Loading…
Clinical tolerability of generic versus brand beta blockers in heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: a retrospective cohort from heart failure clinic
Background: Beta-blockers have been shown to decrease mortality and morbidity in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. However, the side effects are also dose-related, leading to the underdosing. Cost constraint may be one of the limitations of appropriate beta-blocker use;...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of drug assessment (London, U.K.) U.K.), 2018, Vol.7 (1), p.8-13 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3138-ff867863724366c3fea383ce4f75d5ea6cfa3edc24c3fe24bee991f61b26e98d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3138-ff867863724366c3fea383ce4f75d5ea6cfa3edc24c3fe24bee991f61b26e98d3 |
container_end_page | 13 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 8 |
container_title | Journal of drug assessment (London, U.K.) |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Chanchai, Rattanachai Kanjanavanit, Rungsrit Leemasawat, Krit Amarittakomol, Anong Topaiboon, Paleerat Phrommintikul, Arintaya |
description | Background: Beta-blockers have been shown to decrease mortality and morbidity in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. However, the side effects are also dose-related, leading to the underdosing. Cost constraint may be one of the limitations of appropriate beta-blocker use; this can be improved with generic drugs. However, the effects in real life practice have not been investigated.
Methods and results: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of generic and brand beta-blockers in HFrEF patients. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis in HFrEF patients who received either generic or brand beta-blocker in Chiang Mai Heart Failure Clinic. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who received at least 50% target dose of beta-blocker between generic and brand beta-blockers. Adverse events were secondary endpoints. 217 patients (119 and 98 patients received generic and brand beta-blocker, respectively) were enrolled. There were no differences between groups regarding age, gender, etiology of heart failure, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), rate of receiving angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), angiotensin recepter blocker (ARB), or spironolactone. Patients receiving brand beta-blockers had lower resting heart rate at baseline (74.9 and 84.2 bpm, p = .001). Rate of achieved 50% target dose and target daily dose did not differ between groups (40.4 versus 44.5% and 48.0 versus 55.0%, p > .05, respectively). Rate of side effects was not different between groups (32.3 versus 29.5%, p > .05) and the most common side effect was hypotension.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that beta-blocker tolerability was comparable between brand and generic formulations. Generic or brand beta-blockers should be prescribed to HFrEF patients who have no contraindications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/21556660.2018.1423988 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5769774</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1993007270</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3138-ff867863724366c3fea383ce4f75d5ea6cfa3edc24c3fe24bee991f61b26e98d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uctu1DAUjRCIVqWfAPKSzQx-JHbMAoFGvKRKbGBtOc51x8WxB9uZan6Kb8TpTKvCAm98dc_jXvs0zUuC1wT3-A0lXcc5x2uKSb8mLWWy758050t_tQBPH9VnzWXON7ge2RKCxfPmjEomJBftefN7411wRntUooekB-ddOaBo0TUESM6gPaQ8ZzQkHUY0QNFo8NH8rF3kAtqCTgVZ7fycAN26skUJxtnAiDzYUtWhVJfZ64TgBkxxMSCb9F3xFunKLinm3YLsAZm4jYtfitM_1uZuzxfNM6t9hsvTfdH8-PTx--bL6urb56-bD1crwwjrV9b2XPScCdoyzg2zoFnPDLRWdGMHmhurGYyGtgtG2wFASmI5GSgH2Y_sonl39N3Nw1SJyyu0V7vkJp0OKmqn_kaC26rruFed4FKIthq8Phmk-GuGXNTksgHvdYA4Z0WkZBgLKnCldkeqqR-RE9iHMQSrJW51H7da4lanuKvu1eMdH1T34VbC-yPBBRvTpG9j8qMq-uBjqhEE47Ji_5_xB4WmwCY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1993007270</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical tolerability of generic versus brand beta blockers in heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: a retrospective cohort from heart failure clinic</title><source>Taylor & Francis Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Chanchai, Rattanachai ; Kanjanavanit, Rungsrit ; Leemasawat, Krit ; Amarittakomol, Anong ; Topaiboon, Paleerat ; Phrommintikul, Arintaya</creator><creatorcontrib>Chanchai, Rattanachai ; Kanjanavanit, Rungsrit ; Leemasawat, Krit ; Amarittakomol, Anong ; Topaiboon, Paleerat ; Phrommintikul, Arintaya</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Beta-blockers have been shown to decrease mortality and morbidity in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. However, the side effects are also dose-related, leading to the underdosing. Cost constraint may be one of the limitations of appropriate beta-blocker use; this can be improved with generic drugs. However, the effects in real life practice have not been investigated.
