Loading…

Efficiency of multi-trait, indirect, and trait-assisted genomic selection for improvement of biomass sorghum

Key message We compare genomic selection methods that use correlated traits to help predict biomass yield in sorghum, and find that trait-assisted genomic selection performs best. Genomic selection (GS) is usually performed on a single trait, but correlated traits can also help predict a focal trait...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Theoretical and applied genetics 2018-03, Vol.131 (3), p.747-755
Main Authors: Fernandes, Samuel B., Dias, Kaio O. G., Ferreira, Daniel F., Brown, Patrick J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c664t-befd633998401e29c14ee817da8694d27e48c86d1d4d372d36ef27d28a405fdf3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c664t-befd633998401e29c14ee817da8694d27e48c86d1d4d372d36ef27d28a405fdf3
container_end_page 755
container_issue 3
container_start_page 747
container_title Theoretical and applied genetics
container_volume 131
creator Fernandes, Samuel B.
Dias, Kaio O. G.
Ferreira, Daniel F.
Brown, Patrick J.
description Key message We compare genomic selection methods that use correlated traits to help predict biomass yield in sorghum, and find that trait-assisted genomic selection performs best. Genomic selection (GS) is usually performed on a single trait, but correlated traits can also help predict a focal trait through indirect or multi-trait GS. In this study, we use a pre-breeding population of biomass sorghum to compare strategies that use correlated traits to improve prediction of biomass yield, the focal trait. Correlated traits include moisture, plant height measured at monthly intervals between planting and harvest, and the area under the growth progress curve. In addition to single- and multi-trait direct and indirect GS, we test a new strategy called trait-assisted GS, in which correlated traits are used along with marker data in the validation population to predict a focal trait. Single-trait GS for biomass yield had a prediction accuracy of 0.40. Indirect GS performed best using area under the growth progress curve to predict biomass yield, with a prediction accuracy of 0.37, and did not differ from indirect multi-trait GS that also used moisture information. Multi-trait GS and single-trait GS yielded similar results, indicating that correlated traits did not improve prediction of biomass yield in a standard GS scenario. However, trait-assisted GS increased prediction accuracy by up to 50 % when using plant height in both the training and validation populations to help predict yield in the validation population. Coincidence between selected genotypes in phenotypic and genomic selection was also highest in trait-assisted GS. Overall, these results suggest that trait-assisted GS can be an efficient strategy when correlated traits are obtained earlier or more inexpensively than a focal trait.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00122-017-3033-y
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5814553</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A527817100</galeid><sourcerecordid>A527817100</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c664t-befd633998401e29c14ee817da8694d27e48c86d1d4d372d36ef27d28a405fdf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kl1vFCEUhidGY9fqD_DGTPRGE6fyNQNzY9I0VZs0MfHjmrBwmKWZgRWYxv33Mt1au0bDBeTwvC9weKvqOUYnGCH-LiGECWkQ5g1FlDa7B9UKM0oaQhh5WK0QYqhpeUuOqicpXSGESIvo4-qI9AQLysWqGs-tddqB17s62Hqax-yaHJXLb2vnjYugy0p5U98UG5WSSxlMPYAPk9N1grEgLvjahli7aRvDNUzg82K3dmEqijqFOGzm6Wn1yKoxwbPb-bj6_uH829mn5vLzx4uz08tGdx3LzRqs6Sjte8EQBtJrzAAE5kaJrmeGcGBCi85gwwzlxNAOLOGGCMVQa42lx9X7ve92Xk9gdLlNVKPcRjepuJNBOXm4491GDuFatgKztqXF4OXeIKTsZNIug97o4H15qsQM4150BXp9e0oMP2ZIWU4uaRhH5SHMSeKetwj37AZ99Rd6FeboSw8WinacdJz_oQY1gnTehnI5vZjK05bw0oHy64U6-QdVhoHyH8GDdaV-IHhzIChMhp95UHNK8uLrl0MW71kdQ0oR7F3TMJJL5uQ-c7JkTi6Zk7uieXG_23eK3yErANkDqWz5AeK91__X9RfmzeEP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1973672677</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficiency of multi-trait, indirect, and trait-assisted genomic selection for improvement of biomass sorghum</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Fernandes, Samuel B. ; Dias, Kaio O. G. ; Ferreira, Daniel F. ; Brown, Patrick J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Samuel B. ; Dias, Kaio O. G. ; Ferreira, Daniel F. ; Brown, Patrick J. ; Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>Key message We compare genomic selection methods that use correlated traits to help predict biomass yield in sorghum, and find that trait-assisted genomic selection performs best. Genomic selection (GS) is usually performed on a single trait, but correlated traits can also help predict a focal trait through indirect or multi-trait GS. In this study, we use a pre-breeding population of biomass sorghum to compare strategies that use correlated traits to improve prediction of biomass yield, the focal trait. Correlated traits include moisture, plant height measured at monthly intervals between planting and harvest, and the area under the growth progress curve. In addition to single- and multi-trait direct and indirect GS, we test a new strategy called trait-assisted GS, in which correlated traits are used along with marker data in the validation population to predict a focal trait. Single-trait GS for biomass yield had a prediction accuracy of 0.40. Indirect GS performed best using area under the growth progress curve to predict biomass yield, with a prediction accuracy of 0.37, and did not differ from indirect multi-trait GS that also used moisture information. Multi-trait GS and single-trait GS yielded similar results, indicating that correlated traits did not improve prediction of biomass yield in a standard GS scenario. However, trait-assisted GS increased prediction accuracy by up to 50 % when using plant height in both the training and validation populations to help predict yield in the validation population. Coincidence between selected genotypes in phenotypic and genomic selection was also highest in trait-assisted GS. Overall, these results suggest that trait-assisted GS can be an efficient strategy when correlated traits are obtained earlier or more inexpensively than a focal trait.