Loading…
Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia
We have previously reported our successful approach for percutaneous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) lead extraction using inexpensive tools, which we have continued over the years. Herein we report the results of the systematic use of a unique stylet, the lead-locking device (LLD), whi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Anatolian journal of cardiology 2017-10, Vol.18 (4), p.289-295 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-f35dd3ab9cb7881abad69c3e2be6ef36ee685548a7650bf9c8fbbe99d1bbcea33 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 295 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 289 |
container_title | Anatolian journal of cardiology |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Manolis, Antonis S Georgiopoulos, Georgios Metaxa, Sofia Koulouris, Spyridon Tsiachris, Dimitris |
description | We have previously reported our successful approach for percutaneous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) lead extraction using inexpensive tools, which we have continued over the years. Herein we report the results of the systematic use of a unique stylet, the lead-locking device (LLD), which securely locks the entire lead lumen, aided with non-powered telescoping sheaths in 54 patients to extract 98 CIED leads.
This prospective observational clinical study included 38 men and 16 women aged 68.9±13.1 years undergoing lead extraction for device infection (n=46), lead malfunction (n=5), or prior to defibrillator implant (n=3). Leads were in place for 6.7±4.3 years. Infections were more commonly due to Staphylococcus species (n=40). There were 78 pacing (31 ventricular, 37 atrial, 4 VDD, and 6 coronary sinus leads) and 20 defibrillating leads.
Using simple traction (6 leads) and the LLD stylets (92 leads) aided with telescoping sheaths (15 patients), 96 (98%) leads in 52 (96.3%) patients were successfully removed, with all but one leads removed using a subclavian approach; in 1 patient, the right femoral approach was also required. In 2 patients, distal fragments from one ventricular pacing and one defibrillating lead could not be removed. Finally, lead removal was completely (52/54) (96.3%) or partially (2/54) (3.7%) successful in 54 patients for 96 of 98 leads (98%) without major complications.
Percutaneous lead extraction can be successful with mechanical tools using the LLD locking stylet aided with non-powered telescoping sheaths through a simplified, safe, and inexpensive procedure using local anesthesia. |
doi_str_mv | 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2017.7821 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5731525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2021751742</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-f35dd3ab9cb7881abad69c3e2be6ef36ee685548a7650bf9c8fbbe99d1bbcea33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUk1v1DAQjRCIVqV_ARlx4UCW2M6XOSBVK6BFlbjA2Ro7k65bxw6xs21_FX8RZ3dZUWTJHo_fvJlnvSx7Q4sVLZuy_HDhIHr7bQ1TZ7xdsYI2q6Zl9Fl2ymgpcsYa-vwY1_wkOw_htigSjreU1i-zE9amgAt6mv3e0YAmZhgtuAjKIkGLOk7eGU063BqNxCJ0BB_iBDoa78gcjLshcbN_ya3Xd0vigA6PIeLwkdwhjkvaRBIWfnxPAvRpB9cR4_BhRBfMFsm9iRsyoN5A6gmWRO9t2KESc7qDw5CaBQOvshc92IDnh_Ms-_nl84_1ZX79_evV-uI612VFY97zqus4KKFVk7SCgq4WmiNTWGPPa8S6raqyhaauCtUL3fZKoRAdVUojcH6WfdrzjrMasNPoknYrx8kMMD1KD0Y-fXFmI2_8VlYNpxWrEsG7A8Hkf81pfDmYoNGmT0Y_B0kFE21avE3Qt_9Bb_08uSRPsoLRpqJNyRJK7FF68iFM2B-HoYXcOUM-dYZcnCEXZ6Ta1_-qOVb-9QH_Ayn9vxQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2021751742</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Manolis, Antonis S ; Georgiopoulos, Georgios ; Metaxa, Sofia ; Koulouris, Spyridon ; Tsiachris, Dimitris</creator><creatorcontrib>Manolis, Antonis S ; Georgiopoulos, Georgios ; Metaxa, Sofia ; Koulouris, Spyridon ; Tsiachris, Dimitris</creatorcontrib><description>We have previously reported our successful approach for percutaneous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) lead extraction using inexpensive tools, which we have continued over the years. Herein we report the results of the systematic use of a unique stylet, the lead-locking device (LLD), which securely locks the entire lead lumen, aided with non-powered telescoping sheaths in 54 patients to extract 98 CIED leads.
