Loading…
Administration of fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line compared with rapid bolus alleviates fentanyl-induced cough during general anesthesia induction
Objective Fentanyl-induced cough (FIC) is a common complication with a reported incidence from 18.0% to 74.4% during general anesthesia induction. FIC increases the intrathoracic pressure and risks of postoperative nausea and vomiting, yet available treatments are limited. This study was designed to...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of Zhejiang University. B. Science 2017-11, Vol.18 (11), p.955-962 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-50b0a9a9a6d21ec10c54aaf33fae383b53d444672cbcf70d71a6f7a76e950acb3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-50b0a9a9a6d21ec10c54aaf33fae383b53d444672cbcf70d71a6f7a76e950acb3 |
container_end_page | 962 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 955 |
container_title | Journal of Zhejiang University. B. Science |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Liu, Min-qiang Li, Feng-xian Han, Ya-kun He, Jun-yong Shi, Hao-wen Liu, Li He, Ren-liang |
description | Objective
Fentanyl-induced cough (FIC) is a common complication with a reported incidence from 18.0% to 74.4% during general anesthesia induction. FIC increases the intrathoracic pressure and risks of postoperative nausea and vomiting, yet available treatments are limited. This study was designed to investigate whether administering fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line can effectively alleviate FIC during induction of total intravenous general anesthesia.
Methods
A total number of 1200 patients, aged 18–64 years, were enrolled, all of whom were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I or II undergoing scheduled surgeries. All patients received total intravenous general anesthesia, which was induced sequentially by midazolam, fentanyl, propofol, and cisatracurium injection. Patients were randomly assigned to receive fentanyl 3.5 μg/kg via direct injection (control group) or via a slow intravenous fluid line. FIC incidence and the severity grades were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney test. Other adverse reactions, such as hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, tachycardia, hypoxemia, vomiting, and aspiration, during induction were also observed. The online clinical registration number of this study was ChiCTR-IOR-16009025.
Results
Compared with the control group, the incidence of FIC was significantly lower in the slow intravenous fluid line group during induction (9.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.7%–11.4% vs. 55.9%, 95% CI: 51.8%–60.0%,
P
=0.000), as were the severity grades (
P
=0.000). There were no statistical differences between the two groups with regard to other adverse reactions (
P
>0.05).
Conclusions
The administration of fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line can alleviate FIC and its severity during induction for total intravenous general anesthesia. This method is simple, safe, and reliable, and deserves clinical expansion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1631/jzus.B1600442 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5696314</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2008015091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-50b0a9a9a6d21ec10c54aaf33fae383b53d444672cbcf70d71a6f7a76e950acb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkUtv1DAUhSMEoqWwZIsssWGTwTd-JNkglYqXVIkNrC3HuZnxyLGDnUxVfgs_Fodph4eQF7Z0P597zz1F8RzoBiSD1_vvS9q8BUkp59WD4hwaWZVQN-xhfsualSAaOCuepLRfEVrLx8VZ1QK0NWPnxY_LfrTepjnq2QZPwkAG9LP2t44crCaaJBduiPUZOKAPSyKDW2xPnPVITBgnHbEnN3bekainXOiCy5B2DvP_GdNJr7S-X0yGTVi2O9Iv0fot2aLHqB3RHtO8w5R7_uLWaZ4WjwbtEj67uy-Kr-_ffbn6WF5__vDp6vK6NJzDXAraUd3mI_sK0AA1gms9MDZoZA3rBOs557KuTGeGmvY1aDnUupbYCqpNxy6KN0fdaelG7A2ubp2aoh11vFVBW_V3xdud2oaDErLNGfAs8OpOIIZvSzaiRpsMOpdd5ZUpaGXFKwFCZPTlP-g-LNFne6qitKEgaAuZKo-UiSGliMNpGKBqzV2tuav73DP_4k8HJ_o-6AxsjkCa1rVj_N32_4o_AbU1vpU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2008015091</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Administration of fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line compared with rapid bolus alleviates fentanyl-induced cough during general anesthesia induction</title><source>Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access)</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Liu, Min-qiang ; Li, Feng-xian ; Han, Ya-kun ; He, Jun-yong ; Shi, Hao-wen ; Liu, Li ; He, Ren-liang</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Min-qiang ; Li, Feng-xian ; Han, Ya-kun ; He, Jun-yong ; Shi, Hao-wen ; Liu, Li ; He, Ren-liang</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
Fentanyl-induced cough (FIC) is a common complication with a reported incidence from 18.0% to 74.4% during general anesthesia induction. FIC increases the intrathoracic pressure and risks of postoperative nausea and vomiting, yet available treatments are limited. This study was designed to investigate whether administering fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line can effectively alleviate FIC during induction of total intravenous general anesthesia.
