Cognitive load predicts point-of-care ultrasound simulator performance

• Published in: Perspectives on medical education 2018-02, Vol.7 (1), p.23-32
• Main Authors: Aldekhyl, Sara, Cavalcanti, Rodrigo B., Naismith, Laura M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Clinical Competence - standards; Clinical medicine; Cognition & reasoning; Cognitive Ability; Cognitive load; Cognitive Reserve; Computer Simulation - standards; Computer Simulation - trends; Education; Educational Measurement - methods; Expertise; Humans; Measurement Techniques; Medical Education; Ontario; Original; Original Article; Point-of-Care Systems - standards; Simulation; Simulation Training - methods; Surveys and Questionnaires; Task Performance and Analysis; Ultrasonic imaging; Ultrasonography - instrumentation; Ultrasonography - methods
• ISSN: 2212-2761; 2212-277X; 2212-277X
• DOI: 10.1007/s40037-017-0392-7

Introduction The ability to maintain good performance with low cognitive load is an important marker of expertise. Incorporating cognitive load measurements in the context of simulation training may help to inform judgements of competence. This exploratory study investigated relationships between demographic markers of expertise, cognitive load measures, and simulator performance in the context of point-of-care ultrasonography. Methods Twenty-nine medical trainees and clinicians at the University of Toronto with a range of clinical ultrasound experience were recruited. Participants answered a demographic questionnaire then used an ultrasound simulator to perform targeted scanning tasks based on clinical vignettes. Participants were scored on their ability to both acquire and interpret ultrasound images. Cognitive load measures included participant self-report, eye-based physiological indices, and behavioural measures. Data were analyzed using a multilevel linear modelling approach, wherein observations were clustered by participants. Results Experienced participants outperformed novice participants on ultrasound image acquisition. Ultrasound image interpretation was comparable between the two groups. Ultrasound image acquisition performance was predicted by level of training, prior ultrasound training, and cognitive load. There was significant convergence between cognitive load measurement techniques. A marginal model of ultrasound image acquisition performance including prior ultrasound training and cognitive load as fixed effects provided the best overall fit for the observed data. Discussion In this proof-of-principle study, the combination of demographic and cognitive load measures provided more sensitive metrics to predict ultrasound simulator performance. Performance assessments which include cognitive load can help differentiate between levels of expertise in simulation environments, and may serve as better predictors of skill transfer to clinical practice.