Methods and results: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of generic and brand beta-blockers in HFrEF patients. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis in HFrEF patients who received either generic or brand beta-blocker in Chiang Mai Heart Failure Clinic. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who received at least 50% target dose of beta-blocker between generic and brand beta-blockers. Adverse events were secondary endpoints. 217 patients (119 and 98 patients received generic and brand beta-blocker, respectively) were enrolled. There were no differences between groups regarding age, gender, etiology of heart failure, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), rate of receiving angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), angiotensin recepter blocker (ARB), or spironolactone. Patients receiving brand beta-blockers had lower resting heart rate at baseline (74.9 and 84.2 bpm, p = .001). Rate of achieved 50% target dose and target daily dose did not differ between groups (40.4 versus 44.5% and 48.0 versus 55.0%, p > .05, respectively). Rate of side effects was not different between groups (32.3 versus 29.5%, p > .05) and the most common side effect was hypotension.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that beta-blocker tolerability was comparable between brand and generic formulations. Generic or brand beta-blockers should be prescribed to HFrEF patients who have no contraindications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2155-6660</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2155-6660</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/21556660.2018.1423988</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29379674</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Beta-blocker ; brand drug ; Cardiovascular ; generic drug ; heart failure ; tolerability</subject><ispartof>Journal of drug assessment (London, U.K.), 2018, Vol.7 (1), p.8-13</ispartof><rights>2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. 2018</rights><rights>2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. 2018 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3138-ff867863724366c3fea383ce4f75d5ea6cfa3edc24c3fe24bee991f61b26e98d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3138-ff867863724366c3fea383ce4f75d5ea6cfa3edc24c3fe24bee991f61b26e98d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5769774/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5769774/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4022,27501,27922,27923,27924,53790,53792,59142,59143</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29379674$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chanchai, Rattanachai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanjanavanit, Rungsrit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leemasawat, Krit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amarittakomol, Anong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topaiboon, Paleerat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phrommintikul, Arintaya</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical tolerability of generic versus brand beta blockers in heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: a retrospective cohort from heart failure clinic</title><title>Journal of drug assessment (London, U.K.)</title><addtitle>J Drug Assess</addtitle><description>Background: Beta-blockers have been shown to decrease mortality and morbidity in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. However, the side effects are also dose-related, leading to the underdosing. Cost constraint may be one of the limitations of appropriate beta-blocker use; this can be improved with generic drugs. However, the effects in real life practice have not been investigated.
Methods and results: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of generic and brand beta-blockers in HFrEF patients. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis in HFrEF patients who received either generic or brand beta-blocker in Chiang Mai Heart Failure Clinic. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who received at least 50% target dose of beta-blocker between generic and brand beta-blockers. Adverse events were secondary endpoints. 217 patients (119 and 98 patients received generic and brand beta-blocker, respectively) were enrolled. There were no differences between groups regarding age, gender, etiology of heart failure, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), rate of receiving angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), angiotensin recepter blocker (ARB), or spironolactone. Patients receiving brand beta-blockers had lower resting heart rate at baseline (74.9 and 84.2 bpm, p = .001). Rate of achieved 50% target dose and target daily dose did not differ between groups (40.4 versus 44.5% and 48.0 versus 55.0%, p > .05, respectively). Rate of side effects was not different between groups (32.3 versus 29.5%, p > .05) and the most common side effect was hypotension.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that beta-blocker tolerability was comparable between brand and generic formulations. Generic or brand beta-blockers should be prescribed to HFrEF patients who have no contraindications.