Loading…

Clinical tolerability of generic versus brand beta blockers in heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: a retrospective cohort from heart failure clinic

Background: Beta-blockers have been shown to decrease mortality and morbidity in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. However, the side effects are also dose-related, leading to the underdosing. Cost constraint may be one of the limitations of appropriate beta-blocker use;...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of drug assessment (London, U.K.) U.K.), 2018, Vol.7 (1), p.8-13
Main Authors: Chanchai, Rattanachai, Kanjanavanit, Rungsrit, Leemasawat, Krit, Amarittakomol, Anong, Topaiboon, Paleerat, Phrommintikul, Arintaya
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3138-ff867863724366c3fea383ce4f75d5ea6cfa3edc24c3fe24bee991f61b26e98d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3138-ff867863724366c3fea383ce4f75d5ea6cfa3edc24c3fe24bee991f61b26e98d3
container_end_page 13
container_issue 1
container_start_page 8
container_title Journal of drug assessment (London, U.K.)
container_volume 7
creator Chanchai, Rattanachai
Kanjanavanit, Rungsrit
Leemasawat, Krit
Amarittakomol, Anong
Topaiboon, Paleerat
Phrommintikul, Arintaya
description Background: Beta-blockers have been shown to decrease mortality and morbidity in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. However, the side effects are also dose-related, leading to the underdosing. Cost constraint may be one of the limitations of appropriate beta-blocker use; this can be improved with generic drugs. However, the effects in real life practice have not been investigated. Methods and results: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of generic and brand beta-blockers in HFrEF patients. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis in HFrEF patients who received either generic or brand beta-blocker in Chiang Mai Heart Failure Clinic. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who received at least 50% target dose of beta-blocker between generic and brand beta-blockers. Adverse events were secondary endpoints. 217 patients (119 and 98 patients received generic and brand beta-blocker, respectively) were enrolled. There were no differences between groups regarding age, gender, etiology of heart failure, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), rate of receiving angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), angiotensin recepter blocker (ARB), or spironolactone. Patients receiving brand beta-blockers had lower resting heart rate at baseline (74.9 and 84.2 bpm, p = .001). Rate of achieved 50% target dose and target daily dose did not differ between groups (40.4 versus 44.5% and 48.0 versus 55.0%, p > .05, respectively). Rate of side effects was not different between groups (32.3 versus 29.5%, p > .05) and the most common side effect was hypotension. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that beta-blocker tolerability was comparable between brand and generic formulations. Generic or brand beta-blockers should be prescribed to HFrEF patients who have no contraindications.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/21556660.2018.1423988
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5769774</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1993007270</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3138-ff867863724366c3fea383ce4f75d5ea6cfa3edc24c3fe24bee991f61b26e98d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uctu1DAUjRCIVqWfAPKSzQx-JHbMAoFGvKRKbGBtOc51x8WxB9uZan6Kb8TpTKvCAm98dc_jXvs0zUuC1wT3-A0lXcc5x2uKSb8mLWWy758050t_tQBPH9VnzWXON7ge2RKCxfPmjEomJBftefN7411wRntUooekB-ddOaBo0TUESM6gPaQ8ZzQkHUY0QNFo8NH8rF3kAtqCTgVZ7fycAN26skUJxtnAiDzYUtWhVJfZ64TgBkxxMSCb9F3xFunKLinm3YLsAZm4jYtfitM_1uZuzxfNM6t9hsvTfdH8-PTx--bL6urb56-bD1crwwjrV9b2XPScCdoyzg2zoFnPDLRWdGMHmhurGYyGtgtG2wFASmI5GSgH2Y_sonl39N3Nw1SJyyu0V7vkJp0OKmqn_kaC26rruFed4FKIthq8Phmk-GuGXNTksgHvdYA4Z0WkZBgLKnCldkeqqR-RE9iHMQSrJW51H7da4lanuKvu1eMdH1T34VbC-yPBBRvTpG9j8qMq-uBjqhEE47Ji_5_xB4WmwCY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1993007270</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical tolerability of generic versus brand beta blockers in heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: a retrospective cohort from heart failure clinic</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Chanchai, Rattanachai ; Kanjanavanit, Rungsrit ; Leemasawat, Krit ; Amarittakomol, Anong ; Topaiboon, Paleerat ; Phrommintikul, Arintaya</creator><creatorcontrib>Chanchai, Rattanachai ; Kanjanavanit, Rungsrit ; Leemasawat, Krit ; Amarittakomol, Anong ; Topaiboon, Paleerat ; Phrommintikul, Arintaya</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Beta-blockers have been shown to decrease mortality and morbidity in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. However, the side effects are also dose-related, leading to the underdosing. Cost constraint may be one of the limitations of appropriate beta-blocker use; this can be improved with generic drugs. However, the effects in real life practice have not been investigated. Methods and results: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of generic and brand beta-blockers in HFrEF patients. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis in HFrEF patients who received either generic or brand beta-blocker in Chiang Mai Heart Failure Clinic. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who received at least 50% target dose of beta-blocker between generic and brand beta-blockers. Adverse events were secondary endpoints. 