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-5752</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00122-017-3033-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29218378</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Agriculture ; BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES ; Biochemistry ; Biomass ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biotechnology ; Breeding ; Genetic aspects ; Genomics ; Genotype ; Genotypes ; Life Sciences ; Observations ; Original ; Original Article ; Phenotype ; Plant Biochemistry ; Plant Breeding ; Plant Breeding/Biotechnology ; Plant Genetics and Genomics ; Quantitative trait loci ; Selection, Genetic ; Sorghum ; Sorghum - genetics ; Sorghum - growth &amp; development ; Yield</subject><ispartof>Theoretical and applied genetics, 2018-03, Vol.131 (3), p.747-755</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Springer</rights><rights>Theoretical and Applied Genetics is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c664t-befd633998401e29c14ee817da8694d27e48c86d1d4d372d36ef27d28a405fdf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c664t-befd633998401e29c14ee817da8694d27e48c86d1d4d372d36ef27d28a405fdf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29218378$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1411986$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Samuel B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias, Kaio O. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Daniel F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Efficiency of multi-trait, indirect, and trait-assisted genomic selection for improvement of biomass sorghum</title><title>Theoretical and applied genetics</title><addtitle>Theor Appl Genet</addtitle><addtitle>Theor Appl Genet</addtitle><description>Key message We compare genomic selection methods that use correlated traits to help predict biomass yield in sorghum, and find that trait-assisted genomic selection performs best. Genomic selection (GS) is usually performed on a single trait, but correlated traits can also help predict a focal trait through indirect or multi-trait GS. In this study, we use a pre-breeding population of biomass sorghum to compare strategies that use correlated traits to improve prediction of biomass yield, the focal trait. Correlated traits include moisture, plant height measured at monthly intervals between planting and harvest, and the area under the growth progress curve. In addition to single- and multi-trait direct and indirect GS, we test a new strategy called trait-assisted GS, in which correlated traits are used along with marker data in the validation population to predict a focal trait. Single-trait GS for biomass yield had a prediction accuracy of 0.40. Indirect GS performed best using area under the growth progress curve to predict biomass yield, with a prediction accuracy of 0.37, and did not differ from indirect multi-trait GS that also used moisture information. Multi-trait GS and single-trait GS yielded similar results, indicating that correlated traits did not improve prediction of biomass yield in a standard GS scenario. However, trait-assisted GS increased prediction accuracy by up to 50 % when using plant height in both the training and validation populations to help predict yield in the validation population. Coincidence between selected genotypes in phenotypic and genomic selection was also highest in trait-assisted GS. Overall, these results suggest that trait-assisted GS can be an efficient strategy when correlated traits are obtained earlier or more inexpensively than a focal trait.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Observations</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Plant Biochemistry</subject><subject>Plant Breeding</subject><subject>Plant Breeding/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Plant Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Quantitative trait loci</subject><subject>Selection, Genetic</subject><subject>Sorghum</subject><subject>Sorghum - genetics</subject><subject>Sorghum - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Yield</subject><issn>0040-5752</issn><issn>1432-2242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kl1vFCEUhidGY9fqD_DGTPRGE6fyNQNzY9I0VZs0MfHjmrBwmKWZgRWYxv33Mt1au0bDBeTwvC9weKvqOUYnGCH-LiGECWkQ5g1FlDa7B9UKM0oaQhh5WK0QYqhpeUuOqicpXSGESIvo4-qI9AQLysWqGs-tddqB17s62Hqax-yaHJXLb2vnjYugy0p5U98UG5WSSxlMPYAPk9N1grEgLvjahli7aRvDNUzg82K3dmEqijqFOGzm6Wn1yKoxwbPb-bj6_uH829mn5vLzx4uz08tGdx3LzRqs6Sjte8EQBtJrzAAE5kaJrmeGcGBCi85gwwzlxNAOLOGGCMVQa42lx9X7ve92Xk9gdLlNVKPcRjepuJNBOXm4491GDuFatgKztqXF4OXeIKTsZNIug97o4H15qsQM4150BXp9e0oMP2ZIWU4uaRhH5SHMSeKetwj37AZ99Rd6FeboSw8WinacdJz_oQY1gnTehnI5vZjK05bw0oHy64U6-QdVhoHyH8GDdaV-IHhzIChMhp95UHNK8uLrl0MW71kdQ0oR7F3TMJJL5uQ-c7JkTi6Zk7uieXG_23eK3yErANkDqWz5AeK91__X9RfmzeEP</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Fernandes, Samuel B.