</description><subject>Beta-blocker</subject><subject>brand drug</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>generic drug</subject><subject>heart failure</subject><subject>tolerability</subject><issn>2155-6660</issn><issn>2155-6660</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uctu1DAUjRCIVqWfAPKSzQx-JHbMAoFGvKRKbGBtOc51x8WxB9uZan6Kb8TpTKvCAm98dc_jXvs0zUuC1wT3-A0lXcc5x2uKSb8mLWWy758050t_tQBPH9VnzWXON7ge2RKCxfPmjEomJBftefN7411wRntUooekB-ddOaBo0TUESM6gPaQ8ZzQkHUY0QNFo8NH8rF3kAtqCTgVZ7fycAN26skUJxtnAiDzYUtWhVJfZ64TgBkxxMSCb9F3xFunKLinm3YLsAZm4jYtfitM_1uZuzxfNM6t9hsvTfdH8-PTx--bL6urb56-bD1crwwjrV9b2XPScCdoyzg2zoFnPDLRWdGMHmhurGYyGtgtG2wFASmI5GSgH2Y_sonl39N3Nw1SJyyu0V7vkJp0OKmqn_kaC26rruFed4FKIthq8Phmk-GuGXNTksgHvdYA4Z0WkZBgLKnCldkeqqR-RE9iHMQSrJW51H7da4lanuKvu1eMdH1T34VbC-yPBBRvTpG9j8qMq-uBjqhEE47Ji_5_xB4WmwCY</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Chanchai, Rattanachai</creator><creator>Kanjanavanit, Rungsrit</creator><creator>Leemasawat, Krit</creator><creator>Amarittakomol, Anong</creator><creator>Topaiboon, Paleerat</creator><creator>Phrommintikul, Arintaya</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Clinical tolerability of generic versus brand beta blockers in heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: a retrospective cohort from heart failure clinic</title><author>Chanchai, Rattanachai ; Kanjanavanit, Rungsrit ; Leemasawat, Krit ; Amarittakomol, Anong ; Topaiboon, Paleerat ; Phrommintikul, Arintaya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3138-ff867863724366c3fea383ce4f75d5ea6cfa3edc24c3fe24bee991f61b26e98d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Beta-blocker</topic><topic>brand drug</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>generic drug</topic><topic>heart failure</topic><topic>tolerability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chanchai, Rattanachai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanjanavanit, Rungsrit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leemasawat, Krit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amarittakomol, Anong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topaiboon, Paleerat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phrommintikul, Arintaya</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of drug assessment (London, U.K.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chanchai, Rattanachai</au><au>Kanjanavanit, Rungsrit</au><au>Leemasawat, Krit</au><au>Amarittakomol, Anong</au><au>Topaiboon, Paleerat</au><au>Phrommintikul, Arintaya</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical tolerability of generic versus brand beta blockers in heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: a retrospective cohort from heart failure clinic</atitle><jtitle>Journal of drug assessment (London, U.K.)</jtitle><addtitle>J Drug Assess</addtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>8</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>8-13</pages><issn>2155-6660</issn><eissn>2155-6660</eissn><abstract>Background: Beta-blockers have been shown to decrease mortality and morbidity in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. However, the side effects are also dose-related, leading to the underdosing. Cost constraint may be one of the limitations of appropriate beta-blocker use; this can be improved with generic drugs. However, the effects in real life practice have not been investigated.
Methods and results: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of generic and brand beta-blockers in HFrEF patients. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis in HFrEF patients who received either generic or brand beta-blocker in Chiang Mai Heart Failure Clinic. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who received at least 50% target dose of beta-blocker between generic and brand beta-blockers. Adverse events were secondary endpoints. 217 patients (119 and 98 patients received generic and brand beta-blocker, respectively) were enrolled. There were no differences between groups regarding age, gender, etiology of heart failure, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), rate of receiving angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), angiotensin recepter blocker (ARB), or spironolactone. Patients receiving brand beta-blockers had lower resting heart rate at baseline (74.9 and 84.2 bpm, p = .001). Rate of achieved 50% target dose and target daily dose did not differ between groups (40.4 versus 44.5% and 48.0 versus 55.0%, p > .05, respectively). Rate of side effects was not different between groups (32.3 versus 29.5%, p > .05) and the most common side effect was hypotension.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that beta-blocker tolerability was comparable between brand and generic formulations. Generic or brand beta-blockers should be prescribed to HFrEF patients who have no contraindications.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>29379674</pmid><doi>10.1080/21556660.2018.1423988</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2155-6660 |
ispartof | Journal of drug assessment (London, U.K.), 2018, Vol.7 (1), p.8-13 |
issn | 2155-6660 2155-6660 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5769774 |
source | Taylor & Francis Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | Beta-blocker brand drug Cardiovascular generic drug heart failure tolerability |
title | Clinical tolerability of generic versus brand beta blockers in heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: a retrospective cohort from heart failure clinic |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T15%3A00%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20tolerability%20of%20generic%20versus%20brand%20beta%20blockers%20in%20heart%20failure%20with%20reduced%20left%20ventricular%20ejection%20fraction:%20a%20retrospective%20cohort%20from%20heart%20failure%20clinic&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20drug%20assessment%20(London,%20U.K.)&rft.au=Chanchai,%20Rattanachai&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=8&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=8-13&rft.issn=2155-6660&rft.eissn=2155-6660&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/21556660.2018.1423988&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1993007270%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3138-ff867863724366c3fea383ce4f75d5ea6cfa3edc24c3fe24bee991f61b26e98d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1993007270&rft_id=info:pmid/29379674&rfr_iscdi=true |