Loading…
Efficiency of multi-trait, indirect, and trait-assisted genomic selection for improvement of biomass sorghum
Key message We compare genomic selection methods that use correlated traits to help predict biomass yield in sorghum, and find that trait-assisted genomic selection performs best. Genomic selection (GS) is usually performed on a single trait, but correlated traits can also help predict a focal trait...
Saved in:
Published in: | Theoretical and applied genetics 2018-03, Vol.131 (3), p.747-755 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c664t-befd633998401e29c14ee817da8694d27e48c86d1d4d372d36ef27d28a405fdf3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c664t-befd633998401e29c14ee817da8694d27e48c86d1d4d372d36ef27d28a405fdf3 |
container_end_page | 755 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 747 |
container_title | Theoretical and applied genetics |
container_volume | 131 |
creator | Fernandes, Samuel B. Dias, Kaio O. G. Ferreira, Daniel F. Brown, Patrick J. |
description | Key message
We compare genomic selection methods that use correlated traits to help predict biomass yield in sorghum, and find that trait-assisted genomic selection performs best.
Genomic selection (GS) is usually performed on a single trait, but correlated traits can also help predict a focal trait through indirect or multi-trait GS. In this study, we use a pre-breeding population of biomass sorghum to compare strategies that use correlated traits to improve prediction of biomass yield, the focal trait. Correlated traits include moisture, plant height measured at monthly intervals between planting and harvest, and the area under the growth progress curve. In addition to single- and multi-trait direct and indirect GS, we test a new strategy called trait-assisted GS, in which correlated traits are used along with marker data in the validation population to predict a focal trait. Single-trait GS for biomass yield had a prediction accuracy of 0.40. Indirect GS performed best using area under the growth progress curve to predict biomass yield, with a prediction accuracy of 0.37, and did not differ from indirect multi-trait GS that also used moisture information. Multi-trait GS and single-trait GS yielded similar results, indicating that correlated traits did not improve prediction of biomass yield in a standard GS scenario. However, trait-assisted GS increased prediction accuracy by up to
50
%
when using plant height in both the training and validation populations to help predict yield in the validation population. Coincidence between selected genotypes in phenotypic and genomic selection was also highest in trait-assisted GS. Overall, these results suggest that trait-assisted GS can be an efficient strategy when correlated traits are obtained earlier or more inexpensively than a focal trait. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00122-017-3033-y |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5814553</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A527817100</galeid><sourcerecordid>A527817100</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c664t-befd633998401e29c14ee817da8694d27e48c86d1d4d372d36ef27d28a405fdf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kl1vFCEUhidGY9fqD_DGTPRGE6fyNQNzY9I0VZs0MfHjmrBwmKWZgRWYxv33Mt1au0bDBeTwvC9weKvqOUYnGCH-LiGECWkQ5g1FlDa7B9UKM0oaQhh5WK0QYqhpeUuOqicpXSGESIvo4-qI9AQLysWqGs-tddqB17s62Hqax-yaHJXLb2vnjYugy0p5U98UG5WSSxlMPYAPk9N1grEgLvjahli7aRvDNUzg82K3dmEqijqFOGzm6Wn1yKoxwbPb-bj6_uH829mn5vLzx4uz08tGdx3LzRqs6Sjte8EQBtJrzAAE5kaJrmeGcGBCi85gwwzlxNAOLOGGCMVQa42lx9X7ve92Xk9gdLlNVKPcRjepuJNBOXm4491GDuFatgKztqXF4OXeIKTsZNIug97o4H15qsQM4150BXp9e0oMP2ZIWU4uaRhH5SHMSeKetwj37AZ99Rd6FeboSw8WinacdJz_oQY1gnTehnI5vZjK05bw0oHy64U6-QdVhoHyH8GDdaV-IHhzIChMhp95UHNK8uLrl0MW71kdQ0oR7F3TMJJL5uQ-c7JkTi6Zk7uieXG_23eK3yErANkDqWz5AeK91__X9RfmzeEP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1973672677</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficiency of multi-trait, indirect, and trait-assisted genomic selection for improvement of biomass sorghum</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Fernandes, Samuel B. ; Dias, Kaio O. G. ; Ferreira, Daniel F. ; Brown, Patrick J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Samuel B. ; Dias, Kaio O. G. ; Ferreira, Daniel F. ; Brown, Patrick J. ; Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>Key message
We compare genomic selection methods that use correlated traits to help predict biomass yield in sorghum, and find that trait-assisted genomic selection performs best.