217 patients (119 and 98 patients received generic and brand beta-blocker, respectively) were enrolled. There were no differences between groups regarding age, gender, etiology of heart failure, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), rate of receiving angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), angiotensin recepter blocker (ARB), or spironolactone. Patients receiving brand beta-blockers had lower resting heart rate at baseline (74.9 and 84.2 bpm, p = .001). Rate of achieved 50% target dose and target daily dose did not differ between groups (40.4 versus 44.5% and 48.0 versus 55.0%, p &gt; .05, respectively). Rate of side effects was not different between groups (32.3 versus 29.5%, p &gt; .05) and the most common side effect was hypotension. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that beta-blocker tolerability was comparable between brand and generic formulations. Generic or brand beta-blockers should be prescribed to HFrEF patients who have no contraindications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2155-6660</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2155-6660</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/21556660.2018.1423988</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29379674</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Beta-blocker ; brand drug ; Cardiovascular ; generic drug ; heart failure ; tolerability</subject><ispartof>Journal of drug assessment (London, U.K.), 2018, Vol.7 (1), p.8-13</ispartof><rights>2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group. 2018</rights><rights>2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group. 2018 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3138-ff867863724366c3fea383ce4f75d5ea6cfa3edc24c3fe24bee991f61b26e98d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3138-ff867863724366c3fea383ce4f75d5ea6cfa3edc24c3fe24bee991f61b26e98d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5769774/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5769774/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4022,27501,27922,27923,27924,53790,53792,59142,59143</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29379674$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chanchai, Rattanachai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanjanavanit, Rungsrit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leemasawat, Krit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amarittakomol, Anong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topaiboon, Paleerat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phrommintikul, Arintaya</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical tolerability of generic versus brand beta blockers in heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: a retrospective cohort from heart failure clinic</title><title>Journal of drug assessment (London, U.K.)</title><addtitle>J Drug Assess</addtitle><description>Background: Beta-blockers have been shown to decrease mortality and morbidity in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. However, the side effects are also dose-related, leading to the underdosing. Cost constraint may be one of the limitations of appropriate beta-blocker use; this can be improved with generic drugs. However, the effects in real life practice have not been investigated. Methods and results: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of generic and brand beta-blockers in HFrEF patients. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis in HFrEF patients who received either generic or brand beta-blocker in Chiang Mai Heart Failure Clinic. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who received at least 50% target dose of beta-blocker between generic and brand beta-blockers. Adverse events were secondary endpoints. 217 patients (119 and 98 patients received generic and brand beta-blocker, respectively) were enrolled. There were no differences between groups regarding age, gender, etiology of heart failure, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), rate of receiving angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), angiotensin recepter blocker (ARB), or spironolactone. Patients receiving brand beta-blockers had lower resting heart rate at baseline (74.9 and 84.2 bpm, p = .001). Rate of achieved 50% target dose and target daily dose did not differ between groups (40.4 versus 44.5% and 48.0 versus 55.0%, p &gt; .05, respectively). Rate of side effects was not different between groups (32.3 versus 29.5%, p &gt; .05) and the most common side effect was hypotension. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that beta-blocker tolerability was comparable between brand and generic formulations. Generic or brand beta-blockers should be prescribed to HFrEF patients who have no contraindications.</description><subject>Beta-blocker</subject><subject>brand drug</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>generic drug</subject><subject>heart failure</subject><subject>tolerability</subject><issn>2155-6660</issn><issn>2155-6660</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uctu1DAUjRCIVqWfAPKSzQx-JHbMAoFGvKRKbGBtOc51x8WxB9uZan6Kb8TpTKvCAm98dc_jXvs0zUuC1wT3-A0lXcc5x2uKSb8mLWWy758050t_tQBPH9VnzWXON7ge2RKCxfPmjEomJBftefN7411wRntUooekB-ddOaBo0TUESM6gPaQ8ZzQkHUY0QNFo8NH8rF3kAtqCTgVZ7fycAN26skUJxtnAiDzYUtWhVJfZ64TgBkxxMSCb9F3xFunKLinm3YLsAZm4jYtfitM_1uZuzxfNM6t9hsvTfdH8-PTx--bL6urb56-bD1crwwjrV9b2XPScCdoyzg2zoFnPDLRWdGMHmhurGYyGtgtG2wFASmI5GSgH2Y_sonl39N3Nw1SJyyu0V7vkJp0OKmqn_kaC26rruFed4FKIthq8Phmk-GuGXNTksgHvdYA4Z0WkZBgLKnCldkeqqR-RE9iHMQSrJW51H7da4lanuKvu1eMdH1T34VbC-yPBBRvTpG9j8qMq-uBjqhEE47Ji_5_xB4WmwCY</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Chanchai, Rattanachai</creator><creator>Kanjanavanit, Rungsrit</creator><creator>Leemasawat, Krit</creator><creator>Amarittakomol, Anong</creator><creator>Topaiboon, Paleerat</creator><creator>Phrommintikul, Arintaya</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Clinical