Diagnostic value of computed tomography (CT) histogram analysis in thyroid benign solitary coarse calcification nodules

• Published in: Journal of Zhejiang University. B. Science 2018-03, Vol.19 (3), p.211-217
• Main Authors: Zhang, Le-xing, Xiang, Jing-jing, Wei, Pei-ying, Ding, Jin-wang, Luo, Ding-cun, Peng, Zhi-yi, Han, Zhi-jiang
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accuracy; Benign; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Biomedicine; Calcification; Calcification (ectopic); Computation; Computed tomography; Diagnostic systems; Nodules; Sensitivity; Surgery; Thyroid; Thyroid cancer; Thyroid gland; Tomography; Trauma
• ISSN: 1673-1581; 1862-1783
• DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B1700119

This study was to investigate the diagnostic value of the computed tomography (CT) histogram in thyroid benign solitary coarse calcification nodules (BSCNs). A total of 89 thyroid solitary coarse calcification nodules (coarse calcification ≥5 mm, no definite soft tissue around calcification) confirmed either by surgery or histopathological examination in 86 cases enrolled from January 2009 to December 2015 were evaluated. These included 56 BSCNs and 33 malignant solitary coarse calcification nodules (MSCNs). Overall, 27 cut-off values were calculated by N (4≤ N ≤30) times of 50 Hounsfield units (HU) in the range of 200 to 1500 HU, and each cut-off value and the differences in the corresponding area percentages in the CT histogram were recorded for BSCN and MSCN. The optimal cut-off value and the corresponding area percentage were established by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. In the 19 groups with an ROC area under curve (AUC) of more than 0.7, at a cut-off value of 800 HU and at an area percentage of no more than 93.8%, the ROC AUC reached the maximum of 0.79, and the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 75.3%, 80.4%, and 66.7%, respectively. At a cut-off value of 1050 HU and at an area percentage of no more than 93.6%, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 71.9%, 60.7%, and 90.9%, respectively. At a cut-off of 1150 HU and area of no more than 98.4%, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 70.8%, 57.1%, and 93.9%, respectively. At a cut-off of 600 HU and area of no more than 12.1%, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 61.8%, 39.3%, and 100.0%, respectively. Compared with the cut-off value of 800 HU and an area percentage of no more than 93.8%, the sensitivity of cut-off values and minimum areas of 1050 HU and 93.6%, of 1150 HU and 98.4%, and of 600 HU and 12.1%, was gradually decreasing; however, their specificity was gradually increasing. This can provide an important basis for reducing the misdiagnosis and unnecessary surgical trauma.