Loading…

Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia

We have previously reported our successful approach for percutaneous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) lead extraction using inexpensive tools, which we have continued over the years. Herein we report the results of the systematic use of a unique stylet, the lead-locking device (LLD), whi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Anatolian journal of cardiology 2017-10, Vol.18 (4), p.289-295
Main Authors: Manolis, Antonis S, Georgiopoulos, Georgios, Metaxa, Sofia, Koulouris, Spyridon, Tsiachris, Dimitris
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-f35dd3ab9cb7881abad69c3e2be6ef36ee685548a7650bf9c8fbbe99d1bbcea33
cites
container_end_page 295
container_issue 4
container_start_page 289
container_title Anatolian journal of cardiology
container_volume 18
creator Manolis, Antonis S
Georgiopoulos, Georgios
Metaxa, Sofia
Koulouris, Spyridon
Tsiachris, Dimitris
description We have previously reported our successful approach for percutaneous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) lead extraction using inexpensive tools, which we have continued over the years. Herein we report the results of the systematic use of a unique stylet, the lead-locking device (LLD), which securely locks the entire lead lumen, aided with non-powered telescoping sheaths in 54 patients to extract 98 CIED leads. This prospective observational clinical study included 38 men and 16 women aged 68.9±13.1 years undergoing lead extraction for device infection (n=46), lead malfunction (n=5), or prior to defibrillator implant (n=3). Leads were in place for 6.7±4.3 years. Infections were more commonly due to Staphylococcus species (n=40). There were 78 pacing (31 ventricular, 37 atrial, 4 VDD, and 6 coronary sinus leads) and 20 defibrillating leads. Using simple traction (6 leads) and the LLD stylets (92 leads) aided with telescoping sheaths (15 patients), 96 (98%) leads in 52 (96.3%) patients were successfully removed, with all but one leads removed using a subclavian approach; in 1 patient, the right femoral approach was also required. In 2 patients, distal fragments from one ventricular pacing and one defibrillating lead could not be removed. Finally, lead removal was completely (52/54) (96.3%) or partially (2/54) (3.7%) successful in 54 patients for 96 of 98 leads (98%) without major complications. Percutaneous lead extraction can be successful with mechanical tools using the LLD locking stylet aided with non-powered telescoping sheaths through a simplified, safe, and inexpensive procedure using local anesthesia.
doi_str_mv 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2017.7821
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5731525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2021751742</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-f35dd3ab9cb7881abad69c3e2be6ef36ee685548a7650bf9c8fbbe99d1bbcea33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUk1v1DAQjRCIVqV_ARlx4UCW2M6XOSBVK6BFlbjA2Ro7k65bxw6xs21_FX8RZ3dZUWTJHo_fvJlnvSx7Q4sVLZuy_HDhIHr7bQ1TZ7xdsYI2q6Zl9Fl2ymgpcsYa-vwY1_wkOw_htigSjreU1i-zE9amgAt6mv3e0YAmZhgtuAjKIkGLOk7eGU063BqNxCJ0BB_iBDoa78gcjLshcbN_ya3Xd0vigA6PIeLwkdwhjkvaRBIWfnxPAvRpB9cR4_BhRBfMFsm9iRsyoN5A6gmWRO9t2KESc7qDw5CaBQOvshc92IDnh_Ms-_nl84_1ZX79_evV-uI612VFY97zqus4KKFVk7SCgq4WmiNTWGPPa8S6raqyhaauCtUL3fZKoRAdVUojcH6WfdrzjrMasNPoknYrx8kMMD1KD0Y-fXFmI2_8VlYNpxWrEsG7A8Hkf81pfDmYoNGmT0Y_B0kFE21avE3Qt_9Bb_08uSRPsoLRpqJNyRJK7FF68iFM2B-HoYXcOUM-dYZcnCEXZ6Ta1_-qOVb-9QH_Ayn9vxQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2021751742</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Manolis, Antonis S ; Georgiopoulos, Georgios ; Metaxa, Sofia ; Koulouris, Spyridon ; Tsiachris, Dimitris</creator><creatorcontrib>Manolis, Antonis S ; Georgiopoulos, Georgios ; Metaxa, Sofia ; Koulouris, Spyridon ; Tsiachris, Dimitris</creatorcontrib><description>We have previously reported our successful approach for percutaneous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) lead extraction using inexpensive tools, which we have continued over the years. Herein we report the results of the systematic use of a unique stylet, the lead-locking device (LLD), which securely locks the entire lead lumen, aided with non-powered telescoping sheaths in 54 patients to extract 98 CIED leads. This prospective observational clinical study included 38 men and 16 women aged 68.9±13.1 years undergoing lead extraction for device infection (n=46), lead malfunction (n=5), or prior to defibrillator implant (n=3). Leads were in place for 6.7±4.3 years. Infections were more commonly due to Staphylococcus species (n=40). There were 78 pacing (31 ventricular, 37 atrial, 4 VDD, and 6 