Loading…
An evaluation of progression free survival and overall survival of ovarian cancer patients with clear cell carcinoma versus serous carcinoma treated with platinum therapy: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group experience
•In early stage patients, PFS was better for OCCC than for SOC.•In late-stage patients, OCCC was significantly associated with decreased OS.•Treatment effect was influenced by histology. We examined disparities in prognosis between patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) and serous epithel...
Saved in:
Published in: | Gynecologic oncology 2017-11, Vol.147 (2), p.243-249 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •In early stage patients, PFS was better for OCCC than for SOC.•In late-stage patients, OCCC was significantly associated with decreased OS.•Treatment effect was influenced by histology.
We examined disparities in prognosis between patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) and serous epithelial ovarian cancer (SOC).
We reviewed data from FIGO stage I–IV epithelial ovarian cancer patients who participated in 12 prospective randomized GOG protocols. Proportional hazards models were used to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by cell type (clear cell versus serous).
There were 10,803 patients enrolled, 9531 were eligible, evaluable and treated with platinum, of whom 544 (6%) had OCCC, 7054 (74%) had SOC, and 1933 (20%) had other histologies and are not included further. In early stage (I–II) patients, PFS was significantly better in OCCC than in SOC patients. For late stage (III, IV) patients, OCCC had worse PFS and OS compared to SOC, OS HR=1.66 (1.43, 1.91; p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0090-8258 1095-6859 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.08.004 |