tolerability of generic versus brand beta blockers in heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: a retrospective cohort from heart failure clinic</title><author>Chanchai, Rattanachai ; Kanjanavanit, Rungsrit ; Leemasawat, Krit ; Amarittakomol, Anong ; Topaiboon, Paleerat ; Phrommintikul, Arintaya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3138-ff867863724366c3fea383ce4f75d5ea6cfa3edc24c3fe24bee991f61b26e98d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Beta-blocker</topic><topic>brand drug</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>generic drug</topic><topic>heart failure</topic><topic>tolerability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chanchai, Rattanachai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanjanavanit, Rungsrit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leemasawat, Krit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amarittakomol, Anong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topaiboon, Paleerat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phrommintikul, Arintaya</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of drug assessment (London, U.K.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chanchai, Rattanachai</au><au>Kanjanavanit, Rungsrit</au><au>Leemasawat, Krit</au><au>Amarittakomol, Anong</au><au>Topaiboon, Paleerat</au><au>Phrommintikul, Arintaya</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical tolerability of generic versus brand beta blockers in heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: a retrospective cohort from heart failure clinic</atitle><jtitle>Journal of drug assessment (London, U.K.)</jtitle><addtitle>J Drug Assess</addtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>8</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>8-13</pages><issn>2155-6660</issn><eissn>2155-6660</eissn><abstract>Background: Beta-blockers have been shown to decrease mortality and morbidity in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. However, the side effects are also dose-related, leading to the underdosing. Cost constraint may be one of the limitations of appropriate beta-blocker use; this can be improved with generic drugs. However, the effects in real life practice have not been investigated. Methods and results: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of generic and brand beta-blockers in HFrEF patients. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis in HFrEF patients who received either generic or brand beta-blocker in Chiang Mai Heart Failure Clinic. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who received at least 50% target dose of beta-blocker between generic and brand beta-blockers. Adverse events were secondary endpoints. 217 patients (119 and 98 patients received generic and brand beta-blocker, respectively) were enrolled. There were no differences between groups regarding age, gender, etiology of heart failure, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), rate of receiving angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), angiotensin recepter blocker (ARB), or spironolactone. Patients receiving brand beta-blockers had lower resting heart rate at baseline (74.9 and 84.2 bpm, p = .001). Rate of achieved 50% target dose and target daily dose did not differ between groups (40.4 versus 44.5% and 48.0 versus 55.0%, p &gt; .05, respectively). Rate of side effects was not different between groups (32.3 versus 29.5%, p &gt; .05) and the most common side effect was hypotension. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that beta-blocker tolerability was comparable between brand and generic formulations. Generic or brand beta-blockers should be prescribed to HFrEF patients who have no contraindications.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>29379674</pmid><doi>10.1080/21556660.2018.1423988</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2155-6660
ispartof Journal of drug assessment (London, U.K.), 2018, Vol.7 (1), p.8-13
issn 2155-6660
2155-6660
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5769774
source Taylor & Francis Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Beta-blocker
brand drug
Cardiovascular
generic drug
heart failure
tolerability
title Clinical tolerability of generic versus brand beta blockers in heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: a retrospective cohort from heart failure clinic
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T15%3A00%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20tolerability%20of%20generic%20versus%20brand%20beta%20blockers%20in%20heart%20failure%20with%20reduced%20left%20ventricular%20ejection%20fraction:%20a%20retrospective%20cohort%20from%20heart%20failure%20clinic&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20drug%20assessment%20(London,%20U.K.)&rft.au=Chanchai,%20Rattanachai&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=8&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=8-13&rft.issn=2155-6660&rft.eissn=2155-6660&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/21556660.2018.1423988&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1993007270%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3138-ff867863724366c3fea383ce4f75d5ea6cfa3edc24c3fe24bee991f61b26e98d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1993007270&rft_id=info:pmid/29379674&rfr_iscdi=true