This prospective observational clinical study included 38 men and 16 women aged 68.9±13.1 years undergoing lead extraction for device infection (n=46), lead malfunction (n=5), or prior to defibrillator implant (n=3). Leads were in place for 6.7±4.3 years. Infections were more commonly due to Staphylococcus species (n=40). There were 78 pacing (31 ventricular, 37 atrial, 4 VDD, and 6 coronary sinus leads) and 20 defibrillating leads.
Using simple traction (6 leads) and the LLD stylets (92 leads) aided with telescoping sheaths (15 patients), 96 (98%) leads in 52 (96.3%) patients were successfully removed, with all but one leads removed using a subclavian approach; in 1 patient, the right femoral approach was also required. In 2 patients, distal fragments from one ventricular pacing and one defibrillating lead could not be removed. Finally, lead removal was completely (52/54) (96.3%) or partially (2/54) (3.7%) successful in 54 patients for 96 of 98 leads (98%) without major complications.
Percutaneous lead extraction can be successful with mechanical tools using the LLD locking stylet aided with non-powered telescoping sheaths through a simplified, safe, and inexpensive procedure using local anesthesia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2149-2263</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2149-2271</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2017.7821</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28811391</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Turkey: Kare Publishing</publisher><subject>Local anesthesia ; Original Investigation</subject><ispartof>Anatolian journal of cardiology, 2017-10, Vol.18 (4), p.289-295</ispartof><rights>Copyright Aves Yayincilik Ltd. STI. Oct 2017</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2017 Turkish Society of Cardiology 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-f35dd3ab9cb7881abad69c3e2be6ef36ee685548a7650bf9c8fbbe99d1bbcea33</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2021751742/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2021751742?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,53790,53792,74897</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28811391$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Manolis, Antonis S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgiopoulos, Georgios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metaxa, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koulouris, Spyridon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsiachris, Dimitris</creatorcontrib><title>Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia</title><title>Anatolian journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Anatol J Cardiol</addtitle><description>We have previously reported our successful approach for percutaneous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) lead extraction using inexpensive tools, which we have continued over the years. Herein we report the results of the systematic use of a unique stylet, the lead-locking device (LLD), which securely locks the entire lead lumen, aided with non-powered telescoping sheaths in 54 patients to extract 98 CIED leads.
This prospective observational clinical study included 38 men and 16 women aged 68.9±13.1 years undergoing lead extraction for device infection (n=46), lead malfunction (n=5), or prior to defibrillator implant (n=3). Leads were in place for 6.7±4.3 years. Infections were more commonly due to Staphylococcus species (n=40). There were 78 pacing (31 ventricular, 37 atrial, 4 VDD, and 6 coronary sinus leads) and 20 defibrillating leads.
Using simple traction (6 leads) and the LLD stylets (92 leads) aided with telescoping sheaths (15 patients), 96 (98%) leads in 52 (96.3%) patients were successfully removed, with all but one leads removed using a subclavian approach; in 1 patient, the right femoral approach was also required. In 2 patients, distal fragments from one ventricular pacing and one defibrillating lead could not be removed. Finally, lead removal was completely (52/54) (96.3%) or partially (2/54) (3.7%) successful in 54 patients for 96 of 98 leads (98%) without major complications.
