Loading…

Administration of fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line compared with rapid bolus alleviates fentanyl-induced cough during general anesthesia induction

Objective Fentanyl-induced cough (FIC) is a common complication with a reported incidence from 18.0% to 74.4% during general anesthesia induction. FIC increases the intrathoracic pressure and risks of postoperative nausea and vomiting, yet available treatments are limited. This study was designed to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Zhejiang University. B. Science 2017-11, Vol.18 (11), p.955-962
Main Authors: Liu, Min-qiang, Li, Feng-xian, Han, Ya-kun, He, Jun-yong, Shi, Hao-wen, Liu, Li, He, Ren-liang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-50b0a9a9a6d21ec10c54aaf33fae383b53d444672cbcf70d71a6f7a76e950acb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-50b0a9a9a6d21ec10c54aaf33fae383b53d444672cbcf70d71a6f7a76e950acb3
container_end_page 962
container_issue 11
container_start_page 955
container_title Journal of Zhejiang University. B. Science
container_volume 18
creator Liu, Min-qiang
Li, Feng-xian
Han, Ya-kun
He, Jun-yong
Shi, Hao-wen
Liu, Li
He, Ren-liang
description Objective Fentanyl-induced cough (FIC) is a common complication with a reported incidence from 18.0% to 74.4% during general anesthesia induction. FIC increases the intrathoracic pressure and risks of postoperative nausea and vomiting, yet available treatments are limited. This study was designed to investigate whether administering fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line can effectively alleviate FIC during induction of total intravenous general anesthesia. Methods A total number of 1200 patients, aged 18–64 years, were enrolled, all of whom were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I or II undergoing scheduled surgeries. All patients received total intravenous general anesthesia, which was induced sequentially by midazolam, fentanyl, propofol, and cisatracurium injection. Patients were randomly assigned to receive fentanyl 3.5 μg/kg via direct injection (control group) or via a slow intravenous fluid line. FIC incidence and the severity grades were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney test. Other adverse reactions, such as hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, tachycardia, hypoxemia, vomiting, and aspiration, during induction were also observed. The online clinical registration number of this study was ChiCTR-IOR-16009025. Results Compared with the control group, the incidence of FIC was significantly lower in the slow intravenous fluid line group during induction (9.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.7%–11.4% vs. 55.9%, 95% CI: 51.8%–60.0%, P =0.000), as were the severity grades ( P =0.000). There were no statistical differences between the two groups with regard to other adverse reactions ( P >0.05). Conclusions The administration of fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line can alleviate FIC and its severity during induction for total intravenous general anesthesia. This method is simple, safe, and reliable, and deserves clinical expansion.
doi_str_mv 10.1631/jzus.B1600442
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5696314</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2008015091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-50b0a9a9a6d21ec10c54aaf33fae383b53d444672cbcf70d71a6f7a76e950acb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkUtv1DAUhSMEoqWwZIsssWGTwTd-JNkglYqXVIkNrC3HuZnxyLGDnUxVfgs_Fodph4eQF7Z0P597zz1F8RzoBiSD1_vvS9q8BUkp59WD4hwaWZVQN-xhfsualSAaOCuepLRfEVrLx8VZ1QK0NWPnxY_LfrTepjnq2QZPwkAG9LP2t44crCaaJBduiPUZOKAPSyKDW2xPnPVITBgnHbEnN3bekainXOiCy5B2DvP_GdNJr7S-X0yGTVi2O9Iv0fot2aLHqB3RHtO8w5R7_uLWaZ4WjwbtEj67uy-Kr-_ffbn6WF5__vDp6vK6NJzDXAraUd3mI_sK0AA1gms9MDZoZA3rBOs557KuTGeGmvY1aDnUupbYCqpNxy6KN0fdaelG7A2ubp2aoh11vFVBW_V3xdud2oaDErLNGfAs8OpOIIZvSzaiRpsMOpdd5ZUpaGXFKwFCZPTlP-g-LNFne6qitKEgaAuZKo-UiSGliMNpGKBqzV2tuav73DP_4k8HJ_o-6AxsjkCa1rVj_N32_4o_AbU1vpU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2008015091</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Administration of fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line compared with rapid bolus alleviates fentanyl-induced cough during general anesthesia induction</title><source>Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access)</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Liu, Min-qiang ; Li, Feng-xian ; Han, Ya-kun ; He, Jun-yong ; Shi, Hao-wen ; Liu, Li ; He, Ren-liang</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Min-qiang ; Li, Feng-xian ; Han, Ya-kun ; He, Jun-yong ; Shi, Hao-wen ; Liu, Li ; He, Ren-liang</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Fentanyl-induced cough (FIC) is a common complication with a reported incidence from 18.0% to 74.4% during general anesthesia induction. FIC increases the intrathoracic pressure and risks of postoperative nausea and vomiting, yet available treatments are limited. This study was designed to investigate whether administering fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line can effectively alleviate FIC during induction of total intravenous general anesthesia. Methods A total number of 1200 patients, aged 18–64 years, were enrolled, all of whom were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I or II undergoing scheduled surgeries. All patients received total intravenous general anesthesia, which was induced sequentially by midazolam, fentanyl, propofol, and cisatracurium injection. Patients were randomly assigned to receive fentanyl 3.5 μg/kg via direct injection (control group) or via a slow intravenous fluid line. FIC incidence and the severity grades were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney test. Other adverse reactions, such as hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, tachycardia, hypoxemia, vomiting, and aspiration, during induction were also observed. The online clinical registration number of this study was ChiCTR-IOR-16009025. Results Compared with the control group, the incidence of FIC was significantly lower in the slow intravenous fluid line group during induction (9.