Loading…

Involvement of people with dementia in making decisions about their lives: a qualitative study that appraises shared decision-making concerning daycare

ObjectiveTo explore how people with dementia, their informal caregivers and their professionals participate in decision making about daycare and to develop a typology of participation trajectories.DesignA qualitative study with a prospective, multiperspective design, based on 244 semistructured inte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMJ open 2017-11, Vol.7 (11), p.e018337-e018337
Main Authors: Groen-van de Ven, Leontine, Smits, Carolien, de Graaff, Fuusje, Span, Marijke, Eefsting, Jan, Jukema, Jan, Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-aaf2cb373e3795f6977c68492e7445d2e978fa0d42e00b5a5ad3ba1ed313397f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-aaf2cb373e3795f6977c68492e7445d2e978fa0d42e00b5a5ad3ba1ed313397f3
container_end_page e018337
container_issue 11
container_start_page e018337
container_title BMJ open
container_volume 7
creator Groen-van de Ven, Leontine
Smits, Carolien
de Graaff, Fuusje
Span, Marijke
Eefsting, Jan
Jukema, Jan
Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra
description ObjectiveTo explore how people with dementia, their informal caregivers and their professionals participate in decision making about daycare and to develop a typology of participation trajectories.DesignA qualitative study with a prospective, multiperspective design, based on 244 semistructured interviews, conducted during three interview rounds over the course of a year. Analysis was by means of content analysis and typology construction.SettingCommunity settings and nursing homes in the Netherlands.Participants19 people with dementia, 36 of their informal caregivers and 38 of their professionals (including nurses, daycare employees and case managers).ResultsThe participants’ responses related to three critical points in the decision-making trajectory about daycare: (1) the initial positive or negative expectations of daycare; (2) negotiation about trying out daycare by promoting, resisting or attuning to others; and (3) trying daycare, which resulted in positive or negative reactions from people with dementia and led to a decision. The ways in which care networks proceeded through these three critical points resulted in a typology of participation trajectories, including (1) working together positively toward daycare, (2) bringing conflicting perspectives together toward trying daycare and (3) not reaching commitment to try daycare.ConclusionShared decision making with people with dementia is possible and requires and adapted process of decision making. Our results show that initial preferences based on information alone may change when people with dementia experience daycare. It is important to have a try-out period so that people with dementia can experience daycare without having to decide whether to continue it. Whereas shared decision making in general aims at moving from initial preferences to informed preferences, professionals should focus more on moving from initial preferences to experienced preferences for people with dementia. Professionals can play a crucial role in facilitating the possibilities for a try-out period.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018337
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5695519</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1964272046</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-aaf2cb373e3795f6977c68492e7445d2e978fa0d42e00b5a5ad3ba1ed313397f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9u1DAQxiMEolXpEyAhS1y4pPhvvOaAhCpaKlXiAmdrkky6XhI7tZ1F-yS8Lm53WRVO-GLP-DefPfNV1WtGLxgTzft22oQZfc0p0zVlKyH0s-qUUynrhir1_Mn5pDpPaUPLksooxV9WJ9wwIQQ3p9WvG78N4xYn9JmEgcwY5hHJT5fXpH_MOiDOkwl-OH9XUp1LLvhEoA1LJnmNLpLRbTF9IEDuFxhdhlxikvLS7woAmcA8R3AJE0lriNgfZeqDbBd8h9E_vgC7rjCvqhcDjAnPD_tZ9f3q87fLL_Xt1-uby0-3dSs1zzXAwLtWaIFCGzU0RuuuWUnDUUupeo5GrwagveRIaatAQS9aYNiLMgCjB3FWfdzrzks7Yd-VhiOMdo5ugrizAZz9-8a7tb0LW6uaMktmisC7g0AM9wumbCeXOhxH8BiWZJlpJNfFjKagb_9BN2GJvrRnOTVGMm3MqlBiT3UxpBRxOH6GUfvgvT14bx-8t3vvS9Wbp30ca_44XYCLPVCq_0vxN7K4vxQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2099417998</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Involvement of people with dementia in making decisions about their lives: a qualitative study that appraises shared decision-making concerning daycare</title><source>BMJ Open Access Journals</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central (PMC)</source><source>BMJ Publishing</source><creator>Groen-van de Ven, Leontine ; Smits, Carolien ; de Graaff, Fuusje ; Span, Marijke ; Eefsting, Jan ; Jukema, Jan ; Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra</creator><creatorcontrib>Groen-van de Ven, Leontine ; Smits, Carolien ; de Graaff, Fuusje ; Span, Marijke ; Eefsting, Jan ; Jukema, Jan ; Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra</creatorcontrib><description>ObjectiveTo explore how people with dementia, their informal caregivers and their professionals participate in decision making about daycare and to develop a typology of participation trajectories.DesignA qualitative study with a prospective, multiperspective design, based on 244 semistructured interviews, conducted during three interview rounds over the course of a year. Analysis was by means of content analysis and typology construction.SettingCommunity settings and nursing homes in the Netherlands.Participants19 people with dementia, 36 of their informal caregivers and 38 of their professionals (including nurses, daycare employees and case managers).ResultsThe participants’ responses related to three critical points in the decision-making trajectory about daycare: (1) the initial positive or negative expectations of daycare; (2) negotiation about trying out daycare by promoting, resisting or attuning to others; and (3) trying daycare, which resulted in positive or negative reactions from people with dementia and led to a decision. The ways in which care networks proceeded through these three critical points resulted in a typology of participation trajectories, including (1) working together positively toward daycare, (2) bringing conflicting perspectives together toward trying daycare and (3) not