Percutaneous lead extraction can be successful with mechanical tools using the LLD locking stylet aided with non-powered telescoping sheaths through a simplified, safe, and inexpensive procedure using local anesthesia.</description><subject>Local anesthesia</subject><subject>Original Investigation</subject><issn>2149-2263</issn><issn>2149-2271</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUk1v1DAQjRCIVqV_ARlx4UCW2M6XOSBVK6BFlbjA2Ro7k65bxw6xs21_FX8RZ3dZUWTJHo_fvJlnvSx7Q4sVLZuy_HDhIHr7bQ1TZ7xdsYI2q6Zl9Fl2ymgpcsYa-vwY1_wkOw_htigSjreU1i-zE9amgAt6mv3e0YAmZhgtuAjKIkGLOk7eGU063BqNxCJ0BB_iBDoa78gcjLshcbN_ya3Xd0vigA6PIeLwkdwhjkvaRBIWfnxPAvRpB9cR4_BhRBfMFsm9iRsyoN5A6gmWRO9t2KESc7qDw5CaBQOvshc92IDnh_Ms-_nl84_1ZX79_evV-uI612VFY97zqus4KKFVk7SCgq4WmiNTWGPPa8S6raqyhaauCtUL3fZKoRAdVUojcH6WfdrzjrMasNPoknYrx8kMMD1KD0Y-fXFmI2_8VlYNpxWrEsG7A8Hkf81pfDmYoNGmT0Y_B0kFE21avE3Qt_9Bb_08uSRPsoLRpqJNyRJK7FF68iFM2B-HoYXcOUM-dYZcnCEXZ6Ta1_-qOVb-9QH_Ayn9vxQ</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Manolis, Antonis S</creator><creator>Georgiopoulos, Georgios</creator><creator>Metaxa, Sofia</creator><creator>Koulouris, Spyridon</creator><creator>Tsiachris, Dimitris</creator><general>Kare Publishing</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EDSIH</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia</title><author>Manolis, Antonis S ; Georgiopoulos, Georgios ; Metaxa, Sofia ; Koulouris, Spyridon ; Tsiachris, Dimitris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-f35dd3ab9cb7881abad69c3e2be6ef36ee685548a7650bf9c8fbbe99d1bbcea33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Local anesthesia</topic><topic>Original Investigation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manolis, Antonis S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgiopoulos, Georgios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metaxa, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koulouris, Spyridon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsiachris, Dimitris</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Turkey Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Anatolian journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manolis, Antonis S</au><au>Georgiopoulos, Georgios</au><au>Metaxa, Sofia</au><au>Koulouris, Spyridon</au><au>Tsiachris, Dimitris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia</atitle><jtitle>Anatolian journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Anatol J Cardiol</addtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>289</spage><epage>295</epage><pages>289-295</pages><issn>2149-2263</issn><eissn>2149-2271</eissn><abstract>We have previously reported our successful approach for percutaneous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) lead extraction using inexpensive tools, which we have continued over the years. Herein we report the results of the systematic use of a unique stylet, the lead-locking device (LLD), which securely locks the entire lead lumen, aided with non-powered telescoping sheaths in 54 patients to extract 98 CIED leads.
This prospective observational clinical study included 38 men and 16 women aged 68.9±13.1 years undergoing lead extraction for device infection (n=46), lead malfunction (n=5), or prior to defibrillator implant (n=3). Leads were in place for 6.7±4.3 years. Infections were more commonly due to Staphylococcus species (n=40). There were 78 pacing (31 ventricular, 37 atrial, 4 VDD, and 6 coronary sinus leads) and 20 defibrillating leads.
Using simple traction (6 leads) and the LLD stylets (92 leads) aided with telescoping sheaths (15 patients), 96 (98%) leads in 52 (96.3%) patients were successfully removed, with all but one leads removed using a subclavian approach; in 1 patient, the right femoral approach was also required. In 2 patients, distal fragments from one ventricular pacing and one defibrillating lead could not be removed. Finally, lead removal was completely (52/54) (96.3%) or partially (2/54) (3.7%) successful in 54 patients for 96 of 98 leads (98%) without major complications.
Percutaneous lead extraction can be successful with mechanical tools using the LLD locking stylet aided with non-powered telescoping sheaths through a simplified, safe, and inexpensive procedure using local anesthesia.</abstract><cop>Turkey</cop><pub>Kare Publishing</pub><pmid>28811391</pmid><doi>10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2017.7821</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2149-2263 |
ispartof | Anatolian journal of cardiology, 2017-10, Vol.18 (4), p.289-295 |
issn | 2149-2263 2149-2271 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5731525 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Local anesthesia Original Investigation |
title | Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T06%3A33%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cardiac%20implantable%20electronic%20device%20lead%20extraction%20using%20the%20lead-locking%20device%20system:%20keeping%20it%20simple,%20safe,%20and%20inexpensive%20with%20mechanical%20tools%20and%20local%20anesthesia&rft.jtitle=Anatolian%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Manolis,%20Antonis%20S&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=289&rft.epage=295&rft.pages=289-295&rft.issn=2149-2263&rft.eissn=2149-2271&rft_id=info:doi/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2017.7821&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2021751742%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-f35dd3ab9cb7881abad69c3e2be6ef36ee685548a7650bf9c8fbbe99d1bbcea33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2021751742&rft_id=info:pmid/28811391&rfr_iscdi=true |