</creator><creator>Dias, Kaio O. G.</creator><creator>Ferreira, Daniel F.</creator><creator>Brown, Patrick J.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Nature</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Efficiency of multi-trait, indirect, and trait-assisted genomic selection for improvement of biomass sorghum</title><author>Fernandes, Samuel B. ; Dias, Kaio O. G. ; Ferreira, Daniel F. ; Brown, Patrick J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c664t-befd633998401e29c14ee817da8694d27e48c86d1d4d372d36ef27d28a405fdf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Observations</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Plant Biochemistry</topic><topic>Plant Breeding</topic><topic>Plant Breeding/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Plant Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Quantitative trait loci</topic><topic>Selection, Genetic</topic><topic>Sorghum</topic><topic>Sorghum - genetics</topic><topic>Sorghum - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Yield</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Samuel B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias, Kaio O. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Daniel F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Theoretical and applied genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fernandes, Samuel B.</au><au>Dias, Kaio O. G.</au><au>Ferreira, Daniel F.</au><au>Brown, Patrick J.</au><aucorp>Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficiency of multi-trait, indirect, and trait-assisted genomic selection for improvement of biomass sorghum</atitle><jtitle>Theoretical and applied genetics</jtitle><stitle>Theor Appl Genet</stitle><addtitle>Theor Appl Genet</addtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>747</spage><epage>755</epage><pages>747-755</pages><issn>0040-5752</issn><eissn>1432-2242</eissn><abstract>Key message We compare genomic selection methods that use correlated traits to help predict biomass yield in sorghum, and find that trait-assisted genomic selection performs best. Genomic selection (GS) is usually performed on a single trait, but correlated traits can also help predict a focal trait through indirect or multi-trait GS. In this study, we use a pre-breeding population of biomass sorghum to compare strategies that use correlated traits to improve prediction of biomass yield, the focal trait. Correlated traits include moisture, plant height measured at monthly intervals between planting and harvest, and the area under the growth progress curve. In addition to single- and multi-trait direct and indirect GS, we test a new strategy called trait-assisted GS, in which correlated traits are used along with marker data in the validation population to predict a focal trait. Single-trait GS for biomass yield had a prediction accuracy of 0.40. Indirect GS performed best using area under the growth progress curve to predict biomass yield, with a prediction accuracy of 0.37, and did not differ from indirect multi-trait GS that also used moisture information. Multi-trait GS and single-trait GS yielded similar results, indicating that correlated traits did not improve prediction of biomass yield in a standard GS scenario. However, trait-assisted GS increased prediction accuracy by up to 50 % when using plant height in both the training and validation populations to help predict yield in the validation population. Coincidence between selected genotypes in phenotypic and genomic selection was also highest in trait-assisted GS. Overall, these results suggest that trait-assisted GS can be an efficient strategy when correlated traits are obtained earlier or more inexpensively than a focal trait.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>29218378</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00122-017-3033-y</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0040-5752
ispartof Theoretical and applied genetics, 2018-03, Vol.131 (3), p.747-755
issn 0040-5752
1432-2242
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5814553
source Springer Link
subjects Accuracy
Agriculture
BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Biochemistry
Biomass
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biotechnology
Breeding
Genetic aspects
Genomics
Genotype
Genotypes
Life Sciences
Observations
Original
Original Article
Phenotype
Plant Biochemistry
Plant Breeding
Plant Breeding/Biotechnology
Plant Genetics and Genomics
Quantitative trait loci
Selection, Genetic
Sorghum
Sorghum - genetics
Sorghum - growth & development
Yield
title Efficiency of multi-trait, indirect, and trait-assisted genomic selection for improvement of biomass sorghum
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T10%3A21%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficiency%20of%20multi-trait,%20indirect,%20and%20trait-assisted%20genomic%20selection%20for%20improvement%20of%20biomass%20sorghum&rft.jtitle=Theoretical%20and%20applied%20genetics&rft.au=Fernandes,%20Samuel%20B.&rft.aucorp=Univ.%20of%20Illinois%20at%20Urbana-Champaign,%20IL%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=747&rft.epage=755&rft.pages=747-755&rft.issn=0040-5752&rft.eissn=1432-2242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00122-017-3033-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA527817100%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c664t-befd633998401e29c14ee817da8694d27e48c86d1d4d372d36ef27d28a405fdf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1973672677&rft_id=info:pmid/29218378&rft_galeid=A527817100&rfr_iscdi=true