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.7%–11.4% vs. 55.9%, 95% CI: 51.8%–60.0%, P =0.000), as were the severity grades ( P =0.000). There were no statistical differences between the two groups with regard to other adverse reactions ( P &gt;0.05). Conclusions The administration of fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line can alleviate FIC and its severity during induction for total intravenous general anesthesia. This method is simple, safe, and reliable, and deserves clinical expansion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1673-1581</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1862-1783</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B1600442</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29119733</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Bradycardia ; Confidence intervals ; Cough ; Drug delivery systems ; Fentanyl ; Hypertension ; Hypotension ; Hypoxemia ; Incidence ; Injection ; Intravenous administration ; Midazolam ; Nausea ; Patients ; Propofol ; Side effects ; Statistical analysis ; Tachycardia ; Vomiting</subject><ispartof>Journal of Zhejiang University. B. Science, 2017-11, Vol.18 (11), p.955-962</ispartof><rights>Zhejiang University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017</rights><rights>Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © Zhejiang University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-50b0a9a9a6d21ec10c54aaf33fae383b53d444672cbcf70d71a6f7a76e950acb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-50b0a9a9a6d21ec10c54aaf33fae383b53d444672cbcf70d71a6f7a76e950acb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0048-2164</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5696314/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5696314/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29119733$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Min-qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Feng-xian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Ya-kun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Jun-yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Hao-wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Ren-liang</creatorcontrib><title>Administration of fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line compared with rapid bolus alleviates fentanyl-induced cough during general anesthesia induction</title><title>Journal of Zhejiang University. B. Science</title><addtitle>J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B</addtitle><addtitle>J Zhejiang Univ Sci B</addtitle><description>Objective Fentanyl-induced cough (FIC) is a common complication with a reported incidence from 18.0% to 74.4% during general anesthesia induction. FIC increases the intrathoracic pressure and risks of postoperative nausea and vomiting, yet available treatments are limited. This study was designed to investigate whether administering fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line can effectively alleviate FIC during induction of total intravenous general anesthesia. Methods A total number of 1200 patients, aged 18–64 years, were enrolled, all of whom were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I or II undergoing scheduled surgeries. All patients received total intravenous general anesthesia, which was induced sequentially by midazolam, fentanyl, propofol, and cisatracurium injection. Patients were randomly assigned to receive fentanyl 3.5 μg/kg via direct injection (control group) or via a slow intravenous fluid line. FIC incidence and the severity grades were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney test. Other adverse reactions, such as hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, tachycardia, hypoxemia, vomiting, and aspiration, during induction were also observed. The online clinical registration number of this study was ChiCTR-IOR-16009025. Results Compared with the control group, the incidence of FIC was significantly lower in the slow intravenous fluid line group during induction (9.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.7%–11.4% vs. 55.9%, 95% CI: 51.8%–60.0%, P =0.000), as were the severity grades ( P =0.000). There were no statistical differences between the two groups with regard to other adverse reactions ( P &gt;0.05). Conclusions The administration of fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line can alleviate FIC and its severity during induction for total intravenous general anesthesia. This method is simple, safe, and reliable, and deserves clinical expansion.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Bradycardia</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Cough</subject><subject>Drug delivery systems</subject><subject>Fentanyl</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Hypotension</subject><subject>Hypoxemia</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>Intravenous administration</subject><subject>Midazolam</subject><subject>Nausea</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Propofol</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Tachycardia</subject><subject>Vomiting</subject><issn>1673-1581</issn><issn>1862-1783</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkUtv1DAUhSMEoqWwZIsssWGTwTd-JNkglYqXVIkNrC3HuZnxyLGDnUxVfgs_Fodph4eQF7Z0P597zz1F8RzoBiSD1_vvS9q8BUkp59WD4hwaWZVQN-xhfsualSAaOCuepLRfEVrLx8VZ1QK0NWPnxY_LfrTepjnq2QZPwkAG9LP2t44crCaaJBduiPUZOKAPSyKDW2xPnPVITBgnHbEnN3bekainXOiCy5B2DvP_GdNJr7S-X0yGTVi2O9Iv0fot2aLHqB3RHtO8w5R7_uLWaZ4WjwbtEj67uy-Kr-_ffbn6WF5__vDp6vK6NJzDXAraUd3mI_sK0AA1gms9MDZoZA3rBOs557KuTGeGmvY1aDnUupbYCqpNxy6KN0fdaelG7A2ubp2aoh11vFVBW_V3xdud2oaDErLNGfAs8OpOIIZvSzaiRpsMOpdd5ZUpaGXFKwFCZPTlP-g-LNFne6qitKEgaAuZKo-UiSGliMNpGKBqzV2tuav73DP_4k8HJ_o-6AxsjkCa1rVj_N32_4o_AbU1vpU</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>Liu, Min-qiang</creator><creator>Li, Feng-xian</creator><creator>Han, Ya-kun</creator><creator>He, Jun-yong</creator><creator>Shi, Hao-wen</creator><creator>Liu, Li</creator><creator>He, Ren-liang</creator><general>Zhejiang