Genomic selection (GS) is usually performed on a single trait, but correlated traits can also help predict a focal trait through indirect or multi-trait GS. In this study, we use a pre-breeding population of biomass sorghum to compare strategies that use correlated traits to improve prediction of biomass yield, the focal trait. Correlated traits include moisture, plant height measured at monthly intervals between planting and harvest, and the area under the growth progress curve. In addition to single- and multi-trait direct and indirect GS, we test a new strategy called trait-assisted GS, in which correlated traits are used along with marker data in the validation population to predict a focal trait. Single-trait GS for biomass yield had a prediction accuracy of 0.40. Indirect GS performed best using area under the growth progress curve to predict biomass yield, with a prediction accuracy of 0.37, and did not differ from indirect multi-trait GS that also used moisture information. Multi-trait GS and single-trait GS yielded similar results, indicating that correlated traits did not improve prediction of biomass yield in a standard GS scenario. However, trait-assisted GS increased prediction accuracy by up to
50
%
when using plant height in both the training and validation populations to help predict yield in the validation population. Coincidence between selected genotypes in phenotypic and genomic selection was also highest in trait-assisted GS. Overall, these results suggest that trait-assisted GS can be an efficient strategy when correlated traits are obtained earlier or more inexpensively than a focal trait.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-5752</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00122-017-3033-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29218378</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Agriculture ; BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES ; Biochemistry ; Biomass ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biotechnology ; Breeding ; Genetic aspects ; Genomics ; Genotype ; Genotypes ; Life Sciences ; Observations ; Original ; Original Article ; Phenotype ; Plant Biochemistry ; Plant Breeding ; Plant Breeding/Biotechnology ; Plant Genetics and Genomics ; Quantitative trait loci ; Selection, Genetic ; Sorghum ; Sorghum - genetics ; Sorghum - growth & development ; Yield</subject><ispartof>Theoretical and applied genetics, 2018-03, Vol.131 (3), p.747-755</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Springer</rights><rights>Theoretical and Applied Genetics is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c664t-befd633998401e29c14ee817da8694d27e48c86d1d4d372d36ef27d28a405fdf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c664t-befd633998401e29c14ee817da8694d27e48c86d1d4d372d36ef27d28a405fdf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29218378$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1411986$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Samuel B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias, Kaio O. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Daniel F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Efficiency of multi-trait, indirect, and trait-assisted genomic selection for improvement of biomass sorghum</title><title>Theoretical and applied genetics</title><addtitle>Theor Appl Genet</addtitle><addtitle>Theor Appl Genet</addtitle><description>Key message
We compare genomic selection methods that use correlated traits to help predict biomass yield in sorghum, and find that trait-assisted genomic selection performs best.
Genomic selection (GS) is usually performed on a single trait, but correlated traits can also help predict a focal trait through indirect or multi-trait GS. In this study, we use a pre-breeding population of biomass sorghum to compare strategies that use correlated traits to improve prediction of biomass yield, the focal trait. Correlated traits include moisture, plant height measured at monthly intervals between planting and harvest, and the area under the growth progress curve. In addition to single- and multi-trait direct and indirect GS, we test a new strategy called trait-assisted GS, in which correlated traits are used along with marker data in the validation population to predict a focal trait. Single-trait GS for biomass yield had a prediction accuracy of 0.40. Indirect GS performed best using area under the growth progress curve to predict biomass yield, with a prediction accuracy of 0.37, and did not differ from indirect multi-trait GS that also used moisture information. Multi-trait GS and single-trait GS yielded similar results, indicating that correlated traits did not improve prediction of biomass yield in a standard GS scenario. However, trait-assisted GS increased prediction accuracy by up to
50
%
when using plant height in both the training and validation populations to help predict yield in the validation population. Coincidence between selected genotypes in phenotypic and genomic selection was also highest in trait-assisted GS. Overall, these results suggest that trait-assisted GS can be an efficient strategy when correlated traits are obtained earlier or more inexpensively than a focal trait.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Observations</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Plant Biochemistry</subject><subject>Plant Breeding</subject><subject>Plant Breeding/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Plant Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Quantitative trait loci</subject><subject>Selection, Genetic</subject><subject>Sorghum</subject><subject>Sorghum - genetics</subject><subject>Sorghum - growth & development</subject><subject>Yield</subject><issn>0040-5752</issn><issn>1432-2242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kl1vFCEUhidGY9fqD_DGTPRGE6fyNQNzY9I0VZs0MfHjmrBwmKWZgRWYxv33Mt1au0bDBeTwvC9weKvqOUYnGCH-LiGECWkQ5g1FlDa7B9UKM0oaQhh5WK0QYqhpeUuOqicpXSGESIvo4-qI9AQLysWqGs-tddqB17s62Hqax-yaHJXLb2vnjYugy0p5U98UG5WSSxlMPYAPk9N1grEgLvjahli7aRvDNUzg82K3dmEqijqFOGzm6Wn1yKoxwbPb-bj6_uH829mn5vLzx4uz08tGdx3LzRqs6Sjte8EQBtJrzAAE5kaJrmeGcGBCi85gwwzlxNAOLOGGCMVQa42lx9X7ve92Xk9gdLlNVKPcRjepuJNBOXm4491GDuFatgKztqXF4OXeIKTsZNIug97o4H15qsQM4150BXp9e0oMP2ZIWU4uaRhH5SHMSeKetwj37AZ99Rd6FeboSw8WinacdJz_oQY1gnTehnI5vZjK05bw0oHy64U6-QdVhoHyH8GDdaV-IHhzIChMhp95UHNK8uLrl0MW71kdQ0oR7F3TMJJL5uQ-c7JkTi6Zk7uieXG_23eK3yErANkDqWz5AeK91__X9RfmzeEP</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Fernandes, Samuel B.