coronary sinus leads) and 20 defibrillating leads. Using simple traction (6 leads) and the LLD stylets (92 leads) aided with telescoping sheaths (15 patients), 96 (98%) leads in 52 (96.3%) patients were successfully removed, with all but one leads removed using a subclavian approach; in 1 patient, the right femoral approach was also required. In 2 patients, distal fragments from one ventricular pacing and one defibrillating lead could not be removed. Finally, lead removal was completely (52/54) (96.3%) or partially (2/54) (3.7%) successful in 54 patients for 96 of 98 leads (98%) without major complications. Percutaneous lead extraction can be successful with mechanical tools using the LLD locking stylet aided with non-powered telescoping sheaths through a simplified, safe, and inexpensive procedure using local anesthesia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2149-2263</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2149-2271</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2017.7821</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28811391</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Turkey: Kare Publishing</publisher><subject>Local anesthesia ; Original Investigation</subject><ispartof>Anatolian journal of cardiology, 2017-10, Vol.18 (4), p.289-295</ispartof><rights>Copyright Aves Yayincilik Ltd. STI. Oct 2017</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2017 Turkish Society of Cardiology 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-f35dd3ab9cb7881abad69c3e2be6ef36ee685548a7650bf9c8fbbe99d1bbcea33</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2021751742/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2021751742?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,53790,53792,74897</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28811391$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Manolis, Antonis S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgiopoulos, Georgios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metaxa, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koulouris, Spyridon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsiachris, Dimitris</creatorcontrib><title>Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia</title><title>Anatolian journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Anatol J Cardiol</addtitle><description>We have previously reported our successful approach for percutaneous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) lead extraction using inexpensive tools, which we have continued over the years. Herein we report the results of the systematic use of a unique stylet, the lead-locking device (LLD), which securely locks the entire lead lumen, aided with non-powered telescoping sheaths in 54 patients to extract 98 CIED leads. This prospective observational clinical study included 38 men and 16 women aged 68.9±13.1 years undergoing lead extraction for device infection (n=46), lead malfunction (n=5), or prior to defibrillator implant (n=3). Leads were in place for 6.7±4.3 years. Infections were more commonly due to Staphylococcus species (n=40). There were 78 pacing (31 ventricular, 37 atrial, 4 VDD, and 6 coronary sinus leads) and 20 defibrillating leads. Using simple traction (6 leads) and the LLD stylets (92 leads) aided with telescoping sheaths (15 patients), 96 (98%) leads in 52 (96.3%) patients were successfully removed, with all but one leads removed using a subclavian approach; in 1 patient, the right femoral approach was also required. In 2 patients, distal fragments from one ventricular pacing and one defibrillating lead could not be removed. Finally, lead removal was completely (52/54) (96.3%) or partially (2/54) (3.7%) successful in 54 patients for 96 of 98 leads (98%) without major complications. Percutaneous lead extraction can be successful with mechanical tools using the LLD locking stylet aided with non-powered telescoping sheaths through a simplified, safe, and inexpensive procedure using local anesthesia.</description><subject>Local anesthesia</subject><subject>Original Investigation</subject><issn>2149-2263</issn><issn>2149-2271</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUk1v1DAQjRCIVqV_ARlx4UCW2M6XOSBVK6BFlbjA2Ro7k65bxw6xs21_FX8RZ3dZUWTJHo_fvJlnvSx7Q4sVLZuy_HDhIHr7bQ1TZ7xdsYI2q6Zl9Fl2ymgpcsYa-vwY1_wkOw_htigSjreU1i-zE9amgAt6mv3e0YAmZhgtuAjKIkGLOk7eGU063BqNxCJ0BB_iBDoa78gcjLshcbN_ya3Xd0vigA6PIeLwkdwhjkvaRBIWfnxPAvRpB9cR4_BhRBfMFsm9iRsyoN5A6gmWRO9t2KESc7qDw5CaBQOvshc92IDnh_Ms-_nl84_1ZX79_evV-uI612VFY97zqus4KKFVk7SCgq4WmiNTWGPPa8S6raqyhaauCtUL3fZKoRAdVUojcH6WfdrzjrMasNPoknYrx8kMMD1KD0Y-fXFmI2_8VlYNpxWrEsG7A8Hkf81pfDmYoNGmT0Y_B0kFE21avE3Qt_9Bb_08uSRPsoLRpqJNyRJK7FF68iFM2B-HoYXcOUM-dYZcnCEXZ6Ta1_-qOVb-9QH_Ayn9vxQ</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Manolis, Antonis