University Press</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0048-2164</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>Administration of fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line compared with rapid bolus alleviates fentanyl-induced cough during general anesthesia induction</title><author>Liu, Min-qiang ; Li, Feng-xian ; Han, Ya-kun ; He, Jun-yong ; Shi, Hao-wen ; Liu, Li ; He, Ren-liang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-50b0a9a9a6d21ec10c54aaf33fae383b53d444672cbcf70d71a6f7a76e950acb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Bradycardia</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Cough</topic><topic>Drug delivery systems</topic><topic>Fentanyl</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Hypotension</topic><topic>Hypoxemia</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>Intravenous administration</topic><topic>Midazolam</topic><topic>Nausea</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Propofol</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Tachycardia</topic><topic>Vomiting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Min-qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Feng-xian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Ya-kun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Jun-yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Hao-wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Ren-liang</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Zhejiang University. B. Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Min-qiang</au><au>Li, Feng-xian</au><au>Han, Ya-kun</au><au>He, Jun-yong</au><au>Shi, Hao-wen</au><au>Liu, Li</au><au>He, Ren-liang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Administration of fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line compared with rapid bolus alleviates fentanyl-induced cough during general anesthesia induction</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Zhejiang University. B. Science</jtitle><stitle>J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B</stitle><addtitle>J Zhejiang Univ Sci B</addtitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>955</spage><epage>962</epage><pages>955-962</pages><issn>1673-1581</issn><eissn>1862-1783</eissn><abstract>Objective Fentanyl-induced cough (FIC) is a common complication with a reported incidence from 18.0% to 74.4% during general anesthesia induction. FIC increases the intrathoracic pressure and risks of postoperative nausea and vomiting, yet available treatments are limited. This study was designed to investigate whether administering fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line can effectively alleviate FIC during induction of total intravenous general anesthesia. Methods A total number of 1200 patients, aged 18–64 years, were enrolled, all of whom were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I or II undergoing scheduled surgeries. All patients received total intravenous general anesthesia, which was induced sequentially by midazolam, fentanyl, propofol, and cisatracurium injection. Patients were randomly assigned to receive fentanyl 3.5 μg/kg via direct injection (control group) or via a slow intravenous fluid line. FIC incidence and the severity grades were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney test. Other adverse reactions, such as hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, tachycardia, hypoxemia, vomiting, and aspiration, during induction were also observed. The online clinical registration number of this study was ChiCTR-IOR-16009025. Results Compared with the control group, the incidence of FIC was significantly lower in the slow intravenous fluid line group during induction (9.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.7%–11.4% vs. 55.9%, 95% CI: 51.8%–60.0%, P =0.000), as were the severity grades ( P =0.000). There were no statistical differences between the two groups with regard to other adverse reactions ( P &gt;0.05). Conclusions The administration of fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line can alleviate FIC and its severity during induction for total intravenous general anesthesia. This method is simple, safe, and reliable, and deserves clinical expansion.</abstract><cop>Hangzhou</cop><pub>Zhejiang University Press</pub><pmid>29119733</pmid><doi>10.1631/jzus.B1600442</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0048-2164</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1673-1581
ispartof Journal of Zhejiang University. B. Science, 2017-11, Vol.18 (11), p.955-962
issn 1673-1581
1862-1783
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5696314
source Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access); Springer Nature; PubMed Central
subjects Anesthesia
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Bradycardia
Confidence intervals
Cough
Drug delivery systems
Fentanyl
Hypertension
Hypotension
Hypoxemia
Incidence
Injection
Intravenous administration
Midazolam
Nausea
Patients
Propofol
Side effects
Statistical analysis
Tachycardia
Vomiting
title Administration of fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line compared with rapid bolus alleviates fentanyl-induced cough during general anesthesia induction
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T21%3A05%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Administration%20of%20fentanyl%20via%20a%20slow%20intravenous%20fluid%20line%20compared%20with%20rapid%20bolus%20alleviates%20fentanyl-induced%20cough%20during%20general%20anesthesia%20induction&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Zhejiang%20University.%20B.%20Science&rft.au=Liu,%20Min-qiang&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=955&rft.epage=962&rft.pages=955-962&rft.issn=1673-1581&rft.eissn=1862-1783&rft_id=info:doi/10.1631/jzus.B1600442&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2008015091%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-50b0a9a9a6d21ec10c54aaf33fae383b53d444672cbcf70d71a6f7a76e950acb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2008015091&rft_id=info:pmid/29119733&rfr_iscdi=true