Methods
A total number of 1200 patients, aged 18–64 years, were enrolled, all of whom were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I or II undergoing scheduled surgeries. All patients received total intravenous general anesthesia, which was induced sequentially by midazolam, fentanyl, propofol, and cisatracurium injection. Patients were randomly assigned to receive fentanyl 3.5 μg/kg via direct injection (control group) or via a slow intravenous fluid line. FIC incidence and the severity grades were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney test. Other adverse reactions, such as hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, tachycardia, hypoxemia, vomiting, and aspiration, during induction were also observed. The online clinical registration number of this study was ChiCTR-IOR-16009025.
Results
Compared with the control group, the incidence of FIC was significantly lower in the slow intravenous fluid line group during induction (9.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.7%–11.4% vs. 55.9%, 95% CI: 51.8%–60.0%,
P
=0.000), as were the severity grades (
P
=0.000). There were no statistical differences between the two groups with regard to other adverse reactions (
P
>0.05).
Conclusions
The administration of fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line can alleviate FIC and its severity during induction for total intravenous general anesthesia. This method is simple, safe, and reliable, and deserves clinical expansion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1673-1581</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1862-1783</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B1600442</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29119733</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Bradycardia ; Confidence intervals ; Cough ; Drug delivery systems ; Fentanyl ; Hypertension ; Hypotension ; Hypoxemia ; Incidence ; Injection ; Intravenous administration ; Midazolam ; Nausea ; Patients ; Propofol ; Side effects ; Statistical analysis ; Tachycardia ; Vomiting</subject><ispartof>Journal of Zhejiang University. B. Science, 2017-11, Vol.18 (11), p.955-962</ispartof><rights>Zhejiang University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017</rights><rights>Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © Zhejiang University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-50b0a9a9a6d21ec10c54aaf33fae383b53d444672cbcf70d71a6f7a76e950acb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-50b0a9a9a6d21ec10c54aaf33fae383b53d444672cbcf70d71a6f7a76e950acb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0048-2164</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5696314/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5696314/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29119733$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Min-qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Feng-xian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Ya-kun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Jun-yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Hao-wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Ren-liang</creatorcontrib><title>Administration of fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line compared with rapid bolus alleviates fentanyl-induced cough during general anesthesia induction</title><title>Journal of Zhejiang University. B. Science</title><addtitle>J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B</addtitle><addtitle>J Zhejiang Univ Sci B</addtitle><description>Objective
Fentanyl-induced cough (FIC) is a common complication with a reported incidence from 18.0% to 74.4% during general anesthesia induction. FIC increases the intrathoracic pressure and risks of postoperative nausea and vomiting, yet available treatments are limited. This study was designed to investigate whether administering fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line can effectively alleviate FIC during induction of total intravenous general anesthesia.
Methods
A total number of 1200 patients, aged 18–64 years, were enrolled, all of whom were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I or II undergoing scheduled surgeries. All patients received total intravenous general anesthesia, which was induced sequentially by midazolam, fentanyl, propofol, and cisatracurium injection. Patients were randomly assigned to receive fentanyl 3.5 μg/kg via direct injection (control group) or via a slow intravenous fluid line. FIC incidence and the severity grades were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney test. Other adverse reactions, such as hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, tachycardia, hypoxemia, vomiting, and aspiration, during induction were also observed. The online clinical registration number of this study was ChiCTR-IOR-16009025.
Results
Compared with the control group, the incidence of FIC was significantly lower in the slow intravenous fluid line group during induction (9.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.7%–11.4% vs. 55.9%, 95% CI: 51.8%–60.0%,
P
=0.000), as were the severity grades (
P
=0.000). There were no statistical differences between the two groups with regard to other adverse reactions (
P
>0.05).
Conclusions
The administration of fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line can alleviate FIC and its severity during induction for total intravenous general anesthesia. This method is simple, safe, and reliable, and deserves clinical expansion.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Bradycardia</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Cough</subject><subject>Drug delivery systems</subject><subject>Fentanyl</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Hypotension</subject><subject>Hypoxemia</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>Intravenous administration</subject><subject>Midazolam</subject><subject>Nausea</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Propofol</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Tachycardia</subject><subject>Vomiting</subject><issn>1673-1581</issn><issn>1862-1783</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkUtv1DAUhSMEoqWwZIsssWGTwTd-JNkglYqXVIkNrC3HuZnxyLGDnUxVfgs_Fodph4eQF7Z0P597zz1F8RzoBiSD1_vvS9q8BUkp59WD4hwaWZVQN-xhfsualSAaOCuepLRfEVrLx8VZ1QK0NWPnxY_LfrTepjnq2QZPwkAG9LP2t44crCaaJBduiPUZOKAPSyKDW2xPnPVITBgnHbEnN3bekainXOiCy5B2DvP_GdNJr7S-X0yGTVi2O9Iv0fot2aLHqB3RHtO8w5R7_uLWaZ4WjwbtEj67uy-Kr-_ffbn6WF5__vDp6vK6NJzDXAraUd3mI_sK0AA1gms9MDZoZA3rBOs557KuTGeGmvY1aDnUupbYCqpNxy6KN0fdaelG7A2ubp2aoh11vFVBW_V3xdud2oaDErLNGfAs8OpOIIZvSzaiRpsMOpdd5ZUpaGXFKwFCZPTlP-g-LNFne6qitKEgaAuZKo-UiSGliMNpGKBqzV2tuav73DP_4k8HJ_o-6AxsjkCa1rVj_N32_4o_AbU1vpU</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>Liu, Min-qiang</creator><creator>Li, Feng-xian</creator><creator>Han, Ya-kun</creator><creator>He, Jun-yong</creator><creator>Shi, Hao-wen</creator><creator>Liu, Li</creator><creator>He, Ren-liang</creator><general>Zhejiang