total mean velocity (ICC: 0.71–0.95, SEM: 0.05) were more reliable and repeatable than range and area (95% confidence ellipse), while area had the least reliability (ICC: 0.49–0.77, SEM: 0.56). [Conclusion] The Lyapunov exponent can be considered an appropriate postural control index, and the evaluation of postural stability should be done by considering linear and nonlinear tools.</description><subject>Nonlinear measure</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Postural stability</subject><subject>Test-retest reliability</subject><issn>0915-5287</issn><issn>2187-5626</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkU2P0zAQhiMEYsvCjTPKkQMpthN_XZDQCpaVVuKynC3bmbSOUrvYTqVK--NxSbcLF4_G8_qZ8bxV9R6jNaZCfh73Oa2JXGPO2ItqRbDgDWWEvaxWSGLaUCL4VfUmpREhwlEnXldXRGLREcFW1eMDpNxEyCXUESanjZtcPtZhqCfnQcda-772wZ-zHeg0R0gnwT6kPEc91Sk_Pevn6PymPrg0l_se9tEddHbB187XW9BT3h7rNJsRbE5vq1eDnhK8O8fr6tf3bw83P5r7n7d3N1_vG8sIYg21vRWacGE1sZxCawzmphNGyha3rNOkowMzhAwceGtES2DotO4Y74kwJb-uvizc_Wx20FvwuUytymw7HY8qaKf-r3i3VZtwUJSJDiFeAB_PgBh-z2VVaueShWnSHsKcFJa87JZQwYr00yK1MaQUYbi0wUidDFMnwxSR6mRYkX_4d7SL-MmhIrhdBKXqrJ4WI9QY5ujLzpTVYlyICHNVLJalD8LdX3w5OCZStJzSQrpbSGOxawOXVjpmZyd4ngudzmdm-dhFY7c6KvDtHzSpx3o</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Ghofrani, Masoud</creator><creator>Olyaei, Golamreza</creator><creator>Talebian, Saeed</creator><creator>Bagheri, Hossein</creator><creator>Malmir, Kazem</creator><general>The Society of Physical Therapy Science</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Test-retest reliability of linear and nonlinear measures of postural stability during visual deprivation in healthy subjects</title><author>Ghofrani, Masoud ; Olyaei, Golamreza ; Talebian, Saeed ; Bagheri, Hossein ; Malmir, Kazem</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6206-5cdc8a278ca2c75e3bb17b48b9931364a245f6b22f7e73b832ef4aa467d28bb83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Nonlinear measure</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Postural stability</topic><topic>Test-retest reliability</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ghofrani, Masoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olyaei, Golamreza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talebian, Saeed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagheri, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malmir, Kazem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>School of Rehabilitation</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Physical Therapy Department</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Physical Therapy Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ghofrani, Masoud</au><au>Olyaei, Golamreza</au><au>Talebian, Saeed</au><au>Bagheri, Hossein</au><au>Malmir, Kazem</au><aucorp>Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services</aucorp><aucorp>School of Rehabilitation</aucorp><aucorp>Physical Therapy Department</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Test-retest reliability of linear and nonlinear measures of postural stability during visual deprivation in healthy subjects</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Physical Therapy Science</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Physical Therapy Science</addtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1766</spage><epage>1771</epage><pages>1766-1771</pages><issn>0915-5287</issn><eissn>2187-5626</eissn><abstract>[Purpose] The purpose of this study is to evaluate the reliability of linear and nonlinear measures of the center of pressure (COP) during visual deprivation. [Subjects and Methods] Fifteen young adults participated in this study. COP signals were recorded in two conditions: eyes open and eyes closed. Three trials were performed in each condition with a rest period of approximately 1 min. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and standard error of measurement (SEM) were calculated. [Results] The investigation of ICC and SEM between trials showed that the Lyapunov exponent (ICC: 0.76–0.96, SEM: 0.03) and total mean velocity (ICC: 0.71–0.95, SEM: 0.05) were more reliable and repeatable than range and area (95% confidence ellipse), while area had the least reliability (ICC: 0.49–0.77, SEM: 0.56). [Conclusion] The Lyapunov exponent can be considered an appropriate postural control index, and the evaluation of postural stability should be done by considering linear and nonlinear tools.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>The Society of Physical Therapy Science</pub><pmid>29184286</pmid><doi>10.1589/jpts.29.1766</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0915-5287 |
ispartof | Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 2017, Vol.29(10), pp.1766-1771 |
issn | 0915-5287 2187-5626 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5684007 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; J-STAGE Freely Available Titles - English |
subjects | Nonlinear measure Original Postural stability Test-retest reliability |
title | Test-retest reliability of linear and nonlinear measures of postural stability during visual deprivation in healthy subjects |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T03%3A28%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Test-retest%20reliability%20of%20linear%20and%20nonlinear%20measures%20of%20postural%20stability%20during%20visual%20deprivation%20in%20healthy%20subjects&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Physical%20Therapy%20Science&rft.au=Ghofrani,%20Masoud&rft.aucorp=Tehran%20University%20of%20Medical%20Sciences%20and%20Health%20Services&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1766&rft.epage=1771&rft.pages=1766-1771&rft.issn=0915-5287&rft.eissn=2187-5626&rft_id=info:doi/10.1589/jpts.29.1766&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1970272586%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6206-5cdc8a278ca2c75e3bb17b48b9931364a245f6b22f7e73b832ef4aa467d28bb83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1970272586&rft_id=info:pmid/29184286&rfr_iscdi=true |