S</creator><creator>Georgiopoulos, Georgios</creator><creator>Metaxa, Sofia</creator><creator>Koulouris, Spyridon</creator><creator>Tsiachris, Dimitris</creator><general>Kare Publishing</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EDSIH</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia</title><author>Manolis, Antonis S ; Georgiopoulos, Georgios ; Metaxa, Sofia ; Koulouris, Spyridon ; Tsiachris, Dimitris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-f35dd3ab9cb7881abad69c3e2be6ef36ee685548a7650bf9c8fbbe99d1bbcea33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Local anesthesia</topic><topic>Original Investigation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manolis, Antonis S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgiopoulos, Georgios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metaxa, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koulouris, Spyridon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsiachris, Dimitris</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Turkey Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Anatolian journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manolis, Antonis S</au><au>Georgiopoulos, Georgios</au><au>Metaxa, Sofia</au><au>Koulouris, Spyridon</au><au>Tsiachris, Dimitris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia</atitle><jtitle>Anatolian journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Anatol J Cardiol</addtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>289</spage><epage>295</epage><pages>289-295</pages><issn>2149-2263</issn><eissn>2149-2271</eissn><abstract>We have previously reported our successful approach for percutaneous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) lead extraction using inexpensive tools, which we have continued over the years. Herein we report the results of the systematic use of a unique stylet, the lead-locking device (LLD), which securely locks the entire lead lumen, aided with non-powered telescoping sheaths in 54 patients to extract 98 CIED leads. This prospective observational clinical study included 38 men and 16 women aged 68.9±13.1 years undergoing lead extraction for device infection (n=46), lead malfunction (n=5), or prior to defibrillator implant (n=3). Leads were in place for 6.7±4.3 years. Infections were more commonly due to Staphylococcus species (n=40). There were 78 pacing (31 ventricular, 37 atrial, 4 VDD, and 6 coronary sinus leads) and 20 defibrillating leads. Using simple traction (6 leads) and the LLD stylets (92 leads) aided with telescoping sheaths (15 patients), 96 (98%) leads in 52 (96.3%) patients were successfully removed, with all but one leads removed using a subclavian approach; in 1 patient, the right femoral approach was also required. In 2 patients, distal fragments from one ventricular pacing and one defibrillating lead could not be removed. Finally, lead removal was completely (52/54) (96.3%) or partially (2/54) (3.7%) successful in 54 patients for 96 of 98 leads (98%) without major complications. Percutaneous lead extraction can be successful with mechanical tools using the LLD locking stylet aided with non-powered telescoping sheaths through a simplified, safe, and inexpensive procedure using local anesthesia.</abstract><cop>Turkey</cop><pub>Kare Publishing</pub><pmid>28811391</pmid><doi>10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2017.7821</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2149-2263
ispartof Anatolian journal of cardiology, 2017-10, Vol.18 (4), p.289-295
issn 2149-2263
2149-2271
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5731525
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Local anesthesia
Original Investigation
title Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T06%3A33%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cardiac%20implantable%20electronic%20device%20lead%20extraction%20using%20the%20lead-locking%20device%20system:%20keeping%20it%20simple,%20safe,%20and%20inexpensive%20with%20mechanical%20tools%20and%20local%20anesthesia&rft.jtitle=Anatolian%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Manolis,%20Antonis%20S&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=289&rft.epage=295&rft.pages=289-295&rft.issn=2149-2263&rft.eissn=2149-2271&rft_id=info:doi/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2017.7821&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2021751742%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-f35dd3ab9cb7881abad69c3e2be6ef36ee685548a7650bf9c8fbbe99d1bbcea33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2021751742&rft_id=info:pmid/28811391&rfr_iscdi=true