reaching commitment to try daycare.ConclusionShared decision making with people with dementia is possible and requires and adapted process of decision making. Our results show that initial preferences based on information alone may change when people with dementia experience daycare. It is important to have a try-out period so that people with dementia can experience daycare without having to decide whether to continue it. Whereas shared decision making in general aims at moving from initial preferences to informed preferences, professionals should focus more on moving from initial preferences to experienced preferences for people with dementia. Professionals can play a crucial role in facilitating the possibilities for a try-out period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018337</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29133329</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Caregivers ; Caregivers - psychology ; Clinical decision making ; Content analysis ; Day Care, Medical ; Decision Making ; Decision making models ; Dementia ; Dementia - nursing ; Emotions ; Female ; Health Services Research ; Homes for the Aged - organization &amp; administration ; Humans ; Institutionalization ; Interviews ; Interviews as Topic ; Male ; Netherlands ; Nursing Homes - organization &amp; administration ; Patients ; Prospective Studies ; Qualitative Research ; Social research</subject><ispartof>BMJ open, 2017-11, Vol.7 (11), p.e018337-e018337</ispartof><rights>Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.</rights><rights>2017 Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-aaf2cb373e3795f6977c68492e7445d2e978fa0d42e00b5a5ad3ba1ed313397f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-aaf2cb373e3795f6977c68492e7445d2e978fa0d42e00b5a5ad3ba1ed313397f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2099417998/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2099417998?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>112,113,230,314,727,780,784,885,3192,25751,27547,27548,27922,27923,37010,37011,44588,53789,53791,74896,77364,77365,77371,77402</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29133329$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Groen-van de Ven, Leontine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smits, Carolien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Graaff, Fuusje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Span, Marijke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eefsting, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jukema, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra</creatorcontrib><title>Involvement of people with dementia in making decisions about their lives: a qualitative study that appraises shared decision-making concerning daycare</title><title>BMJ open</title><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><description>ObjectiveTo explore how people with dementia, their informal caregivers and their professionals participate in decision making about daycare and to develop a typology of participation trajectories.DesignA qualitative study with a prospective, multiperspective design, based on 244 semistructured interviews, conducted during three interview rounds over the course of a year. Analysis was by means of content analysis and typology construction.SettingCommunity settings and nursing homes in the Netherlands.Participants19 people with dementia, 36 of their informal caregivers and 38 of their professionals (including nurses, daycare employees and case managers).ResultsThe participants’ responses related to three critical points in the decision-making trajectory about daycare: (1) the initial positive or negative expectations of daycare; (2) negotiation about trying out daycare by promoting, resisting or attuning to others; and (3) trying daycare, which resulted in positive or negative reactions from people with dementia and led to a decision. The ways in which care networks proceeded through these three critical points resulted in a typology of participation trajectories, including (1) working together positively toward daycare, (2) bringing conflicting perspectives together toward trying daycare and (3) not reaching commitment to try daycare.ConclusionShared decision making with people with dementia is possible and requires and adapted process of decision making. Our results show that initial preferences based on information alone may change when people with dementia experience daycare. It is important to have a try-out period so that people with dementia can experience daycare without having to decide whether to continue it. Whereas shared decision making in general aims at moving from initial preferences to informed preferences, professionals should focus more on moving from initial preferences to experienced preferences for people with dementia. Professionals can play a crucial role in facilitating the possibilities for a try-out period.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Caregivers - psychology</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Day Care, Medical</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Decision making models</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Dementia - nursing</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Homes for the Aged - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Institutionalization</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Nursing Homes - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Social research</subject><issn>2044-6055</issn><issn>2044-6055</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc9u1DAQxiMEolXpEyAhS1y4pPhvvOaAhCpaKlXiAmdrkky6XhI7tZ1F-yS8Lm53WRVO-GLP-DefPfNV1WtGLxgTzft22oQZfc0p0zVlKyH0s-qUUynrhir1_Mn5pDpPaUPLksooxV9WJ9wwIQQ3p9WvG78N4xYn9JmEgcwY5hHJT5fXpH_MOiDOkwl-OH9XUp1LLvhEoA1LJnmNLpLRbTF9IEDuFxhdhlxikvLS7woAmcA8R3AJE0lriNgfZeqDbBd8h9E_vgC7rjCvqhcDjAnPD_tZ9f3q87fLL_Xt1-uby0-3dSs1zzXAwLtWaIFCGzU0RuuuWUnDUUupeo5GrwagveRIaatAQS9aYNiLMgCjB3FWfdzrzks7Yd-VhiOMdo5ugrizAZz9-8a7tb0LW6uaMktmisC7g0AM9wumbCeXOhxH8BiWZJlpJNfFjKagb_9BN2GJvrRnOTVGMm3MqlBiT3UxpBRxOH6GUfvgvT14bx-8t3vvS9Wbp30ca_44XYCLPVCq_0vxN7K4vxQ</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>Groen-van de Ven, Leontine</creator><creator>Smits, Carolien</creator><creator>de