University Press</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0048-2164</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>Administration of fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line compared with rapid bolus alleviates fentanyl-induced cough during general anesthesia induction</title><author>Liu, Min-qiang ; Li, Feng-xian ; Han, Ya-kun ; He, Jun-yong ; Shi, Hao-wen ; Liu, Li ; He, Ren-liang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-50b0a9a9a6d21ec10c54aaf33fae383b53d444672cbcf70d71a6f7a76e950acb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Bradycardia</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Cough</topic><topic>Drug delivery systems</topic><topic>Fentanyl</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Hypotension</topic><topic>Hypoxemia</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>Intravenous administration</topic><topic>Midazolam</topic><topic>Nausea</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Propofol</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Tachycardia</topic><topic>Vomiting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Min-qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Feng-xian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Ya-kun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Jun-yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Hao-wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Ren-liang</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Zhejiang University. B. Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Min-qiang</au><au>Li, Feng-xian</au><au>Han, Ya-kun</au><au>He, Jun-yong</au><au>Shi, Hao-wen</au><au>Liu, Li</au><au>He, Ren-liang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Administration of fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line compared with rapid bolus alleviates fentanyl-induced cough during general anesthesia induction</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Zhejiang University. B. Science</jtitle><stitle>J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B</stitle><addtitle>J Zhejiang Univ Sci B</addtitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>955</spage><epage>962</epage><pages>955-962</pages><issn>1673-1581</issn><eissn>1862-1783</eissn><abstract>Objective
Fentanyl-induced cough (FIC) is a common complication with a reported incidence from 18.0% to 74.4% during general anesthesia induction. FIC increases the intrathoracic pressure and risks of postoperative nausea and vomiting, yet available treatments are limited. This study was designed to investigate whether administering fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line can effectively alleviate FIC during induction of total intravenous general anesthesia.
Methods
A total number of 1200 patients, aged 18–64 years, were enrolled, all of whom were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I or II undergoing scheduled surgeries. All patients received total intravenous general anesthesia, which was induced sequentially by midazolam, fentanyl, propofol, and cisatracurium injection. Patients were randomly assigned to receive fentanyl 3.5 μg/kg via direct injection (control group) or via a slow intravenous fluid line. FIC incidence and the severity grades were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney test. Other adverse reactions, such as hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, tachycardia, hypoxemia, vomiting, and aspiration, during induction were also observed. The online clinical registration number of this study was ChiCTR-IOR-16009025.
Results
Compared with the control group, the incidence of FIC was significantly lower in the slow intravenous fluid line group during induction (9.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.7%–11.4% vs. 55.9%, 95% CI: 51.8%–60.0%,
P
=0.000), as were the severity grades (
P
=0.000). There were no statistical differences between the two groups with regard to other adverse reactions (
P
>0.05).
Conclusions
The administration of fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line can alleviate FIC and its severity during induction for total intravenous general anesthesia. This method is simple, safe, and reliable, and deserves clinical expansion.</abstract><cop>Hangzhou</cop><pub>Zhejiang University Press</pub><pmid>29119733</pmid><doi>10.1631/jzus.B1600442</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0048-2164</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1673-1581 |
ispartof | Journal of Zhejiang University. B. Science, 2017-11, Vol.18 (11), p.955-962 |
issn | 1673-1581 1862-1783 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5696314 |
source | Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access); Springer Nature; PubMed Central |
subjects | Anesthesia Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Bradycardia Confidence intervals Cough Drug delivery systems Fentanyl Hypertension Hypotension Hypoxemia Incidence Injection Intravenous administration Midazolam Nausea Patients Propofol Side effects Statistical analysis Tachycardia Vomiting |
title | Administration of fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line compared with rapid bolus alleviates fentanyl-induced cough during general anesthesia induction |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T21%3A05%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Administration%20of%20fentanyl%20via%20a%20slow%20intravenous%20fluid%20line%20compared%20with%20rapid%20bolus%20alleviates%20fentanyl-induced%20cough%20during%20general%20anesthesia%20induction&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Zhejiang%20University.%20B.%20Science&rft.au=Liu,%20Min-qiang&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=955&rft.epage=962&rft.pages=955-962&rft.issn=1673-1581&rft.eissn=1862-1783&rft_id=info:doi/10.1631/jzus.B1600442&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2008015091%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-50b0a9a9a6d21ec10c54aaf33fae383b53d444672cbcf70d71a6f7a76e950acb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2008015091&rft_id=info:pmid/29119733&rfr_iscdi=true |