Regional variations in baseline characteristics of cardiac rhythm device recipients: The PANORAMA observational cohort study

Abstract Background The PANORAMA study was designed to collect concurrent data on subjects from different worldwide regions implanted with CRM devices. Methods In this prospective, multi-center study, we analyzed baseline data on 8586 subjects implanted with CRM devices with no additional selection...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of cardiology. Heart & vessels 2014-09, Vol.4, p.90-96
Main Authors: Al Kandari, Fawziah, Erglis, Andrejs, Sweidan, Raed, Dannheimer, Ingrid, Sepsi, Milan, Bénézet, Juan, Padour, Michal, Naik, Ajay, Escudero, Jaime, West, Teena, Holbrook, Reece, Lorgat, Faizel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bradyarrhythmias
Cardiac pacing
Cardiac resynchronization
Cardiovascular
Defibrillators
Heart failure
Tachyarrhythmias
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background The PANORAMA study was designed to collect concurrent data on subjects from different worldwide regions implanted with CRM devices. Methods In this prospective, multi-center study, we analyzed baseline data on 8586 subjects implanted with CRM devices with no additional selection criteria (66% pacemaker (IPG), 16% implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD), 17% cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and < 1% Internal Loop Recorder) from 156 hospitals across 6 geographical regions between 2005 and 2011. Results Regardless of the device implanted, subjects from the Middle East and India often had more diabetes than other regions. Eastern and Western Europe had higher rates of atrial fibrillation reported, and men were more likely to smoke than women (46% vs 11%, p < 0.001). Within the CRT cohort there was significant variation in the proportion of males receiving a device, ranging from 55% in India to 83% in Eastern Europe. Conclusions We provide comprehensive descriptive data on patients receiving CRM devices from a range of geographies that are not typically reported in literature. We found significant variations in clinical characteristics and implant practices. Long term follow-up data will help evaluate if these variations require adjustments to outcome expectations.
ISSN:2214-7632
2214-7632
DOI:10.1016/j.ijchv.2014.06.008