Graaff, Fuusje</creator><creator>Span, Marijke</creator><creator>Eefsting, Jan</creator><creator>Jukema, Jan</creator><creator>Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>Involvement of people with dementia in making decisions about their lives: a qualitative study that appraises shared decision-making concerning daycare</title><author>Groen-van de Ven, Leontine ; Smits, Carolien ; de Graaff, Fuusje ; Span, Marijke ; Eefsting, Jan ; Jukema, Jan ; Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-aaf2cb373e3795f6977c68492e7445d2e978fa0d42e00b5a5ad3ba1ed313397f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Caregivers - psychology</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Day Care, Medical</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Decision making models</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Dementia - nursing</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Homes for the Aged - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Institutionalization</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Nursing Homes - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Social research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Groen-van de Ven, Leontine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smits, Carolien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Graaff, Fuusje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Span, Marijke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eefsting, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jukema, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health &amp; Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Groen-van de Ven, Leontine</au><au>Smits, Carolien</au><au>de Graaff, Fuusje</au><au>Span, Marijke</au><au>Eefsting, Jan</au><au>Jukema, Jan</au><au>Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Involvement of people with dementia in making decisions about their lives: a qualitative study that appraises shared decision-making concerning daycare</atitle><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e018337</spage><epage>e018337</epage><pages>e018337-e018337</pages><issn>2044-6055</issn><eissn>2044-6055</eissn><abstract>ObjectiveTo explore how people with dementia, their informal caregivers and their professionals participate in decision making about daycare and to develop a typology of participation trajectories.DesignA qualitative study with a prospective, multiperspective design, based on 244 semistructured interviews, conducted during three interview rounds over the course of a year. Analysis was by means of content analysis and typology construction.SettingCommunity settings and nursing homes in the Netherlands.Participants19 people with dementia, 36 of their informal caregivers and 38 of their professionals (including nurses, daycare employees and case managers).ResultsThe participants’ responses related to three critical points in the decision-making trajectory about daycare: (1) the initial positive or negative expectations of daycare; (2) negotiation about trying out daycare by promoting, resisting or attuning to others; and (3) trying daycare, which resulted in positive or negative reactions from people with dementia and led to a decision. The ways in which care networks proceeded through these three critical points resulted in a typology of participation trajectories, including (1) working together positively toward daycare, (2) bringing conflicting perspectives together toward trying daycare and (3) not reaching commitment to try daycare.ConclusionShared decision making with people with dementia is possible and requires and adapted process of decision making. Our results show that initial preferences based on information alone may change when people with dementia experience daycare. It is important to have a try-out period so that people with dementia can experience daycare without having to decide whether to continue it. Whereas shared decision making in general aims at moving from initial preferences to informed preferences, professionals should focus more on moving from initial preferences to experienced preferences for people with dementia. Professionals can play a crucial role in facilitating the possibilities for a try-out period.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>29133329</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018337</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2044-6055
ispartof BMJ open, 2017-11, Vol.7 (11), p.e018337-e018337
issn 2044-6055
2044-6055
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5695519
source BMJ Open Access Journals; Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central (PMC); BMJ Publishing
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Caregivers
Caregivers - psychology
Clinical decision making
Content analysis
Day Care, Medical
Decision Making
Decision making models
Dementia
Dementia - nursing
Emotions
Female
Health Services Research
Homes for the Aged - organization & administration
Humans
Institutionalization
Interviews
Interviews as Topic
Male
Netherlands
Nursing Homes - organization & administration
Patients
Prospective Studies
Qualitative Research
Social research
title Involvement of people with dementia in making decisions about their lives: a qualitative study that appraises shared decision-making concerning daycare
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T12%3A08%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Involvement%20of%20people%20with%20dementia%20in%20making%20decisions%20about%20their%20lives:%20a%20qualitative%20study%20that%20appraises%20shared%20decision-making%20concerning%20daycare&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20open&rft.au=Groen-van%20de%20Ven,%20Leontine&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e018337&rft.epage=e018337&rft.pages=e018337-e018337&rft.issn=2044-6055&rft.eissn=2044-6055&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018337&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1964272046%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-aaf2cb373e3795f6977c68492e7445d2e978fa0d42e00b5a5ad3ba1ed313397f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2099417998&rft_id=info:pmid/29133329&rfr_iscdi=true