</creator><creator>Dias, Kaio O. G.</creator><creator>Ferreira, Daniel F.</creator><creator>Brown, Patrick J.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Nature</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Efficiency of multi-trait, indirect, and trait-assisted genomic selection for improvement of biomass sorghum</title><author>Fernandes, Samuel B. ; Dias, Kaio O. G. ; Ferreira, Daniel F. ; Brown, Patrick J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c664t-befd633998401e29c14ee817da8694d27e48c86d1d4d372d36ef27d28a405fdf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Observations</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Plant Biochemistry</topic><topic>Plant Breeding</topic><topic>Plant Breeding/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Plant Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Quantitative trait loci</topic><topic>Selection, Genetic</topic><topic>Sorghum</topic><topic>Sorghum - genetics</topic><topic>Sorghum - growth & development</topic><topic>Yield</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Samuel B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias, Kaio O. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Daniel F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Theoretical and applied genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fernandes, Samuel B.</au><au>Dias, Kaio O. G.</au><au>Ferreira, Daniel F.</au><au>Brown, Patrick J.</au><aucorp>Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficiency of multi-trait, indirect, and trait-assisted genomic selection for improvement of biomass sorghum</atitle><jtitle>Theoretical and applied genetics</jtitle><stitle>Theor Appl Genet</stitle><addtitle>Theor Appl Genet</addtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>747</spage><epage>755</epage><pages>747-755</pages><issn>0040-5752</issn><eissn>1432-2242</eissn><abstract>Key message
We compare genomic selection methods that use correlated traits to help predict biomass yield in sorghum, and find that trait-assisted genomic selection performs best.
Genomic selection (GS) is usually performed on a single trait, but correlated traits can also help predict a focal trait through indirect or multi-trait GS. In this study, we use a pre-breeding population of biomass sorghum to compare strategies that use correlated traits to improve prediction of biomass yield, the focal trait. Correlated traits include moisture, plant height measured at monthly intervals between planting and harvest, and the area under the growth progress curve. In addition to single- and multi-trait direct and indirect GS, we test a new strategy called trait-assisted GS, in which correlated traits are used along with marker data in the validation population to predict a focal trait. Single-trait GS for biomass yield had a prediction accuracy of 0.40. Indirect GS performed best using area under the growth progress curve to predict biomass yield, with a prediction accuracy of 0.37, and did not differ from indirect multi-trait GS that also used moisture information. Multi-trait GS and single-trait GS yielded similar results, indicating that correlated traits did not improve prediction of biomass yield in a standard GS scenario. However, trait-assisted GS increased prediction accuracy by up to
50
%
when using plant height in both the training and validation populations to help predict yield in the validation population. Coincidence between selected genotypes in phenotypic and genomic selection was also highest in trait-assisted GS. Overall, these results suggest that trait-assisted GS can be an efficient strategy when correlated traits are obtained earlier or more inexpensively than a focal trait.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>29218378</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00122-017-3033-y</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0040-5752 |
ispartof | Theoretical and applied genetics, 2018-03, Vol.131 (3), p.747-755 |
issn | 0040-5752 1432-2242 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5814553 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Accuracy Agriculture BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES Biochemistry Biomass Biomedical and Life Sciences Biotechnology Breeding Genetic aspects Genomics Genotype Genotypes Life Sciences Observations Original Original Article Phenotype Plant Biochemistry Plant Breeding Plant Breeding/Biotechnology Plant Genetics and Genomics Quantitative trait loci Selection, Genetic Sorghum Sorghum - genetics Sorghum - growth & development Yield |
title | Efficiency of multi-trait, indirect, and trait-assisted genomic selection for improvement of biomass sorghum |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T10%3A21%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficiency%20of%20multi-trait,%20indirect,%20and%20trait-assisted%20genomic%20selection%20for%20improvement%20of%20biomass%20sorghum&rft.jtitle=Theoretical%20and%20applied%20genetics&rft.au=Fernandes,%20Samuel%20B.&rft.aucorp=Univ.%20of%20Illinois%20at%20Urbana-Champaign,%20IL%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=747&rft.epage=755&rft.pages=747-755&rft.issn=0040-5752&rft.eissn=1432-2242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00122-017-3033-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA527817100%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c664t-befd633998401e29c14ee817da8694d27e48c86d1d4d372d36ef27d28a405fdf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1973672677&rft_id=info:pmid/29218378&rft_galeid=A527817100&rfr_iscdi=true |